SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that delivers a solid 1080p gaming experience and robust productivity performance, though the data indicates a clear CPU-led configuration. This analysis is based entirely on synthetic benchmark scores, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from component performance.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all performance expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,765. This places it as a capable 1080p performer, likely handling modern titles at high settings with smooth frame rates, though the data does not specify exact FPS figures. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with heavy texture packs.

At 1440p, the RX 6650 XT’s performance would likely drop noticeably, with the 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 64 ROPs suggesting it can manage moderate settings but not consistently high refresh rates. The pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s indicate the GPU is balanced for rasterization-heavy workloads rather than ray tracing, where its 32 RT cores would be underpowered. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,133, is strong enough to avoid being the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. However, the lack of measured data means users should temper expectations: this is a 1080p-oriented build, not a 4K or high-refresh 1440p solution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33,206 places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with a combined system percentile of 74. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 22,195 and single-core score of 3,133 show a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19,765 at the 65th percentile is notably lower in relative standing, creating a performance gap between the two components. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals in aggregate: it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (avg score 33,091) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13650HX (avg score 33,089). The GPU, meanwhile, trails the NVIDIA Tesla K40m by 0.6% (avg score 19,885) and the AMD FirePro D300 by 0.7% (avg score 19,637), though it is 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7000 (avg score 19,905) and 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (avg score 19,602).

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1,859, while Geekbench OpenCL shows 10,111 and Vulkan 81,306. The PassMark G3D score of 17,166 reinforces the GPU’s mid-range positioning, while the G2D score of 918 indicates competent 2D performance. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a high-end performer relative to all processors, while the GPU is only slightly above average—meaning the overall benchmark profile is dominated by the CPU’s strength rather than balanced by GPU power.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is a Raptor Lake-R architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3, which supports strong multi-threaded scaling. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,237 and R20 multi-core of 9,321 show consistent performance across generations of the benchmark, while the single-core scores of 315 (R15) and 1,315 (R20) indicate excellent per-thread capability. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,112 and single-thread score of 4,305 confirm this dual strength.

For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU is a productivity powerhouse. The PassMark data encryption score of 14,862 and data compression score of 282,939 indicate fast cryptographic and archival tasks. Floating-point math scores 61,873 and integer math 81,325, showing robust number-crunching abilities. Extended instructions score 18,528, which helps with modern SIMD-heavy applications. The find prime numbers score of 176 is modest, but that is a niche workload. The physics score of 2,399 in PassMark is solid, though gaming physics is more dependent on single-core performance, which is clearly strong here. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, making it efficient for sustained all-core workloads without excessive cooling requirements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance: the CPU at the 83rd percentile versus the GPU at the 65th percentile creates a CPU-heavy configuration. In gaming, this means the RX 6650 XT will be the primary limiter at 1080p in most titles, as the CPU’s single-core score of 4,305 (PassMark) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the first constraints, likely capping texture quality and resolution before the CPU becomes an issue. At lower resolutions or with less demanding games, the CPU’s headroom will go unused, while at higher settings, the GPU will hit its limits first.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse, with its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 and PassMark multi-thread of 26,112 driving performance. The GPU’s compute score of 7,532 (PassMark GPU Compute) is moderate, meaning GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering or some content creation will be slower than the CPU’s processing. The FPS scaling would likely show that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p yields significant gains because the GPU is the bottleneck; conversely, upgrading the GPU would provide a larger gaming uplift than upgrading the CPU, based on the percentile gap.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support measured FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E is at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 33,206, indicating it outperforms roughly 83% of processors in the database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6650 XT has an average score of 19,765, which is 0.6% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K40m and 0.7% behind the AMD FirePro D300, but 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7000 and 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K5200.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement for a system?

A: The GPU has a 176 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 450 W, with a single 8-pin power connector required.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported on this processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is end-of-life, released on 2022-05-09, while the CPU is active and was released on 2024-06-30.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers at 1080p resolution who want high frame rates in esports and moderate settings in AAA titles, based on the GPU’s 65th percentile standing. The CPU’s 83rd percentile makes it ideal for content creators who edit video or work with 3D applications, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 and PassMark multi-thread of 26,112 provide substantial rendering power. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,305) for compilation tasks, while the 33 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. Students and small business workstations can leverage the 65 W TDP for low-power, always-on systems, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display output without the discrete GPU. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p content creation but may limit larger 3D scenes, so this build is best for those who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-accelerated rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning there is bandwidth headroom for future high-end GPUs. The motherboard platform is a mature one, as the CPU is from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, so compatibility with existing 1700 boards is likely. The suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU and a CPU TDP of 65 W mean the total system draw is modest, leaving room for upgrades without a PSU change in most cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, since the 65th percentile GPU is the system’s weakest link; the CPU has enough headroom to support a higher-tier card. For memory, moving to DDR5 with higher speeds would benefit the CPU’s cache-heavy workloads, though DDR4 remains viable. The platform does not support overclocking due to the locked multiplier, so future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining an Intel Core i7-14701E (Raptor Lake-R, 8 cores, 16 threads) with an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RDNA 2.0, Navi 23). The combined percentile of 74 places it above average in the database, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 65th percentile creates a lopsided profile. The CPU is a high-end performer with a low 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a mid-range part with 8 GB VRAM and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32. Overall, this is a productivity-first system that can handle 1080p gaming, not a high-end gaming rig. The benchmark data shows a clear tier: the CPU competes with mobile high-end chips like the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Intel Core i7-13650HX, while the GPU sits near professional workstation cards like the NVIDIA Quadro K5200, indicating a mismatch in class that favors CPU-heavy tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build can likely achieve high frame rates in competitive titles, given the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,305 and the GPU’s 65th percentile standing, but the 8 GB VRAM may force lower textures in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 26,112 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU’s compute score of 7,532 limits hardware encoding quality.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 makes timeline playback and export fast, but the GPU’s 10.79 TFLOPS will slow effects-heavy workflows and 4K rendering.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) will be strong due to the 8 cores and 33 MB L3 cache, but GPU rendering will be limited by the RX 6650 XT’s 65th percentile and 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: Compilation times will be short thanks to the PassMark integer math score of 81,325 and data compression score of 282,939, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on build machines.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display solution, and the CPU’s low power draw (65 W TDP) makes this an efficient desktop for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis, where the PassMark single-thread score of 4,305 ensures snappy responsiveness.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14701E

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds