SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i7-14701E with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is an unusual one: a 65 W embedded-oriented desktop processor from Intel's Raptor Lake Refresh line bolted to a 300 W RDNA 3 flagship-tier graphics card. The combined percentile of 69 suggests a build that sits comfortably in the upper third of all systems, but the asymmetry between the two components — a CPU in the 83rd percentile versus a GPU in the 55th percentile by average benchmark aggregation — raises interesting questions about where this configuration's ceiling actually lies. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile split is the first clue. The i7-14701E sits at the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, while the RX 7900 XT averages at the 55th percentile versus all GPUs, and the build as a whole lands at the 69th percentile. That spread implies the processor is proportionally the stronger of the two parts — which, in a gaming context, is the healthier direction of imbalance. A GPU-bound system is generally preferable to a CPU-bound one for playability, because the GPU is the component whose limits can be deferred by resolution scaling.

But the more curious detail is the nature of the CPU. Eight cores and sixteen threads with a 65 W TDP is a compact design for a chip that scores 22195 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. That score puts it in genuine contention with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and Ryzen 7 7745HX — both chips associated with higher-power mobile segments — yet it does so within a desktop-typical 65 W envelope. In GPU-limited scenarios, meaning anything at high resolution with heavy rendering load, this processor should rarely be the constraint. In CPU-limited scenarios — high-refresh, low-resolution competitive titles, or simulation-heavy workloads — the 5.40 GHz boost clock and 3133 single-core R23 score keep it competitive, but its eight cores will eventually cap throughput in heavily threaded games or streaming-plus-gaming stacks. The data suggests a build that will feel GPU-limited at 4K and increasingly CPU-curious at 1080p high-refresh settings.

GPU Analysis

The RX 7900 XT is a Navi 31 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 57,700 million transistors into a 529 mm² die at a density of 109.1M per mm². The raw specifications are substantial: 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 192 render output units, and 84 RT cores. Compute output is rated at 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 in a 2:1 configuration, with a texture fill rate of 804.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s.

Memory is where this card flexes: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, delivering 800 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads — and note the Vulkan score of 71068 in Geekbench, which is dramatically higher than the OpenCL score of 12756 — that VRAM pool and bandwidth figure mean large scenes, high-resolution textures, and compute workloads with sizeable working sets should not hit memory walls. The Vulkan-versus-OpenCL gap is worth investigating: it suggests the card performs strongest in software that targets Vulkan, which matters for certain renderers and emulation-style compute paths.

The PassMark G3D score of 29009 is the headline gaming-adjacent figure, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 provides a modern DirectX 12 Ultimate data point. Interestingly, the average benchmark score of 13745 places the card at the 55th percentile with rivals listed as the AMD Radeon 660M, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, AMD Radeon RX 570X, and RX 9070 XT — a spread that mixes an integrated GPU and mobile parts with desktop cards, which hints the averaging methodology blends compute and graphics tests in ways that flatter some chips more than others. Clocks run from a 1387 MHz base to a 2394 MHz boost, with a 2025 MHz game clock and 20 Gbps effective memory speed. The card carries no tensor cores, so AI-accelerated upscaling is not hardware-tensor-driven on this architecture. Its production status is listed as end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 899 USD.

FAQ

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: Not perfectly. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the GPU aggregates at the 55th, so the graphics card is the limiting component in graphically demanding games. That is the preferred imbalance for gaming, since raising resolution shifts load onto the stronger-positioned side of the pairing only in a relative sense — the combined 69th percentile indicates a solid upper-tier system overall.

Q: No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing — how reliable are frame-rate expectations?

A: They are estimates only. The fact pack contains no measured per-game FPS rows, so all gaming discussion here is inferred from the PassMark G3D score of 29009, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623, and the card's raw specifications. Treat any frame-rate expectation as directional rather than exact.

Q: Can the i7-14701E handle streaming while gaming?

A: Partially. Sixteen threads from eight cores, a 22195 R23 multi-core score, and a 26112 PassMark multithread score indicate solid encoding throughput, but the core count is modest by modern streaming-plus-gaming standards, so heavily threaded stream stacks will eat into headroom faster than on larger CPUs.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XT have enough VRAM for content creation?

A: Yes, by the numbers. 20 GB of GDDR6 with 800 GB/s of bandwidth is a large pool that should comfortably hold large 3D scenes, high-resolution video timelines, and sizeable compute datasets.

Q: What power supply does this configuration need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, driven by its 300 W TDP and dual 8-pin connectors. The CPU adds only a 65 W TDP, so a 700 W unit provides meaningful headroom for the pair.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited to whatever the platform permits around locked multipliers.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: Both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a rarity that matters for workstation stability in professional settings.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits three broad groups. First, high-resolution gamers: anyone targeting 4K or ultrawide resolutions will find the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB framebuffer and 800 GB/s of bandwidth doing the heavy lifting, with the eight-core processor more than capable of feeding it at that pixel count. Second, content creators and 3D artists: the R23 multi-core score of 22195 and the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, combined with the enormous VRAM pool, make this viable for scene assembly, lookdev, and GPU rendering — especially in Vulkan-targeting renderers given the 71068 Vulkan Geekbench result. Third, small-business workstation builders: the CPU's ECC support, 65 W thermal envelope, and embedded-adjacent part number positioning make it a natural fit for compact, quiet, reliability-conscious professional machines that still need serious graphics horsepower for visualization. Software developers and students will also find it comfortable — the 4305 PassMark single-thread score handles IDE responsiveness and compilation well — though this build is arguably over-provisioned on graphics for purely computational coursework.

CPU Analysis

The i7-14701E is a Raptor Lake-R chip on Intel's 10 nm process, an active-production desktop part released mid-2024. Its topology is straightforward: 8 cores, 16 threads, a 2.60 GHz base clock, and a 5.40 GHz maximum boost — one of the higher boost figures in its cohort. Cache is generous at 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3, which helps in latency-sensitive gaming and compilation workloads.

The benchmark picture is consistent: 315 single-core and 2237 multi-core in R15, 1315 and 9321 in R20, and 3133 and 22195 in R23. The single-core figures are strong — the 5.40 GHz boost clock is clearly doing its job — while the multi-core numbers reflect the eight-core ceiling rather than any weakness per-core. PassMark confirms the shape: 4305 single-thread, 26112 multithread, with the sub-scores telling the workload story. Integer math at 81325 and floating point at 61873 are healthy; data compression at 282939 is excellent; encryption at 14862 and extended instructions at 18528 are mid-pack; find-prime-numbers at 176 and physics at 2399 are modest. Random string sorting at 29158 indicates good memory subsystem behavior. Against its nearest rivals, the margins are razor-thin: 0% against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, -0.1% against the Ryzen 5 8645HS, 0.3% against the Ryzen 7 7745HX, and 0.4% against the Core i7-13650HX. In practical terms, this chip trades blows with a cluster of higher-TDP mobile-adjacent parts — remarkable given its 65 W rating, but also a signal that buyers comparing on raw multi-core throughput alone will find no differentiation here.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform fundamentals are solid. Socket 1700 gives access to a broad Intel ecosystem; the chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and — notably — supports ECC memory, which is uncommon outside workstation parts. PCIe connectivity splits by component: the CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the RX 7900 XT itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, meaning the card does not need the CPU's Gen 5 link to perform fully. Display outputs on the card include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C.

Power planning is simple: the GPU's 300 W TDP and dual 8-pin connectors anchor the recommendation at a 700 W suggested PSU, and with the CPU contributing only 65 W, that leaves comfortable headroom for the rest of the system. The locked multiplier removes overclocking from the upgrade calculus, so the sensible next upgrade is graphics-side: the card is listed as end-of-life with a successor generation (Navi IV) in the data, and its 55th-percentile aggregate position is the build's weakest link. A next-generation GPU swap on the same platform would directly address the imbalance that the percentiles reveal. Dual-channel memory is another consideration — saturating the dual-channel bus with fast DDR5 is the cheapest way to protect the CPU's gaming feed rate.

Benchmark Performance

The exact scores, in full. CPU: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2237, single-core 315; R20 multi-core 9321, single-core 1315; R23 multi-core 22195, single-core 3133; PassMark multithread 26112, single-thread 4305, with sub-scores of 81325 integer math, 61873 floating point, 282939 data compression, 14862 encryption, 18528 extended instructions, 176 find-prime-numbers, 2399 physics, and 29158 string sorting. The CPU's average benchmark score is 33206, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

GPU: PassMark G3D 29009, GPU compute 16828, DirectX 9 at 322, DirectX 10 at 158, DirectX 11 at 340, DirectX 12 at 110, G2D at 1232; 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 5623; Geekbench OpenCL 12756 and Vulkan 71068. The GPU's average benchmark score is 13745, at the 55th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is the interesting part. A CPU at the 83rd percentile paired with a GPU whose average lands at the 55th produces a combined percentile of 69 — squarely upper-third territory. The interpretation depends on workload: for anything GPU-bound, the system performs like its graphics card; for anything CPU-bound, it performs like a chip that matches 33201-avgScore rivals within a fraction of a percent. The benchmark data also flags a curiosity — the GPU's rival list mixes integrated and mobile parts with desktop cards at near-identical aggregate scores, suggesting the averaged percentile understates this card's gaming-specific strength relative to its compute-mixed average.

Gaming Performance

To be clear: there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database, and dataIsMeasured is false. Everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores above.

The estimates point in a consistent direction. A G3D score of 29009 paired with a 5623 Steel Nomad result is territory associated with high-refresh 1440p gaming and comfortably playable 4K. At 4K ultra settings, the 20 GB framebuffer and 800 GB/s bandwidth mean texture-heavy titles should not stutter from memory pressure — that VRAM pool is the single most future-facing spec on the card. At 1440p, the CPU enters the conversation: the 4305 single-thread PassMark score and 5.40 GHz boost suggest the processor can drive high frame rates, but eight cores may cap the very top end in the most CPU-hungry engines. At 1080p high-refresh, the GPU would likely be underutilized in less demanding titles and the CPU becomes the honest limit. Ray tracing is supported via 84 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate, though without tensor cores there is no hardware-tensor upscaling path, which shapes expectations in RT-heavy scenes: the raw fill rates — 459.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 804.4 GTexel/s texture rate — remain high, but enabling heavy RT will cost more than on architectures with dedicated upscaling hardware.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The G3D score of 29009 and single-thread performance of 4305 support high frame rates at 1440p, though the eight-core CPU sets the ceiling in the most demanding engines. This is a strong 1440p high-refresh configuration by the numbers.

4K gaming. With 20 GB of GDDR6, 800 GB/s of bandwidth, and 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32, the card is equipped for 4K ultra play. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost keep the CPU from bottlenecking at that resolution, where the GPU does the dominant share of work.

Streaming. The 26112 PassMark multithread score and sixteen threads handle a game plus an encoder stream simultaneously, but the core count is modest — streamers running heavy scene compositions and multiple sources will consume the multi-core budget faster than the R23 score alone suggests.

Video editing. The combination of 20 GB of VRAM for timeline and effects work, an 800 GB/s memory bus, and solid CPU throughput makes this a capable editing machine for 4K and higher-resolution timelines, particularly in NLEs that lean on GPU compute — the 16828 GPU compute score is respectable rather than exceptional.

3D rendering. This is arguably the strongest creative use case: the VRAM pool plus 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 suits GPU renderers, and the 71068 Vulkan Geekbench score indicates particular strength where software targets Vulkan. CPU-side viewport work benefits from the 22195 R23 multi-core result.

Software development. Compilation scales with cores and clocks; the i7-14701E offers eight cores with a 5.40 GHz boost and 33 MB of L3, plus 282939 in data compression — a proxy for fast parallel I/O-heavy operations. ECC support adds correctness assurance for long-running builds and test infrastructure.

Student and office work. This pairing is heavily over-provisioned for documents, browsing, and coursework — the 4305 single-thread score makes everyday responsiveness effortless. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also exists as a fallback, meaning the system remains usable for basic tasks if the discrete card is ever removed, a quiet advantage of this particular CPU choice for maintenance scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds