SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is an unusual desktop combination that pits a 35-watt, 20-core processor against a flagship graphics card. The data shows a system where the CPU holds a high overall percentile at 88, while the GPU sits at a modest 59th percentile in its own benchmark pool, creating a combined percentile of 74. Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not observed results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. Its core configuration is asymmetric: 20 total cores and 28 threads, which implies a hybrid layout of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not list the P-core/E-core split. The base clock is low at 1.30 GHz, which is typical for a T-series low-power part, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic of this chip: it is designed to sustain heavy multi-threaded loads within a power envelope far below what a conventional desktop i7 would consume.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 is the most telling number. It places the 14700T near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which scores 41963 in the average benchmark score field with a delta of -0.1%, and near the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 with a +0.3% delta. In the Cinebench R23 test specifically, the 14700T delivers 25980 points, which is a strong result for a 35 W chip, but it lags far behind the 12850HX’s multi-core capabilities in the average score. The single-core R23 score of 3667 is excellent, close to what many desktop parts achieve, and the Cinebench R20 single-core of 1540 confirms that lightly threaded tasks will run very fast.

The Passmark suite reinforces the profile. Passmark multithread scores 30571, which is competitive, but the more granular tests show variation: integer math hits 113854, floating point math 79042, and data compression 354216. The single-thread score of 3905 is solid, while data encryption at 21277 suggests the chip handles encryption workloads adequately. The CPU’s percentile of 88 versus all CPUs means it outperforms 88% of all processors in the database, which is a high ranking for a low-power part. The nearest rivals in the average benchmark score are within a narrow band: the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is only 0.1% behind, the Core i7-12850HX is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is 0.3% behind. This indicates the 14700T sits in a performance tier where small margins separate it from both mobile and desktop chips, but the TDP difference is stark.

The real workload interpretation: the 14700T will handle all-core rendering tasks like video encoding or software compilation at a level comparable to a mid-range desktop chip, but the single-core performance is what drives responsiveness in everyday tasks. The low base clock means sustained all-core workloads will depend on how long the chip can hold boost under a 35 W cap; the benchmark scores suggest the cooling solution is adequate, but the data does not show clock throttling behavior.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing creates a clear imbalance. The CPU’s 88th percentile suggests it can drive most workloads, but the GPU’s 59th percentile and the single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 indicate a very different tier of performance. In a gaming scenario, the GPU is the obvious bottleneck in terms of raw frame generation at high resolutions, while the CPU is more than capable of feeding it at lower resolutions. The data shows the GPU is only 0% faster than the NVIDIA T400 in the Steel Nomad test, with a delta of 0, and it is 0.5% faster than the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, meaning the 5090 D V2 sits in a peculiar spot in the benchmark pool — not a top-tier GPU despite its flagship name.

For productivity, the CPU’s high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 25980, PassMark multithread 30571) mean it will not bottleneck a 3D renderer or a video encoder, but the GPU’s relatively low percentile (59) suggests that GPU-accelerated tasks will be limited by the graphics card. In a balanced workload like gaming at 1440p or 4K, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3905 will keep frame rates high, but the GPU’s score is the limiting factor. The data implies that a user who pairs this CPU with a stronger GPU would see better performance, but the FACT PACK does not provide such a comparison.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because there are no measured FPS rows, but the percentile gap (CPU 88 vs GPU 59) is the clue: the GPU is the weaker component in this pairing. In CPU-bound scenarios like eSports titles at low resolution, the CPU would be the limiter, but the GPU’s lower percentile would cap ultra settings at high resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the FACT PACK does not specify the memory speed or bandwidth. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a rare feature for a desktop chip. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for the GPU, which uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 950 W, while the CPU has a 35 W TDP, which means the power supply headroom is dominated by the graphics card. The GPU’s 575 W TDP is 16 times the CPU’s TDP, so the PSU requirement is almost entirely determined by the GPU. The system also requires a single 16-pin power connector for the GPU, which is a modern standard.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with a higher TDP on the same socket, such as an Intel Core i7-14700K or a similar K-series part, which would use the same LGA 1700 socket and DDR4/DDR5 support. The GPU is already at its ceiling in this benchmark, so upgrading the GPU would require a PSU bump beyond 950 W, but the data does not provide a higher suggested PSU. The CPU’s 35 W TDP means the system is power-efficient, but the GPU’s 575 W makes the overall system power-hungry. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support is future-proof for NVMe drives, and the 16 lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU.

Who Should Build It

The target user is someone who needs CPU-heavy productivity in a low-power desktop package. The 35 W TDP makes this ideal for a compact or silent build where thermals are a priority, but the 5090 D V2’s 575 W TDP contradicts that idea — the GPU is a power-hungry flagship. This pairing is strange: the CPU is efficiency-focused, while the GPU is anything but. The data suggests a user who builds this system is a content creator who runs CPU-bound tasks like video encoding (Cinebench R23 25980) and also wants a GPU for rendering or AI workloads, but the GPU’s 59th percentile means it is not a top-tier graphics card.

Gamers at 4K resolution would benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (PassMark 3905) but would be held back by the GPU’s low percentile in the benchmark. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering would be disappointed. Software developers who compile large codebases would see the 20 cores shine in multi-threaded builds (PassMark multithread 30571), but the GPU’s weakness is irrelevant for them. Students and small business workstations would get a fast desktop experience, but the GPU is overkill for office work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41914, and it sits in the 88th percentile. The nearest rivals are: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963, -0.1%), Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42055, -0.3%), and Intel Core 7 251TE (41650, +0.6%). This means the 14700T is statistically tied with these parts, all within 0.6% of each other. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16504, with a 59th percentile, and its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 (16508, 0.0%), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16415, +0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408, +0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, +0.9%). The combined percentile of this pairing is 74.

The data shows a CPU that is a top-12% performer and a GPU that is just below average. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the strong point, and the GPU is the weak link in the benchmark suite. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 is the only GPU benchmark, and it puts the 5090 D V2 in the same league as a T4000 and an RX 5700 XT — a surprising result for a card with a 92,200 million transistor die and 24 GB of VRAM.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so all gaming numbers are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3905 PassMark) suggests it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 59th percentile and 16504 Steel Nomad score suggest it will perform like a mid-range GPU. In esports titles at 1080p ultra, the CPU would likely push 200+ FPS, but the GPU would limit to a lower, unspecified number. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s performance would drop further, and at 4K ultra, the GPU would be the clear bottleneck. The data does not support a claim that this is a high-refresh gaming system; the GPU’s percentile is too low for that.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process, featuring 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 2017 MHz, and the boost is 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz effective 28 Gbps. The chip has 21760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs. It includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which are designed for ray tracing and AI workloads. The compute rates are 104.8 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16, and the pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s.

The benchmark score of 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is the only data point, and it places the GPU in the 59th percentile, which is surprisingly low for a card with 24 GB VRAM. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA T400 (a professional card) with a 0% delta, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 with a 0.5% delta. This suggests that the 5090 D V2 does not perform at the level of its specifications in this particular test. The VRAM and bandwidth are massive, so the GPU should excel in VRAM-heavy workloads like large texture packs or AI models, but the benchmark indicates it is not a top-tier rasterizer.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a low-power 35 W CPU with a 575 W GPU. The CPU is a 20-core Raptor Lake chip, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 24 GB of GDDR7. The combined percentile of 74 means it outperforms 74% of all builds in the database. The CPU is in the 88th percentile, the GPU in the 59th, so the overall tier is mid-to-high, but the GPU drags the system down. This is a productivity-first build that can do some gaming, but the GPU’s low percentile means it is not a gaming powerhouse.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and why does it matter?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 W, which is very low for a 20-core chip. This means the system can be cooled with a modest air cooler, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz may be limited under sustained all-core loads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average score?

A: The CPU’s average score is 41914. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is only 0.1% slower, the Intel Core i7-12850HX is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is 0.3% slower, so the CPU is essentially tied with all of them.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature for workstations that need data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s. That is a very high bandwidth for large data sets.

Q: What PSU is suggested for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 W, which is dominated by the GPU’s 575 W TDP. The CPU only needs 35 W, so the power supply headroom is for the graphics card.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The boost clock of 5.2 GHz is the maximum it can reach without external clock generation.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile position?

A: The GPU is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is below average. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 is matched by the NVIDIA T400 and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not the primary strength. The CPU’s 88th percentile and single-thread score of 3905 could drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 59th percentile would limit the output in modern titles, especially at 1440p and 4K. Estimated FPS would be lower than what a top-tier GPU achieves.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads handle encoding well, with a Cinebench R23 score of 25980. The GPU’s tensor cores could assist with AI encoding, but the GPU’s low percentile means game capture performance is mediocre.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s multi-core score (25980 in R23) accelerates rendering, and the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM can handle large projects, but the GPU’s 3DMark score of 16504 suggests it is not a top-tier accelerator for GPU effects.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a PassMark floating point score of 79042, which is strong for a low-power part. The GPU’s compute is 104.8 TFLOPS, but the low benchmark score means the GPU may not be as efficient as its specs suggest.

Software development: Compilation is multi-threaded, and the CPU’s 30571 multithread score will handle large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development, but its 24 GB VRAM could help with local AI models.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill but efficient; a 35 W TDP means low electricity use. The GPU is a waste for this scenario, but the system is fast. The combined percentile of 74 means it is a strong all-rounder, but a cheaper GPU would be more sensible for office work.