SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a lopsided combination: a CPU sitting in the 83rd percentile of all processors anchored to a GPU in the 18th percentile. The combined system percentile of 51 tells the story at a glance — this is a workstation-class processor doing heavy lifting while an entry-level graphics card handles display and light rendering duties. For anyone whose workload is CPU-bound, the pairing works. For anyone expecting strong gaming or GPU rendering throughput, the benchmark data points firmly the other way. One important note up front: no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

GPU Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4010 is, by every architectural measure in its profile, a compact entry-level part. It is built on the GA107 chip, an Ampere-architecture die manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process, packing 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die at a density of 43.5M transistors per square millimetre. Despite carrying a 40-series name, the silicon is Ampere — the same generation as the GeForce 30 line — with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support.

The hardware allocation is modest. There are 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. Raw throughput comes in at 2.706 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 2.706 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. Clocks run from a 1417 MHz base to a 1762 MHz boost.

The memory subsystem is the most restrictive element. The card carries 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for a total of 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads, that is the ceiling that matters: 4 GB of capacity will be exhausted quickly in modern scene complexity, and the narrow bus and modest bandwidth limit texture streaming and compute throughput well before the shader array runs out of headroom. The presence of 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores means ray-tracing acceleration and AI upscaling features technically exist on this silicon, but with only a handful of each unit, they serve as feature enablement rather than performance drivers.

The single recorded benchmark result — 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) at 2893 — positions the card against a peculiar set of neighbours: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (a -0.5% delta for the 4010), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (-0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (-0.7%), and the Quadro P600 at 2923 (-1%). The deltas are within a percent, which the data attributes to averaging across the full benchmark suite rather than head-to-head Steel Nomad parity; the takeaway is that the RTX 4010 lands in a score band shared by those parts. At the 18th percentile versus all GPUs, the verdict for rendering is clear: this card can drive displays, handle viewport work at modest settings, and accelerate lightweight compute, but it is not a rendering engine. GPU-bound offline rendering, heavy ray-traced scenes, and high-resolution texture work will all hit the 4 GB / 96 GB/s wall.

Physical and power characteristics reinforce the entry-level positioning. It is a single-slot card, 163 mm long and 69 mm tall, drawing 50 W with no external power connectors, on a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, with four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The suggested PSU for the whole system is 250 W.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of the ledger is strong. The Core i7-14701E posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133 — the latter an excellent figure that reflects the processor's 5.40 GHz boost clock. In the older Cinebench runs, it scores 9321 multi-core and 1315 single-core in R20, and 2237 multi-core and 315 single-core in R15. PassMark results fill out the picture: 26112 in the multithread test, 4305 in the single-thread test, 81325 integer math, 61873 floating point math, 282939 in data compression, 14862 in data encryption, 18528 in extended instructions, 176 in find prime numbers, 2399 in physics, and 29158 in random string sorting.

The aggregate average benchmark score of 33206 puts the i7-14701E in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals cluster almost perfectly around it: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201 (deltaPct 0), the Ryzen 5 8645HS at 33244 (-0.1%), the Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091 (0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-13650HX at 33089 (0.4%). Those deltas — all within half a percent — mean the i7-14701E performs, on aggregate, like a high-tier mobile Ryzen 9 or a previous-generation mobile i7 HX chip. That is solid mainstream-desktop territory, not halo territory, but comfortably upper-tier.

The GPU's only recorded score is the 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, with an average benchmark score of 2893 and a percentile of 18 versus all GPUs. The combined system percentile of 51 is the arithmetic middle point of two very different components: an 83rd-percentile CPU dragging a GPU from the bottom fifth of the database. Practically, this means any workload that fits in system memory and runs on CPU cores — compilation, encoding, compression, physics, office productivity — will feel fast, while any workload that spills onto the GPU will feel entry-level.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. This is the weakest scenario for the pairing. With the GPU at the 18th percentile and 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus, high-refresh play at 1080p in demanding titles is not supported by the data. Competitive esports titles at reduced settings are the realistic ceiling, and even then frame expectations should be framed from the 2893 Steel Nomad score rather than measured figures, since no FPS data exists for this combination.

Streaming. The CPU can carry stream encoding comfortably — a 22195 Cinebench R23 multi-core score across 16 threads leaves headroom for a game plus an encode pipeline. The limitation is on the game side: whatever is being captured must first be rendered by the RTX 4010, and that is where the stream quality/frames trade-off gets tight.

Video editing. Mixed verdict. Timeline scrubbing, cutting, and CPU-side codec work will feel responsive given the 8-core/16-thread design and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. But effects acceleration, GPU-accelerated exports, and multi-cam work at higher resolutions will collide with 4 GB of VRAM and 96 GB/s of bandwidth quickly.

3D rendering. CPU rendering is viable; GPU rendering is not. The 22195 R23 multi-core score means native CPU render engines will complete frames at a respectable pace. GPU render engines will be constrained by the 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and 4 GB of memory — viewports at low settings, final frames elsewhere.

Software development. One of the best-fit scenarios. The 4305 PassMark single-thread score and 5.40 GHz boost make IDEs, debuggers, and single-threaded toolchains snappy, while the 26112 multithread score handles parallel builds. The 282939 data compression result is directly relevant — repository operations and archive work will fly.

Student and office work. Fully covered. Documents, browsers, video calls, and analytics workloads are trivially light against this CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 even provides display fallback, and ECC memory support adds a stability angle for coursework or small-business data integrity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck structure here is unambiguous: the GPU is the limiter in every graphically demanding workload. An 83rd-percentile CPU feeding an 18th-percentile GPU produces a system where the processor spends most of its time waiting. In gaming terms, CPU-side frame preparation is rarely the constraint — the 3133 R23 single-core score is strong — so frame rates will scale almost entirely with graphics settings and resolution, and reductions there will yield near-linear gains until the RTX 4010's modest shader array and 4 GB framebuffer saturate.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads the GPU is nearly irrelevant, and the system performs like a compact workstation: the combined percentile of 51 understates the CPU experience in those tasks. The practical implication for a builder is that money spent on the GPU side has the highest leverage for improving overall system balance, while the CPU is already performing in the tier of a Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H or Core i7-13650HX on aggregate and needs no attention.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14701E is a Raptor Lake-R part — Raptor Lake architecture, Intel's 10 nm process, on Intel Socket 1700, released June 2024 and currently in active production. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a 2.60 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost, inside a 65 W TDP envelope. Note that the multiplier is locked, so the boost clock is the performance ceiling.

The cache hierarchy is generous for the class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3, on a 257 mm² die. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC is supported — an unusual, workstation-friendly feature that pairs naturally with this chip's embedded-leaning "E" designation. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

What the scores mean in practice: the single-core results (315 R15, 1315 R20, 3133 R23, 4305 PassMark single-thread) describe a processor that feels fast in everything user-facing — application launches, browser tabs, scripting, IDE responsiveness. The multi-core results (22195 R23, 26112 PassMark multithread, 282939 compression, 81325 integer math) describe a chip that can also sustain real parallel workloads across its 16 threads. The aggregate 33206 score, within a rounding error of a Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and marginally ahead of a Ryzen 7 7745HX and Core i7-13650HX, confirms this is upper-mainstream silicon — capable, efficient at 65 W, and unpretentious.

Who Should Build It

The profile fits three user groups tightly. First, developers and small-business workstation users: the locked multiplier, ECC support, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, and 65 W TDP make this a stable, cool-running platform for compilation, databases, virtualisation-light workloads, and office productivity, with the PassMark compression and encryption scores directly supporting data-handling tasks. Second, students and general-purpose users who need a fast, responsive system for years of coursework — the 83rd-percentile CPU carries that load alone. Third, budget-conscious content creators whose work is CPU-rendered or CPU-encoded, and who accept that GPU acceleration on this card is a placeholder rather than a performer.

It does not fit high-refresh gamers at 1440p or 4K, GPU render artists, or anyone whose workflow depends on large VRAM buffers — the 4 GB card cannot serve those roles according to every metric in its profile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame record is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so the following figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The anchor data point is the 2893 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score, which places the RTX 4010 at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, roughly a percentage point off the score band shared with the RTX 4060 Ti variants and Quadro P600 in aggregate terms. From that positioning, expectations should be set at modest 1080p gaming: older or lighter titles playable at high settings, modern AAA titles requiring aggressive setting reductions, and ray tracing effectively off the table for sustained play given the 6 RT cores. The 4 GB framebuffer will be the binding constraint in texture-heavy scenes. The strong CPU means none of this is a processor problem — raising graphics quality will tax the GPU alone, and frame rates will follow GPU capability, not the i7-14701E.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700 with DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel memory support, giving builders a choice between economical DDR4 and faster DDR5 kits. CPU PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so a future GPU upgrade gets a modern host interface — though the RTX 4010 itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x8. Power headroom is generous for upgrades: the CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 50 W draw sit comfortably inside the 250 W suggested PSU, and since the card needs no power connectors, a future GPU swap is the single highest-leverage upgrade this build can receive. A stronger card would rebalance the system toward the CPU's 83rd-percentile capability without touching the platform. Memory is the second sensible step: populating dual-channel DDR5 maximises bandwidth for the integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback and feeds the CPU's compression and integer workloads. The locked multiplier means CPU overclocking is not an upgrade path; the 5.40 GHz boost is fixed ceiling.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-14701E compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its aggregate benchmark score of 33206 is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, 0% delta), marginally behind the Ryzen 5 8645HS (-0.1%) and marginally ahead of the Ryzen 7 7745HX (0.3%) and Intel Core i7-13650HX (0.4%). All four sit within half a percent of each other.

Q: Is the RTX 4010 good for gaming?

A: It is an entry-level card: 18th percentile versus all GPUs, 768 shading units, 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, and 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. Light 1080p gaming is the realistic ceiling; demanding titles will require significant setting reductions.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS entries for this exact combination, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Can this CPU handle video editing and rendering?

A: Yes on the CPU side — a 22195 Cinebench R23 multi-core score across 16 threads handles timeline work and CPU rendering well. GPU-accelerated effects and exports will be limited by the RTX 4010's 4 GB of VRAM.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-14701E supports ECC, which suits workstation and small-business deployments where data integrity matters.

Q: What power supply is needed?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 250 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU draws 50 W with no external power connectors, leaving headroom for a future GPU upgrade.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so performance is capped at the 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds