SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs a 20-core Intel Core i7-14700T with a dual NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU setup. The combination targets a specific niche: high-throughput parallel compute and multi-threaded productivity where the CPU’s efficiency and the GPU’s rendering capabilities work in tandem. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU array lands at the 50th percentile, making this a system where the processor is the standout component. The i7-14700T’s 25980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates strong sustained performance for heavily threaded workloads, and the dual RTX 5000 Embedded cards provide a combined 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute pool, which is substantial for rendering and simulation tasks.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The GPU configuration is a dual NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation setup, each card built on the AD103 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process. Each GPU houses 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The architecture is Ada Lovelace, which brings 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores per card. With two cards, the system has access to 152 RT cores and 608 tensor cores, making this a formidable platform for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated tasks like denoising or DLSS. The tensor core count suggests significant headroom for machine learning inference and training acceleration, provided the software supports multi-GPU execution.

Memory bandwidth is a critical factor for rendering large scenes and high-resolution textures. Each GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s per card. Combined across both GPUs, the system can address 32 GB of VRAM with a theoretical aggregate bandwidth of 1152.0 GB/s. This level of memory capacity is well-suited for 4K texture sets, complex 3D scenes, and large dataset processing in scientific visualization. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps, which is consistent with high-end workstation-class memory performance. The pixel rate per GPU is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering.

Clock speeds are modest relative to desktop gaming GPUs, with a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. This conservative clocking strategy likely contributes to the 150 W TDP per card, making the embedded form factor a priority over absolute peak performance. The FP32 compute throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS per GPU is the headline number here; two cards yield 65.38 TFLOPS of raw single-precision compute, which is a significant resource for rendering, simulation, and compute-heavy applications. The FP16 performance is identical at 32.69 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is useful for mixed-precision workloads that benefit from higher throughput without sacrificing accuracy.

The benchmark scores for this GPU are listed as zero, with no measured data available. This means the percentile ranking of 50 is based on the hardware specifications rather than empirical testing. The lack of measured FPS or compute scores makes it difficult to position this GPU against specific rivals, as the nearestRivals field is empty. However, the architectural features — 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores per GPU — suggest that ray-traced rendering performance will be strong, particularly in applications that can leverage multiple GPUs. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth per card ensures that memory-intensive operations like path tracing and texture streaming will not be the bottleneck. For rendering tasks, the dual-GPU setup provides a scalable platform, assuming the software can utilize both cards effectively; otherwise, the performance will reflect a single GPU’s capabilities.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark results tell a clear story of multi-core dominance. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700T scores 25980 in multi-core and 3667 in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a processor with a 35 W TDP. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700T edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS by 0.1% (score 41963 vs 41914 average), while the Intel Core i7-12850HX trails by 0.3% (41779). The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 leads by 0.3% (42055), and the Intel Core 7 251TE trails by 0.6% (41650). These are marginal differences, indicating the i7-14700T sits in a highly competitive performance band where single-digit percentage swings separate the top contenders.

In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 10911, and the single-core score is 1540. The R15 results are 2618 multi-core and 369 single-core. These scores across different Cinebench versions show consistent scaling, confirming that the processor maintains its performance profile across synthetic workloads. The PassMark suite reinforces this picture: the multi-thread score is 30571, with integer math at 113854 and floating-point math at 79042. Data compression scores 354216, and encryption hits 21277, indicating robust performance for data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 20052 suggests strong SIMD throughput, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding. The single-thread PassMark score is 3905, placing it in the upper tier for lightly threaded applications.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its percentile of 50 is based on specification analysis rather than measured performance. The combined percentile for the build is 69, reflecting the CPU’s strong showing and the GPU’s mid-pack positioning. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound workloads like compilation, video encoding, and multi-threaded rendering, while the GPU provides a balanced but not top-tier compute resource. The lack of GPU benchmark data means the build’s true gaming or rendering performance is uncertain, but the specification suggests a capable workstation rather than a gaming powerhouse. The data shows a clear asymmetry: the CPU is a high-performer relative to its peers, while the GPU array is average, meaning the CPU will often be the component that boosts the system’s overall capability in mixed workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980, placing it just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in average benchmark score.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU setup provide total?

A: Each NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, so the dual-GPU configuration provides 32 GB total, with a per-card bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700T supports ECC memory, which is a feature aimed at workstation and server environments where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: Each GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, so the dual setup offers 152 RT cores and 608 tensor cores, which is substantial for ray-traced rendering and AI acceleration.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is very low for a 20-core processor, allowing for a capable air cooler and quiet operation in compact desktop builds.

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance per card?

A: Each NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, yielding 65.38 TFLOPS combined across both cards.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is asymmetrical, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. This means in workloads that rely heavily on GPU compute—such as gaming at high resolutions, ray tracing, or GPU-accelerated rendering—the GPU array will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance (25980 in Cinebench R23) will not compensate for a mid-pack GPU in these scenarios. For example, in a 4K gaming workload where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 3667 in Cinebench R23 will ensure it does not hold back the GPU, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking will cap the frame rate.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D scene compilation, or data processing, the CPU will be the performance driver. The i7-14700T’s 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with its low 35 W TDP, make it a strong candidate for sustained multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30571 indicates that the CPU can handle heavy parallel loads without thermal throttling, given adequate cooling. In these scenarios, the GPU’s mid-pack performance is less relevant, as the CPU does the heavy lifting.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this build. However, based on the percentile difference, the bottleneck pattern is predictable. In games or applications that scale well with multiple cores, the CPU will provide a smooth experience, but the GPU will limit maximum frame rates. In GPU-centric applications like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender, the dual-GPU setup will provide a modest compute advantage over a single GPU, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not compete with top-tier desktop cards. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this split: the system is better than average overall, but the GPU holds it back from being a high-end gaming or rendering machine.

The 150 W TDP per GPU and the absence of a suggested PSU rating mean power delivery is a consideration. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is negligible, so the total system power draw is dominated by the GPUs. A 300 W combined GPU load, plus other components, suggests a power supply with ample headroom is necessary, but the exact wattage is not specified in the data. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface for the GPUs and the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes means the CPU can drive one GPU at Gen 5 speeds, but the GPUs are Gen 4, so the bus is not a bottleneck. For workloads that use both GPUs, the CPU’s PCIe lanes are sufficient for data transfer, but the GPU’s mid-pack compute performance will be the constraint.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance in a low-power package. The i7-14700T’s 88th percentile ranking and 35 W TDP make it ideal for small form factor workstations or always-on systems where energy efficiency is paramount. Industries that rely on multi-threaded CPU tasks—such as software development, where compilation times benefit from 20 cores and 28 threads—will see immediate gains. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 indicates strong performance in rendering software that uses CPU-based ray tracing, like Blender’s Cycles engine, though the GPU can also accelerate this workload.

Content creators working with video editing software that leverages multi-core CPUs for export and encoding will find the i7-14700T capable. The PassMark data compression score of 354216 suggests efficient handling of large file archives, which is common in media asset management. Data encryption at 21277 indicates adequate performance for secure file storage or network transfers. The ECC memory support makes this build attractive for scientific computing or financial modeling where data accuracy is non-negotiable. Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the CPU’s parallel processing capabilities for simulations and numerical analysis.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means this is not a gaming-first build. However, for users who need occasional GPU acceleration for rendering or machine learning, the dual RTX 5000 Embedded setup provides 32 GB of VRAM and 65.38 TFLOPS combined FP32 compute. This is sufficient for training medium-sized neural networks or rendering high-resolution images, but not for top-tier gaming performance. Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet analysis, or web servers will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and low power draw appealing. The lack of measured FPS data means gamers should approach this with caution; the CPU will handle game logic and physics well, but the GPU will limit frame rates at higher resolutions.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame, or frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it will deliver average performance relative to all GPUs, meaning it is likely to handle 1080p gaming at high settings but may struggle with 4K or ray tracing at playable frame rates in demanding titles.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3667 in Cinebench R23 is strong, indicating that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording while gaming. However, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM per card is generous, but the dual-GPU configuration may not scale in games that do not support SLI or multi-GPU rendering. In such cases, gaming performance will reflect a single RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, which is a mid-range part based on its 50th percentile ranking. At 1080p, this GPU should deliver high frame rates in esports titles and moderate settings in AAA games. At 1440p, expect playable frame rates in most titles with adjustments to quality settings. At 4K, the GPU will likely require significant settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay.

Given the absence of measured data, these expectations are qualitative. The GPU’s 1680 MHz boost clock and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are not exceptional for gaming, and the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 compute is respectable but not top-tier. For ray tracing, the 76 RT cores per GPU provide decent acceleration, but the mid-pack percentile suggests it will not match high-end desktop GPUs like the RTX 4080 or 4090. The dual-GPU setup may benefit games that use DX12 explicit multi-GPU, but this is rare. Most users should expect gaming performance consistent with a mid-range GPU, with the CPU ensuring a stable frame delivery. The combined percentile of 69 indicates the overall system is above average, but gaming is not its primary strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is compatible with 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. This means the motherboard can be reused for a future CPU upgrade within the same socket generation, though the 14th Gen is the last to use Socket 1700, so the upgrade path is limited to Raptor Lake Refresh parts. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and motherboard compatibility. The dual-channel memory bus is standard, and ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides high bandwidth for storage or a single GPU, but the RTX 5000 Embedded GPUs use PCIe 4.0 x16, so they will run at Gen 4 speeds without issue.

The CPU’s TDP of 35 W means the power supply requirements are modest from the CPU side. The GPUs have a TDP of 150 W each, totaling 300 W, which is a significant load. The suggestedPsu field is null, so no specific wattage is recommended. A sensible PSU choice would provide enough headroom for the GPUs plus other components, but the exact figure is not in the FACT PACK. The power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," indicating they draw power from the motherboard or a proprietary connection, which is typical for embedded or IGP-class parts. This limits the upgrade path for the GPU: replacing the embedded GPUs is not feasible in a standard desktop chassis, so the only meaningful upgrade is the CPU or additional storage.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count CPU within the Socket 1700 platform, such as a Core i9-14900K, but the data does not specify its performance. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the bus, but the embedded GPU form factor means the user would need a different GPU type. The memory support for DDR5 allows for a future upgrade to faster memory, which could improve memory-bound workloads. The 33 MB L3 cache is substantial, and the 2 MB L2 cache per core is generous, so cache-bound applications are well-served. The platform’s primary limitation is the embedded GPU, which cannot be swapped for a discrete card without significant modification. The CPU’s low TDP also means the cooling solution can be modest, and the power supply headroom is dominated by the GPUs, so a future CPU upgrade would not strain the PSU.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700T with dual NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPUs. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture and a 10 nm process. The GPUs are embedded-class parts from NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace generation, using the AD103 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process. The build’s combined percentile is 69, indicating it is better than 69% of all builds in the database. The CPU’s 88th percentile is the standout feature, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is the weak point.

The class is desktop, but the GPU’s "IGP" slot width and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs suggest this is an unusual configuration, likely found in specialized workstations or all-in-one systems. The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice, and the dual-GPU setup provides 32 GB of VRAM for memory-intensive tasks. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The GPU’s mid-pack ranking means the system is not a top-tier gaming or rendering machine, but it is a capable workstation for CPU-bound workloads. The build’s average benchmark score for the CPU is 41914, which is competitive with the nearest rivals, all within 0.6% of each other. This suggests the CPU is well-positioned in its performance class, making the overall build a solid choice for users who need many cores without excessive power consumption.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700T is a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This is a high-core-count part with a low base clock, indicating a design focused on multi-threaded throughput rather than single-thread burst performance. The 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly threaded tasks still get fast execution, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667. The architecture is Raptor Lake, a refresh of the Alder Lake design, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that access large datasets, such as database queries or scientific simulations.

The TDP of 35 W is remarkable for a 20-core processor, making it one of the most efficient high-core-count parts available. This low power draw means the CPU can be cooled by a capable air cooler, and it generates minimal heat, which is ideal for compact desktops or systems that run 24/7. The benchmark scores confirm its multi-threaded prowess: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 is competitive with desktop processors that have higher TDPs. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30571 and the integer math score of 113854 indicate strong performance in compilation, rendering, and data processing. The floating-point math score of 79042 shows good SIMD performance, benefiting scientific and engineering applications.

The single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3905, is solid but not top-tier, as the low base clock and high boost clock create a wide range of operating frequencies. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, along with ECC, makes this a flexible CPU for different builds. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or systems without a discrete GPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking places it in the top 12% of all CPUs, and the nearest rivals show it is within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Intel Core i7-12850HX. This means the i7-14700T is not a leader but is firmly in the pack of high-performance processors. For real workloads, the CPU excels at tasks that use all 20 cores, such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The 28 threads provide ample parallelism for heavily threaded applications, and the large cache reduces memory latency. The low TDP makes it a strong choice for power-conscious builders who do not want to sacrifice multi-core performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame, or frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds