SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation represents a top-tier desktop workstation combination, ranking in the 95th percentile overall. This pairing delivers exceptional multi-threaded compute and professional-grade graphics acceleration, with the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 both placing the system firmly at the high end of the performance spectrum. The data shows a machine built for sustained productivity and demanding rendering workloads, though its strengths in professional applications are more pronounced than its appeal for pure gaming.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU die, designated AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, achieving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². This density enables a substantial feature set: 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. The card operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 2175 MHz, which drives a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 26.73 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the latter at a 1:1 ratio, indicating balanced compute capabilities for single and half precision workloads.

Memory configuration is a defining strength of this GPU. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation ships with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. This 20 GB capacity is critical for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex simulations that exceed the VRAM of typical consumer cards. For rendering tasks, the memory bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s ensures that data-heavy operations like texture streaming and frame buffer access do not become the primary constraint. The GPU also includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, which accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated denoising or upscaling tasks, respectively. The presence of DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures broad compatibility with professional applications and modern game engines.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135,218. In Geekbench OpenCL, the card scores 146,593, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 123,842. The OpenCL score is particularly relevant for rendering, as many professional renderers (like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender) rely on OpenCL or CUDA-like compute paths. The gap between OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggests the card is optimized for compute-heavy tasks rather than pure graphics throughput, which aligns with its workstation positioning. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is effectively tied with the NVIDIA A10M, showing a 0% deltaPct (135,230 vs 135,218). It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 and 0.4% behind the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, but 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V620. These near-identical scores indicate that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is performance-parity with other professional cards in raw compute, but its 20 GB VRAM and Ada Lovelace features (RT cores and tensor cores) provide additional capabilities beyond the raw score. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering with multiple display outputs, as the card offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s performance is characterized by a suite of benchmark scores that place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score for the Intel Core i7-14700KF is 70,163. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 4,452 and single-core is 628. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 18,550 and single-core to 2,618. The most demanding CPU test, Cinebench R23, shows a multicore score of 44,167 and single-core of 6,235. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 21,462 and single-core of 2,578. PassMark tests reveal specific workload strengths: data compression scores 694,963, data encryption scores 40,046, extended instructions score 40,660, floating point math scores 134,393, integer math scores 183,056, multithread scores 52,425, physics scores 2,961, and random string sorting scores 74,723. The single-thread PassMark score is 4,480.

The GPU’s benchmark scores, as detailed above, place it in the 95th percentile with an average of 135,218. The combined percentile for the system is 95, indicating that this pairing is near the top of the database. The combined picture is one of balanced high-end performance: the CPU handles complex multi-threaded workloads with its 20 cores and 28 threads, while the GPU provides professional-grade compute and graphics. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which scores 69,996 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69,875 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (0.9% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K at 70,879 (1% ahead). This means the i7-14700KF sits at the top of its immediate competitive cluster, within 1% of the best and worst of these four rivals. The GPU’s rivals are all within 0.9% of each other, so the differentiation comes from features, not raw scores. For this exact CPU+GPU combination, there are no measured FPS rows in the data; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, any frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed in testing.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842 suggests strong graphics API performance, but the absence of measured FPS data means estimates are speculative. Given the RTX 4000 Ada Generation’s 95th percentile ranking and the CPU’s single-core PassMark score of 4,480, this system could plausibly drive high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, though the workstation-class GPU is not optimized for consumer gaming features like DLSS frame generation. The 20 GB VRAM provides headroom for high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at extreme resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167, provide ample parallel headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The PassMark data encryption score of 40,046 indicates strong cryptographic performance, which is useful for secure streaming protocols. The GPU’s 192 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based encoding or noise reduction, though the lack of consumer-oriented NVENC data in the pack means this is an inference from the tensor core count.

Video Editing: For video editing, the combination of CPU and GPU compute is ideal. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 183,056 and floating point math score of 134,393 handle codec operations and effects processing. The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 GB VRAM support timeline rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18,550 indicates sustained multi-threaded performance for export tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 146,593 accelerates render previews.

3D Rendering: This is the primary strength of the system. The GPU’s 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, combined with 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth, make it a capable renderer. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 is high, and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 handles CPU-based rendering tasks. The GPU’s FP16 performance at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1) supports half-precision workflows common in AI denoising.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 694,963 and extended instructions score of 40,660 are relevant for compilation and code analysis. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 28 threads reduce build times. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 146,593 can accelerate compute kernels for testing, though most development workloads rely on the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for office tasks, but the data shows it handles them effortlessly. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,235 ensures snappy responsiveness, while the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking means even demanding spreadsheet or database visualizations render smoothly. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 130 W TDP of the GPU suggest reasonable power draw for a workstation.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The target user for this build is a content creator or professional workstation user who prioritizes compute throughput over gaming-specific features. The 95th combined percentile indicates a top-tier system. Specific industries include 3D rendering studios, where the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 48 RT cores handle complex scenes; video production houses, where the CPU’s 28 threads and GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS accelerate exports; and scientific computing, where the PassMark floating point math score of 134,393 is relevant. For gamers, this system is suited for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, but the lack of measured FPS data and the workstation-oriented GPU make it a less obvious choice than a consumer card. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. Small business workstations handling data analysis benefit from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 52,425 and data compression score of 694,963. Students in engineering or design fields would find the system capable, but the cost (launch MSRP of $384 for the CPU) and workstation GPU tier suggest a professional budget.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is workload-dependent. For CPU-bound tasks like code compilation or physics simulations, the i7-14700KF’s 94th percentile ranking is the primary driver, and the GPU is underutilized. The PassMark physics score of 2,961 is a lower relative score, suggesting physics-heavy workloads could be a bottleneck on the CPU side. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or OpenCL compute, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation’s 95th percentile ranking is the limit, and the CPU has headroom. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842 is lower than its OpenCL score of 146,593, indicating that gaming or Vulkan-based graphics may be less efficient than compute workloads. In gaming, the absence of measured FPS data means scaling is estimated; however, the CPU’s single-core score of 6,235 (Cinebench R23) is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking, while the GPU’s 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth might limit frame rates at high resolutions. For mixed workloads, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU’s 20 cores and GPU’s 6,144 shading units providing complementary parallelism. The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks, while the CPU limits in tasks with poor multi-threading scaling, given its 94th percentile vs the GPU’s 95th.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is backward compatible with the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W, leaving significant headroom for a larger PSU if needed. The GPU is a single-slot design with a 1x 16-pin power connector, which is standard for modern cards. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory bandwidth by using DDR5 instead of DDR4, as the CPU supports both. For the GPU, the next upgrade would be to a newer workstation card, as the predecessor is Workstation Ampere and the successor is Blackwell PRO W. The 20 GB VRAM is already generous, so an upgrade would focus on raw compute gains rather than capacity. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking to boost the 5.60 GHz boost clock further. The platform is mature, so any upgrade would likely be a full system rebuild rather than a component swap, as the Socket 1700 is nearing end-of-life.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, which is the highest boost clock in the CPU’s benchmark cluster. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a professional feature, and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $384, and it was released on 2023-10-16.

Benchmark scores reveal specific workload characteristics. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 is exceptional, placing it in the 94th percentile. This translates to rapid video exports and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 6,235 is equally strong, ensuring fast application launches and responsive UI. The PassMark data compression score of 694,963 is a standout, indicating excellent archival or database performance. The data encryption score of 40,046 is solid for security tasks. The floating point math score of 134,393 and integer math score of 183,056 show balanced arithmetic capability. The find prime numbers score of 212 is relatively low, suggesting the CPU is not optimized for pure integer recursion tasks. The multithread score of 52,425 confirms the scaling of the 28 threads. The random string sorting score of 74,723 indicates strong memory access patterns. Compared to rivals, the i7-14700KF is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, but 1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K. This places it at the top of its immediate class, with the Core Ultra 7 being the only direct competitor slightly ahead.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, combining the Intel Core i7-14700KF with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The combined percentile is 95, meaning it outperforms 95% of all recorded systems. The CPU’s percentile is 94, and the GPU’s is 95, so the system is balanced at the high end. This pairing is a professional workstation, given the GPU’s "Workstation Ada" generation and 20 GB VRAM, rather than a consumer gaming rig. The data indicates a top-tier system for rendering, compute, and multi-threaded productivity. The CPU’s market segment is Desktop, and the GPU is a single-slot workstation card, confirming the form factor. The overall tier is premium, with the CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 70,163 and GPU’s 135,218 combining for a system that is in the top 5% of all configurations. This is a build for professionals who need sustained performance, not for budget-conscious users.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 95, indicating the system outperforms 95% of all recorded configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an avgBenchmarkScore of 70,163, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X’s score of 69,515.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700KF supports ECC memory, which is a feature for professional and server workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and its closest rival’s score?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile, and its closest rival is the NVIDIA A10M with an avgScore of 135,230, which is a 0% deltaPct difference.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and the suggested PSU wattage?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds