SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

20,534 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines a 20-core Intel Core i7-14700HX processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile GPU, placing the build at the 77th percentile overall among all system combinations. The CPU is a top-tier mobile part (89th percentile), while the GPU sits lower (65th percentile), creating a configuration where processing headroom substantially outpaces graphics capability. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 20 cores and 28 threads with a 2.10 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost clock. This hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core mix. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 20-core processor, suggesting power management is heavily constrained in the mobile form factor, but the 5.50 GHz boost clock indicates significant single-thread headroom when thermal conditions allow.

Cache configuration is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, such as database queries, compilation tasks, and multi-threaded rendering. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability present — a feature uncommon in mobile consumer chips and typically associated with workstation-class reliability.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strength. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 24,595 multi-core and 2,103 single-core. The multi-core score is approximately 1,070% higher than the single-core score on the same test, reflecting the massive parallelism available from 20 cores. Geekbench results show 14,390 multi-core and 2,116 single-core, a ratio of about 6.8x. PassMark multi-thread score of 36,566 with a single-thread score of 3,947 yields a scaling factor of roughly 9.3x, indicating that thread-heavy workloads extract nearly full benefit from the core count.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 45,953 places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: AMD EPYC 7303 (45,960, 0% delta), AMD EPYC 4364P (45,970, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46,030, -0.2% delta), and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46,062, -0.2% delta). The i7-14700HX is statistically indistinguishable from these server and mobile parts in aggregate performance, trailing the fastest by only 0.2%. This places it firmly in high-end desktop-replacement territory for mobile computing.

Specific PassMark subtests reveal workload characteristics. Data compression scores 438,539, which is very high and indicates strong integer throughput. Integer math at 131,296 and floating-point math at 93,836 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. Extended instructions (SIMD) score 25,718, suggesting good vectorized workload execution. Random string sorting at 48,544 and find prime numbers at 165 are lower relative scores, indicating that memory-latency-sensitive and branch-heavy workloads do not scale as impressively as pure throughput tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 Mobile GPU (65th percentile) is the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming, not the CPU. At 1080p and 1440p, the i7-14700HX's single-core score of 2,103 in Cinebench R23 ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates in demanding titles. Expect 60-100+ FPS at high settings depending on the game, though the lack of measured data makes precise estimates unreliable.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample capacity for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. PassMark data encryption at 26,092 and data compression at 438,539 indicate strong throughput for x264 encoding, while the GPU's 160 tensor cores and 40 RT cores can offload NVENC tasks. The multi-core advantage (89th percentile CPU) means streaming overhead will minimally impact game performance.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,595 and PassMark floating-point math at 93,836 point to strong rendering performance in export tasks. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect previews. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates GPU-accelerated effects, though the 65th GPU percentile means 4K multi-layer timelines may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core scores (13,059 in Cinebench R20, 24,595 in R23) place it at 89th percentile, meaning CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will perform well. The GPU's 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 and 5,120 shading units provide solid but not class-leading GPU rendering. For hybrid CPU+GPU rendering, this combination balances both paths well, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting.

Software development: PassMark integer math at 131,296 and random string sorting at 48,544 indicate strong compilation throughput. The 20 cores accelerate parallel builds, while the 2,103 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures responsive IDE interaction. Data encryption at 26,092 supports secure development workflows with encrypted filesystems. ECC memory support is a notable plus for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (3,947 PassMark single-thread) handles document processing, spreadsheets, and browser workloads with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU will handle any graphics acceleration. Office tasks will be limited by storage and memory rather than this CPU, which vastly exceeds requirements for productivity applications.

Gaming Performance

As noted, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's ability to feed frames, not from empirical testing. The RTX 3070 Mobile scores 15,309 in PassMark G3D and 2,380 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU is estimated to deliver 60-90 FPS in most AAA titles, with lighter esports titles pushing higher. The CPU's single-core performance (2,103 Cinebench R23) ensures no significant CPU bottleneck at this resolution. At 1440p ultra, frame rates are estimated to drop to 45-70 FPS in demanding titles, as the GPU becomes increasingly saturated. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor in VRAM-hungry titles at higher resolutions or with texture packs.

The GPU's nearest rivals in aggregate score are Intel Arc B570 (20,556, -0.1% delta), Intel Arc A750 (20,582, -0.2% delta), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.3% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, -0.6% delta). This places the RTX 3070 Mobile within 0.6% of these parts, meaning gaming performance will be broadly comparable to these GPUs. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern titles, and Vulkan 1.4 support is current.

The GPU's compute performance (6,827 PassMark GPU Compute) is weaker relative to its graphics score, suggesting compute-heavy game effects like ray tracing may underperform. The 40 RT cores are present but at a lower performance tier than newer architectures. For esports titles (CS2, Valorant, Fortnite), the CPU's strength and GPU's raw throughput should deliver high frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear CPU-favored imbalance. The processor sits at the 89th percentile while the GPU is at the 65th percentile, a 24-point gap that means the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions. In CPU-bound workloads (compilation, rendering, data processing), the CPU's strength is fully utilized, and the GPU plays a secondary role.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects this middle-ground positioning. The CPU's average benchmark score of 45,953 versus the GPU's 20,534 shows the processor contributes roughly 69% of the combined compute score (45,953 / 66,487). This ratio suggests the build is optimized for mixed workloads where CPU horsepower matters more than raw graphics.

In gaming at 1080p, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck most titles, as its single-core score (2,103 Cinebench R23) is among the top 11% of CPUs. However, at 1440p and above, the GPU's 65th percentile positioning will limit frame rates, and the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU. In CPU-intensive simulation games (e.g., strategy titles, city builders), the CPU's multi-core advantage (24,595 Cinebench R23) will shine, and the GPU may be the limiting factor even at lower resolutions.

The GPU's 115 W TDP versus the CPU's 55 W TDP indicates the graphics card draws more power, but the total system power in a laptop chassis will be constrained by shared thermal and power budgets. The CPU's boost clock of 5.50 GHz is likely sustainable only in short bursts or when the GPU is idle, as simultaneous high load on both would exceed typical laptop power delivery.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact scores: Cinebench R15 multi-core 3,812 and single-core 296; Cinebench R20 multi-core 13,059 and single-core 1,843; Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,595 and single-core 2,103; Geekbench multi-core 14,390 and single-core 2,116; PassMark multi-thread 36,566 and single-thread 3,947. The average benchmark score is 45,953, ranking at the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's exact scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2,380; Geekbench OpenCL 92,939; Geekbench Vulkan 86,768; PassMark G3D 15,309; PassMark G2D 641; PassMark GPU Compute 6,827. The average benchmark score is 20,534, ranking at the 65th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile is 77, indicating this pairing outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's nearest rivals in aggregate performance are all within 0.2% — the AMD EPYC 7303, AMD EPYC 4364P, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 — which means the i7-14700HX delivers server-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile package. The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly tight, with the Intel Arc B570, Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X all within 0.6%, showing this GPU sits at a performance plateau shared by several mid-range parts.

The PassMark subtest scores for the CPU reveal specific strengths: data compression at 438,539 is exceptional, floating-point math at 93,836 is strong, and integer math at 131,296 is very high. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 138 versus DirectX 12 score of 64 suggests a larger relative drop in DX12 workloads, which may indicate driver overhead or architecture limitations in newer APIs.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower for multi-threaded productivity but can accept mid-range gaming performance. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages multi-core rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,595) will benefit most. Software developers compiling large codebases will utilize the 20 cores and 28 threads effectively, and the PassMark integer math score of 131,296 indicates strong build performance.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this sufficient for high-refresh play, though the GPU's 65th percentile means they should expect to adjust settings in demanding titles. At 1440p, the RTX 3070 Mobile will handle esports and older titles well but will struggle with the latest AAA games at ultra settings. Students pursuing computer science, engineering, or data analysis will find the CPU more than adequate for coursework, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running simulations.

Small business workstations handling database operations, data compression (438,539 PassMark), and encryption tasks (26,092 PassMark) will see strong performance. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes this a viable alternative to workstation-class laptops for tasks that are CPU-bound rather than GPU-bound. However, users whose primary workload is GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning training, or high-end gaming at 1440p+ should look for a build with a higher GPU percentile.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this build outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU rank compared to other processors?

A: The i7-14700HX sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 45,953. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7303, scores 45,960, a 0% delta.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to similar graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile is at the 65th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 20,534. Its closest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20,556, a -0.1% delta.

Q: Does this laptop support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Are there measured FPS numbers for this specific combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming frame-rate figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel BGA 1964 socket with PCIe Gen 5, providing 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The 55 W TDP and mobile form factor constrain cooling and power delivery, so any future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard and chassis. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility, but the dual-channel bus width means users should install memory in matched pairs to maximize bandwidth.

PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes offers high bandwidth for future NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving tasks. The socket's BGA (ball grid array) nature means the CPU is soldered, eliminating upgrade potential without replacing the entire board.

The GPU has a TDP of 115 W with no power connectors listed, indicating it draws power through the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined 170 W TDP for CPU and GPU (55 W + 115 W) suggests a laptop power adapter of sufficient wattage is required. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, meaning this is a mature platform, and future driver updates may be limited.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity and speed (leveraging DDR5 support) and add high-speed NVMe storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. For users seeking more graphics performance, the BGA socket and mobile form factor mean the GPU is not upgradeable; a new laptop would be required. The platform is at the end of its upgrade cycle, so users should maximize RAM and storage now rather than plan for component swaps.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700HX (20 cores, 28 threads, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh, 10 nm) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (Ampere, GA104 chip, 8 nm, 5,120 shading units, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a high-end mobile processor at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile part at the 65th percentile. The combined percentile of 77 positions this as an upper-mid-tier laptop configuration.

The CPU's strengths are multi-threaded compute (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,595), data compression (438,539 PassMark), and integer math (131,296 PassMark), making it ideal for productivity and content creation. The GPU's strengths are solid 1080p gaming (estimated 60-90 FPS at ultra) and general graphics acceleration, but it is not a high-end gaming part. The imbalance between CPU and GPU performance means this build excels in CPU-bound workloads while gaming performance is adequate but not exceptional.

The build class is laptop, with a production status of active for the CPU and end-of-life for the GPU. The release dates are January 2024 for the CPU and January 2021 for the GPU, indicating a newer processor paired with an older graphics card. This suggests a system where the CPU was prioritized in the design, possibly for workstation or creator use cases where multi-threaded performance matters more than gaming frame rates. Overall, this is a capable mobile workstation with gaming potential, not a dedicated gaming laptop.