SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
80%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score
Top 20% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Usage Scenarios

The Intel Core i7-14700HX paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation presents a peculiar performance envelope. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 21st percentile. This disparity shapes every usage scenario.

High-refresh gaming: The GPU is the limiting factor here. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596, this GPU lands in the same performance neighborhood as the GeForce GTX 1050, which scores 3629. The 14700HX's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2103 is strong enough to feed modern game engines, but the GPU will struggle to push high frame rates at demanding settings. For esports titles at lower settings, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3947 indicates responsive frame pacing, but players seeking 144Hz experiences in AAA titles will be disappointed.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 places this chip well above typical laptop processors, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 36566 reinforces this. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, while not benchmarked here, are present in the Ada Lovelace architecture, but the low GPU percentile suggests that gaming while streaming will strain the graphics subsystem heavily.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The 14700HX's multi-core prowess, evidenced by the Geekbench multi-core score of 14390, handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides substantial capacity for video buffers and effects layers, but the 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute is modest for GPU-accelerated effects. Editors working with 4K timelines will find the CPU adequate, but GPU-accelerated rendering tasks will not see flagship-level throughput.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this domain. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3812 and R20 multi-core score of 13059 demonstrate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU, however, with its 9728 shading units and 76 RT cores, offers only 21st percentile performance. Ray-traced renders will proceed, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596 indicates that GPU-accelerated rendering will be significantly slower than what a higher-tier GPU would deliver.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 131296 and data compression score of 438539 suggest efficient handling of build tasks, code indexing, and test execution. The 33 MB shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so developers can work comfortably without worrying about graphics bottlenecks.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2116, handles office suites, web browsing, and document processing effortlessly. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for display output, though the discrete GPU will handle any light graphics work. Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the CPU's multi-core muscle for simulation and analysis tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the processor is soldered to the motherboard. This is a mobile platform, so CPU upgrades are not practical in the traditional sense. The build class is laptop, which further constrains upgrade options.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a consumer-class mobile chip and suggests this platform can serve workstation duties. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel bus provides adequate throughput for the 20-core design.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This provides substantial bandwidth for NVMe storage and future peripherals. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is the previous generation. This mismatch is not a practical bottleneck for the GPU's performance tier, but it does mean the platform's full Gen 5 capability is reserved for storage or other devices.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, while the GPU's TDP is 120 W. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined 175 W thermal envelope for the two primary components suggests a laptop power adapter in the 200-250 W range would be appropriate. This is a power-hungry mobile configuration, and users should expect battery life to be modest under load.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a faster GPU, but the laptop form factor makes this impossible. The CPU is already among the strongest mobile processors available, ranking at the 89th percentile overall. For users seeking more graphics performance, a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU would be the only practical path forward. The CPU's performance is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any future workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 45953.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.1% ahead of the GeForce GT 545 (3594) and 0.6% behind the GeForce GT 735M (3616). It is 0.9% ahead of the GTX 1050 (3629) and 1.5% ahead of the Radeon HD 6770 (3649).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop configuration is 55, placing it in the mid-range of all tested systems.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation-class hardware.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussion must be treated as estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU in this configuration is stark. The CPU operates at the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 21st percentile. This creates a system where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596 indicates that frame rates will be constrained by the graphics processor. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2103, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 3947 reinforces this conclusion. Players will see GPU utilization pinned at maximum while the CPU idles, a classic GPU-bound scenario.

For multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computation, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13059 and PassMark multi-thread score of 36566 demonstrate that the processor can sustain heavy parallel loads. The GPU's modest compute throughput, 41.15 TFLOPS FP32, will not accelerate these tasks to the same degree. In CPU-bound rendering, the GPU becomes the secondary contributor, and the CPU carries the workload.

The PassMark physics score of 2252 and floating-point math score of 93836 further indicate that the CPU handles simulation and physics calculations effectively. The GPU's pixel rate of 236.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 643.0 GTexel/s are modest for modern titles, reinforcing the GPU bottleneck in gaming. The 76 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the overall GPU performance tier suggests ray-traced effects will be limited to lower resolutions or reduced quality settings.

The combined percentile of 55 reflects this imbalance. A system with more balanced components would typically land higher, but the strong CPU pulls the average up while the weak GPU drags it down. Users should understand that this is a CPU-first system with a supplementary GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700HX delivers strong benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3812 multi-core and 296 single-core. The R20 test shows 13059 multi-core and 1843 single-core, while R23 produces 24595 multi-core and 2103 single-core. Geekbench results are 14390 multi-core and 2116 single-core.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The multi-thread score is 36566, with a single-thread score of 3947. Integer math reaches 131296, while floating-point math hits 93836. Data compression scores 438539, and data encryption scores 26092. Extended instructions score 25718, and random string sorting scores 48544. The physics score is 2252, and find prime numbers scores 165.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 45953, placing it at the 89th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7303 with an average score of 45960 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 4364P at 45970 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 at 46062 (-0.2% delta). This places the 14700HX in elite company, essentially tied with server-class EPYC processors.

The GPU's benchmark data is limited to a single test: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 3596. This places the GPU at the 21st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 3596. Its nearest rivals are the GeForce GT 545 at 3594 (0.1% delta), the GeForce GT 735M at 3616 (-0.6% delta), the GeForce GTX 1050 at 3629 (-0.9% delta), and the Radeon HD 6770 at 3649 (-1.5% delta). The GPU's performance tier is comparable to decade-old entry-level desktop graphics cards.

The combined picture is a laptop with exceptional CPU performance and modest GPU performance. The CPU can compete with server processors, while the GPU sits in the entry-level segment. This makes the system ideal for CPU-heavy workloads but poorly suited for graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with reduced settings will find the GPU adequate for esports and older titles, but those seeking high-refresh experiences in modern AAA games should look elsewhere. The GPU's 21st percentile ranking indicates that 1440p and 4K gaming will be limited to lower frame rates.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based workflows will benefit most. Video editors using software encoders, 3D artists relying on CPU rendering, and developers compiling large projects will see strong performance from the 14700HX. The GPU provides 16 GB of VRAM, which is useful for holding large textures and buffers, but the compute throughput is modest.

Software developers will appreciate the 20 cores and 28 threads for parallel builds and test execution. The PassMark integer math score of 131296 and data compression score of 438539 indicate efficient handling of code compilation and data processing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Students in engineering, data science, or scientific computing programs will find the CPU's multi-core performance valuable for simulations and numerical analysis. The floating-point math score of 93836 and physics score of 2252 demonstrate capability in these areas. The GPU is sufficient for visualization but not for GPU-accelerated computation.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications will find this configuration more powerful than needed. The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy responsiveness, and the GPU handles basic graphics tasks. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in business applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, boosting to 5.50 GHz.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This generous L3 allocation helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support enabled.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2103 indicates strong per-core performance, while the multi-core score of 24595 demonstrates excellent scaling across the 20 cores. The Geekbench scores of 2116 single-core and 14390 multi-core corroborate this.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 131296 shows strong general-purpose computation, while the floating-point score of 93836 indicates capable scientific computing. The data compression score of 438539 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance for archive operations and database workloads. The data encryption score of 26092 is moderate, reflecting the lack of dedicated encryption hardware beyond standard AES-NI.

The 89th percentile ranking places this processor among the top 11% of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include server-class AMD EPYC processors, which underscores its performance tier. The average benchmark score of 45953 is essentially tied with the EPYC 7303 and EPYC 4364P, both scoring 45960 and 45970 respectively.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and video playback capabilities. While not suitable for gaming, it serves as a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled or fails. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and peripherals.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration featuring the Intel Core i7-14700HX paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The build class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor with integrated components.

The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-HX refresh processor with a 55 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 120 W TDP. The combined thermal envelope of 175 W for the two primary components suggests a substantial laptop chassis with adequate cooling.

The combined percentile of 55 places this system in the mid-range of all tested configurations. This is a direct result of the CPU's strong 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's weak 21st percentile ranking. The overall tier is therefore mid-range, despite the CPU being near the top of its class.

The GPU's predecessor is Ampere-MW, and its successor is Blackwell-MW, indicating that this is a mobile workstation-oriented part. The GPU uses the AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

This pairing is unusual in that the CPU outperforms the GPU by a wide margin. Most laptop configurations aim for balance, but this system prioritizes processor performance. Users should be aware of this imbalance and choose workloads accordingly.

The CPU's release date is January 7, 2024, while the GPU's release date is March 20, 2023. Both are active production parts, so availability should be reasonable. The CPU's part number is SRMXG, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on supported platforms.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is a laptop GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm².

The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1425 MHz, boosting to 2115 MHz.

Compute resources include 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. There are 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 41.15 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 places this GPU at the 21st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the GeForce GT 545 (3594, 0.1% faster), GeForce GT 735M (3616, 0.6% faster), GeForce GTX 1050 (3629, 0.9% faster), and Radeon HD 6770 (3649, 1.5% faster). This is a striking result, as the GPU performs comparably to graphics cards from over a decade ago.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has no power connectors, as it is an integrated laptop part. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop model.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM capacity is substantial and can hold large scenes and textures. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for this memory size. However, the compute throughput of 41.15 TFLOPS is modest for GPU rendering, and the 76 RT cores will handle ray tracing at reduced performance levels.

The TDP of 120 W is moderate for a mobile GPU, allowing for reasonable sustained performance in a laptop chassis. The GPU's performance class, however, is firmly entry-level, as indicated by its 21st percentile ranking and its proximity to legacy graphics cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 and its 21st percentile ranking serve as the primary indicators of gaming capability.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's performance tier suggests frame rates in the range of 30-60 FPS for modern AAA titles, depending on the optimization of each game. The GPU's proximity to the GTX 1050, which scores 3629 in the same benchmark, indicates that this GPU will perform similarly to that entry-level card from several generations ago.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2103, can help maintain high frame rates at lower settings. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for these games, and the 112 ROPs can handle the rasterization demands. Players might achieve 60-100 FPS at competitive settings.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles. The pixel rate of 236.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 643.0 GTexel/s are limiting factors. Most modern AAA games at 1440p ultra settings will likely run below 30 FPS. Reducing settings to medium or low could bring frame rates to 40-60 FPS in less demanding titles.

At 4K, this GPU is not viable for modern gaming. The 21st percentile performance means that even older titles will struggle to maintain playable frame rates. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 4K textures, but the compute throughput is inadequate for the resolution's demands.

Ray tracing performance will be limited. The 76 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the overall GPU performance tier means that ray-traced effects will need to be used sparingly, likely at lower resolutions and with reduced ray counts. The 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute is the ceiling for ray tracing workloads, and this is below what modern flagship GPUs offer.

The CPU will not bottleneck gaming performance in most scenarios. Its single-core performance is strong enough to drive the GPU to its limits. The PassMark single-thread score of 3947 and Geekbench single-core score of 2116 both indicate that the CPU can handle game logic and physics calculations without holding back the GPU. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as massive open-world games with many NPCs, the CPU's 20 cores will provide ample headroom.