SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pairing represents a desktop configuration that blends a high-frequency, power-efficient 14th Gen processor with an end-of-life, high-bandwidth Ampere flagship GPU. The benchmark data places this combination at the 78th percentile overall, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median performer but is not at the absolute apex of the hardware spectrum. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, achieves an average benchmark score of 33206, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 27565 lands it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This disparity in percentile rankings—with the CPU outperforming the GPU relative to their respective fields—immediately suggests an interesting dynamic where the processor may have more headroom than the graphics card in certain workloads. The data presents a configuration that is strong for productivity and multi-threaded tasks, yet the GPU’s position relative to its peers hints that its raw compute might be the limiting factor in the most demanding graphical scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R die, and is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features 8 physical cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 65 watts, which is notably modest for a desktop processor with such a high boost frequency, suggesting that the chip is engineered for efficiency as much as raw performance. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB of L3 cache, which is critical for feeding the high clock speeds and reducing memory latency in multi-threaded applications.

Benchmark results show a processor that is particularly strong in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 22195 in multi-core, which is a robust figure for an 8-core part, while its single-core score of 3133 indicates excellent per-thread performance. This is reinforced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4305, which places it among the faster desktop CPUs for lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-threaded Passmark score of 26112 further confirms its capability, but the data also reveals specific strengths: the Passmark integer math score of 81325 and floating point math score of 61873 are high, indicating strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression and encryption scores of 282939 and 14862, respectively, show that the chip handles data-intensive tasks effectively, though the encryption figure is comparatively lower, suggesting that cryptographic workloads are not its primary forte.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14701E is essentially a statistical tie with several mobile processors. It sits 0% delta against the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13650HX. The only rival it trails is the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, by a negligible 0.1%. This is a curious result: the i7-14701E is a desktop chip with a 65-watt TDP, yet its average score is nearly identical to that of high-end mobile parts. This suggests that the Raptor Lake architecture’s efficiency at lower power levels allows it to compete directly with mobile chips that have higher thermal envelopes, but it also implies that the desktop CPU is not stretching its legs fully in these benchmarks, perhaps due to the 8-core limit. The single-core performance is where the i7-14701E distinguishes itself, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz delivering a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133, which is a figure that would be competitive with any modern desktop CPU. For real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness in office applications, faster compilation times in software development, and strong performance in games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform associated with 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for builders who may be migrating from an older system with DDR4 modules or starting fresh with DDR5. The memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed, but the dual-channel bus and the 33 MB of shared L3 cache suggest that memory-bound workloads will be handled adequately, though the lack of a specific bandwidth figure means that the exact throughput remains unquantified in this data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is the current standard for high-bandwidth peripherals, ensuring that the platform is not a bottleneck for modern NVMe SSDs or the latest GPUs, though the GPU itself in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0.

The platform’s power requirements are modest due to the CPU’s 65-watt TDP. This is a low figure for a desktop processor, and it means that a wide range of power supplies can support the system. The suggested PSU for the entire build, as dictated by the GPU, is 750 watts, which provides ample headroom for the CPU and other components. Given that the CPU draws only 65 watts, the 750-watt PSU is not stressed by the processor, leaving the bulk of the power budget for the graphics card. The upgrade path from this platform is clear: a user could move to a higher-core-count 14th Gen processor on the same socket, such as a Core i9 variant, which would offer more threads for heavily parallel workloads without changing the motherboard. However, the socket is not forward-compatible with future generations beyond 14th Gen, so a more significant upgrade would require a new motherboard. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display output and troubleshooting, which is a practical feature for a desktop workstation. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for stability-sensitive tasks like data processing or running a small server, though the motherboard must also support ECC for this to be utilized.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-14701E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a study in contrasting strengths. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 73rd percentile indicates that, relative to their respective markets, the processor is the stronger component. This suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in scenarios that rely heavily on graphics compute. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 27565 is only 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which are both lower-tier parts in terms of desktop hierarchy. This places the RTX 3090 in a peculiar position: it is an older flagship with a high memory capacity, but its raw compute score is not far ahead of mid-range mobile or desktop parts. In contrast, the CPU is statistically tied with mobile processors but offers a higher boost clock, which gives it an edge in single-threaded tasks.

The bottleneck analysis from the data is nuanced. For gaming, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133) and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM suggest that the system is well-suited for high-resolution gaming, where the GPU’s memory capacity is an asset. However, the GPU’s percentile rank suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU may be able to push more frames than the GPU can render, creating a GPU-bound scenario. In productivity, the CPU’s multi-threaded score of 22195 in Cinebench R23 is strong, but the GPU’s compute score of 15356 in Passmark GPU Compute indicates that for tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning, the GPU will be the primary accelerator, and its performance relative to its peers will define the system’s capability. The data shows no measured FPS figures for this exact combination, so any gaming bottleneck must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock and the GPU’s 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest a pairing where neither component is drastically outclassing the other, but the GPU’s lower percentile ranking makes it the more likely candidate to hold back performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for a specific set of users who require both high single-threaded performance and substantial graphics memory. Gamers targeting 4K resolution will find the RTX 3090’s 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth to be a compelling feature, as this capacity is rarely fully utilized at lower resolutions but becomes critical for high-resolution textures and demanding titles. The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, even in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. Content creators working with large video files or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded score of 22195 in Cinebench R23, which handles rendering tasks efficiently, while the GPU’s 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features in applications like Blender or Adobe Premiere. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 81325, which indicates strong throughput for compilation tasks, and the ECC memory support offers a layer of reliability for long-running builds or server-like workloads.

Students and small business workstations that do not require extreme graphics performance would find this pairing to be overkill, but the data suggests it is not an inefficient choice. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP makes it an energy-conscious option for a desktop, and the integrated graphics provide a fallback for basic tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status and its 350-watt TDP mean that this is not a power-sipping configuration. The target user is someone who prioritizes high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated content creation over raw compute density, as the GPU’s percentile rank is lower than the CPU’s. The system is also suited for professionals who need to run multiple virtual machines or handle large datasets in memory, given the 24 GB of VRAM and the CPU’s 16 threads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-14701E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 26645 provide a baseline for expectations. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU’s high boost clock will likely keep frame rates high in esports titles, but the GPU’s performance relative to its peers—sitting only 0.5% above the RTX 4070 Mobile—suggests that it will not dominate modern titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more relevant, and the 24 GB of VRAM will allow for maximum texture quality without memory pressure. At 4K, the GPU’s 936.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are the primary drivers, and the CPU’s role diminishes as the resolution scales.

The estimated frame rates would place this system in the high-refresh territory for 1080p and 1440p in most games, but not at the level of the fastest GPUs on the market. The GPU’s percentile rank of 73 indicates that it is above average but not elite, so in the most demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, a player might expect to adjust settings from ultra to high to maintain smooth frame rates at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures that games that are not well-optimized for multi-threading will still run smoothly, but the GPU’s compute capabilities are the ceiling for graphics. For competitive gamers seeking the highest possible frame rates at 1080p, the CPU will not be the bottleneck, but the GPU’s raw rasterization power, as indicated by its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110, is moderate, suggesting that frame rates will be respectable but not record-breaking.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i7-14701E?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33206, which is 0% delta compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13650HX. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS by 0.1%.

Q: What is the memory capacity and bandwidth of the RTX 3090?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 384-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory, which can be beneficial for stability in certain workstation and server applications.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the system with the RTX 3090 is 750 watts, which provides sufficient headroom for the CPU’s 65-watt TDP and the GPU’s 350-watt TDP.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and how does it compare to its rivals?

A: The RTX 3090 is in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, but 1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7800M.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS figures for this exact combination. The data indicates that all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It is a massive die, measuring 628 mm² with 28,300 million transistors, and it features a substantial 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and its memory runs at an effective speed of 19.5 Gbps. The shading units number 10496, with 328 texture mapping units and 112 render output units. It also includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively. The FP32 performance is rated at 35.58 TFLOPS, and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s, with a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed picture. The Passmark G3D score is 26645, which places it in the 73rd percentile, but its performance in specific API tests is more telling. The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 110, which is low, while the DirectX 11 score is 220 and the DirectX 9 score is 268. This suggests that the GPU’s performance in modern APIs is not as strong as its raw compute might imply, possibly due to driver optimizations or the age of the architecture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 is robust, indicating strong compute performance for general-purpose tasks, while the Vulkan score of 53927 is moderate. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 is a specific figure that shows the GPU’s capability in a modern synthetic benchmark. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 27565 is only 0.5% higher than the RTX 4070 Mobile and the RX 6700 XT, which are both lower-tier parts in terms of desktop hierarchy.

The RTX 3090’s 24 GB of VRAM is its standout feature, as this capacity is more than sufficient for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures and for professional workloads like video editing or 3D rendering that require large datasets. The 82 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 328 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status and its 350-watt TDP are important considerations. The power connectors are a single 12-pin, and the card is triple-slot, requiring significant case space. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will run at the lower spec. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, which support modern high-refresh monitors.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i7-14701E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 14th Gen Raptor Lake part with 8 cores and a 65-watt TDP, designed for efficiency and high single-thread performance. The GPU is an end-of-life Ampere flagship with 24 GB of VRAM and a 350-watt TDP, aimed at high-resolution gaming and professional graphics work. The combined percentile of this pairing is 78, which places it above the majority of systems but not at the very top. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 73rd percentile indicate that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card when compared to their respective peers. This suggests a system that is well-balanced for tasks that rely on both CPU and GPU, but with a slight lean towards CPU-heavy workloads.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end, given the percentile scores. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33206 is competitive with high-end mobile processors, while the GPU’s score of 27565 is closer to mid-range parts. This means that the system is not a top-tier performer in graphics-intensive tasks, but it excels in productivity and multi-threaded applications. The pairing is logical for a user who wants a fast processor for daily tasks and a GPU with ample memory for occasional heavy graphical work. The 65-watt CPU TDP is a positive for cooling and power consumption, but the GPU’s 350-watt TDP and suggested 750-watt PSU mean the system still requires a robust power supply.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are headlined by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133. In Passmark, it scores 26112 in multi-thread and 4305 in single-thread, with an average benchmark score of 33206. The CPU’s percentile is 83, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its score, indicating a tight cluster of performance. The GPU’s benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758, and a Passmark G3D score of 26645. Its average benchmark score is 27565, with a percentile of 73. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT, both 0.5% behind, and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 and RX 7800M, which are 1% and 1.1% ahead, respectively.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is performing at a level comparable to high-end mobile processors, which is notable for a 65-watt desktop part. The GPU, on the other hand, is performing at a level that is only slightly above mid-range parts, despite its flagship status. This discrepancy suggests that the RTX 3090’s raw compute is not translating into benchmark scores that match its memory capacity and bandwidth. The CPU’s single-thread performance is a clear strength, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz driving scores that are competitive with any desktop CPU. The GPU’s strength is its memory subsystem, which is not fully reflected in the synthetic benchmarks that focus on compute. The overall system percentile of 78 is a composite that reflects the CPU’s higher relative standing, pulling the average up.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 3133 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM suggest that this system can drive high-refresh monitors at 1080p and 1440p in most games. The CPU will not bottleneck frame rates, but the GPU’s performance, as indicated by its Passmark G3D score of 26645, is not at the level of the fastest cards, so achieving maximum frame rates in the most demanding titles may require settings adjustments.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, along with a Passmark multi-thread score of 26112, provide enough processing power to handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, which is part of the Ampere architecture, can offload this task, but the CPU is capable of handling x264 encoding if preferred.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM make this a capable system for video editing. The large VRAM allows for smooth scrubbing of high-resolution timelines, and the CPU’s multi-threaded performance accelerates rendering and export times. The GPU’s compute score of 15356 in Passmark GPU Compute supports GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 82 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, while the CPU’s multi-threaded score of 22195 handles CPU-based rendering tasks. The 24 GB of VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes, and the system is well-suited for Blender or similar applications.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 81325 and data compression score of 282939 indicate strong performance for compiling code and handling large datasets. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running processes.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4305 in Passmark ensures fast responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, and the 65-watt TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for a desktop that may be left on for extended periods. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but it does not detract from the system’s usability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds