SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and it is part of Intel's Core 14th Gen series. It is produced on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This combination of a modest base clock and a high boost clock suggests a design that prioritizes power efficiency during idle or lightly threaded tasks while reserving significant performance headroom for demanding workloads. The processor includes a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and data-heavy applications, as it reduces the need to access slower system memory. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation and small business server environments that require data integrity.

The architecture's performance is reflected in its benchmark scores, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core test yielding 22195 points and a single-core score of 3133. The multi-core result indicates strong parallel processing capability for a 65 W TDP part, while the single-core score shows excellent per-thread performance, which is essential for applications that rely on high clock speeds. The PassMark tests provide a more granular view: integer math scores 81325, floating-point math scores 61873, and data compression scores 282939. These numbers suggest the CPU handles a wide array of computational tasks efficiently. The extended instructions score of 18528 indicates robust SIMD and vector processing capabilities, which benefit multimedia encoding and scientific computing. The processor's percentileVsAllCpus is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of all CPUs in the database, and its average benchmark score is 33206. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, with a deltaPct of 0, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX, with a deltaPct of 0.4. This places the i7-14701E in a competitive position against mobile and desktop parts, though the comparison is close, with deltas of just a fraction of a percent.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E presents an interesting profile: it is a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP, which is unusually low for a high-performance Core i7 part, yet it delivers a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This combination suggests a focus on sustained multi-core workloads without requiring massive cooling or power delivery systems. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is a sweet spot for modern gaming and productivity, as most games do not scale beyond 8 cores effectively, while 16 threads provide headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording. The Raptor Lake architecture is a refined version of Alder Lake, and here it is implemented on a 10 nm process, which is a mature node that allows for high clock speeds. The L3 cache of 33 MB is generous and directly improves gaming performance by holding more game assets on-chip.

In terms of real-world workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 indicates that the CPU can handle video rendering and 3D modeling tasks with respectable speed. For instance, a typical 4K video export or a complex 3D scene render will finish in a reasonable time, though it will not match the top-tier HEDT or server chips. The single-core score of 3133 is more telling for everyday responsiveness: opening applications, browsing the web, and running office software will feel snappy. The PassMark multithread score of 26112 reinforces the multi-core capability, while the single-thread score of 4305 confirms strong per-core performance. The data encryption score of 14862 and random string sorting score of 29158 are relevant for security and database applications, respectively. The physics score of 2399 is curious, as it is relatively low compared to other scores, which might indicate a specific test condition, but it does not detract from the overall picture.

The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, have an average score of 33244, which is only 0.1% higher than the i7-14701E's 33206. This suggests that despite being a desktop part, the i7-14701E is closely matched with some high-end mobile processors, which speaks to its efficiency. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is 0.3% slower, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX is 0.4% faster, indicating that the i7-14701E sits in a very tight performance band. This means that users upgrading from a previous generation will see incremental gains, but the real value lies in the platform features and the low TDP, which allows for quieter and cooler builds.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for the CPU and GPU paints a clear picture of a high-performance desktop pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 33206, positioning it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, scores 33201, which is a delta of 0%, meaning they are effectively tied. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is 0.3% slower. These tight deltas indicate that the i7-14701E is at the top of its class, but not a class leader. The GPU, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, has an average benchmark score of 58392, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores 58528, which is 0.2% higher, while the Intel Arc A570M is 0.3% lower at 58239. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 0.5% lower, and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.5% lower. This puts the RX 6950 XT in a solid position, just edging out some competitors.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 86, which is a strong indicator that this system will handle most tasks well above average. In GPU-specific benchmarks, the RX 6950 XT scores 4235 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern test of DX12 performance. The Geekbench scores are also notable: Metal scores 222653, OpenCL scores 205998, and Vulkan scores 165212. These numbers suggest the GPU is particularly strong in compute-heavy tasks, which benefits content creation. The PassMark G3D score of 28070 is a high mark for rasterization, while the G2D score of 1063 is more modest, indicating that 2D tasks are not the primary strength. The GPU compute score of 14199 shows solid performance for non-graphics compute workloads. The data shows that this pairing is balanced: the CPU is in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 88th, with a combined 86th percentile, meaning neither component is severely bottlenecking the other. This is a system that excels in both gaming and productivity, as the high GPU percentile ensures smooth high-resolution gaming, while the CPU's strong multi-core scores support streaming and rendering.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-14701E and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 86, which means this system outperforms 86% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201. This is a deltaPct of 0%, indicating they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and its closest competitor?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100, which scores 58528 compared to the RX 6950 XT's 58392, a delta of -0.2%.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU and the game clock of the GPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the GPU has a game clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2310 MHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 700 W, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is exceptional. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures high frame rates at 1440p and even 4K, while the CPU's single-core score of 3133 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with game asset loading, reducing stutter. The CPU's 83rd percentile also indicates it can handle the physics and AI calculations in modern games without issue.

For streaming, the 8-core, 16-thread CPU is ideal. The multi-core score of 22195 in Cinebench R23 allows for simultaneous gaming and encoding without a significant performance drop. The PassMark multithread score of 26112 further supports this, showing that the CPU can handle the parallel workloads of encoding and gameplay. The GPU's hardware encoding capabilities, while not detailed, are complemented by the CPU's headroom.

Video editing is a strong suit for this system. The CPU's floating-point math score of 61873 and integer math score of 81325 accelerate video codecs and effects processing. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998 provides compute acceleration for rendering and export tasks. The large 16 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for editing high-resolution timelines and applying complex effects without running out of memory.

3D rendering benefits from both components. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 will speed up CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 80 RT cores accelerate GPU-based rendering and ray tracing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates strong DX12 performance, which is common in modern render engines.

Software development is well-served by this configuration. The CPU's data compression score of 282939 is useful for build tools and version control, while the extended instructions score of 18528 supports vectorized code. The support for DDR5 memory (or DDR4) allows for fast compile times. The GPU's compute capabilities are also useful for machine learning tasks, with a GPU compute score of 14199.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but not unwieldy. The CPU's single-thread performance of 4305 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and document editing. The low 65 W TDP of the CPU means the system can run quietly and efficiently, which is beneficial for a shared workspace. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, though the RX 6950 XT will handle any graphical tasks with ease.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates that this is a well-balanced system, but there are nuances. The CPU's percentile of 83 and the GPU's percentile of 88 are close, but the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. This means that in CPU-intensive workloads like physics simulations or data compression, the CPU will be the limiting factor, while in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or rendering, the GPU will be the primary driver. The combined percentile of 86 suggests that the system is not severely bottlenecked in either direction.

Looking at specific scores, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 is robust, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast part, so in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, it may hold back the GPU's compute abilities. However, the GPU's FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS is substantial, and in gaming scenarios, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor. The CPU's single-core score of 3133 in Cinebench R23 is high enough to avoid bottlenecking in most games, which typically rely on one or two threads. The FPS scaling is not measured for this exact combination, but based on the percentile gap, one would expect that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU might become the bottleneck in very high-refresh-rate scenarios, while at 4K, the GPU will be the clear limiting factor.

In terms of memory, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and the choice will affect performance. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is ample for its class, so memory is not a bottleneck on the GPU side. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU is ahead of the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface, so there is no bandwidth limitation. Overall, the system is balanced for 1440p gaming and productivity, but for 1080p esports titles, the CPU's single-thread performance might not fully feed the GPU's high frame rate potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning the following expectations are qualitative. The GPU's 88th percentile and the CPU's 83rd percentile suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance. In less demanding titles like esports games, the CPU's single-core score of 4305 in PassMark and boost clock of 5.40 GHz should allow for frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p or 1440p with high settings. The GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 80 RT cores will handle ray tracing at moderate settings, though the RDNA 2 architecture is not as strong as more recent generations.

For AAA titles, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing for high-resolution textures without exceeding memory limits. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates strong performance in modern DX12 games, which are often GPU-bound. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 165212 suggests good performance in Vulkan-based titles as well. The CPU's L3 cache of 33 MB helps with game asset streaming, reducing load times and stutter. In terms of resolution scaling, the GPU's high memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s ensures that 4K performance is not hampered by memory bandwidth limitations. Overall, expect 1440p gaming at ultra settings with high frame rates, and 4K gaming at high settings with frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for most titles, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility: they can use existing DDR4 memory to save costs or opt for DDR5 for better performance. The CPU has Gen 5 PCIe lanes, specifically 16 lanes for the CPU, which is forward-looking for future graphics cards and NVMe SSDs. The platform also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which is a useful fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output without the discrete GPU.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, and its TDP is 335 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W. This means a typical system with this pairing would require a PSU in the 700-750 W range to account for other components. The GPU is triple-slot wide and requires two 8-pin power connectors, so case and PSU compatibility must be checked. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production, so an upgrade path would involve moving to a newer GPU generation. The CPU is still active, so it can be upgraded to a higher-tier 14th Gen processor on the same socket, though the 65 W TDP limit might restrict the choice to lower-power SKUs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the first consideration would be the GPU, as the RX 6950 XT is end-of-life. A newer GPU with better ray tracing and higher performance would be a logical step. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier? No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option. Therefore, the platform upgrade path is limited to swapping the CPU for a higher-end locked part or moving to a new socket entirely. The memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules if not already in use. The storage can be upgraded to a Gen 5 NVMe SSD to take advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14701E with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, forming a high-performance desktop configuration. The build class is explicitly "desktop," and the combined percentile of 86 indicates that this system outperforms 86% of all recorded configs. The CPU is a mid-range-to-high-end part in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is a high-end part in the 88th percentile. This creates a system that is well-suited for enthusiast gaming and content creation. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low, making it easy to cool, while the GPU's 335 W TDP requires a robust cooling solution, as indicated by its triple-slot design. The overall tier of this build is high, with the GPU being the standout component, but the CPU is not a weak link, as its scores are competitive with its nearest rivals.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a newer generation (14th Gen) while the GPU is from the previous generation (RX 6000 series). This is not a problem, as the PCIe Gen 4 interface of the GPU is well-matched with the CPU's Gen 5 support. The system is capable of handling demanding workloads, but the GPU's end-of-life status means that it will eventually be the limiting factor in future games that require more advanced features. The CPU's support for ECC memory makes this build viable for small business workstations where data integrity is critical, though the GPU is more gaming-oriented. In summary, this is a balanced, high-tier desktop build that excels in gaming and productivity, with the GPU providing the bulk of the performance in graphics-heavy tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who want to play at 1440p with high refresh rates or at 4K with high settings. The GPU's 88th percentile and 16 GB VRAM ensure that modern games will run smoothly, while the CPU's strong single-core performance prevents bottlenecks in CPU-bound titles. It is also suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design. The CPU's multi-core score of 22195 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 205998, Metal 222653) provide ample power for rendering and encoding tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for editing high-resolution footage or working with large 3D scenes.

Developers and software engineers will appreciate the CPU's data compression and encryption scores, which speed up build times and secure data handling. The support for ECC memory is a bonus for those who run simulations or handle sensitive data. Students and office workers will find this system to be more than sufficient, though it is overkill for basic tasks. The low CPU TDP of 65 W means the system can run quietly, making it suitable for a dorm room or shared office. Small business workstations can benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's reliability, though the GPU might be more than necessary for typical office tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is based on the Navi 21 chip and the RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It has 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU features 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 80 RT cores for ray tracing. It does not have tensor cores, which are specific to NVIDIA, but it does support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The clock speeds are a base of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective, across a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is a high-bandwidth configuration for a 16 GB GDDR6 memory pool.

The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 23.65 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 47.31 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate strong rasterization performance, which is the primary workload for gaming. The RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but the RDNA 2 architecture's ray tracing performance is not as strong as NVIDIA's Ampere or newer architectures, meaning that ray tracing will require lower settings or resolutions. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its capabilities: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 is solid, and the PassMark G3D score of 28070 is high. The Geekbench Metal score of 222653 is particularly strong, indicating excellent compute performance on macOS-like workloads, though this is a Windows-based build.

The GPU's 88th percentile ranking places it among the top GPUs in the database, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, is only 0.2% faster. This indicates that the RX 6950 XT is a top-tier performer for its generation. The 16 GB VRAM is a future-proofing feature, as many modern games are starting to exceed 8 GB or even 12 GB at 4K with high textures. The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is sufficient for 4K gaming and compute workloads. The GPU is end-of-life, which means it is no longer in production, but its performance is still competitive with mid-range current-generation GPUs. The launch MSRP was 1,099 USD, which reflects its high-end positioning at the time of release. In summary, the RX 6950 XT is a powerful GPU that excels in traditional rasterization and compute, with ray tracing being its weaker point, but it remains a strong choice for high-resolution gaming and content creation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds