SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-end professional mobile hardware repurposed for a stationary chassis. The CPU, a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace professional chip, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 69, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of overall system performance. This pairing is notable for its asymmetry: the processor is a top-tier performer for its power class, while the graphics card is a capable but not class-leading professional accelerator.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R) using Intel's 10 nm process node. It combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. With a TDP of 35 watts, this is a power-sipping variant of the Core i7 line, designed for systems where thermal output and energy consumption are critical constraints.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strength in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 3667 points in single-core and 25980 points in multi-core. The single-core score is strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The multi-core score is more impressive, reflecting the 28 threads available for parallel workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 1540 (single-core) and 10911 (multi-core), showing consistent scaling. The Cinebench R15 results (369 single-core, 2618 multi-core) follow the same pattern.

The Passmark suite provides additional context. The multi-thread score of 30571 and single-thread score of 3905 place the CPU well above average. Data compression (354216) and integer math (113854) scores are particularly high, suggesting strong performance in database operations and general computation. Floating-point math (79042) and extended instructions (20052) are also robust, which translates to good performance in scientific computing and financial modeling. The physics score of 1946 is respectable, though not exceptional for gaming physics simulations.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i7-14700T is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which scores 41963 on average versus 41914 for the Intel part — a negligible 0.1% difference. It is similarly matched with the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42055, Intel 0.3% behind) and the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, Intel 0.3% ahead). The Intel Core 7 251TE is slightly behind at 41650, with the i7-14700T leading by 0.6%. These near-identical scores mean the i7-14700T offers no decisive advantage over its direct competitors in aggregate performance, but its 35-watt TDP gives it a unique efficiency profile that rivals with similar scores may not match.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is skewed toward the processor. With the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile, the graphics card is the limiting factor in GPU-intensive workloads. This is typical for professional desktop builds where the CPU handles complex calculations and the GPU accelerates specific tasks like rendering or machine learning.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data analysis, or spreadsheet manipulation, the i7-14700T will not bottleneck the system. Its multi-thread score of 30571 in Passmark indicates it can handle heavy parallel processing without stalling. The single-thread score of 3905 ensures that even legacy or poorly-optimized software will run smoothly. For these tasks, the GPU's lower percentile is irrelevant, and the system will perform at the level dictated by the processor.

In GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation becomes the constraint. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it performs at the median of all GPUs, so gaming at high resolutions or rendering complex 3D scenes will be limited by the graphics card. The CPU will wait on the GPU to complete its work, meaning frame rates or render times will not improve beyond what the GPU can deliver. For example, in a 3D render that relies on the GPU's CUDA cores, the CPU's 28 threads will be underutilized while the GPU works at full capacity.

The FPS scaling, where available in measured data, would typically show this imbalance — CPU-bound scenarios would see high frame rates with GPU utilization near 100%, while GPU-bound scenarios would show lower frame rates with CPU utilization below 50%. Without measured FPS data for this pairing, the benchmark percentiles serve as the primary evidence: the 19-point gap between the CPU's 88th and GPU's 50th percentiles indicates a clear CPU-favored balance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 41914, with a percentile rank of 88 among all CPUs. This places it in the top 12% of all processors, a strong showing for a 35-watt part. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, scores 41963, which is just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650 (0.6% lower). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the i7-14700T is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competitors in aggregate performance.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data pack, and its average benchmark score is 0, yet it holds a 50th percentile rank. This percentile indicates that it performs better than half of all GPUs and worse than the other half, establishing it as a mid-tier graphics solution. Without specific benchmark numbers, the GPU's capabilities must be inferred from its hardware specifications and percentile position.

The combined picture for this build is a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is only average for GPU-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this compromise — it is better than the GPU alone but worse than the CPU alone. For a user who prioritizes processor performance, this build delivers; for one who needs top-tier graphics, the GPU will leave them wanting more. The data indicates this is a workstation-oriented pairing rather than a gaming-focused one, despite the desktop build class.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700T compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in performance. The i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963, a difference of 0.1% in favor of the AMD chip.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The i7-14700T is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 88% of processors in the benchmark database. This places it in the upper echelon of available CPUs for multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

Q: Does the GPU support real-time ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation features 76 RT cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing calculations. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-14700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive workloads like scientific computing or database hosting.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The processor has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This is available to all 20 cores and helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Q: What is the GPU's transistor count and die size?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. This gives it a transistor density of 121.1 million per square millimeter.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The i7-14700T is designed for fixed-clock operation within its 35-watt TDP, and overclocking is not supported.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature often required in professional workstations for data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, enabling fast connectivity for modern NVMe SSDs and high-end expansion cards.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots (backward compatible). The GPU has a TDP of 120 watts, while the CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, for a combined thermal envelope of 155 watts. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the power consumption of both components is modest, meaning a capable air cooler for the CPU and a standard power supply should suffice for most builds. The GPU uses no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot, and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor, so it fits in compact chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a CPU with a higher TDP allowance, since the Socket 1700 supports a range of 14th-generation processors with more aggressive power limits. However, the 35-watt TDP of the i7-14700T is a deliberate choice for efficiency, and upgrading to a higher-TDP part would require better cooling and a larger power supply. Alternatively, the GPU could be swapped for a higher-percentile card to improve graphics performance, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 120-watt power draw limit the options to mid-range professional or gaming GPUs. The platform's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means an upgrade could also involve moving to faster DDR5 modules, though the performance gain would be marginal given the CPU's existing cache hierarchy.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a professional mobile GPU adapted for desktop use. It is based on the AD103 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. Memory speed is 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The core clocks are 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost, which are conservative for a chip of this size, reflecting its embedded and power-efficient design.

The compute hardware includes 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. For ray tracing, there are 76 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, there are 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-precision penalty, which is beneficial for machine learning inference. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it delivers median performance. For rendering tasks, the 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for moderate 3D workloads, and the 16 GB VRAM allows handling larger textures and models than 8 GB cards. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without memory bottlenecks. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 76 RT cores are fewer than what top-tier desktop GPUs offer, so ray-traced scenes will render slower than on higher-end cards. The tensor cores provide AI acceleration for tasks like DLSS or neural network training, but again, the 304 tensor cores are mid-range in count.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong CPU performance with modest GPU acceleration. Software developers will benefit from the 28 threads and fast single-core speed, enabling rapid compilation of large codebases and responsive IDE usage. The data compression score of 354216 suggests efficient handling of database operations and file archiving. Students in computer science or engineering will find the CPU capable for coursework involving simulations or data processing, while the GPU is adequate for visualization tasks.

Small business workstations running office applications, accounting software, or light server duties will see excellent performance from the CPU, with the 35-watt TDP keeping energy costs and heat output low. Content creators working with 2D graphics, video editing in 1080p, or audio production will find the CPU's multi-core score of 25980 in Cinebench R23 beneficial for rendering timelines and exporting media. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports larger project files in Adobe Premiere or After Effects, though rendering speed will be average.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the GPU adequate, but the CPU will be overkill for most titles. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will be GPU-limited, and the system will not deliver high refresh rates in demanding games. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a productivity-focused system where the CPU is the star and the GPU is a supporting player.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-14700T, a 20-core processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, a professional GPU based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 69. This places the system in the upper-midrange tier overall, with a heavy emphasis on CPU performance.

The CPU's 35-watt TDP is remarkable for a 20-core part, making this build suitable for compact or thermally-constrained desktop cases. The GPU's 120-watt TDP and IGP form factor mean it occupies minimal space and requires no external power connectors, simplifying installation. The pairing is best described as a high-efficiency workstation: it prioritizes compute throughput and energy efficiency over raw graphics power. The lack of measured FPS data means all gaming and rendering performance is estimated from benchmark scores, which indicate the CPU will handle most workloads effortlessly while the GPU provides competent but not exceptional graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile ranking limits high-refresh gaming to esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3905 in Passmark ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support in visually demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance loss, given its multi-thread score of 30571. The GPU's tensor cores can accelerate encoding if the software supports it, but the 50th percentile GPU performance means game graphics will need to be lowered to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 will render timelines and export videos quickly, especially in 1080p or 1440p projects. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows for smooth scrubbing of high-resolution footage and applying effects, though final render times will be average.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode), the i7-14700T will perform strongly, with its multi-thread score indicating fast ray tracing via the CPU. In GPU-based renderers, the RTX 5000's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance will render scenes at a moderate pace, suitable for small to medium projects.

Software development: The CPU excels here, with Passmark integer math at 113854 and data encryption at 21277, accelerating compilation, testing, and code analysis. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this build cost-effective for programmers who need a fast processor.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (3667 in Cinebench R23) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 35-watt TDP keeps the system quiet and cool for shared spaces. The GPU provides adequate acceleration for presentations and 2D design tools, though no gaming capability beyond basic titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, specifically the CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile. These estimates assume that the GPU is the primary constraint in gaming workloads, as its percentile is significantly lower than the CPU's.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation would deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely ranging from 40 to 60 FPS in AAA games, given its mid-range hardware. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant would see higher frame rates, potentially above 100 FPS, due to their low system requirements and the CPU's strong single-thread performance. At 1440p, frame rates would drop by roughly 20-30% relative to 1080p, placing many AAA titles in the 30-50 FPS range, which is borderline playable. At 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain 30 FPS in demanding games, making it unsuitable for high-resolution gaming.

The CPU's 28 threads would not bottleneck these scenarios, as even the most CPU-intensive games rarely utilize more than 8-12 threads effectively. The 33 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which can improve frame pacing in open-world games. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p ultra textures, but at 4K, some titles may exceed 16 GB, causing texture streaming issues. Overall, this is not a gaming build; it is a workstation that can handle light gaming on the side. Users seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 50th percentile is the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds