SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 9060: A Balanced Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines an 8-core Intel Raptor Lake Refresh processor with a 4 nm AMD RDNA 4.0 graphics card, targeting a mainstream desktop build with a combined percentile of 71 among all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the processor holds a distinct performance advantage over the graphics subsystem. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it firmly within the 12th, 13th, and 14th generation ecosystem. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, established memory platforms or newer, faster DDR5 modules. For ECC memory support, the CPU includes this capability, which is relevant for workstation use cases that require error correction in memory operations.

PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. The GPU in this build uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which aligns perfectly with the CPU's lane allocation, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck at the interface level. The CPU also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output or for troubleshooting when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The power delivery requirements are modest for this pairing. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 132 watts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 watts, which accounts for the combined system draw with reasonable headroom for other components such as storage drives, fans, and motherboard circuitry. A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model, as the CPU's 83rd percentile standing leaves considerable room for a more powerful graphics card before the processor becomes the limiting factor. Alternatively, adding more memory or migrating to DDR5 (if currently using DDR4) would extract additional performance from the platform's memory support capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133, placing it in the upper tier of desktop processors. The multi-core result is particularly strong, reflecting the 8-core, 16-thread configuration's ability to handle parallel workloads. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 9321, while single-core hits 1315, maintaining a consistent performance ratio across Cinebench versions. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26112 and single-thread score of 4305 corroborate the Cinebench findings, showing balanced performance across both threading paradigms.

The GPU delivers a PassMark G3D score of 17631 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 and Vulkan score of 39476 indicate strong compute capability for a mid-range graphics card. In direct comparison, the GPU's average benchmark score of 16014 places it within 0.7 percent of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (score 16129), essentially matching that card's overall performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33206 sits between the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, 0 percent delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244, -0.1 percent delta), showing that the i7-14701E is statistically tied with these processors in aggregate performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its direct rivals by a margin of 0.3 to 0.4 percent against the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Intel Core i7-13650HX respectively, while the GPU trades blows with the RTX 3060 Ti at a -0.7 percent delta. This creates a platform where CPU-bound tasks will see excellent performance, while GPU-bound workloads will perform at a level comparable to previous-generation mid-range graphics cards.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R design, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². This 8-core, 16-thread processor operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, providing a substantial frequency range for both efficiency and peak performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is ample for the 8-core configuration.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 positions this CPU well above typical desktop processors, while the single-core score of 3133 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The PassMark data compression score of 282939 and encryption score of 14862 indicate robust performance in data-intensive tasks, while the extended instructions score of 18528 shows good SIMD throughput. The floating-point math score of 61873 and integer math score of 81325 provide a comprehensive picture of arithmetic capability.

The 65-watt TDP is notably efficient for the performance level delivered, making this CPU suitable for systems where power consumption and thermal output are considerations. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported through standard multiplier adjustment, but the high boost clock of 5.40 GHz already provides substantial single-thread performance. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application responsiveness, fast compilation times, and efficient video encoding, with the 16 threads handling concurrent tasks without significant contention.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this combination delivers estimated performance suitable for 1080p and 1440p displays, with the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensuring that frame generation is not bottlenecked by the processor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17631 places it in the mid-range tier, capable of driving high frame rates in less demanding titles at high refresh rates.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 16 threads, which can handle game encoding alongside the game itself. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 suggests sufficient headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's compute scores offer hardware encoding alternatives. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26112 supports concurrent streaming and gaming scenarios.

Video editing is well-served by this configuration, with the CPU's multi-core performance handling timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88183 provides acceleration for effects and color grading, while the 8 GB VRAM accommodates moderate video projects without exceeding memory limits.

3D rendering workloads will leverage the CPU's 16 threads for CPU-based rendering engines, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9321 indicating solid performance. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that utilize DirectX 12 or Vulkan APIs.

Software development benefits from the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4305 in PassMark, which accelerates compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the multi-thread score handles parallel builds and test execution. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code and data.

Student and office work is handled with ease, as the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures responsive everyday computing, while the GPU's 59th percentile provides adequate acceleration for productivity applications and moderate graphical tasks. The 65-watt CPU TDP and 132-watt GPU TDP keep the system quiet and cool in shared spaces.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance delta between the CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile creates a clear imbalance, with the processor capable of feeding significantly more data to the graphics card than the GPU can process. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 2399 indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming with ultra settings, the GPU will be the constraint, as its percentile ranking suggests it is less capable relative to other graphics cards than the CPU is relative to other processors.

The estimated FPS scaling follows this pattern: at lower resolutions where CPU performance dominates, the system will perform closer to the CPU's capability, while at higher resolutions where GPU throughput becomes paramount, the GPU will cap performance. The CPU's 0.3 percent advantage over the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and 0.4 percent advantage over the Intel Core i7-13650HX in average benchmark scores means that among similar processors, the i7-14701E provides a marginal edge in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's -0.7 percent delta against the RTX 3060 Ti positions it as a near-equal competitor to that card, meaning that in GPU-bound workloads, this system will perform like an RTX 3060 Ti-equipped build.

The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the GPU is moderate for the 8 GB GDDR6 memory configuration, and this could become a bottleneck in texture-heavy workloads at high resolutions. The CPU's dual-channel memory bus with DDR4/DDR5 support provides adequate bandwidth for the processor's needs, but the overall system balance favors CPU-bound tasks.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, all frame rate expectations are estimated from the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17631 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicate performance in the mid-range segment, comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti which scores 16129 in aggregate benchmarks.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, estimated frame rates would be high in esports titles and moderate in AAA games, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensuring minimal frame pacing issues. The GPU's 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs provide adequate pixel throughput for this resolution, with the pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s supporting high fill rates.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth would become more limiting, reducing estimated frame rates in demanding titles. The 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability provides the raw processing power for moderate settings at this resolution.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggests that ultra settings would be challenging, with estimated frame rates dropping to playable levels only in less demanding titles or at reduced settings. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT effects, but the overall GPU performance tier limits ray tracing quality at higher resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p resolution and prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles, with the CPU's 83rd percentile ensuring that the processor never becomes the bottleneck in gameplay. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's strong multi-core scores, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22195 providing substantial processing power for export and render tasks.

Software developers will find this configuration suitable for compilation and testing, with the PassMark integer math score of 81325 and data compression score of 282939 indicating strong performance in build tools and version control operations. Students and office workers seeking a responsive system for daily tasks will benefit from the CPU's high single-thread performance, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for presentations and light graphical work.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, database management, or virtual machines will leverage the CPU's 16 threads and ECC memory support for reliability. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps operating costs low, while the 300-watt suggested PSU allows for a compact and efficient system build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14701E with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, representing a pairing where the processor significantly outpaces the graphics card in relative performance. The CPU's 83rd percentile vs. all CPUs and the GPU's 59th percentile vs. all GPUs results in a combined percentile of 71, placing this configuration in the upper-mid tier of desktop systems.

The CPU delivers 8 cores and 16 threads from the Raptor Lake architecture, with a 5.40 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU provides 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with RDNA 4.0 architecture. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering platform flexibility, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity for the GPU and storage. The overall tier is that of a balanced productivity and mid-range gaming system, where the CPU provides headroom for future GPU upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, which is 0.7 percent lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129, indicating essentially equivalent overall performance.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support included.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 watts, with the GPU having a TDP of 132 watts and the CPU a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning standard multiplier-based overclocking is not supported, though the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-14701E scores 33206 on average, which is 0.3 percent higher than the Ryzen 7 7745HX's score of 33091.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, providing a wide frequency range for power management and peak performance. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth through the 128-bit bus.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though it may limit texture quality at higher resolutions. The GPU features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s. The FP32 compute performance of 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), provides solid compute capability for general-purpose workloads.

The 28 ray tracing cores deliver hardware-accelerated ray tracing, supported through DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 17631 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 indicate performance in the mid-range tier, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 showing strong compute throughput. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking places it below the CPU's 83rd percentile, making the GPU the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation, while the display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a support modern monitor configurations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds