SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip is socketed in Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory support. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 94th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 70,163. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 44,167 while the single-core score is 6,235. The R20 results show 18,550 multi-core and 2,618 single-core, while R15 delivers 4,452 multi-core and 628 single-core. Geekbench scores are 21,462 multi-core and 2,578 single-core. PassMark tests reveal a multi-thread score of 52,425 and a single-thread score of 4,480. Specialized workloads show strong results: floating point math scores 134,393, integer math reaches 183,056, data compression hits 694,963, and data encryption scores 40,046.

The nearest competitors illustrate the performance tier. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, which is 0.2% behind the i7-14700KF. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875, trailing by 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515, a 0.9% deficit. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70,879, which is 1% ahead of the i7-14700KF. These tight margins suggest the i7-14700KF sits in a highly competitive performance band where differences among top-tier CPUs are minimal in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the 20-core/28-thread configuration with the 5.60 GHz boost clock means heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will leverage the core count effectively. The single-core performance, indicated by the 6,235 R23 single-core score, supports responsive everyday use and gaming scenarios where per-core speed matters. The PassMark physics score of 2,961 and find prime numbers score of 212 provide additional context for computational physics and integer-heavy workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a compact RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC's 6 nm process, featuring the Navi 24 chip with 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. It offers 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1923 MHz, a game clock of 2039 MHz, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz.

Compute resources include 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU includes 12 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not present. Pixel rate is 74.27 GPixel/s, texture rate is 111.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance reaches 3.565 TFLOPS with FP16 at 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TDP is a modest 53 W, requiring no power connectors and a suggested PSU of only 250 W. The card occupies a single slot and connects via PCIe 4.0 x4, with display outputs consisting of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,001. PassMark G3D scores 7,673, while G2D scores 722. DirectX tests show 93 for DX9, 70 for DX11, 54 for DX10, and 30 for DX12. GPU compute scores 2,812. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 32,011 and Vulkan scores 16,372. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 176.

The nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6,000 (0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5,996 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W4100 scores 5,987 (0.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M scores 5,986 (0.3% ahead). This places the RX 6400 in a performance bracket well below the i7-14700KF's standing, indicating a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU capabilities.

For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets. The 768 shading units provide modest rasterization throughput, while the 12 ray tracing cores offer entry-level ray tracing support. The DirectX 12 Ultimate API support with feature level 12_2 ensures compatibility with modern graphics features, but the 30-point DX12 PassMark score suggests limited headroom for demanding DX12 titles.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 94th percentile standing with a 5.60 GHz boost clock provides ample processing power for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU's 35th percentile ranking means frame rates will be limited by the RX 6400. Expectations for 1080p high-refresh gaming are modest; the GPU's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed.

Streaming: The 20-core, 28-thread CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously without breaking a sweat, as evidenced by the 44,167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, the RX 6400's 4 GB VRAM and modest compute resources will restrict game quality settings while streaming, potentially requiring lower resolutions or graphical presets.

Video editing: The CPU excels here with strong multi-core performance (18,550 in R20 multi-core) and data compression scores of 694,963 in PassMark. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 35th percentile ranking will handle basic effects and timeline acceleration, but 4K editing or heavy color grading may strain the memory capacity.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong; the 44,167 R23 multi-core score places it among high-end workstation CPUs. GPU-accelerated rendering will lag significantly due to the RX 6400's 3.565 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, making it unsuitable for GPU-rendered scenes with complex geometry or high-resolution textures.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 cores and 28 threads, with the 183,056 integer math score indicating strong throughput for build processes. The 694,963 data compression score accelerates packaging and distribution tasks. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development workloads, making this pairing acceptable for coding tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance (6,235 R23 single-core) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU handles basic desktop composition and office graphics without issue. The modest 53 W GPU TDP means low overall system power draw, suitable for dorm rooms or small offices.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p with modest graphical expectations will find the RX 6400 sufficient for e-sports titles and older games, though the 35th GPU percentile indicates limited headroom for modern AAA releases at high settings. Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering, video encoding, or software development will benefit from the 94th CPU percentile while the GPU handles only light acceleration tasks.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed and multi-threaded performance for simulations, while the GPU covers basic display needs. Small business workstations handling data processing, spreadsheets, and database work will leverage the CPU's 694,963 data compression score and 40,046 encryption score for efficient operations. The 125 W CPU TDP and 53 W GPU TDP together create a system that is power-efficient under typical loads, though the GPU's end-of-life production status should be noted for long-term planning.

Professionals running virtual machines, containerized development environments, or heavy spreadsheet models will find the 28 threads beneficial. The CPU's 33 MB L3 cache aids in data locality for multi-threaded workloads. However, any task requiring substantial GPU compute — such as machine learning training, GPU rendering, or high-end gaming — will be severely constrained by the RX 6400's specifications.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection without changing the motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which accommodates modern high-bandwidth devices. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x4, which is adequate for the RX 6400's bandwidth needs but limits future GPU upgrades to cards that perform well on x4 links.

The 125 W CPU TDP and 53 W GPU TDP combine to 178 W, well within the 250 W suggested PSU rating. This leaves minimal headroom for upgrades; a more powerful GPU would likely require a PSU upgrade. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, but this would increase power draw beyond the 125 W TDP, potentially necessitating a stronger PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RX 6400 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU has substantial headroom, as evidenced by its 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 35th percentile. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface on the GPU may bottleneck high-end cards, so verifying motherboard support for x8 or x16 PCIe slots on the GPU riser is advisable. Memory expansion from dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 would benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the 33 MB L3 cache already present.

The platform's production status is active for the CPU, while the GPU is end-of-life. This suggests the GPU should be the first component replaced, with the CPU having a longer useful lifespan. The 10 nm process and Raptor Lake architecture remain competitive, as indicated by the 1% delta to the newer Core Ultra 7 265K.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 35th percentile ranking and the CPU's 94th percentile, the RX 6400 will be the primary limiter in gaming scenarios. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest 1080p as the practical resolution for most titles. The 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 throughput aligns with entry-level performance, indicating playable frame rates in e-sports and older games but potentially sub-60 FPS in modern AAA titles at high settings.

The CPU's 6,235 R23 single-core score ensures that CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics calculations, AI, and draw call processing — will not bottleneck typical gaming workloads. The 28 threads handle background tasks like Discord, browser tabs, and streaming software without competing with the game for resources.

Ray tracing performance will be minimal due to the 12 RT cores and 4 GB VRAM. Games with heavy ray tracing effects will likely require significant compromises in resolution or settings. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility, but the 30-point DX12 PassMark score indicates limited practical performance in DX12 titles.

For competitive gaming at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the RX 6400 should deliver acceptable frame rates in most titles. For immersive single-player games with high graphical fidelity, the GPU will struggle, and users should expect to lower settings or accept reduced frame rates.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is stark: the CPU sits in the 94th percentile while the GPU sits in the 35th percentile. This creates a significant bottleneck where the GPU limits overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks. In CPU-heavy workloads — rendering, compilation, data processing — the system performs at a high level, but GPU-accelerated tasks will operate at a fraction of the system's potential.

The combined percentile is 65, reflecting the GPU's drag on the overall pairing. The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 1% of the i7-14700KF, confirming its position among top-tier processors. The GPU's rivals are clustered within 0.3%, but at a much lower absolute performance level, confirming its entry-level status.

In gaming, the bottleneck is almost exclusively the GPU. The CPU's single-core performance ensures it can feed frames to the GPU at high rates, but the RX 6400's compute resources and memory bandwidth cap the achievable frame rates. In productivity workloads, the CPU dominates and the GPU's role is minimal, so the bottleneck shifts to the CPU's threading and cache performance.

For mixed workloads — such as streaming while gaming — the CPU handles encoding while the GPU renders, but the GPU's limited performance will constrain game settings. For video editing, the CPU accelerates export and encoding while the GPU handles effects and preview, with the 4 GB VRAM limiting timeline complexity.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 65, reflecting the balance between the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 35th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70,163, which is 0.9% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X's 69,515.

Q: What memory types does the i7-14700KF support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the RX 6400?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 250 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 53 W with no power connectors required.

Q: Does the i7-14700KF have integrated graphics?

A: The FACT PACK lists integratedGraphics as null, indicating no integrated GPU is present. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: How does the RX 6400 compare to the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M?

A: The RX 6400 has an average benchmark score of 6,001, which is 0.3% higher than the Quadro K4000M's 5,986.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 70,163, placing it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, scores 70,879, a 1% advantage. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515 (0.9% behind). These margins show the i7-14700KF is competitive with the latest generation CPUs, despite being from the Raptor Lake Refresh line.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 6,001, placing it in the 35th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6,000 (0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5,996 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W4100 at 5,987 (0.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M at 5,986 (0.3% ahead). The tight clustering indicates the RX 6400 sits in a well-defined performance tier with minimal variation among its closest competitors.

The combined picture is one of significant asymmetry. The CPU delivers top-tier performance suitable for demanding professional workloads, while the GPU provides entry-level graphics capability. The 65th combined percentile reflects this imbalance, with the CPU's strength unable to compensate for the GPU's limitations in graphics-bound tasks.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700KF, a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6400, an entry-level RDNA 2.0 GPU with 4 GB VRAM. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and the GPU's 35th percentile ranking create a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but underperforms in GPU-bound scenarios.

The i7-14700KF was released on 2023-10-16 with a launch MSRP of $384, while the RX 6400 was released on 2022-01-18 with a launch MSRP of 159 USD. The CPU remains in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and its 125 W TDP is manageable for most cooling solutions. The GPU's 53 W TDP and single-slot design enable compact builds with minimal power requirements.

Overall, this is a workstation-oriented pairing where the CPU's computational power is the primary asset. The GPU provides basic display output and light graphics acceleration but will not satisfy demanding gaming or GPU-compute requirements. For users whose workloads are CPU-bound — software development, data processing, CPU rendering — this build offers strong performance. For gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the RX 6400 represents a significant limitation that should be addressed with a GPU upgrade for those use cases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds