SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing aimed at high-performance 1440p gaming and content creation. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark scores and hardware specifications, as no measured frame rate data exists for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK confirms the absence of measuredFps data, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than empirical results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, meaning the following performance analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4305 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 collectively suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and smooth 1440p gameplay with adjusted settings. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which aligns with modern game engines that prioritize asynchronous compute and draw call efficiency.

At 1080p resolution, the pairing’s bottleneck shifts toward the CPU in lighter titles, but the i7-14701E’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 suggest it can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates. The RX 6750 XT’s pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s point to solid fill-rate performance, which translates to smooth texture streaming and particle effects in fast-paced shooters. For 1440p gaming, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, with the 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth providing adequate capacity for modern textures but potentially forcing medium-to-high presets in the most demanding titles of 2024.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 and OpenCL score of 16360 indicate strong API-level performance, which is relevant for games using Vulkan or compute-based rendering paths. The absence of measured data means these estimates carry uncertainty, but the percentile positions — CPU at 83rd and GPU at 71st — suggest a balanced pairing that avoids severe stuttering in typical gaming scenarios. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with ray-traced effects, though the RT performance will be modest given the 40 RT cores and RDNA 2 architecture.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4305 and boost clock of 5.40 GHz support frame rates exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles at 1080p, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 suggests 100+ FPS in AAA games at 1440p with medium settings. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS provides ample compute for modern game physics and post-processing effects.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 26112, allow for software encoding of 1080p60 streams while maintaining playable frame rates. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware encoding relies on AMD’s fixed-function media engine, which handles H.264 and HEVC but lacks the AI-enhanced features found in newer architectures.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 indicates strong rendering performance in non-linear editors like Premiere Pro, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and timeline scrubbing. The PassMark data compression score of 282939 further supports efficient handling of video codecs.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads deliver a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9321, making it suitable for CPU-based rendering in Blender and V-Ray. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) provide substantial compute for GPU-accelerated renderers, though the lack of tensor cores limits AI denoising performance.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 81325 and floating point math score of 61873 indicate strong compile times and scientific computing performance. The 33 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 8 cores provide responsive multitasking for document editing, web browsing, and coding assignments. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles any accelerated workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4305 ensures snappy UI interactions in everyday applications.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i7-14701E bottleneck the RX 6750 XT in gaming?

A: At 1080p, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4305 and boost clock of 5.40 GHz suggest it can keep pace with the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20700 in most titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the CPU’s 83rd percentile position providing sufficient headroom.

Q: What is the estimated FPS for this system in AAA games at 1440p?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700, estimates suggest 60+ FPS in most AAA titles at high settings, with some demanding games requiring medium presets to maintain smooth performance.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) with 40 RT cores, but the RDNA 2 architecture’s ray tracing performance is modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548 does not isolate RT workloads, so expect playable frame rates only with FSR upscaling and reduced ray tracing quality.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?

A: The i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, a delta of 0%. The performance is effectively identical, despite the Intel chip having fewer cores but a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus the mobile-focused AMD processor.

Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM sufficient for modern games?

A: The GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides enough capacity for 1440p texture-heavy titles, but some 2024 releases may exceed this at ultra settings. The PassMark G3D score of 20700 suggests the GPU’s compute capability aligns with its memory capacity.

Q: What is the CPU’s power draw and cooling requirement?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for an 8-core processor and allows for a capable air cooler. The GPU has a 250 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 600 W, so the combined system draws approximately 315 W under load, demanding adequate case airflow.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: The CPU’s multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency, and memory overclocking via DDR5 support is the primary tuning avenue.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the i7-14701E and RX 6750 XT depends heavily on workload and resolution. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 71st percentile suggests the GPU is the weaker link in most scenarios, meaning the graphics card will limit performance in GPU-bound tasks. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4305 and boost clock of 5.40 GHz are sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548 may cap performance in titles that stress pixel shading.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s fill rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s become the primary constraints, with the CPU idle waiting for frames. The combined percentile of 77 indicates a well-matched pairing overall, but the CPU’s superior PassMark multithread score of 26112 versus the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 9550 highlights a significant disparity in compute-heavy workloads. For tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU will often finish its portion of the work before the GPU completes its rendering pass, creating a pipeline stall.

The GPU’s 12 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth align with its compute capabilities, avoiding a memory bandwidth bottleneck at 1440p. The CPU’s 33 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce cache misses in gaming and productivity, but the dual-channel memory bus may limit bandwidth in memory-intensive scenarios. The data indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield larger gaming gains than upgrading the CPU, while the reverse is true for CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 282939).

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is a Raptor Lake-R architecture processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for the performance level, enabling efficient cooling in compact desktop builds. The 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache (80 KB L1 per core) provide ample on-die storage for gaming and productivity workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 and single-core score of 3133 place the CPU in the upper echelon of desktop processors, with the PassMark single-thread score of 4305 confirming strong per-core performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 14862 and extended instructions score of 18528 indicate robust cryptography and SIMD capabilities, making it suitable for scientific computing and database workloads. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it outperforms 83% of processors, while its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, scores 33201 versus the Intel chip’s 33206 — a negligible 0% difference.

The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size suggest efficient power delivery, with the 65 W TDP enabling sustained boost clocks under load. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and video decode acceleration, though the discrete GPU handles all demanding graphics tasks. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 offers flexibility in platform choice, with dual-channel configuration being the standard for this socket.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers seeking 1440p performance with high refresh rates, as the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures while the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures responsive gameplay. Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS, which accelerate render and export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 81325 and the 16 threads for parallel builds.

Students and small business users building a single workstation for coursework, office productivity, and occasional gaming will find the 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP manageable in standard cases with a 600 W PSU. The platform’s support for ECC memory (eccMemory: true) makes it suitable for entry-level workstation tasks requiring data integrity, such as financial modeling or scientific simulations. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with upcoming game releases, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking provides future-proofing for multi-threaded applications.

Enthusiasts looking for a balanced system without extreme power draw will appreciate the 65 W CPU TDP, which allows for quiet air cooling, while the GPU’s 250 W TDP is standard for its class. The combination’s 77th percentile ranking indicates it sits above the majority of systems, making it a sensible choice for users who want high performance without chasing top-tier components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33206, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201 (0% delta). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26011, placing it at the 71st percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891 (0.5% delta). The combined percentile for the pairing is 77, indicating that this system outperforms 77% of all tracked configurations.

Key CPU benchmarks include Cinebench R23 multicore at 22195 and single-core at 3133, PassMark multithread at 26112, and PassMark single-thread at 4305. The GPU benchmarks show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548, Geekbench OpenCL score of 16360, and PassMark G3D score of 20700. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 11 score of 180 and DirectX 12 score of 80 suggest that legacy API performance is strong, while newer APIs like Vulkan (Geekbench score of 98089) show excellent optimization.

The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 282939 and floating point math score of 61873 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 9550 and FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS show solid parallel processing capability. The combined picture is a system where the CPU leads in single-threaded and lightly-threaded tasks, while the GPU handles graphics and compute-heavy workloads, with the CPU’s percentile advantage (83 vs 71) suggesting that the GPU is the more limiting component for overall system performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-14701E with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, targeting the mainstream-to-high-end segment of the market. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 71st percentile combine to a 77th percentile overall, placing this system above the majority of tracked configurations but below top-tier enthusiast builds. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP (600 W suggested PSU) make this a power-efficient pairing that does not require exotic cooling or oversized power supplies.

The build class is desktop, indicating a full-sized ATX or micro-ATX form factor with standard expansion capabilities. The CPU’s Intel Socket 1700 platform supports the latest 14th Gen Core series, while the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for the 12 GB frame buffer. The 77th combined percentile suggests that this system handles modern games and productivity applications well, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades without creating a significant bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors and a 335 mm² die size. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 40 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The boost clock of 2600 MHz and game clock of 2495 MHz provide high-frequency operation, with a base clock of 2150 MHz. The pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for 1440p gaming. The FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) provide substantial compute power for rendering and compute workloads. The GPU’s 71st percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 20700 place it in the upper-midrange tier, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at a 0.5% delta.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 shows excellent low-level API utilization. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, and the 40 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability. The 250 W TDP and dual-slot cooler design (267 mm length) require adequate case clearance, and the 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors mandate a 600 W PSU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 CPU lanes for high-bandwidth peripherals. The 65 W TDP leaves significant thermal headroom for a potential CPU upgrade within the same socket, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking. The platform’s ECC memory support (eccMemory: true) is a notable feature for workstation use, though it requires compatible motherboards and memory modules.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with older slots and provides sufficient bandwidth for the 12 GB frame buffer. The 600 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a future GPU upgrade up to approximately 350 W TDP, assuming the current 250 W GPU is replaced. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the primary constraint for the GPU, so a future upgrade should prioritize higher bandwidth (e.g., 512 GB/s or more) for 4K gaming.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU first, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking provides headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The CPU’s 16 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock can support up to a high-end GPU without bottlenecking at 1440p or 4K resolutions. Alternatively, adding more memory (beyond the current unspecified capacity) or faster DDR5 modules would improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel bus limits overall bandwidth. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future storage and GPU bandwidth needs are met, making this a future-proof foundation for incremental upgrades.