SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets the upper echelon of both compute and professional graphics workloads. The CPU, a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-R part, and the GPU, a workstation-class Ada Lovelace chip with 32 GB of memory, combine to deliver a system that sits at the 96th combined percentile against all other pairings. While no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, the individual benchmark scores for both components provide a robust basis for estimating performance across gaming and productivity scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel, featuring a die size of 257 mm². It houses 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 pool. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the chip includes ECC memory support, a feature typically associated with workstation reliability. The processor connects via Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the top tier. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and a single-core score of 6235, indicating strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21462 and single-core score of 2578 corroborate this balance. PassMark results further break down the performance profile: multi-thread score of 52425, single-thread score of 4480, integer math at 183056, and floating-point math at 134393. Data compression and encryption scores stand at 694963 and 40046, respectively.

The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 94, with an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rivals are extremely close, with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scoring 69996 (a 0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 (0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.9% delta). The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, which is 1% higher. These margins are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i7-14700KF trades blows with the fastest consumer and mobile flagship chips from AMD. For multi-core rendering tasks, the 44167 Cinebench R23 score suggests it can handle long-duration CPU renders that would stall lesser processors, while the 6235 single-core score ensures snappy response in everyday applications and lightly threaded games.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the combination of the CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock and the GPU’s high compute throughput suggests excellent frame pacing at 1440p and 4K, though specific FPS figures are not measured. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most titles.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 indicates that encoding video while gaming will not cripple the system’s responsiveness. PassMark data encryption at 40046 also suggests quick handling of stream encryption overhead.

Video editing workloads, particularly in 4K or higher, rely on the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and the CPU’s multi-threaded muscle. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21462 supports timeline scrubbing and export tasks, while the GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering is a primary strength. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18550 and R15 score of 4452 show strong ray-traced CPU rendering, while the GPU’s 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle GPU-accelerated renders. The 32 GB memory buffer allows for large scenes that would exceed the VRAM of consumer cards.

Software development workloads benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 183056 and random string sorting of 74723, indicating fast compilation and data processing. The 28 threads allow parallel builds to complete quickly, and the 33 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code.

For student and office work, this pairing is overkill but still effective. The single-thread score of 6235 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread of 4480 ensure that word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers operate with zero lag. The CPU’s ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running calculations or database work.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions herein are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 and OpenCL score of 175286 place it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests that at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation should deliver frame rates well above 100 FPS in most titles, limited primarily by the CPU’s single-core performance rather than the GPU. At 4K ultra, the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate become more critical, and the 32 GB VRAM ensures that even the most demanding texture packs will not cause stuttering due to memory overflow.

The CPU’s boost clock of 5.60 GHz is a strong indicator for gaming, as most titles are sensitive to single-thread speed. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235 is among the highest for any processor, meaning the CPU will keep up with the GPU’s frame output in CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at high refresh rates. However, the GPU is a workstation part, and its driver optimizations may favor compute over raw rasterization, so actual gaming performance could be slightly lower than a comparable GeForce RTX 40-series card. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs also indicate a focus on professional displays rather than high-refresh gaming monitors with HDMI 2.1.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system that is balanced for compute-heavy tasks but potentially imbalanced for pure gaming. The CPU’s percentile rank of 94 and the GPU’s percentile rank of 98 indicate that the GPU is slightly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU is. This means in gaming at 4K, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, which is typical and desirable. At 1080p, however, the CPU’s single-thread performance may become the bottleneck, as the GPU could be waiting for the CPU to deliver draw calls.

In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 44167 Cinebench R23 score and the GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are both substantial, but the workload determines which is utilized. For CPU-based rendering, the 20 cores will scale well, but the GPU’s 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores will dominate GPU-accelerated renders, creating a scenario where the GPU finishes its portion faster than the CPU, leaving the CPU as the bottleneck in hybrid render pipelines.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would follow a predictable pattern: at 1080p, CPU-bound with high frame rates; at 4K, GPU-bound with lower frame rates. The lack of measured data prevents exact quantification, but the 94th and 98th percentiles suggest that neither component is a weak link. The 125W TDP of the CPU and 250W TDP of the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 600W, indicate that the power delivery is adequate for sustained loads, though overclocking the unlocked multiplier on the CPU would increase headroom requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70163, with a percentile rank of 94. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 is its highest multi-threaded result, while the single-core score of 6235 is its peak single-thread result. PassMark multi-thread at 52425 and single-thread at 4480 confirm the CPU’s position. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21462 is notably lower than Cinebench, reflecting different workload scaling, but still high.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 184664, with a percentile rank of 98. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 is higher than its OpenCL score of 175286, indicating strong Vulkan optimization. The GPU’s closest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183725 (0.5% lower), and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182109 (1.4% lower). The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050, which is 3.7% lower, showing that this workstation GPU outpaces even the fastest consumer card in compute benchmarks.

Combined, the system’s percentile rank is 96, meaning it outperforms 96% of all tested CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is virtually identical in average score (0.2% delta), suggesting that platform choice matters more than raw CPU performance at this tier. The GPU’s 98th percentile is a stronger differentiator, placing this build in the top 2% of GPU configurations.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for professionals who need both high CPU throughput and massive GPU memory. For 3D artists and animators, the 32 GB VRAM allows rendering scenes that would fail on 16 GB cards, while the CPU’s 28 threads handle simulation and physics calculations. The GPU’s 400 tensor cores also accelerate AI denoising and machine learning inference, making it suitable for researchers working with neural networks.

Video editors working with 8K RAW footage will benefit from the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32 GB memory, which allows for multiple high-resolution streams in real-time. The CPU’s data compression score of 694963 suggests fast proxy generation and export encoding.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the 20 cores, and the ECC memory support provides data integrity for long-running test suites. The system is also viable for students in engineering or data science, though the cost would be justified only if workloads demand the GPU’s compute capabilities.

Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or financial modeling will find the dual 94th and 98th percentiles reassuring. The GPU’s 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups common in trading floors or design studios. Gamers at 4K will enjoy high settings, but the workstation drivers and lack of measured FPS data mean that a consumer GeForce card might offer better price-performance for that specific use case.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 70163 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s 69996, and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX’s 69875. It is 1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K’s 70879.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this build?

A: The combined percentile rank is 96, indicating it outperforms 96% of all tested pairings.

Q: What is the GPU’s transistor count?

A: The GPU has 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which accommodates the CPU’s 125W TDP and the GPU’s 250W TDP.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU’s 125W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking, but this would increase power draw beyond the base TDP. The GPU’s 250W TDP and 1x 16-pin power connector require a PSU with that connector, and the suggested 600W PSU provides headroom for the CPU at stock settings. For a sensible next upgrade, users could add more DDR5 memory or install a faster PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive, as the CPU’s 16 lanes are already saturated by the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The GPU’s 267 mm length and dual-slot width are standard for workstation cards, fitting most mid-tower cases. The display outputs are limited to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, so users with HDMI-only monitors will need adapters. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a unique feature that cannot be added via firmware, so it must be selected at build time. A future CPU upgrade on this socket would be limited to other Raptor Lake parts, as the socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel platforms.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700KF, a 20-core, 28-thread processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 98th percentile place this system in the 96th combined percentile, making it one of the most powerful configurations available for compute-intensive tasks.

The CPU’s architecture is Raptor Lake-R, a refresh of the Raptor Lake design, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and a 33 MB L3 cache. The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The system is not measured for gaming performance, but the individual scores suggest it would excel at 4K rendering and professional applications, while being overkill for basic office tasks.

The build’s overall tier is high-end desktop, positioned for professionals who require both multi-threaded CPU power and massive GPU memory. The absence of integrated graphics on the CPU is mitigated by the dedicated GPU, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive workloads. This pairing is a workstation in desktop clothing, suited for rendering, simulation, and AI development.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the AD102 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The GPU’s base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

The compute configuration includes 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. It has 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, which accelerate ray tracing and AI inference respectively. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 achieving the same 65.28 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and a Vulkan score of 194041, placing the GPU at the 98th percentile against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 184664 is 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725) and 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050). The GPU’s 250W TDP and dual-slot design are modest for the performance level, with a suggested PSU of 600W and a 1x 16-pin power connector.

For rendering, the 32 GB VRAM is the standout feature, allowing entire scenes to be loaded into memory without host RAM fallback. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and geometry data transfer do not bottleneck the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 100 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in compatible renderers, while the 400 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-based upscaling. The GPU’s 98th percentile means it outperforms nearly all other GPUs in compute benchmarks, making it a top choice for professionals who need both memory capacity and raw throughput.