SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop build that represents an extreme divergence in component tier. The CPU is a high-end 20-core processor that sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level part that falls into the 17th percentile of all GPUs. The data clearly indicates that this is not a balanced configuration for gaming; instead, it is a platform where the processor dominates every benchmark metric, and the graphics card serves as a basic display output solution. The combined percentile for this pairing is 56, reflecting the drag that the GPU places on the overall system score.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallel processing capability for heavily threaded workloads. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, allowing for strong single-thread performance when demand spikes. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which adds a layer of reliability for workstation tasks. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the chip has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The TDP is rated at 125 W, and the physical die size is 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Benchmark results show the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 and a single-core score of 6235. In Geekbench, it scores 21462 multicore and 2578 single-core. These figures place the CPU in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score is 70163. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1%. This places the 14700KF in a tightly contested group of top-tier processors, where performance differences are within a single percentage point. For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle multi-threaded applications like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations with ease, while its strong single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in general computing tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 52425 and integer math score of 183056 further reinforce its capability in number-crunching applications. Data compression performance is particularly high at 694963 in Passmark, indicating efficient handling of archive and file management workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than lab-tested results. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235 and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11897 provide the basis for these projections. The GPU sits in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which is a very low position, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 confirms that it is not designed for high-fidelity gaming. The CPU's performance is far beyond what the GPU can feed, so in gaming scenarios, the frame rate will be almost entirely dictated by the RX 7400. At 1080p with ultra settings, the system would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in modern AAA titles, and competitive esports games might hover around 60 FPS on lower settings. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth become limiting factors, and playable frame rates would require significant graphical compromises. At 4K, the system is effectively not viable for gaming, as the GPU's compute throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for the pixel workload. These estimates are consistent with the GPU's nearest rivals, which include integrated graphics solutions like the Intel HD Graphics 610 and low-end mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce 710M.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU is the bottleneck, and its 17th percentile ranking means it cannot drive high refresh rates. The CPU could easily support a faster GPU, but with the RX 7400, frame rates will be limited to entry-level levels, making high-refresh displays a waste of potential.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 indicates significant spare capacity. However, the GPU's low performance means the gaming experience being streamed would be subpar, so this pairing only makes sense for streaming older or less demanding titles.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a Geekbench multicore score of 21462 and a Passmark floating point math score of 134393. Video editing software that leverages multiple cores will see strong performance in rendering and export tasks. The GPU's role is minimal, but its 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for basic GPU-accelerated effects in 1080p timelines.

3D rendering: Rendering is dominated by the CPU, and the 14700KF's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 18550 and R15 multicore score of 4452 demonstrate its capability in this domain. The GPU's 1792 shading units and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance are far too weak to contribute meaningfully to GPU-based renderers, so users should rely on CPU rendering paths.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 28 threads, and the Passmark integer math score of 183056 indicates strong performance in logical operations. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work, though its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures API compatibility for graphics debugging.

Student and office work: The CPU is massively overqualified for this workload, but that is not a negative. The Passmark single-thread score of 4480 ensures fast application launches and responsive spreadsheets, while the 33 MB L3 cache improves efficiency in multitasking scenarios. The GPU's low power draw of 43 W TDP is a minor benefit for electricity costs, though this is not a primary consideration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 56, which reflects the significant gap between the CPU's 94th percentile ranking and the GPU's 17th percentile ranking.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF is 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark score, making the two processors effectively tied in performance.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, but its overall compute performance is low, so ray tracing workloads will not run at playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is available on performance cores under appropriate thermal and power conditions.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU's 17th percentile ranking and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 compute mean that 4K gaming is not viable, as the graphics card cannot handle the pixel workload.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark performance is exceptional, with an average score of 70163 and a 94th percentile position among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 and single-core score of 6235 highlight its dual nature as both a multi-threaded powerhouse and a strong single-thread performer. In Geekbench, it scores 21462 multicore and 2578 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 52425, a single-thread score of 4480, and strong results in specific workloads: data compression at 694963, data encryption at 40046, extended instructions at 40660, floating point math at 134393, integer math at 183056, physics at 2961, and random string sorting at 74723. The CPU finds prime numbers at a rate of 212 in the Passmark test. These numbers place the 14700KF in a class with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, where performance differences are measured in fractions of a percent. The GPU, in stark contrast, has an average benchmark score of 2467 and a 17th percentile position. Its best result is the Passmark G3D score of 11897, but its DirectX scores are low: DirectX 9 at 176, DirectX 10 at 59, DirectX 11 at 97, and DirectX 12 at 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and the Passmark GPU compute score is 5152. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% faster), the Intel HD Graphics 610 (1.8% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (1.9% faster). This places the RX 7400 in the same performance neighborhood as decade-old integrated graphics, which is a sobering assessment of its gaming capability.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need extreme CPU performance but have minimal or no GPU demands. The target audience includes software developers who compile large codebases, researchers running single-threaded or lightly-parallel numerical simulations, and professionals who work with data compression or encryption tasks where the CPU's Passmark scores of 694963 and 40046, respectively, are directly relevant. Content creators who focus on CPU-based rendering, such as those using Blender's Cycles engine with CPU compute, will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167. For gamers, this build is only suitable for those playing at 1080p with low settings in older or esports titles, as the GPU's 17th percentile ranking severely limits modern AAA gaming. Students and office workers would find the CPU far more capable than needed, but the system would excel at multitasking, as the 20 cores and 28 threads handle dozens of browser tabs and office applications without strain. Small business workstations that run accounting software, database queries, or light virtual machines would see excellent performance from the CPU, though the GPU adds no value for these tasks. The build is not recommended for any GPU-accelerated workflow, such as 3D modeling in real-time viewports or machine learning training, as the GPU's compute score of 5152 is too low to contribute.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the Navi 33 chip and the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, effective to 18 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, though their performance is limited by the overall low compute throughput. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 32.97 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The TDP is rated at 43 W, which is low, and the GPU requires a 200 W power supply and a single 6-pin power connector. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The GPU's benchmark scores are uniformly low, with a Passmark G3D score of 11897 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103. Its percentile ranking of 17 means it performs worse than 83% of all GPUs. For rendering, this means the GPU is only suitable for basic 2D desktop compositing or light 3D workloads at low resolutions. The ray tracing cores are present but effectively useless for modern games, as the raw compute power is insufficient to handle the additional overhead. The GPU's nearest rivals are integrated graphics and ancient mobile parts, which confirms its position as a display adapter rather than a gaming card.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the Intel Core i7-14700KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is an entry-level Radeon RX 7000 series part. The combined percentile is 56, which masks the extreme disparity between the two components. The CPU alone would place this system in the top 6% of all builds, but the GPU drags the overall ranking down to the middle of the pack. This is not a gaming system, nor is it a balanced workstation. It is a CPU-centric platform where the processor is the sole driver of performance. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking means it provides no meaningful acceleration for any modern workload beyond basic display output. The build's overall tier is defined by the CPU's 94th percentile performance, which is exceptional for professional and creative applications that rely on multi-threading. The GPU's low power draw of 43 W is a minor advantage, as it keeps the total system power requirement low, but this does not compensate for its lack of compute capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU. In any workload that touches the graphics card, the RX 7400 will be the limiting factor. The CPU's benchmarks are 94th percentile, while the GPU is 17th percentile, creating a massive imbalance. In gaming, the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to render frames, as the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11897 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 indicate a severe lack of rendering throughput. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235 is more than sufficient to feed any frame rate the GPU can produce, so the CPU will never be the constraint in gaming. Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU's 28 threads will be fully utilized. The Passmark multithread score of 52425 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 show that the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads without issue. The FPS scaling in this system is effectively flat; increasing the resolution from 1080p to 1440p will not change the frame rate much because the GPU is already at its absolute limit. The CPU has no influence on FPS, as it is far faster than the GPU in every scenario. For users who intend to game, the GPU must be replaced with a higher-performing part to achieve playable frame rates. For users who intend to use the system for CPU-heavy tasks, the GPU is a non-factor, and its presence is merely to provide a video output. The balance is skewed entirely toward the CPU, and any performance upgrade to this system must start with the graphics card.