SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i7-14700F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 combines a recent high-core-count desktop CPU with a large-memory flagship GPU from the previous generation. The combined benchmark percentile of 82 places this build firmly in the upper tier of tracked systems, driven primarily by the processor, which sits at the 91st percentile against all CPUs, while the graphics card holds the 73rd percentile against all GPUs. This page analyzes what those positions mean in practice, where the balance between the two components lands, and which users the data supports.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-14700F have?

A: The i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, built on Intel's Raptor Lake-R architecture on a 10 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 include, and what type is it?

A: The RTX 3090 carries 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Where does the i7-14700F rank against other CPUs in the database?

A: It sits at the 91st percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620 — within a fraction of a percent of rivals such as the Intel Xeon 6505P (deltaPct -0.2) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (deltaPct 0.6).

Q: Where does the RTX 3090 rank against other GPUs?

A: The RTX 3090 holds the 73rd percentile versus all GPUs with an average score of 27565, sitting essentially level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.5) and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M (deltaPct -1.1).

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The dataset contains no measured FPS entries for this pairing, so all frame-rate discussion on this page is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Q: Does the i7-14700F include integrated graphics?

A: No. The "F" suffix part has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU such as the RTX 3090 is mandatory for display output.

Q: What power supply does this pairing call for?

A: The RTX 3090's suggested PSU is 750 W, against a GPU TDP of 350 W and a CPU TDP of 65 W.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this build posts strong results across every test in the dataset. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700F scores 35122 multi-core and 4958 single-core; in the older R20 run it records 14751 multi-core and 2082 single-core, and in R15 it lands at 3540 multi-core and 499 single-core. Geekbench returns 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core, while Passmark's multithreaded test reports 41317 and its single-thread test reports 4257. Those figures put the processor at the 91st percentile against all CPUs tracked in the database — top-ten-percent territory, and an average benchmark score of 53620 confirms consistency rather than a single outlier result.

That average score is instructive when placed beside the nearest rivals. The Intel Xeon 6505P averages 53701, just 0.2 percent ahead; the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 averages 53469, 0.3 percent behind; the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X averages 53288, 0.6 percent behind; and the AMD EPYC 7313P averages 53206, 0.8 percent behind. In other words, the i7-14700F performs in the same envelope as workstation and enthusiast processors, despite its 65 W TDP rating.

The GPU posts a more mixed picture. The RTX 3090 scores 26645 in Passmark G3D, 172758 in Geekbench OpenCL, 53927 in Geekbench Vulkan, 15356 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 5118 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). Those results produce an average score of 27565 and the 73rd percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile at 27435 (0.5 percent behind the 3090), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27425 (0.5 percent behind), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27839 (1 percent ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M at 27883 (1.1 percent ahead). The combined build percentile of 82 reflects the CPU pulling the average upward: this is a processor-forward system with a still-capable, though no longer front-of-class, graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The i7-14700F belongs to Intel's Core 14th Gen family, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm node with a 257 mm² die. The core topology is the story: 20 cores and 28 threads give it the parallel throughput its benchmark scores demonstrate. The jump from 20 physical cores to only 28 threads indicates a hybrid arrangement in which a subset of cores support hyper-threading while others do not, and that mix is visible in the scaling behavior — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 4958, strong scaling for a desktop part.

Clock behavior spans a wide range: a 2.10 base clock with a 5.40 boost clock. That 5.40 figure is what drives the excellent single-thread results — Geekbench single-core at 2429 and Passmark single-thread at 4257 put snappy interactive response and lightly threaded applications firmly in this chip's comfort zone. Cache resources reinforce both sides of that equation: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 33 MB L3 pool that keeps working sets close to the execution units.

The Passmark subsystem scores fill out the workload picture. Integer math lands at 155808, floating point math at 107005, data compression at 505885, encryption at 30144, extended instructions at 28564, prime number finding at 176, string sorting at 55918, and physics at 2455. High compression and encryption throughput matter directly for archival work, encrypted volumes, and build pipelines; the strong physics score is a useful proxy for game simulation and real-time engine performance. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — an unusual capability on a mainstream desktop part and one that broadens the chip's appeal toward reliability-sensitive workstations. The platform exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, giving the GPU a modern link even though the RTX 3090 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile split defines this build's character: CPU at 91, GPU at 73, combined at 82. In any workload where the processor leads — compilation, code compilation-adjacent tasks, physics simulation, video encoding preparation, compression — the system behaves like a top-tier machine. In GPU-bound rendering and gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 3090's 73rd percentile is the ceiling, and the i7-14700F will spend much of its capacity waiting.

That surplus is not wasted, however. With 28 threads available and a Passmark physics score of 2455, this pairing is well suited to gaming while simultaneously encoding a stream: the GPU renders frames while a meaningful share of the CPU's threads handle encoding, scene management, and OS overhead. In the other direction, GPU compute workloads such as OpenCL-accelerated rendering — where the RTX 3090's Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 is the relevant metric — will saturate the graphics card and leave CPU headroom for asset management and UI tasks.

For pure gaming, the balance implies the build is processor-rich. Titles that scale with single-thread performance (single-thread 4257 on Passmark, 2429 on Geekbench) will never be limited by the CPU; the frame ceiling is set by the GPU's G3D score of 26645. Users targeting very high refresh rates at lower resolutions will find the GPU saturating first, while heavy simulation and strategy games with large thread counts will leverage the 20-core topology more fully.

Because the dataset includes no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, the scaling discussion above remains an inference from benchmark scores rather than from captured frame-time data.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination — the dataset's measured FPS table is empty and the data-is-measured flag is false. All frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not captured results.

From the RTX 3090's Passmark G3D score of 26645 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 5118, the expectation is high-refresh gameplay at 1080p and 1440p in most modern titles, with ultra settings viable at 1440p where the 24 GB frame buffer and 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth absorb high-resolution texture loads without strain. At 4K, the estimates point to playable but not universally high-refresh performance: the GPU's 73rd percentile position means recent demanding engines will pull frame rates down at native 4K ultra, while lighter titles should remain smooth.

Ray tracing is supported through the card's 82 RT cores, but the percentile position suggests enabling heavy RT at 4K will push frame rates toward the uncomfortable range without upscaling. The 328 tensor cores provide the hardware basis for DLSS in supported games, which is the practical lever for maintaining frame rates with RT enabled. The CPU side contributes essentially no gaming-side limitation here: a single-thread Passmark score of 4257 and a 5.40 boost clock keep frame delivery well ahead of what the GPU can produce, so estimated frame-rate curves should flatten at GPU-bound settings rather than sag at CPU-bound ones.

Who Should Build It

The data supports several distinct user groups. Content creators are the primary fit: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and Geekbench multi-core result of 19620 provide the throughput for video editing timelines, and the RTX 3090's 24 GB of GDDR6X is a genuine asset for GPU-accelerated editing, effects work, and local AI inference where model size matters more than raw compute rank. Developers are equally well served — the 20-core/28-thread topology, a Passmark data compression score of 505885, and top-decile CPU positioning make compilation and containerized workloads fast.

Gamers targeting 1440p are the best fit on the graphics side; 4K players will get playable estimated performance but not class-leading frame rates given the 73rd GPU percentile. Streamers benefit from the CPU surplus described above. Small businesses and students building workstations should note the ECC memory support and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lane provision, which together give this configuration credibility as a long-lived professional machine rather than a pure consumer toy. This is not the build for buyers chasing the absolute highest GPU percentile; it is a build for users whose workloads are thread-heavy and whose GPU needs are capacity-forward as much as speed-forward.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With the CPU at the 91st percentile and single-thread Passmark at 4257, frame delivery is never the constraint. Estimated frame rates from the GPU's G3D score of 26645 point to high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming in most titles, with the GPU as the limiting factor at 4K.

Streaming while gaming: The 28-thread CPU can dedicate a subset of cores to encoding while the RTX 3090 handles rendering. The Passmark physics score of 2455 supports the simulation side, and the combined 82nd percentile indicates the pairing holds up under parallel load better than a GPU-matched, weaker-CPU configuration would.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 35122 handles timeline scrubbing, proxies, and export passes, while 24 GB of VRAM with 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth lets the GPU hold large frame buffers and effects graphs in memory. Geekbench OpenCL at 172758 confirms strong acceleration for GPU-enabled editing operations.

3D rendering: CPU rendering benefits from the 35122 multi-core score; GPU rendering leans on the OpenCL and Vulkan results (172758 and 53927 respectively) and the 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 rate. The 328 tensor cores also accelerate denoising and AI-assisted rendering steps.

Software development: Compilation, tests, and container workloads map directly onto the 20-core topology, and the 505885 compression score benefits dependency caching and artifact packaging. DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes keep the platform responsive for years of tooling growth.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, this build is overqualified in the best sense — the single-core scores of 4257 (Passmark) and 2429 (Geekbench) guarantee instant application response, and the CPU's 65 W rated TDP keeps the platform manageable for general-purpose machines that occasionally tackle heavier coursework such as data analysis or media projects.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as flagged by the buildClass field, pairing a current-generation, actively produced Intel desktop processor with an end-of-life but still-memorable NVIDIA flagship. The overall tier, judged by the combined percentile of 82, is upper-tier: better than roughly four of five tracked systems. The internal composition matters more than the headline number — the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 73rd produce a build that is processor-dominant. The RTX 3090's status as an Ampere-generation card with a 628 mm² Samsung 8 nm die and 28,300 million transistors explains both its strong memory subsystem and its mid-pack aggregate ranking against a newer field. The i7-14700F, released later in the timeline, keeps the platform's CPU side current, with its launch MSRP of $359 and active production status making it the more future-proof half of the pairing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3090 is built on the GA102 chip, Ampere architecture, Samsung 8 nm process, with a transistor density of 45.1 million transistors per square millimeter across its 628 mm² die. The hardware inventory is extensive: 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. Peak rates follow — 189.8 GPixel/s pixel fill, 556.0 GTexel/s texture fill, and 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 35.58 TFLOPS.

Clocks run from a 1395 MHz base to a 1695 MHz boost, with memory at 19.5 Gbps effective on the 384-bit bus. That memory subsystem is the card's signature: 24 GB of GDDR6X moving 936.2 GB/s, a combination that remains rare and that explains why the card stays relevant for memory-hungry workloads even as its aggregate percentile has slipped to 73.

The benchmark scores translate as follows. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 and Vulkan score of 53927 indicate strong general compute throughput for rendering engines and GPU compute libraries. The Passmark GPU Compute result of 15356 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5118 place real-time rendering performance in the upper-middle of the field — competitive with the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 7800M per the rival deltas, but no longer at the frontier. API support is modern: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card is physically substantial — triple-slot, 336 mm long, 140 mm tall, 61 mm wide — with one 12-pin power connector and outputs of one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a. Its launch MSRP was 1,499 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform anchors on Intel Socket 1700, which determines the CPU upgrade surface: any compatible Socket 1700 part is a drop-in candidate, and the board's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 (dual-channel, ECC capable) gives builders flexibility depending on the motherboard chosen. PCIe provision is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes — more than the RTX 3090's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface requires, which means a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the host platform.

Power is the first practical planning item. The suggested PSU for the RTX 3090 is 750 W, sized against the card's 350 W TDP and its single 12-pin connector; the CPU's 65 W rated TDP leaves clear headroom within that recommendation for the rest of the system. Builders should verify the case accommodates the card's triple-slot, 336 mm footprint.

The sensible upgrade direction is asymmetric. The CPU, at the 91st percentile and averaging within a percent of the Ryzen 9 7900X and Xeon 6505P, has little room to move within this platform without diminishing returns. The GPU, at the 73rd percentile, is the upgrade lever: the card's successor generation is the GeForce 40 series per the dataset, and any replacement would inherit the Gen 5 link and the 750 W power envelope already in place. Because the RTX 3090 is officially end-of-life while the i7-14700F remains in active production, the practical trajectory for this build is to keep the processor and platform, treat the graphics card as the replaceable component, and rely on the CPU's ECC and DDR5 support to keep the machine professionally viable through that transition.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds