SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-14700HX pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh in a laptop configuration that sits in the 70th percentile of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations. This is a mobile workstation pairing with a strong 20-core CPU and a capable but aging professional GPU, making it a system that favours compute-heavy tasks over high-refresh gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has 20 cores and 28 threads, which is a hybrid arrangement typical of Raptor Lake designs, though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core breakdown. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the processor's TDP is rated at 55 W. This is an unlocked multiplier CPU, meaning the silicon is theoretically capable of being tuned, though in a laptop chassis the thermal and power limits will dictate what is actually achievable.

Cache configuration is significant: each core has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, while the shared L3 cache totals 33 MB. This large L3 pool is beneficial for workloads with shared data sets, such as database operations or multi-threaded rendering. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory, which is a strong indicator that this chip is aimed at professional and workstation use cases rather than pure consumer gaming. The integrated GPU is UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output should the discrete GPU be unavailable.

Benchmark data shows a processor that is clearly strong in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 24595, while the single-core score is 2103. The R20 multi-core score is 13059 with a single-core score of 1843, and the older R15 test shows 3812 multi-core and 296 single-core. Geekbench results are 14390 multi-core and 2116 single-core. The Passmark suite paints a similar picture: multi-thread score is 36566, single-thread is 3947, integer math is 131296, floating point math is 93836, and extended instructions score 25718. Data compression is 438539, data encryption is 26092, random string sorting is 48544, and physics is 2252. Find prime numbers is 165.

In terms of standing, this CPU is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 45953. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD EPYC 7303 scores 45960 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (-0.2% delta). The data shows that this mobile i7 is essentially performance-equivalent to those server and desktop parts in aggregate scoring, which is impressive for a laptop chip with a 55 W TDP. The single-core performance at 2103 in R23 is respectable, and the multi-core result of 24595 indicates that this CPU will handle heavily threaded productivity software without breaking a sweat. For real workloads, this means fast compilation times, quicker video exports, and responsive multi-tasking in CPU-bound scenarios. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample parallelism for software that can use it, and the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures that lightly threaded tasks still feel snappy.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU holds an 89th percentile ranking against all CPUs, which places it firmly in the upper tier of available processors. The GPU, however, is a different story: the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 (the FACT PACK lists no benchmark entries for this GPU). The combined percentile for this pairing is 70th. This discrepancy is the defining characteristic of this build—an extremely strong CPU paired with a mid-tier professional GPU.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show a 0% delta against the AMD EPYC 7303 and 4364P, meaning the i7-14700HX is statistically identical in aggregate performance to those server chips. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235. These are all high-performing parts, so the i7-14700HX is clearly not a bottleneck in most workflows. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is exactly average among all GPUs, which is not a strong position for a professional mobile Quadro card. The combined picture is a system that will excel at CPU-driven tasks like code compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering, but the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive applications such as 3D viewport manipulation or modern game rendering. The CPU is over twice as strong relative to its peers (89th vs 50th percentile), so the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

For gaming, the data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data at all. All FPS discussion in this analysis is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and the percentile positions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-upgradable; any future CPU upgrade would require a new laptop or motherboard replacement. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC support, so a user can choose between older DDR4 or newer DDR5 depending on the laptop design. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is current-generation and provides ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe drives and any docked external GPU solutions.

The GPU is a mobile part with a 110 W TDP, and it connects via PCIe 3.0 x16. Its power connectors are listed as "None", which is typical for a mobile IGP (integrated graphics processor) soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, so no power supply recommendation is provided; however, the CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 110 W suggest a total of 165 W for the primary compute components. The laptop's power adapter must supply this plus the rest of the system, but no specific wattage can be stated here because the FACT PACK does not list one.

The GPU is end-of-life production status, with its predecessor being Quadro Pascal-M and successor being Ampere-MW. This means the GPU is a legacy component. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the entire laptop, since neither the CPU nor GPU are socketed for user replacement. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 110 W TDP indicate a laptop designed for sustained professional workloads rather than a slim ultrabook. The CPU's unlock multiplier is moot in a laptop context, but it does suggest the chip is capable of higher clocks if the thermal solution permits.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, and the CPU at 89th. The CPU can certainly feed frames fast enough, but the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a professional card, not a gaming card, and its mid-pack percentile ranking means it will struggle to push high frame rates at high settings in modern titles. Estimated FPS would be moderate at best, likely requiring lower settings to approach 60 FPS in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 indicates the CPU can handle both game and encoder without major frame drops. The GPU's 50th percentile is a limiting factor for the gaming side, but as a streaming workstation for non-gaming content, the CPU would handle it easily. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can also assist with video decode tasks.

Video editing: This is a strong use case. The CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 24595, Passmark multi-thread 36566) will accelerate export times and timeline rendering. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is useful for GPU-accelerated effects and colour grading, though the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 50th percentile ranking mean it is not a top-tier accelerator. The 16 GB VRAM is a notable asset for large projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent. The Passmark integer math score of 131296 and floating point math score of 93836 show a CPU that can crunch through complex scenes. GPU rendering is less impressive; the Quadro RTX 5000 has 3072 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores, with 9.400 TFLOPS FP32, but its 50th percentile ranking means it is only average. The 16 GB VRAM helps for large scenes, but render times will be slower than on a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and high multi-core scores mean fast compiles. The Passmark data compression score of 438539 and random string sorting score of 48544 indicate fast build tooling and code analysis. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the CPU's strength dominates.

Student and office work: Overkill but competent. The single-core performance (Geekbench 2116, Cinebench R23 2103) ensures snappy document editing and web browsing. The multi-core power is wasted on typical office tasks, but the 55 W CPU TDP suggests the laptop will have decent battery life under light loads. The GPU's 50th percentile is irrelevant for office work, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle basic display duties if needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance. The CPU is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 70th. The bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU in graphics-bound tasks. In CPU-heavy workloads such as software compilation, data encryption (Passmark 26092), or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will perform at a high level with no GPU involvement. But in any task that relies on the GPU—gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, real-time 3D viewport—the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available because there is no measured FPS data in the FACT PACK. However, the percentile gap implies that in games, the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU is capable of delivering. The CPU can easily feed a higher-tier GPU, but with this GPU, the system will be GPU-limited at most resolutions. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios with the GPU largely idle, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the storage, memory, or software will be. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on the GPU is generous for its compute class, which helps in VRAM-heavy tasks like large textures or high-resolution renders, but the raw compute throughput remains average.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professional mobile users who need heavy CPU compute and moderate GPU acceleration. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the 20-core CPU's fast exports, and the 16 GB GPU VRAM will hold large timelines. 3D modellers using CPU-based renderers will see strong performance, though GPU renderers will be slower. Software developers will find the CPU's multi-threaded compile times excellent. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU power for simulations and code, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running tasks. Small business workstations that run data analysis, virtualization, or financial modelling will be well-served by the CPU's 89th percentile performance. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with high-refresh monitors should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will not satisfy high-FPS demands. The system is a laptop, so it targets mobile professionals rather than desktop builders.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings. The GPU's 50th percentile and the CPU's 89th percentile suggest that in gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For a game that is well-optimised and scales well across CPU and GPU, the CPU will easily keep up, but the GPU will cap performance. At 1080p ultra settings, expect average frame rates in the range of 40–60 FPS in modern AAA titles, with lighter or older games potentially reaching 60–80 FPS. At 1440p ultra, expect 30–50 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle, likely below 30 FPS in most modern games. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 compute is not enough to push high frame rates at high resolutions. The CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench 2116) is more than adequate for gaming, so the bottleneck will be entirely the GPU. Players should expect to lower settings to medium or high to achieve playable frame rates, or accept lower resolutions. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, may run well because the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will still limit the absolute maximum.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the Intel Core i7-14700HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and a 55 W TDP, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a Turing-architecture professional mobile card with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, a 110 W TDP, and a 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 70th, which places this system in the upper-mid tier of all builds. The CPU is the clear star, delivering near-server-class multi-threaded performance, while the GPU is a capable but average professional part. This is a workstation-first system with gaming as a secondary, lower-priority capability. The overall tier is "capable professional laptop with a strong CPU and an average GPU," suitable for compute-heavy tasks and moderate graphics work.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 45953, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062), and statistically tied with the AMD EPYC 7303 (45960) and EPYC 4364P (45970).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 (no benchmark data listed).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70th, meaning it outperforms 70% of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.