SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing represents a desktop-class combination that targets a specific performance tier. The CPU, a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh part with 28 threads, sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 79, indicating a balanced mid-to-high tier desktop build. Benchmark data is measured, with the pair ranking 2420 out of 3732 pairs and averaging 106.2 FPS across tested games at ultra settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is strongly supported by this pairing. Data shows esports titles reaching exceptional frame rates: Valorant hits 375 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 361 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 194 FPS at 1920x1080 ultra. Even more demanding shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone maintain 166 FPS at 1080p. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2429 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958, ensures that high-refresh scenarios are not bottlenecked by processing overhead.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 places it ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6% in average benchmark score, indicating robust multi-threaded capability for encoding while gaming. PassMark multithread score of 41317 and integer math score of 155808 further support simultaneous streaming and gameplay. The 65W TDP means thermal headroom is available, though the GPU’s 130W TDP and 300W suggested PSU should be considered for total system power.

Video editing and 3D rendering tasks are well-served by this configuration. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14751 and R15 multicore score of 3540 demonstrate strong sustained rendering performance. The GPU’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 80 tensor cores provide acceleration for effects and AI-assisted workflows. Data compression score of 505885 and floating-point math score of 107005 indicate the CPU handles data-intensive tasks efficiently, making this build viable for 1080p and 1440p video editing timelines.

Software development workloads benefit from the CPU’s high thread count and memory flexibility. The 28 threads allow for rapid compilation of parallel builds, while support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives developers flexibility in platform choices. The PassMark extended instructions score of 28564 suggests strong SIMD performance for scientific computing. The 33 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code paths, and the 2 MB per-core L2 cache aids in tight loops.

Student and office work is handled with significant headroom. The single-threaded PassMark score of 4257 ensures snappy application responsiveness for everyday tasks. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs means even demanding spreadsheet or database operations are fluid. The GPU’s 1113 PassMark G2D score supports smooth 2D desktop compositing, though office workloads barely stress either component. This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom ensures longevity for evolving software demands.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5050 is built on the GB207 chip using Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. It packs 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 20 dedicated RT cores, while 80 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The base clock is 2317 MHz with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth is modest by modern standards, which directly impacts performance at higher resolutions. The 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles at 4K, as seen in the measured FPS drops. Pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 13.17 TFLOPS due to 1:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores place the GPU at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2502, Geekbench OpenCL is 90334, and Geekbench Vulkan is 89381. PassMark scores show DirectX 11 at 150, DirectX 12 at 66, and DirectX 9 at 186. The G3D score is 17326, and GPU compute is 9184. These results indicate the GPU performs close to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which has a deltaPct of 1.6, and slightly below the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at -0.6 deltaPct.

The RT and tensor hardware supports modern rendering features like DLSS and ray-traced effects. However, measured performance shows that at 4K ultra, many titles fall below playable thresholds. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 24 FPS at 3840x2160, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 22 FPS. At 1080p, the same titles achieve 48 and 44 FPS respectively, indicating the GPU is better suited to lower resolutions or with upscaling technologies enabled.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across 50 games reveals a clear resolution scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the average experience is strong: Call of Duty: Warzone delivers 166 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 hits 163 FPS, and Minecraft reaches 161 FPS. Less demanding titles like Roblox achieve 211 FPS, and Valorant tops 375 FPS. However, heavier games show strain: Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 24 FPS, The Medium falls to 34 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 manages only 48 FPS at 1080p ultra.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 147 FPS, Valorant stays at 320 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 drops to 108 FPS. Mid-range titles like Assetto Corsa hit 68 FPS, while Fortnite achieves 50 FPS. The more demanding games struggle further: Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 15 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 reaches only 33 FPS. This resolution is playable for competitive and lighter titles, but challenging for AAA games at ultra settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become significant bottlenecks. Call of Duty: Warzone is the standout at 125 FPS, but most titles fall below 60 FPS. Valorant still achieves 256 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 147 FPSable. However, Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 8 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 24 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 22 FPS. The average frame rate across all games at 4K is low, making this resolution only viable for esports or older titles.

The overall pair rank of 2420 out of 3732 pairs with an average FPS of 106.2 across all games and resolutions confirms this is a mid-tier gaming solution. Titles optimized for competitive play excel, while graphically intensive AAA games require reduced settings or upscaling. The data shows a consistent pattern: 1080p ultra is the sweet spot for this pairing, with 1440p viable for competitive titles and lighter games, and 4K reserved for esports only.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 66th percentile indicates the processor has significant headroom over the graphics card. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at 1080p, the i7-14700F’s strong single-core performance ensures high frame rates. Valorant at 375 FPS and CS:GO at 361 FPS demonstrate that the CPU is not limiting these workloads. The GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, evidenced by the frame rate drops from 1080p to 1440p to 4K.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU dominates. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and PassMark multithread score of 41317 show that rendering and encoding tasks are CPU-bound. The GPU’s compute score of 9184 is comparatively modest, so GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding may not scale as well. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample parallel processing, but the GPU’s 2560 shading units limit overall throughput in graphics-heavy tasks.

Memory bandwidth creates a secondary bottleneck. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, while the GPU has 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In games like Minecraft at 161 FPS at 1080p, the CPU’s cache hierarchy and memory latency matter more than raw bandwidth. The 33 MB L3 cache helps, but the GPU’s 128-bit bus becomes restrictive at higher resolutions where texture streaming demands exceed available bandwidth.

The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP suggest a balanced power profile, but the GPU’s 300W suggested PSU indicates system-level power is moderate. In gaming workloads, the GPU is typically the primary power consumer and performance limiter. The data shows that at 1080p, the GPU is the bottleneck in most titles, while at 4K, the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth are the limiting factors. The CPU rarely becomes the constraint except in very high-refresh scenarios above 200 FPS.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701, a deltaPct of -0.2, meaning the i7-14700F is essentially tied. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288 with a deltaPct of 0.6, placing the Intel part slightly ahead. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 with a deltaPct of 0.8, again showing the i7-14700F in a favorable positionless. The Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469 with a deltaPct of 0.3, confirming the CPU’s competitive positioning.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 35122 and single-core at 4958, Geekbench multicore at 19620 and single-core at 2429, and Cinebench R20 multicore at 14751 with single-core at 2082. PassMark tests show multithread at 41317, single-thread at 4257, integer math at 155808, floating-point math at 107005, and data compression at 505885. The CPU’s power efficiency is notable given the 65W TDP, achieving these scores without requiring high power draw.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21035, placing it at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL at 21153 with a deltaPct of -0.6, meaning the RTX 5050 is slightly behind. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237 with a deltaPct of -1, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 with a deltaPct of -1.6. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713 with a deltaPct of 1.6, placing the RTX 5050 ahead of that rival.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The 91st percentile CPU paired with a 66th percentile GPU creates a build where the processor is not the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, with the GPU constraining overall system performance in graphics-heavy tasks. The average FPS of 106.2 across all games and resolutions confirms that this pairing delivers solid 1080p performance but struggles at higher resolutions.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh esports will find this pairing ideal. The measured FPS at 1920x1080 shows Valorant at 375, CS:GO at 361, and Rainbow Six Siege at 194, all well above 144Hz monitors. Competitive shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone at 166 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 163 FPS also benefit. For gamers who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity, this build excels without requiring expensive high-resolution displays.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded power. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and PassMark multithread score of 41317 indicate strong performance in Adobe Premiere or Blender workloads. The GPU’s 80 tensor cores accelerate AI effects, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit some GPU-accelerated tasks. The 20 cores and 28 threads handle 4K video encoding well, and the 65W TDP keeps power costs low during long renders.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s compile times. The 28 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the high single-core score of 4257 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives developers flexibility in choosing cost-effective or high-bandwidth memory configurations. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces compilation bottlenecks, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

Students and office workers will find this build overkill but future-proof. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking ensures it handles any productivity software for years. The GPU, while not top-tier, provides smooth 2D performance with a G2D score of 1113)Skip the need for a separate graphics solution if the CPU’s lack of integrated graphics is considered. The build’s 300W suggested PSU keeps electricity costs low, making it viable for daily office use while retaining gaming capability.

Small business workstations can leverage this pairing for data-intensive tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 505885 and encryption score of 30144 indicate strong performance for database operations and secure file handling. The CPU’s 20 cores handle virtualization workloads, and the GPU supports CUDA-accelerated applications. The desktop-class build with active production status for both components ensures long-term availability and support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited to memory and GPU tuning. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high bandwidth for future expansion, though the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x8, which is sufficient for current graphics workloadshe.

The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP suggest the system can run on a 300W PSU as indicated by the suggested PSU. This leaves limited headroom for upgrades; adding more power-hungry components would require a larger supply. The single 8-pin power connector on the GPU is standard, and the dual-slot design fits most cases. The production status is active for both components, ensuring availability.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 91st percentile CPU can drive more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth would improve 1440p and 4K performance, which is currently limited by the RTX 5050’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface would support faster GPUs without bandwidth constraints.

Memory upgrades are also viable, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5. Moving from DDR4 to DDR5 would increase memory bandwidth, potentially improving CPU-bound workloads. The L3 cache of 33 MB is fixed, but faster memory can reduce latency. The platform supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation applications. The Socket 1700 platform is mature, and the active production status ensures BIOS updates and driver support.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The i7-14700F ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The RTX 5050 ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 79, and it ranks 2420 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The RTX 5050 has a suggested PSU of 300 W and a TDP of 130 W.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has a 65W TDP and supports ECC memory.

The 20 cores and 28 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122)Skip. The single-core performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and Geekbench single-core score of 2429. The PassMark single-thread score of 4257 confirms excellent per-core efficiency. The CPU’s architecture is optimized for both throughput and latency-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores show the CPU outperforming nearest rivals. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, the i7-14700F has a deltaPct of 0.6, meaning it is 0.6% ahead in average score. The Intel Xeon 6505P has a deltaPct of -0.2, placing the i7-14700F essentially at parity. The AMD EPYC 7313P has a deltaPct of 0.8, indicating the i7-14700F is 0.8% faster. The Xeon Phi 7290 has a deltaPct of 0.3, so the i7-14700F is 0.3% ahead.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, and the dual-channel bus is sufficient for most workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high bandwidth for GPUs and NVMe storage. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required, which is already present in this build. The 10 nm process and 65W TDP indicate good power efficiency for a 20-core part.

Build Overview

This desktop-class build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The CPU is a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh part with 28 threads, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip with 2560 shading units. The combined percentile is 79, placing it in the upper-mid tier of all systems. The pair ranks 2420 out of 3732 pairs with an average FPS of 106.2 across all tested games.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking indicates it is a high-end processor, while the GPU’s 66th percentile places it in the mid-range graphics segment. This creates a system where the CPU has significant headroom, making the GPU the primary performance limiter in gaming workloads. The measured FPS data confirms that 1080p ultra is the target resolution, with 1440p viable for competitive titles and 4K only for esports.

The build is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming, content creation, and software development. The 65W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP keep power requirements modest, with a 300W suggested PSU. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering upgrade flexibility. The active production status for both components ensures ongoing driver support and availability.

The overall tier is solidly mid-to-high, with the CPU providing more performance than the GPU can utilize in many scenarios. For users seeking a balanced system, this pairing delivers strong 1080p gaming and excellent multi-threaded CPU performance. The upgrade path is clear: improving the GPU would provide the most significant performance gains, as the CPU is unlikely to become a bottleneck in most workloads.