SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: Data-Driven Performance Analysis

The pairing of Intel's Core i7-14700KF with NVIDIA's Quadro RTX 4000 represents a desktop configuration that marries a high-end 14th-generation CPU with a professional-grade GPU from the Turing era. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 61st percentile, and their combined configuration ranks at the 78th percentile overall. This document analyzes the benchmark data for this specific combination, noting that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing — all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm², and its base clock runs at 3.40 GHz with a boost capability of 5.60 GHz. The thermal design power is set at 125 W, which positions it as a high-performance desktop part requiring adequate cooling. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 33 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support enabled — a notable feature for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results for the CPU show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 44,167 points in multi-core and 6,235 in single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 18,550 multi-core and 2,618 single-core, while the older R15 test produces 4,452 and 628 respectively. Geekbench results measure 21,462 multi-core and 2,578 single-core. The Passmark suite provides additional insight: multi-thread score is 52,425, single-thread is 4,480, and the average benchmark score across all tests is 70,163. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 94, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700KF shows a 0.2% advantage over the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, a 0.4% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and a 0.9% edge over the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. However, it trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1.0%. These tight margins suggest that the i7-14700KF is positioned squarely within the top tier of current desktop CPUs, with differences that are often within noise margins for real-world workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 694,963 and data encryption score of 40,046 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while floating point math at 134,393 and integer math at 183,056 reinforce its computational versatility. For workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the multi-core scores are the primary indicator; the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 44,167 places it comfortably ahead of many competing parts.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 70,163 places it at the 94th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 17,789 places it at the 61st percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 78, reflecting the GPU's drag on the overall configuration.

The GPU benchmarks show a professional card that is not designed for raw gaming throughput. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1,873. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 74,540 and Vulkan reaches 78,844. Passmark scores include G3D at 15,117, GPU Compute at 6,176, and DirectX tests that are notably low: DirectX 9 at 205, DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, and DirectX 12 at 52. These DirectX scores suggest the Quadro RTX 4000 is optimized for compute and professional visualization rather than gaming rasterization.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its positioning. It sits 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560. These small deltas indicate that despite its age, the Quadro RTX 4000 remains competitive with modern entry-level options in aggregate benchmark scores. However, the CPU is dramatically stronger relative to its peers — a 0.9% lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X (a flagship part) contrasts sharply with the GPU's modest 0.9% edge over the RTX 4060 (a mid-range card). This asymmetry is critical for understanding workload suitability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel interface. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The platform's ECC memory support is a differentiator for professional workloads where data integrity is paramount. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 160 W TDP together suggest a system that a 450 W PSU can handle, as indicated by the suggested PSU rating for the GPU.

The GPU itself is end-of-life, with a release date of November 2018. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support — this mismatch means the GPU will not benefit from the CPU's newer PCIe lanes, though PCIe 3.0 bandwidth remains sufficient for this card's 8 GB GDDR6 memory. For users considering an upgrade path, the CPU has headroom: it is a current-generation part with an active production status, while the GPU is discontinued. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it will not be the limiting factor in most workloads. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a modern GPU could fully utilize the available bandwidth, though the current card's PCIe 3.0 interface caps its potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's DirectX 12 Passmark score of 52 is extraordinarily low, and the DirectX 11 score of 128 is similarly modest. These numbers suggest that the Quadro RTX 4000 is poorly suited for modern gaming workloads, particularly at high settings. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,873 is a more modern benchmark, but it remains low for a dedicated GPU.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the GPU would likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. The 61st percentile GPU ranking means it sits above average but far from the top tier. At 1440p, the performance gap would widen, and at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and modest compute throughput would likely result in sub-30 FPS in many modern games. The CPU, by contrast, is more than capable of feeding any GPU — its single-thread score of 6,235 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,480 indicate strong per-core performance that minimizes CPU bottlenecks in gaming. Estimates suggest that for esports titles or older games, the system could deliver playable frame rates, but for AAA releases at high detail, the GPU would be the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's low DirectX scores and 61st percentile ranking make high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming at high settings unrealistic for modern titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU cannot deliver the frame rates needed. Users would need to lower settings to medium or low for competitive play.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the multi-thread score of 52,425 in Passmark indicates strong parallel processing. However, the GPU's gaming limitations constrain the streaming experience to less demanding games.

Video editing: The CPU excels here with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and Passmark floating point math at 134,393. The GPU's compute score of 6,176 in Passmark GPU Compute provides some acceleration, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit large project sizes. This is a viable workstation scenario.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's Turing architecture with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising in compatible applications. The 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest but usable for professional workloads.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 28 threads and Passmark integer math score of 183,056. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong configuration for developers who occasionally game.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical office productivity. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is far beyond what word processing or spreadsheet work requires. The GPU's professional drivers may benefit certain CAD or scientific applications, but for general use, this is an unbalanced build.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software that leverages multi-threaded CPU performance will find the i7-14700KF exceptional — its 0.9% lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark score demonstrates its top-tier status. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 28 threads and high integer math scores. The GPU, however, serves a specific niche: professional workstation users who need certified drivers for applications like CAD or scientific visualization, where the Quadro RTX 4000's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations, or those playing older or less demanding titles, could build this system, but they would be paying a premium for CPU capability they do not need. Small business workstations requiring reliable ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers would find value here, particularly for tasks like financial modeling or engineering simulations where CPU throughput is paramount. Students in engineering or computer science programs could benefit from the CPU power for computational coursework, though the GPU is not ideal for gaming-oriented students.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits this build in any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile creates a 33-point gap, the largest imbalance in this configuration. In gaming, the CPU could easily drive a GPU several tiers higher; the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 suggests it would bottleneck even at 1080p in modern titles. In compute workloads, the balance shifts — the GPU's 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide specialized acceleration that the CPU cannot match, so for ray-traced rendering, the GPU is the relevant component.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this: since no measured data exists, we infer from the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,873 that the GPU produces low frame rates in modern games. The CPU would not be the constraint in any scenario except heavily threaded CPU-bound simulations, where its 20 cores excel. For users seeking balance, the GPU is the clear upgrade target — replacing it with a modern card would boost the combined percentile from 78 significantly, as the CPU has ample headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF ranks at the 94th percentile, meaning it outperforms 94% of all CPUs in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17,789, which is 0.9% higher than the RTX 4060's average score of 17,639.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700KF supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU configuration?

A: The combined percentile is 78, reflecting the GPU's lower ranking dragging down the CPU's strong performance.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 4000 is 450 W, which accounts for the GPU's 160 W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip, codenamed TU104, contains 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based tasks. Clock speeds are 1005 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, yielding 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The GPU's benchmark scores reveal its professional orientation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 and Vulkan score of 78,844 are respectable, but the Passmark DirectX scores are low: DirectX 9 at 205, DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, and DirectX 12 at 52. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,873. The GPU's percentile ranking is 61, and its average benchmark score is 17,789. For rendering workloads, the 36 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 288 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising and other deep learning tasks. The 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for professional 3D modeling and simulation, but the low DirectX scores indicate poor gaming performance. The GPU is single-slot, requires one 8-pin power connector, and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. It has 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs, supporting modern display connectivity. The card measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, and its production status is end-of-life.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i7-14700KF with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a current-generation, active-production part with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an end-of-life professional card at the 61st percentile. The combined percentile of 78 places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU's launch MSRP is $384, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $899. The i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, 33 MB of L3 cache, and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory. The Quadro RTX 4000 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores, making it suitable for professional visualization but not gaming.

The pairing is fundamentally unbalanced: the CPU is a top-tier performer that could drive much more powerful GPUs, while the GPU is a workstation part with modest gaming capability. This configuration serves users who prioritize CPU throughput for multi-threaded workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, and who also need professional GPU features like ECC memory support and certified drivers. For gaming, the GPU would need to be replaced to achieve modern performance levels. The overall tier, as indicated by the 78th combined percentile, reflects a build that is strong in CPU-bound tasks but limited in graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds