SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop build defined by a steep CPU-to-GPU imbalance. The processor sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs benchmarked, while the graphics card lands in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined percentile of 76 reflects exactly the mix you would expect: enormous compute headroom up top, mid-tier graphics below. Note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database — all frame-rate discussion on this page is estimated from the benchmark scores, not recorded in-game measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The RTX 3050 OEM's PassMark G3D score of 11857 puts it in the same bracket as the Radeon RX 7600 (avgScore 15171, deltaPct 0.2) and the RTX 2060 (avgScore 15290, deltaPct -0.6) — that is entry-level dedicated graphics territory, not high-refresh hardware at max settings. Estimated from the benchmark scores, esports titles should run at high frame rates at 1080p, but demanding AAA games at ultra settings will be constrained by the GPU. The CPU will never be the reason a frame rate drops in games; the single-thread PassMark score of 4480 is elite-tier.

Streaming. This is where the pairing starts to make sense. Streaming while gaming splits the workload, and the i7-14700KF's 20 cores and 28 threads absorb encoding and compositing without breaking a sweat — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 is far more throughput than a stream encoder pipeline needs. The caveat is that the GPU will already be near its limit in demanding games, so the stream quality ceiling is set by the RTX 3050's 8 GB of GDDR6 and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, not the CPU.

Video editing. The CPU side is genuinely strong: a Geekbench multi-core score of 21462 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18550 indicate fast timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export throughput. GPU-accelerated effects, however, will run on 2304 shading units with 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores — usable, but modest. Expect CPU-driven exports to feel quick and GPU-accelerated effects to feel ordinary.

3D rendering. PassMark GPU compute at 5779 and Geekbench OpenCL at 60740 describe a card that can participate in rendering but won't lead it. CPU rendering is the better story here; Cinebench R23 multi at 44167 places the processor in genuinely high territory, sitting within 0.9% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X's average score in the database. For viewport work in modeling applications, the GPU is adequate.

Software development. This is close to ideal CPU territory for the money. Compiling is throughput-bound, and the multi-thread PassMark score of 52425 plus a data compression score of 694963 mean large builds, container workloads, and test suites finish quickly. A single-thread score of 4480 keeps IDEs and interpreters responsive. The GPU is irrelevant to most of this work.

Student and office work. Overkill on the CPU side, and that is fine. Documents, browsers, video calls, and office suites will run with enormous headroom given the 94th-percentile processor. The dual display outputs (one HDMI, three DisplayPort) support a multi-monitor desk setup directly off the RTX 3050 OEM.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to its closest rivals?

A: The database places it within a fraction of a percent of several strong chips: 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69996), 0.4% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), and 0.9% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (70879) by 1%. In practical terms it trades blows with all of them.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to rival GPUs?

A: It sits statistically level with the Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct 0.2), the Radeon 680M (deltaPct -0.5), the GTX 580 (deltaPct -0.5), and the RTX 2060 (deltaPct -0.6) by average score. It is a mid-tier card by database ranking — 57th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: No. A 94th-percentile CPU paired with a 57th-percentile GPU is CPU-heavy by design. Games will be GPU-limited at every resolution; the processor will simply never be the constraint.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked, and the memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough?

A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is sufficient for 1080p gaming with moderate texture settings; the bus width and bandwidth, not the capacity, become the limiting factors as resolution and settings climb.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What was the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: $384, stated once here as launch MSRP. The GPU's launch MSRP is not in the database.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than recorded runs — treat these as expectations, not measurements.

The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and the DirectX test results (DirectX 9 at 137, DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, DirectX 10 at 61) frame the card's character: competent in older APIs, progressively less dominant as API and workload complexity rise. The relative drop from the DirectX 9 score to the DirectX 12 score tells you where this card lives — it is more comfortable with simpler rendering pipelines than with modern, heavily multi-threaded ones.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect the RTX 3050 OEM to be the frame-rate limiter in every demanding title, because the i7-14700KF's gaming-relevant numbers (single-thread PassMark 4480, Geekbench single-core 2578, physics score 2961) describe one of the stronger CPUs in the database. Esports and competitive titles at reduced settings should reach high frame rates, since those workloads are exactly where the card's older-API strength and the CPU's exceptional single-thread speed align. At 1440p and especially 4K, the 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth will pull frame rates down hard; the 8 GB buffer also stops absorbing texture load gracefully at higher resolutions. Ray tracing is technically available through 18 RT cores, but a card at this tier will struggle to run RT effects without a significant frame-rate penalty.

The honest summary: the CPU could deliver far more frames than this GPU can generate. Any gap between achievable and delivered frame rates belongs entirely to the graphics card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The imbalance here is the defining feature. A CPU in the 94th percentile versus a GPU in the 57th percentile produces a combined percentile of 76 — the average of an elite processor and a mid-tier graphics card, weighted accordingly.

In gaming, the bottleneck is unambiguous. Scaling data isn't available for this pairing, but the structure of the scores leaves no ambiguity: with a Cinebench R23 single-core of 6235 and a multi-core of 44167, the i7-14700KF can prepare and dispatch frames faster than 2304 shading units and 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput can rasterize them. Increasing resolution or graphics settings will reduce frame rates without meaningfully changing CPU load — classic GPU-bound behavior.

In productivity, the picture inverts. Rendering, compilation, compression (PassMark 694963), encryption (40046), and floating-point math (134393) all draw on the CPU, where the processor ranks near Ryzen 9 and Core Ultra 7 rivals. Here the GPU is not a bottleneck so much as a passenger, occasionally contributing via GPU compute (5779 in PassMark's test).

The practical implication: adding a stronger GPU to this system later would unlock substantial gaming performance immediately, because the CPU headroom is already enormous. In the other direction, there is no realistic upgrade to the CPU that would improve gaming frame rates at all.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3050 OEM is an Ampere-generation card built on the GA106 chip, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die at a density of 43.5M transistors per mm².

The core configuration: 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 18 RT cores, and 72 tensor cores. Peak rates work out to 56.16 GPixel/s pixel fill and 126.4 GTexel/s texture fill, with 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 and an identical FP16 rate (1:1). The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

What do the benchmark scores mean for rendering? The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 versus Vulkan at 57103 shows reasonably consistent compute performance across APIs. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5779 is modest — enough for hardware encoding assist, light CUDA/Tensor work, and basic GPU rendering passes, but not for primary GPU-based production rendering. The DirectX tier results (12 Ultimate, 12_2 feature level) mean the card supports modern rendering features, including ray tracing via its 18 RT cores; it simply lacks the throughput to run them heavily. The 72 tensor cores enable DLSS-style AI upscaling from the Ampere feature set, which is the single most effective lever for extending this card's playable settings in supported titles.

Physically, it's a dual-slot card, 242 mm long and 112 mm tall, powered by a single 8-pin connector, on a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, with a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W. Output configuration is one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a. Production status is end-of-life, succeeded by the GeForce 40 series and preceded by GeForce 20.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers who also work. This pairing suits someone whose gaming happens at 1080p with mixed settings but whose daytime workload is CPU-heavy — a developer who games in the evenings fits perfectly, because the 94th-percentile CPU earns its keep during work hours.

Content creators on a GPU-constrained workflow. Video editors, motion designers, and photographers doing timeline work, color grading, and exports will get strong CPU-side performance (Cinebench R23 multi 44167) with adequate GPU acceleration. 3D artists doing viewport modeling rather than final-frame GPU rendering also fit.

Software developers and data workers. Compiling, containerizing, and data processing (compression 694963, integer math 183056, encryption 40046) all run at near-flagship CPU level. The GPU's role is display output and light compute, which this card handles.

Students. Any technical program — engineering, computer science, data science — will find this CPU more than sufficient for coursework, virtualization, and simulations, with the 8 GB GPU handling CUDA coursework at a basic level.

Small business workstations. ECC memory support on the CPU, dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes make this a legitimate professional workstation platform where the modest GPU is a non-issue.

Who should skip it: anyone building primarily for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. The GPU is the wrong half of this pairing for that goal, and a different allocation of the same components would serve better.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700KF is a Raptor Lake-R processor (Raptor Lake architecture) on Intel's 10 nm node, fabricated by Intel on a 257 mm² die. It's a 20-core, 28-thread design with a 3.40 GHz base clock boosting to 5.60 GHz, a 125 W TDP, and an unlocked multiplier. The cache hierarchy comprises 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. It fits Socket 1700, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel, and includes ECC support — unusual and welcome in a consumer part. There is no integrated graphics, which is worth remembering: the "KF" suffix means the system's display output depends entirely on the RTX 3050 OEM. Release date is mid-October 2023; production status is active.

The benchmark scores describe a top-tier all-rounder. Cinebench R23 multi at 44167 and Geekbench multi at 21462 indicate heavy multi-threaded throughput — code compilation, rendering, simulation, batch media processing. Single-thread performance is equally strong: 6235 in Cinebench R23 single, 2618 in R20 single, 2578 Geekbench single-core, and 4480 PassMark single-thread. That dual strength matters for real workloads: tools that behave badly under heavy threading (many game engines, some DCC applications, most interpreted languages) still run fast here.

Against rivals, the picture is remarkably tight. The i7-14700KF's average score of 70163 leads the Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.2%, the Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.4%, and the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.9%, while trailing the Core Ultra 7 265K by 1%. Those deltas are effectively noise — this CPU competes in a cluster where platform features, memory support, and per-workload behavior matter more than the aggregate number.

For real workloads, the practical reading: 28 threads keep parallel build pipelines and render queues moving, the 5.60 GHz boost keeps latency-sensitive applications snappy, and 33 MB of shared L3 helps data-heavy tasks that benefit from cache residency. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provides modern storage and GPU connectivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a current, actively produced, upper-echelon Intel processor with an end-of-life, mid-tier NVIDIA graphics card. The combined percentile of 76 captures the pairing's character accurately: a system whose aggregate capability is good, but whose halves point in different directions.

The i7-14700KF at the 94th percentile is workstation-grade compute in a consumer socket. The RTX 3050 OEM at the 57th percentile is squarely mid-pack graphics. Together they form a classic "CPU-first" build — the kind of machine that excels at work and merely participates in gaming. That's a legitimate configuration, provided it's chosen deliberately. The unlocked multiplier and the enormous CPU headroom mean the system's future upgrade path runs entirely through the graphics card.

Platform notes worth flagging: the CPU requires discrete graphics (no iGPU), needs a Socket 1700 motherboard, and can run either DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The GPU needs a dual-slot space, a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 300 W — modest requirements that make it easy to house.

Benchmark Performance

CPU scores:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Cinebench R15 Multi / Single | 4452 / 628 |

| Cinebench R20 Multi / Single | 18550 / 2618 |

| Cinebench R23 Multi / Single | 44167 / 6235 |

| Geekbench Multi / Single | 21462 / 2578 |

| PassMark Multi-Thread / Single-Thread | 52425 / 4480 |

| PassMark Physics | 2961 |

| PassMark Data Compression / Encryption | 694963 / 40046 |

| PassMark Integer / Floating Point Math | 183056 / 134393 |

| PassMark Extended Instructions | 40660 |

| PassMark Random String Sorting | 74723 |

| PassMark Find Prime Numbers | 212 |

The CPU's average benchmark score is 70163, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals — Ryzen 7 9700F (69996, +0.2%), Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875, +0.4%), Ryzen 9 7950X (69515, +0.9%), and Core Ultra 7 265K (70879, -1%) — sit within a one-percent band, meaning the i7-14700KF competes directly with chips including a 16-core Ryzen 9 flagship class.

GPU scores:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Geekbench OpenCL | 60740 |

| Geekbench Vulkan | 57103 |

| PassMark G3D | 11857 |

| PassMark GPU Compute | 5779 |

| PassMark DirectX 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 | 137 / 61 / 86 / 58 |

| PassMark G2D | 973 |

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs — dead center of the mid-tier. Its rivals, the RX 7600 (15171, 0.2%), Radeon 680M (15270, -0.5%), GTX 580 (15283, -0.5%), and RTX 2060 (15290, -0.6%), confirm the bracket.

The combined picture: percentile 76 overall, driven almost entirely by the processor. Every CPU-intensive benchmark on this page reads as elite; every GPU-intensive one reads as average. The data shows a build that will feel exceptionally fast in compute work and merely acceptable in demanding games — and, since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing in the database, gaming expectations should be treated as estimates derived from these benchmark scores until real-world runs are recorded.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds