SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing represents a solid mid-range desktop foundation, combining a modern 14th-generation CPU with a last-generation GPU. The data shows a strong processor that holds its own against recent mobile chips, paired with a graphics card that remains capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The following analysis is based solely on the provided benchmark scores, with no measured frame rate data available for this specific combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features 8 physical cores with 16 threads, a base clock of 2.60 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support included. Its 33 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core, provides ample headroom for data-heavy workloads. The CPU integrates UHD Graphics 770, though in this desktop build, the discrete GPU will handle graphics duties.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The average benchmark score of 33206 places it in a tight cluster with several competitors. The data shows it is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, which scores 33201 with a 0% delta. It is also within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089) and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091). The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, putting it 0.1% ahead of the i7-14701E. These margins are negligible, meaning the i7-14701E delivers performance parity with a range of high-end mobile and desktop processors.

In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability. This translates to strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where all 16 threads are utilized. The single-core score of 3133 in the same test indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. PassMark results reinforce this picture: the multithread score of 26112 and single-thread score of 4305 both support a balanced design that handles both heavily threaded and latency-sensitive tasks well. The floating-point math score of 61873 and integer math score of 81325 show strong arithmetic processing, while the data compression score of 282939 suggests efficient handling of file archiving and database tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The 5.40 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133) provide the responsiveness needed for high-refresh gaming. The CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, making it suitable for pushing high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p.

Streaming: With 8 cores and 16 threads, the i7-14701E can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously. The 16-thread capacity, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9321 and PassMark multithread score of 26112, offers enough headroom for streaming software alongside a game without severe performance drops.

Video Editing: The multicore performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 22195) accelerates timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and final exports. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures it competes well with more expensive alternatives.

3D Rendering: The high multicore scores translate directly to faster ray tracing and final frame rendering in applications like Blender or 3ds Max. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2237 and R20 score of 9321 indicate good scalability across all cores, making this a viable budget rendering workstation component.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 16 threads and high memory bandwidth potential via DDR5 support. The PassMark data encryption score of 14862 and extended instructions score of 18528 also indicate strong performance in cryptographic operations and SIMD-optimized code, useful for build pipelines and security-related development.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks, the CPU’s single-core performance (PassMark single-thread 4305) ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw low, making it suitable for systems that run all day without high cooling requirements.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is based on the Ampere architecture and uses the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and its memory runs at an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

The GPU features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation processors. It also includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, making it well-equipped for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling). The FP32 performance is 16.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores show the RTX 3060 Ti ranks in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 provides a modern gaming benchmark reference. Geekbench results show an OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784, indicating strong compute performance. PassMark G3D score of 20349 and GPU compute score of 10006 further demonstrate its rendering and compute capabilities.

The nearest rival comparisons show tight competition. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, putting it 0.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and RX 5700 XT both score 16351 and 16361 respectively, placing them 1.4% ahead. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, which is 1.7% behind. These small deltas indicate that the RTX 3060 Ti performs on par with a range of cards from different generations and tiers.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while sufficient for current games at 1080p and 1440p, may become a limiting factor in future titles or at higher resolutions with maximum texture settings. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this somewhat, but the card is best suited for 1080p ultra settings or 1440p high settings.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p with the option to step up to 1440p without upgrading the CPU. The RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile GPU ranking and the i7-14701E's 83rd percentile CPU ranking create a balanced system for gamers who play competitive titles at high refresh rates or AAA games at high settings.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU's multicore strength (Cinebench R23 multicore 22195) beneficial. The GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and CUDA support (implied by the architecture) accelerate effects and rendering tasks. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16-thread CPU, while the GPU's tensor cores can accelerate machine learning workloads.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the low 65 W CPU TDP, which allows for smaller, quieter cooling solutions. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation platforms, making this a cost-effective option for users who need data integrity. The system handles office productivity, web development, and moderate content creation without breaking a sweat.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing with the CPU as the stronger component. The i7-14701E sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 3060 Ti occupies the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in most workloads.

In gaming, the RTX 3060 Ti will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and with graphics-intensive settings. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints for 4K gaming or high-resolution texture packs. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3133) will keep up with the GPU, but the GPU will still determine maximum frame rates in graphically demanding titles.

For productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 22195, PassMark multithread 26112) far exceed what the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 10006) can contribute. Tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering will rely heavily on the CPU, with the GPU providing acceleration for specific effects and final rendering passes.

The combined percentile of 71 for this pairing indicates a system that exceeds average performance across both components. The bottleneck will shift depending on the workload: CPU-bound in productivity and simulation games, GPU-bound in modern AAA titles at high settings.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the RTX 3060 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 and its 59th percentile GPU ranking, this system should handle most games at 1080p with high to ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough throughput for modern textures at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU's performance will drop, but the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute power should still deliver playable frame rates in most games at medium to high settings. The RTX 3060 Ti's 38 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable performance levels, though users may need to enable DLSS to maintain high frame rates with ray tracing enabled.

The CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 16 threads ensure that frame pacing remains stable and that background tasks do not cause stuttering. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. However, in CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulation games, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, and its 8-core/16-thread configuration is well-suited for such workloads.

For esports titles, the high single-core performance (PassMark single-thread 4305) will push frame rates well beyond 144 Hz at 1080p on low to medium settings. The system is well-matched for gamers who play a mix of competitive and AAA titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33206 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089 (0.4% delta). This clustering shows the i7-14701E performs at the same level as these competitors, with differences too small to notice in real-world use.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 16129 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014, 0.7% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351, 1.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, 1.4% ahead), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1.7% behind). The RTX 3060 Ti sits in the middle of this group, trading blows with cards from different generations and market positions.

The combined picture shows a system with a CPU that outperforms most processors on the market and a GPU that exceeds average performance. The combined percentile of 71 reflects a balanced build where the CPU carries more weight in productivity tasks, while the GPU handles gaming duties with solid, if not class-leading, performance.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14701E a good CPU for gaming?

A: Yes. The CPU has a 5.40 GHz boost clock and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133, which is critical for gaming performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates strong overall capability.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3060 Ti have, and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture settings, but 4K gaming with max textures may exceed this capacity.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for desktop processors.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 200 W TDP. A 550 W power supply is suggested for the system.

Q: Does the RTX 3060 Ti support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes. The GPU has 38 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for DLSS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 demonstrates its DirectX 12 Ultimate capability.

Q: How does this CPU compare to an AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS has an average benchmark score of 33244, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-14701E's 33206. This difference is negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What socket does the i7-14701E use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with a range of Intel 12th, 13th, and 14th generation motherboards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 memory depending on their budget and motherboard selection. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the fastest current GPUs and NVMe storage drives.

The RTX 3060 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and is currently marked as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 40 series. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is the most likely component to become a limiting factor in future games, making a GPU upgrade the most sensible first step. A newer GPU would slot into the same PCIe Gen 5 slot without issue.

The system's 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP suggest a total system draw that fits within a 550 W power supply, which is the suggested PSU rating. This leaves some headroom for a moderate GPU upgrade, though a more powerful graphics card may require a higher-rated power supply.

Memory upgrades are straightforward with dual-channel support for DDR4 and DDR5. The 33 MB L3 cache and 16 threads provide solid headroom for future software, meaning the CPU should remain relevant for several years. The next sensible upgrade path would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicates it has more longevity than the graphics card.