SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel's 20-core Core i7-14700KF with NVIDIA's RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a workstation-class single-slot-height... rather, a dual-slot, low-power professional card. The data shows an unusual combination: a 94th-percentile desktop CPU sitting alongside a 95th-percentile professional GPU, producing a combined percentile of 95. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded gameplay captures.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700KF is a Raptor Lake-R part built on Intel's 10 nm process at a 257 mm² die size, released on October 16, 2023. It carries 20 cores and 28 threads — the hybrid layout Intel uses across the Raptor Lake family — with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. That last figure matters for gaming and creative work alike, because large shared cache keeps working sets resident and reduces trips to main memory.

The benchmark numbers describe a CPU that is firmly in the top tier of desktop processors without being a halo part. Cinebench R23 multi-core lands at 44167, with single-core at 6235. In Cinebench R20 the scores are 18550 multi-core and 2618 single-core; in the older R15, 4452 multi-core and 628 single-core. Geekbench reports 21462 multi-core and 2578 single-core, while PassMark puts single-thread performance at 4480 and multi-thread at 52425. The single-core figures are the headline for latency-sensitive work: at 6235 in R23 single-core and 2578 in Geekbench single-core, this chip trades blows with parts priced and positioned well above the mainstream.

Against its nearest rivals, the i7-14700KF sits in remarkably tight company. Its average benchmark score of 70163 is just 0.2 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69996), 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), and 0.9 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515) — a chip usually positioned as a step-up flagship. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K edges it out by 1 percent with an average of 70879. In practical terms: any workload you throw at this CPU lands within a rounding error of some of the strongest AMD desktop and mobile silicon on record, and the 94th percentile versus all CPUs confirms it.

The hybrid 20-core arrangement means heavily threaded workloads scale well — PassMark's multithread score of 52425 alongside strong sub-scores in integer math (183056), floating point math (134393), data compression (694963), and encryption (40046) shows broad throughput rather than one narrow strength. Random string sorting at 74723 and extended instructions at 40660 round out a profile that handles code compilation, compression, encryption, and general productivity with equal competence. The multiplier is unlocked, so there is tuning headroom for builders who want it.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is not a gaming card, and the data makes that clear from every angle. It is a workstation Ada Lovelace part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, using the AD104 chip with 35.8 billion transistors packed into a 294 mm² die at a density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimeter. It carries 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. FP32 throughput is 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 19.17 TFLOPS in a 1:1 configuration. Pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s and texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s.

Memory is where this card distinguishes itself from consumer boards at comparable compute: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280 GB/s of bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective on memory running at 1750 MHz. For rendering and professional workloads, capacity often trumps raw bandwidth — large scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU compute datasets benefit from the 20 GB pool even though the bus is narrower than enthusiast gaming cards.

Clocks are modest: 720 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost. The power story is the real signature. TDP is 70 W, the card needs no auxiliary power connectors at all, and the suggested PSU for the whole system is 250 W. It fits in a dual-slot envelope, measures 168 mm long and 69 mm tall, and outputs through four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 over a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The benchmark picture: Geekbench OpenCL scores 124812 and Geekbench Vulkan scores 109364, for an average of 117088 and a 95th percentile against all GPUs. The rivals list is telling — the NVIDIA GB10 sits 0.3 percent ahead (117393), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 1.6 percent ahead (118976), the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB trails by 2.4 percent (114395), and the RTX A5500 Mobile trails by 2.8 percent (113944). Sharing a statistical neighborhood with a Tesla data-center accelerator and beating one in these compute tests tells you where this card lives: professional GPU compute, rendering, and stability-first driver environments, not maximum frame rates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the database contains no gameplay captures for the pair — so everything in this section is estimated from benchmark scores, not recorded measurements.

With that caveat stated: the pairing will game, but asymmetrically. The CPU side is excellent for games. Single-core scores of 6235 in Cinebench R23, 2578 in Geekbench, and 4480 in PassMark single-thread, plus a PassMark physics score of 2961, indicate the processor will feed frames as fast as almost any mainstream rig at 1080p and 1440p.

The GPU side is the limiter. A 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 figure, 48 RT cores, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean modern titles will run with ray tracing and upscaling available, and the Vulkan score of 109364 suggests competent API-level performance. But the 280 GB/s memory bandwidth and 160-bit bus are workstation-class constraints, and the card's compute peer group — Tesla V100, mobile Ampere professional parts — is not a gaming leaderboard. Expect high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p in most titles, with 4K gaming requiring upscaling and reduced settings. Estimated, not measured — treat all of this as directional guidance from the compute scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which keeps the motherboard market broad. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a genuine advantage when this build's GPU is aimed at professional work where silent data corruption matters. PCIe from the CPU is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so a future GPU upgrade can exploit faster interface bandwidth, though the current card itself runs at PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 125 W CPU TDP plus the 70 W GPU TDP sums to a modest total, and the GPU's suggested PSU figure of 250 W for a system containing it reflects how undemanding this pairing is on the power side. There is substantial headroom here: a builder could later swap the SFF Ada card for a far hungrier gaming GPU without touching the power supply, or the modest draw could be exploited for a compact build — the card's 168 mm length and dual-slot, connector-free design are practically inviting for small-form-factor cases.

A sensible next upgrade: keep the i7-14700KF (94th percentile, effectively tied with the Ryzen 9 7950X per the rivals table) and replace the GPU if gaming becomes the priority. The CPU will not be the obstacle for years. Conversely, if the build stays professional, the CPU's unlocked multiplier and DDR5 support provide the tuning and memory headroom to extend its useful life.

Benchmark Performance

The complete score sheet, consolidated:

CPU — Intel Core i7-14700KF

Cinebench R23: 44167 multi-core / 6235 single-core
Cinebench R20: 18550 multi-core / 2618 single-core
Cinebench R15: 4452 multi-core / 628 single-core
Geekbench: 21462 multi-core / 2578 single-core
PassMark: 52425 multithread / 4480 single-thread / 2961 physics
PassMark subscores: integer math 183056, floating point 134393, data compression 694963, encryption 40046, string sorting 74723, extended instructions 40660, prime finding 212
Average benchmark score: 70163 — 94th percentile versus all CPUs

GPU — RTX 4000 SFF Ada

Geekbench OpenCL: 124812
Geekbench Vulkan: 109364
Average benchmark score: 117088 — 95th percentile versus all GPUs

Combined percentile: 95.

The combined picture is a build that is elite in compute terms on both sides but elite in different directions. The CPU's percentile comes from balanced single- and multi-core excellence — the gap between its single-core and multi-core Cinebench results shows the hybrid cores scaling efficiently. The GPU's percentile comes from raw professional compute throughput, where it effectively ties the NVIDIA GB10 and Radeon PRO W7700 and outperforms a Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 2.4 percent. Together they form a 95th-percentile system, but the composition matters more than the headline: this is a compute-heavy pairing, not a frame-rate-optimized one.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional first, gamer second. 3D artists and CAD operators get the 20 GB VRAM pool, certified-class Ada hardware with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, and OpenCL compute that sits in the 95th GPU percentile — enough to render scenes that would stall on cards with smaller memory allocations. Video editors working with high-resolution timelines benefit from both the GPU's capacity and the CPU's 44167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for exports and effects. Developers and data scientists get a PassMark multithread score of 52425 plus a GPU that trades blows with a Tesla V100 in compute benchmarks, with ECC memory support on the CPU side as a correctness safeguard. Students in technical fields get a machine that compiles fast (2578 Geekbench single-core) and runs GPU coursework without a data-center card. Small businesses building compact workstations get the practical wins: 70 W GPU with no power connectors, a 250 W suggested PSU, and a 168 mm card that fits tight enclosures. Pure gamers should look elsewhere — the GPU's bandwidth and clock profile are not tuned for maximum frame delivery, even though the CPU half of this build is gaming-ready.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. Estimated, not measured: the CPU's single-core strength (6235 R23) and physics score (2961) support high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's 280 GB/s bandwidth and 1560 MHz boost likely cap sustained high-refresh output at lower resolutions. Competitive 1080p play is the realistic target.

Streaming. The 20-core/28-thread layout with a 52425 PassMark multithread score absorbs x264 encoding, scene compositing, and chat/browser overhead without sacrificing game performance, and the modest 70 W GPU draw leaves thermal and power room for capture hardware.

Video editing. CPU multi-core throughput of 44167 in R23 handles timeline scrubbing and exports, while 20 GB of GDDR6 holds large media caches and GPU-accelerated effects in memory. This is arguably the single best-fit scenario for the pairing.

3D rendering. The 48 RT cores, 192 tensor cores, 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32, and 124812 OpenCL score place rendering performance in professional territory — within 1.6 percent of the Radeon PRO W7700 and ahead of the RTX A5500 Mobile by 2.8 percent.

Software development. Compilation is single-core-burst and multi-core-sustain work; 2578 Geekbench single-core plus 21462 Geekbench multi-core means both phases are fast, and the data compression subscore of 694963 speeds repository operations and container builds.

Student and office work. Frankly overkill — but the 6235 single-core R23 score means instant application launches and zero-friction multitasking, and ECC support adds reliability for long-lived academic or business machines.

FAQ

Q: Is this a good gaming build?

A: Partially. The CPU is excellent for gaming, but the RTX 4000 SFF Ada is a workstation card. Expect solid 1080p and capable 1440p performance estimated from its Vulkan score of 109364 — this is not a 4K-max-settings pairing.

Q: How much power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W, drawing 70 W itself with no auxiliary power connectors. Combined with the 125 W CPU TDP, even a modest PSU has headroom for upgrades.

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to the Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The 14700KF's average benchmark score of 70163 beats the 7950X's 69515 by 0.9 percent in this database — effectively a tie with a chip positioned above it.

Q: What memory should be used?

A: Either DDR4 or DDR5 works, on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported. DDR5 with ECC is the strongest choice for the professional workloads this GPU targets.

Q: Can the GPU handle ray tracing?

A: Yes — it has 48 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, so ray-traced rendering and RT-enabled games are fully supported.

Q: Are the frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores such as the GPU's OpenCL 124812 and the CPU's single-core results.

Q: Will the CPU bottleneck a future GPU upgrade?

A: Unlikely. At the 94th CPU percentile and within 1 percent of the Core Ultra 7 265K, the 14700KF has the single-core speed (6235 R23) to drive substantially faster GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is deliberately unbalanced, and the data quantifies exactly how. Both components sit at adjacent elite percentiles — 94 for the CPU, 95 for the GPU — but in different disciplines. In GPU-bound gaming, the card is the constraint: its 1560 MHz boost clock and 280 GB/s bandwidth cannot exploit the frame-feeding capacity of a processor that scores 6235 single-core in R23 and 2961 in PassMark physics. The CPU will sit partially idle at higher resolutions and settings.

Flip to professional compute and the balance inverts. The GPU's 124812 OpenCL score and 20 GB VRAM do the heavy lifting, and here the CPU's role — 44167 R23 multi-core, 52425 PassMark multithread — is to keep the GPU fed with scene data, decode assets, and handle host-side computation. That is precisely the workload profile where this combination makes sense. The only genuinely CPU-limited scenarios for this build would be extreme single-threaded tasks, and even there the i7 is in the 94th percentile of all processors.

The practical read: as a gaming rig, the build wastes the CPU. As a compact professional workstation — rendering, editing, GPU compute, development — it is coherent, power-efficient, and 95th-percentile capable as a combined system. Builders choosing this pair should be choosing it for the compute, not the frames.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds