SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop combination that sits at the 77th percentile overall. This pairing leverages a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake CPU with a 125 W TDP, paired with a 132 W RDNA 4.0 GPU that has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The benchmark data shows a clear division of labor: the CPU is a top-tier performer at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is more mid-range at the 59th percentile. The result is a system where the graphics card is almost always the limiting factor for gaming, except in specific scenarios where the CPU's massive thread count matters.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound in gaming workloads. The RX 9060's average benchmark score is 16014, which places it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. In contrast, the i7-14700KF's average score of 70163 puts it at the 94th percentile. This 35-point percentile gap means that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, as it is the weaker component relative to its peers.

This is confirmed by the measured FPS data. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 111 FPS across all games, which is respectable. However, the frame rate drop when moving to higher resolutions is steep. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system delivers 50 FPS at 1080p, falls to 38 FPS at 1440p, and drops to 25 FPS at 4K. This pattern—where performance scales linearly with resolution—is the classic signature of a GPU-limited system. The CPU is not the constraint here; the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are what limit the frame rate.

The CPU's strength becomes apparent in less GPU-intensive titles. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system hits 377 FPS at 1080p and still manages 153 FPS at 4K. Similarly, Valorant runs at 391 FPS at 1080p and 267 FPS at 4K. These are CPU-bound scenarios where the i7-14700KF's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of shared L3 cache shine. The bottleneck shifts to the CPU only in these esports titles or when the GPU is not the limiting factor.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects this imbalance. The system is not a balanced performer; it is a strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. For workloads that are purely computational, such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will dominate. For gaming, the GPU will cap performance. Builders should understand that upgrading the GPU later will yield significant gains, while the CPU will not need replacement for many years.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of high-refresh gaming in most titles. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 174 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 171 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 203 FPS. These are all playable at 144 Hz or higher, making this a solid choice for competitive gamers at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable in many titles. Warzone still hits 155 FPS, Valorant runs at 334 FPS, and Ready Or Not manages 87 FPS. However, more demanding games start to struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 38 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this system if you are willing to lower settings in the most demanding titles, but ultra settings will not be consistent.

At 3840x2160, the system is not suitable for demanding games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 25 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23 FPS, and The Medium at 24 FPS. Even lighter titles struggle; Fortnite drops to 28 FPS and Grand Theft Auto V to 30 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are clear limitations at 4K. The only games that remain smooth at this resolution are esports titles like Valorant at 267 FPS and CS:GO at 153 FPS.

The data shows a GPU that is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, the average FPS across all games is 111, which is strong. At 1440p, the average drops significantly, and at 4K, only the least demanding games are playable. The pair's rank of 2211 out of 3732 pairs by FPS indicates a mid-tier gaming experience overall.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size are typical for this generation.

Benchmark scores show a processor that is highly competitive. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 is exceptional, placing it in the top tier for desktop CPUs. The single-core score of 6235 is equally strong, indicating excellent performance in lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21462 and single-core score of 2578 reinforce this picture. The PassMark multithread score of 52425 and single-thread score of 4480 are both strong, with the data compression score of 694963 suggesting excellent performance in compression workloads.

The CPU's percentile of 94 means it outperforms the vast majority of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all close in average score: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.2% slower, the Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.4% slower, and the Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% slower. Only the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is faster, at 1% higher average score. This places the i7-14700KF in the upper echelon of desktop processors, with performance that rivals the best AMD has to offer.

For real workloads, this CPU is a monster. The 28 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The high single-core boost clock of 5.60 GHz ensures snappy response in everyday tasks and in games that rely on single-thread performance. The PassMark physics score of 2961 indicates strong performance in physics simulations, which is relevant for gaming and scientific computing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system is excellent for high-refresh gaming. CS:GO hits 377 FPS, Valorant 391 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 203 FPS. These titles will run at 144 Hz or higher without issue. The CPU's single-core strength and the GPU's adequate 1080p performance make this a solid choice for competitive shooters.

Streaming: The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for streaming while gaming. The CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, as indicated by its high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167. However, the GPU's mid-range nature means game settings may need to be dialed back at 1440p to maintain frame rates while streaming.

Video editing: The PassMark data compression score of 694963 and floating-point math score of 134393 indicate strong performance in video editing workloads. The CPU will handle 4K video timelines without breaking a sweat, and the GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance will assist with effects and rendering. This is a capable system for content creators.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 is exceptional for CPU-based rendering. The i7-14700KF will render scenes quickly in Cinema 4D, Blender, or similar applications. The GPU's 1792 shading units and 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 will also help with GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very large scenes.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 183056 and extended instructions score of 40660 indicate strong performance in code compilation and execution. The 28 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 33 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. This is a good CPU for developers.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for standard student and office tasks. The single-core performance is excellent, but the 20 cores are unnecessary for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The system will be extremely responsive, but it is far more power than needed for these workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the final generation for this socket. This means the upgrade path for the CPU is limited to other 14th Gen parts, as no future processors will be released for this socket. However, the CPU itself is so strong that an upgrade is unlikely to be necessary for several years.

The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility. If you are building new, DDR5 is the better choice for future-proofing, but DDR4 is a viable budget option. The memory bus is dual-channel, so a matched pair of modules is recommended for optimal performance.

For PCIe, the CPU provides 16 lanes of Gen 5 connectivity. This is used for the GPU, and the RX 9060 supports PCIe 5.0 x16, so the full bandwidth is available. The 16 lanes are more than adequate for the 8 GB GPU, and there is no bottleneck from the interface.

The GPU has a TDP of 132 W and suggests a 300 W PSU, which is very modest. The CPU has a 125 W TDP. A quality 500 W PSU would be sufficient for this system, leaving headroom for overclocking the CPU (it has an unlocked multiplier) or adding a few drives. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU. The CPU is so strong that it will not bottleneck any graphics card on the market. Replacing the RX 9060 with a higher-tier GPU would yield significant performance gains in gaming, especially at higher resolutions where the current GPU struggles. The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot ensures that a new GPU will run at full bandwidth.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the Navi 44 chip, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture. It has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz. The memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate a GPU that is capable for 1080p gaming but limited by its memory configuration.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is mid-range. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 is decent, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 is good. The PassMark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 are moderate. The GPU's percentile of 59 places it in the middle of the pack, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which is 0.7% faster. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 are 1% slower, and the Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% slower.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is the main limitation. At 1080p, this is sufficient for most games, but at 1440p and 4K, it will cause stuttering and forced lower texture settings in VRAM-heavy titles. The 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are also limiting factors for high-resolution gaming, as they cannot feed the GPU fast enough.

The ray tracing cores are present but not a strong point. The 28 RT cores will handle ray tracing effects, but at a significant performance cost, as seen in the lower FPS in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 with RT enabled. For pure rasterization, the GPU is competent, but it is not a high-end part.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured data shows that Valorant at 391 FPS, CS:GO at 377 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 203 FPS at 1080p make this an excellent choice for esports enthusiasts. These players will benefit from the CPU's raw speed and the GPU's adequate 1080p performance.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU to be a powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and PassMark multithread score of 52425 indicate that this system can handle heavy workloads. However, they may want to consider a GPU with more VRAM if they work with large textures or 4K video.

Software developers will appreciate the 28 threads for parallel compilation and the high integer math score of 183056. The system will handle large codebases and complex builds without issue. The 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks are also fast.

Students and small business workstations would be over-served by this system. While it would be extremely responsive for office tasks, the cost of the CPU is not justified for word processing or spreadsheet work. A less powerful CPU and a more balanced GPU would be a better fit for these users.

The system is not ideal for 4K gaming. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows that only esports titles are playable at high settings. Gamers who want 4K performance should look at a more powerful GPU, as the RX 9060 is the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of all CPU-GPU pairs in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, which is 0.9% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X's average score of 69515.

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor based on average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 9060 has an average score of 16014, placing it 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16129.

*Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080?*

A: The system achieves a measured 391 FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080 resolution with ultra settings.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the power consumption specification for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, and AMD suggests a 300 W power supply unit for a system using this GPU.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the RX 9060 have?

A: The RX 9060 has 28 ray tracing cores, which are part of the RDNA 4.0 architecture.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and single-core score of 6235 are top-tier. The Geekbench scores of 21462 (multi-core) and 2578 (single-core) are also strong. The PassMark multithread score of 52425 and single-thread score of 4480 confirm the CPU's dominance. The data compression score of 694963 is particularly high, indicating strong performance in compression tasks. The CPU's percentile of 94 means it is in the top 6% of all CPUs.

The GPU benchmarks are more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 is acceptable, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 is decent. The PassMark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 are mid-range. The GPU's percentile of 59 places it in the lower half of the top two-thirds of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the RTX 3060 Ti, which is 0.7% faster.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU is at the 94th percentile while the GPU is at the 59th percentile. This imbalance means that the system's performance is capped by the GPU in gaming and other GPU-accelerated tasks. The pair's rank of 2211 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 111 across all games, reflects this mid-tier gaming performance.

For a builder, this means the CPU will not need an upgrade for a long time, but the GPU will likely be the first component to be replaced. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks, but it will struggle at 4K or in demanding GPU workloads. The benchmark data is clear: this is a system with a top-tier brain and a mid-tier heart.