SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700T paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 represents a study in extreme asymmetry within a desktop build. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread powerhouse based on the Raptor Lake architecture, featuring a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm² and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The processor includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, along with integrated UHD Graphics 770. Its 35 W TDP is remarkably low for the core count, positioning it as an efficiency-focused part, yet its benchmark scores place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a modest entry-level GPU built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, and its clock speeds are set to a base of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost of 2300 MHz. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations pipelines, and 28 ray tracing cores, delivering 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. However, its benchmark results place it in only the 17th percentile of all GPUs, making it a clear bottleneck relative to the CPU in almost every workload. The combined percentile for this pairing is 53, indicating a mid-tier overall system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Its core configuration includes 20 physical cores and 28 threads, a hybrid design that allows for substantial parallel processing across demanding applications. The base clock of 1.30 GHz is low to maintain the 35 W TDP, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz provides significant single-thread headroom when needed. This dynamic range is reflected in the benchmark scores: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 25980, while the single-core score is 3667. The substantial difference between these figures highlights the processor's ability to scale from efficient multi-tasking to bursty high-performance workloads.

The cache hierarchy, with 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3, supports the high thread count by reducing latency in data-heavy tasks. Benchmark results from PassMark show strong performance in integer math at 113854 and floating-point math at 79042, which are indicative of both general productivity and scientific computing capabilities. The data compression score of 354216 is particularly notable, suggesting the CPU excels in archival and database tasks. The processor's position in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41914, places it just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX. This indicates that while it is not the absolute fastest, it sits at the top tier of desktop processors, often competing with higher-TDP mobile parts.

For real workloads, the i7-14700T handles software compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering with ease due to its multi-core might, while the high boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 3905 confirms that the architecture is competitive in legacy and single-core-centric software. The processor also supports ECC memory, which is a boon for data integrity in workstation environments, although the dual-channel memory bus may limit bandwidth compared to higher-end platforms. Overall, the CPU analysis shows a component that is overqualified for the GPU it is paired with, offering far more compute capability than the graphics card can utilize in most scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a discrete graphics card from the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It utilizes the Navi 33 chip, which contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The GPU's memory subsystem is comprised of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is adequate for 1080p gaming with moderate texture loads, but the capacity and bandwidth are not sufficient for high-resolution or high-detail textures in modern titles. The clock speeds are set to a base of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost of 2300 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This yields a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s.

The GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, but the overall compute power is limited. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1). These numbers are low by modern standards, and the benchmark scores reflect this. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1103, which is a modest result for a dedicated card. PassMark scores show DirectX 9 at 176, DirectX 11 at 97, DirectX 12 at 44, and DirectX 10 at 59, indicating that the card performs better in older APIs but struggles with modern graphics workloads. The PassMark G3D score is 11897, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2467. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8040S, which it leads by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which it leads by 1.4%, showing that it is only slightly better than integrated graphics or very old entry-level parts.

For rendering and compute tasks, the GPU's 5152 PassMark compute score suggests it can handle basic OpenCL workloads, but it lacks the tensor cores or dedicated AI hardware found in competing NVIDIA parts. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 3D rendering with large scenes, and the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will throttle texture streaming in high-resolution content. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, and requires a 200 W suggested PSU, drawing only 43 W TDP with a single 6-pin connector. Overall, the GPU analysis reveals a component that is designed for light gaming and basic display output, not for heavy graphics acceleration, making it a poor match for the high-end CPU it accompanies.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of the performance disparity between the CPU and GPU in this build. The Intel Core i7-14700T achieves an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the processor showing a delta of -0.1% against the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and +0.3% against the Intel Core i7-12850HX. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 25980, which is a high figure for a 35 W part, while the single-core score of 3667 is respectable. The PassMark multithread score of 30571 further confirms the CPU's prowess in parallel workloads.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. This is a stark contrast to the CPU's percentile. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S, which it beats by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which it beats by 1.4%, but these are all low-tier parts. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is a modest figure for a dedicated card, and the PassMark G3D score of 11897 shows it is only slightly ahead of integrated graphics solutions. The combined percentile for the build is 53, which indicates that the system as a whole performs at the midpoint of all configurations, despite having a top-tier CPU.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. In CPU-heavy tasks, the system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will drag down the overall experience. For example, in a video encoding workload, the CPU can process frames quickly, but the GPU may not be able to render previews or apply effects at a similar rate. The data shows that the CPU's performance is roughly 17 times the GPU's average score, which is an extreme ratio. This suggests that any application that relies on the GPU for acceleration will be severely limited, while CPU-only tasks will excel. The benchmark scores indicate that the system is best suited for productivity workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, rather than graphics-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-14700T and AMD Radeon RX 7400. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning the following analysis is qualitative and based on the performance characteristics of the CPU and GPU rather than direct testing.

Given the GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44, gaming performance at high settings is expected to be poor. The RX 7400 is likely to struggle with modern titles at 1080p, even at medium or low settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, but the bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and the low compute power will limit frame rates. For example, in a demanding game like Cyberpunk 2077 or a battle royale title, the GPU would likely deliver low double-digit FPS at ultra settings. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3667 in Cinebench R23 means it will not be a bottleneck in most games, but the GPU will cap performance.

At 1440p or 4K, the situation worsens due to the increased pixel count and texture memory demands. The GPU's pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s is not enough for high-resolution rendering, and the texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s will cause slowdowns in texture-heavy scenes. The ray tracing cores are present, but with only 28 of them and limited compute power, enabling RT effects will likely halve or worse the already low frame rates. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are less demanding, the GPU might achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with low settings, but it would still be far from high-refresh gaming. The estimated gaming performance suggests that this build is not intended for gaming, and users should expect a subpar experience in almost any modern title.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable with the RX 7400. The GPU's low percentile and benchmark scores mean it cannot push high frame rates at any resolution. The CPU is capable of handling high frame rates, but the GPU will limit the system to well below 60 FPS in most titles, making high-refresh monitors a waste of potential.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming, with its 20 cores and 28 threads providing ample headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 ensures that x264 encoding will not cause significant frame drops. However, the GPU's limitations mean the game being streamed will run poorly, which negates the CPU's advantage.

Video Editing: The Intel Core i7-14700T excels in video editing, with high PassMark scores in data compression (354216) and integer math (113854), which are relevant for codecs and filters. The GPU's compute score of 5152 is adequate for basic effects, but the 8 GB VRAM and low bandwidth will slow down rendering previews. Overall, the CPU handles the heavy lifting, but the GPU is a bottleneck for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a strong performer in 3D rendering, as evidenced by its Cinebench scores. The GPU, however, is weak, with a low FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS, which is insufficient for complex scenes. The 8 GB VRAM will also limit texture sizes, leading to errors or slow performance in professional applications.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's 20 cores and high PassMark multithread score of 30571 make compilation times short. The GPU is largely irrelevant for code editing and building, so the system's combined percentile of 53 is acceptable for development tasks.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for this scenario, but it will handle any office application with ease. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures fast spreadsheet calculations and document processing, while the GPU's low power draw of 43 W means the system runs cool and quiet. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can also serve as a fallback, reducing power consumption further.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes CPU performance above all else and has little to no need for discrete graphics power. This includes software developers who compile large codebases, data analysts running complex simulations, and financial modelers who rely on multi-threaded calculations. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and high PassMark integer math score of 113854 make it a compute beast for these tasks. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light 2D work, but it will not hinder CPU-bound workflows.

Content creators who work primarily with audio or text, such as podcast editors or technical writers, would also benefit from the CPU's speed without needing the GPU. Students in engineering or computer science fields, who might run virtual machines or compile programs, would find the system capable, though the GPU is unnecessary for their work. Small business workstations that run database queries or server-side tasks would also perform well, thanks to the ECC memory support and high multi-core scores. However, gamers at any resolution above 720p or 1080p low settings should avoid this build, as the GPU's 17th percentile ranking will result in a poor experience. Similarly, 3D artists or video editors who rely on GPU acceleration will be frustrated by the RX 7400's limitations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the AMD Radeon RX 7400 as the primary bottleneck in this build. The CPU's average benchmark score of 41914 is in the 88th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 2467 is in the 17th percentile. This disparity means that in any workload that uses the GPU, the graphics card will cap performance. For example, in gaming, the CPU can render frames quickly, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 will limit frame rates to a fraction of what the CPU is capable of supporting. The FPS scaling is thus dictated by the GPU's compute power, not the CPU's.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like data compression or physics calculations, the GPU is idle, and the system performs at the CPU's level. The bottleneck is not always one-sided; the CPU can also be a bottleneck in certain scenarios. For instance, the CPU's base clock of 1.30 GHz is low, and in single-threaded tasks that cannot boost to the 5.20 GHz maximum, the GPU might wait for data. However, given the GPU's low performance, this is unlikely to be a practical issue. The 35 W TDP of the CPU and 43 W TDP of the GPU mean the system has low total power draw, but the power delivery is not a bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU is sufficient for its bandwidth, so the bottleneck is purely the GPU's compute and memory limitations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-14700T and AMD Radeon RX 7400 is 53, which places it at the midpoint of all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i7-12850HX.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700T supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-correcting workloads in professional environments.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and GPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 43 W, making the combined power draw quite low for a desktop system.

Q: What is the GPU's score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The GPU scores 1103 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a low result indicating limited DirectX 12 performance.

Q: Is the CPU's boost clock sufficient for single-threaded tasks?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3667, indicating strong performance in lightly-threaded applications.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700T, a desktop processor with 20 cores and 28 threads, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, a discrete GPU with 8 GB of VRAM. The CPU is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the GPU is based on RDNA 3.0 with a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The class is desktop, and the overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 53, is mid-range. The CPU's individual percentile is 88, indicating a high-end processor, while the GPU's percentile is 17, indicating a low-end graphics card. This asymmetry defines the system's character, making it a powerful compute workstation with minimal graphics capability. The build is not balanced, but it serves a specific niche where CPU performance is paramount.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with the Core 14th Gen series. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexibility in memory choice, though the dual-channel bus is a limitation for bandwidth-heavy tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is future-proof for fast storage and add-in cards, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The suggested PSU is 200 W, and with a CPU TDP of 35 W and GPU TDP of 43 W, there is ample headroom for additional components or upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the AMD Radeon RX 7400 with a more powerful GPU that can match the CPU's performance tier. Since the CPU is in the 88th percentile, a GPU in a similar percentile would balance the system. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a modern high-end GPU would not be bandwidth-limited. The 200 W PSU would need to be upgraded if a more powerful GPU is installed, but the CPU's low TDP leaves room for power allocation. Alternatively, users could upgrade the CPU to a higher-tier Core i7 or i9 on the same socket, though the 14700T's performance is already strong. Memory could be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules to improve memory bandwidth, but the current configuration is sufficient for most CPU-bound tasks. The upgrade path is straightforward, with the primary bottleneck being the GPU, which is easily swappable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds