SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

11,842 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700T and AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in an unusual position in the benchmark database. The processor is a high-core-count, power-efficient 14th Gen part, while the graphics card is an entry-level RDNA 2 solution. The data shows a significant performance imbalance, with the CPU placing in the 88th percentile among all processors and the GPU landing at the 51st percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, indicating that the whole system’s performance is dragged down by the graphics adapter. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41914, which is statistically tied with its nearest rivals—AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, Intel Core i7-12850HX, AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and Intel Core 7 251TE—with deltas ranging from -0.3% to 0.6%. This is a CPU that can handle demanding productivity tasks without breaking a sweat, but the GPU will limit any graphics-intensive workload to 1080p-class performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that pairs performance cores with efficiency cores to balance throughput and power draw. The base clock is 1.30 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, allowing the chip to burst to high frequencies for single-threaded tasks while keeping idle and low-load power consumption minimal. The TDP is rated at 35 W, which is remarkably low for a 20-core part, making it a strong candidate for compact or thermally constrained systems. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache, which helps feed the cores during multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s dual personality. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 25980, which places it well ahead of typical desktop processors, while the single-core score of 3667 is strong for everyday responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 scores are 10911 multicore and 1540 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 2618 multicore and 369 single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the chip’s capabilities: a multithread score of 30571, a single-thread score of 3905, and strong math performance with an integer math score of 113854 and a floating-point math score of 79042. The data compression score of 354216 and encryption score of 21277 indicate that the chip is well-suited for archival and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 20052 shows solid SIMD throughput, and the find prime numbers score of 145 is less impressive, but that is a niche workload.

What this means in real terms is that the i7-14700T behaves like a desktop-class workhorse in a low-power envelope. It is less than 1% away from the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and the Ryzen 5 7400, and it edges out the Intel Core i7-12850HX by 0.3%. The 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, but its 35 W TDP suggests it will sustain those scores only if the cooling solution and motherboard power delivery are adequate. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, which can handle basic display output but is not intended for gaming.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data points to the GPU being the primary constraint. The RX 6500 XT scores 9608 in PassMark G3D and sits at the 51st percentile, which is average for a graphics card. The CPU, with its high single-thread score of 3905, will not hold back frame generation in most titles, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit settings and resolution. Expect playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced detail, but not high-refresh 1440p or 4K.

Streaming and content creation benefit heavily from the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 and PassMark multithread score of 30571 show that the processor can handle simultaneous encoding, rendering, and background tasks without choking. The GPU’s lack of a dedicated encoder for modern codecs is a drawback, but software encoding on the CPU is feasible given the core count.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong performance in export and render tasks, driven by the CPU’s high multicore scores. The passmark data compression score of 354216 indicates fast handling of compressed video streams. However, real-time effects and previews that rely on GPU acceleration will be limited by the RX 6500 XT’s modest compute power of 5.765 TFLOPS FP32.

3D rendering in CPU-based engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray will be excellent, with the i7-14700T’s Cinebench R23 score of 25980 placing it in a tier that can tackle complex scenes. The GPU’s 16 ray accelerators provide some support for GPU rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM will be a hard limit for larger scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high integer math score of 113854 and multithread performance, which speed up compilation times. The single-thread score of 3905 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering but will struggle with any graphical debugging or shader work.

Student and office work is a mixed bag. The CPU is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the low 35 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle office tasks without the discrete GPU, but the RX 6500 XT’s presence adds gaming capability. The 51st percentile GPU ranking is adequate for 1080p productivity displays.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of imbalance. The CPU’s percentile ranking of 88 against all CPUs versus the GPU’s 51 percentile against all GPUs shows a wide gap in relative capability. In any workload that is primarily GPU-bound, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 6500 XT will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 11842, which is within 1.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080, GTX 960A, GTX 1660, and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT—a strange grouping that shows the 6500 XT’s performance is inconsistent across different test types.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as video encoding, 3D scene preparation, or software compilation, the i7-14700T will dominate. The PassMark multithread score of 30571 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 indicate headroom that the GPU cannot match. The practical result is that the system will feel extremely fast for productivity and noticeably slower for gaming. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface on the GPU is a limitation; it only has four lanes, which can reduce performance in some scenarios compared to a x8 or x16 connection, though the benchmark scores already reflect this constraint.

The FPS scaling in games will be almost entirely dictated by the GPU. The CPU’s high single-core performance ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the absolute frame rate will be capped by the GPU’s 143.9 GB/s memory bandwidth and 1024 shading units. The data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious CPU compute power but have modest graphics demands. The i7-14700T is ideal for small business workstations that run heavy multi-threaded applications like data analysis, virtualization, or batch processing, where the 35 W TDP keeps operating costs and cooling requirements low. The 88th percentile CPU ranking and the 0.6% lead over the Intel Core 7 251TE show it is a top-tier productivity chip.

Content creators who prioritize CPU rendering and encoding over GPU effects will find the system capable. Video editors working with 4K footage can rely on the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 for fast exports. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the integer math score of 113854 and multithread score of 30571. The chip’s ECC memory support makes it suitable for financial modeling or scientific computing where data integrity is critical.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings are the only gaming audience that fits this GPU. The RX 6500 XT’s 51st percentile ranking means it is an average performer, adequate for esports titles but not for AAA games at high detail. Students building a system for coursework and light gaming will find the CPU overprovisioned but the GPU sufficient for their needs. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $384, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 199 USD.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and frame rates should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 9608 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 235 indicate entry-level performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 54724 and OpenCL score of 48289 suggest that the GPU can handle modern APIs, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will cause texture swapping and stuttering in modern titles at high settings.

For 1080p gaming, the RX 6500 XT can likely achieve playable frame rates in competitive shooters and older titles, where the CPU’s high single-thread score of 3905 ensures that the game logic and physics run smoothly. In newer AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation, and textures will need to be set to low or medium to avoid exceeding memory capacity. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 5.765 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p at medium presets in most games, but not for high-refresh monitors. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 38 is low, indicating poor performance in modern graphics workloads.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most games. The pixel rate of 90.08 GPixel/s and texture rate of 180.2 GTexel/s are not sufficient for high-resolution rendering with demanding effects. The GPU’s bandwidth of 143.9 GB/s is a bottleneck for higher resolutions. In short, this is a 1080p gaming system, and even then, only with settings adjusted to match the GPU’s capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is based on the Navi 24 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. It uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is part of the Navi II generation. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 16 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The base clock is 2310 MHz, with a game clock of 2610 MHz and a boost clock of 2815 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 2248 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 143.9 GB/s.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest: FP32 performance is 5.765 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 11.53 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 90.08 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 180.2 GTexel/s. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and has 16 ray tracing cores. The TDP is 107 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W, and it uses a single 6-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x4, which is a limitation, as it only has four lanes.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are mixed. The PassMark G3D score is 9608, which places it at the 51st percentile. The GPU compute score is 4456, indicating weak computational throughput. The DirectX 9 score of 108 is higher than the DirectX 11 score of 90, and the DirectX 10 score is 60, while the DirectX 12 score is only 38. This suggests the GPU performs better in legacy APIs than in modern ones. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 54724 is respectable, but the OpenCL score of 48289 is lower. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 235 is very low, reflecting the GPU’s poor performance in next-generation graphics tests. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 11842, which is 1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 and 1.3% lower than the GTX 960A, but 1.4% higher than the GTX 1660 and 1.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT.

For rendering, the GPU is not a primary choice. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for large textures or complex scenes, and the 64-bit memory bus severely limits bandwidth. The 16 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the low compute power means ray-traced effects will run at low frame rates. The GPU is better suited for esports gaming and light productivity tasks that use GPU acceleration, such as basic photo editing or video playback. Its end-of-life production status and 107 W TDP make it a simple drop-in for a budget system, but it is not a future-proof investment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory that matches their motherboard and budget. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and graphics, but the RX 6500 XT only uses PCIe 4.0 x4, so it does not take advantage of the full Gen 5 bandwidth. The motherboard choice will dictate whether the system uses DDR4 or DDR5, and ECC memory support is available on the CPU, but it requires a motherboard and memory that support ECC.

The TDP is 35 W, which is very low, meaning that almost any Socket 1700 motherboard with adequate VRM cooling can handle the CPU. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, and the GPU TDP is 107 W, so a 300 W power supply is the minimum. For a full system with the 35 W CPU and 107 W GPU, a 400 W or 450 W PSU would provide comfortable headroom, though the data only specifies the 300 W suggestion.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6500 XT with a more powerful GPU that has more VRAM and a wider memory bus. The CPU has enough headroom to support a significantly faster graphics card, as evidenced by its high percentile ranking and benchmark scores. However, the 35 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform are nearing the end of their upgrade path, as newer Intel platforms use different sockets. The CPU’s locked multiplier means no overclocking, so performance gains must come from a GPU upgrade or faster memory. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are ready for a next-generation GPU or NVMe SSD, but the current GPU does not use them.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary performance bottleneck in this system?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 88th percentile while the GPU is in the 51st percentile, and the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain any graphics-intensive workload.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU’s 143.9 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for 4K. The pixel rate of 90.08 GPixel/s and the low DirectX 12 score of 38 indicate that 4K is not feasible; even 1440p will require reduced settings.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 and PassMark multithread score of 30571 indicate strong export and render performance. The data compression score of 354216 also helps with video codecs.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: It has 16 ray accelerators, but the low compute power of 5.765 TFLOPS FP32 means ray tracing performance will be poor. It is better to disable ray tracing in games for playable frame rates.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is also supported, which is rare for consumer desktop processors.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41914. It is 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i7-12850HX, 0.3% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and 0.6% faster than the Intel Core 7 251TE.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and the GPU has a 107 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which is the minimum recommended for the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. The Intel Core i7-14700T achieves an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779 (+0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650 (+0.6%). In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25980 multicore and 3667 single-core, while in R20 it scores 10911 and 1540, and in R15 it scores 2618 and 369. PassMark results include a multithread score of 30571, a single-thread score of 3905, integer math of 113854, floating-point math of 79042, and data compression of 354216.

The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT produces an average benchmark score of 11842, placing it in the 51st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (11960, -1% delta), GTX 960A (11998, -1.3%), GTX 1660 (11680, +1.4%), and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (11627, +1.9%). The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 9608, with a GPU compute score of 4456. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 235, and Geekbench scores are 48289 for OpenCL and 54724 for Vulkan. The DirectX scores from PassMark are 60 for DX10, 90 for DX11, 38 for DX12, and 108 for DX9.

The combined percentile for the pairing is 70, which reflects the GPU holding back the CPU. The CPU’s performance is excellent for productivity, but the GPU’s modest scores mean that the system’s overall capability is average. The data contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from these benchmark scores. In practical terms, this is a CPU-first system where the graphics card is the clear upgrade target. The 0.6% lead over the Intel Core 7 251TE and the 0.3% lead over the Intel Core i7-12850HX show that the i7-14700T is a competitive high-end processor, but the GPU’s 1% deficit to the GTX 1080 and 1.9% advantage over the RX 7800 XT highlight its inconsistent performance in modern workloads.