SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance envelope. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the 91st percentile against all processors, paired with a GPU that sits in the 75th percentile against all graphics cards. This creates an interesting asymmetry where the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics card in most scenarios. The following analysis breaks down what this means for rendering, gaming, productivity, and the overall system balance.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung’s 8 nm process, housing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. This is a substantial chip with 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The memory subsystem is a key specification: 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus delivers 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective, and the GPU boost clock reaches 1770 MHz from a 1575 MHz base.

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated features, the RTX 3070 Ti includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. These are not just marketing numbers; they directly impact performance in games that use DLSS or ray-traced effects. The FP32 compute rating of 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1), indicates strong raw compute for both traditional shading and mixed-precision workloads. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s suggest the card can handle high fill-rate demands, though the actual gaming results will show where these theoretical limits hit real-world walls.

Benchmark scores for the GPU paint a clear picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,478 is a modern workload measure, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 119,718 and 139,541 respectively show strong compute performance. PassMark G3D score of 23,356 places this GPU in the 75th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 29,945. The nearest rival comparisons are telling: the RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29,928 (0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30,095 (-0.5% delta), and the RTX 2080 Ti scores 29,783 (0.5% delta). This means the 3070 Ti sits in a tight competitive cluster, essentially trading blows with last-generation flagship cards and current mid-range mobile parts. The 8 GB VRAM is a notable constraint for 4K texture-heavy titles, and the data will show this limitation clearly at 3840x2160 resolution.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and single-core score of 4,958 are both strong figures. Geekbench multi-core of 19,620 and single-core of 2,429 reinforce this. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 and single-thread score of 4,257 (listed twice in the data as 4,257) show consistency across different benchmarking methodologies. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53,701 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53,469 (0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53,288 (0.6% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53,206 (0.8% delta). The i7-14700F is essentially neck-and-neck with these server and high-end desktop parts, which is remarkable for a 65 W TDP processor.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29,945 places it in the 75th percentile, a full 16 percentile points lower than the CPU. This gap is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The combined percentile for the system is 83, which reflects that the CPU is doing most of the heavy lifting in overall system capability. The pair rank by FPS across 3,732 pairs is 1,285, with an average FPS across games of 145.1. This rank indicates that in gaming scenarios, this combination is above average but not elite, primarily because the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The data shows a system where the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at 1080p, but the GPU’s 75th percentile performance caps the experience at 1440p and especially 4K. The measured FPS data will confirm this: at 1920x1080, many games exceed 100 FPS, but at 3840x2160, most titles drop below 60 FPS. The combined picture is one of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-to-high-end GPU that was released in 2021 and is now end-of-life, meaning the CPU has more future longevity than the GPU.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 10 nm process node from Intel, and the die size is 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, a significant single-core advantage for lightly-threaded tasks. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is crucial for gaming and data-intensive workloads where repeated access to the same data benefits from fast on-die storage.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. This is a unique feature for a consumer desktop chip, making it suitable for entry-level workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RTX 3070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is still fully utilized. The lack of integrated graphics (marked as N/A) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build already includes.

The benchmark scores reveal the CPU’s character. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,122 is a strong result for a 65 W TDP part, showing efficient multi-threading. The single-core score of 4,958 is excellent, indicating strong per-thread performance from the 5.40 GHz boost clock. PassMark data compression score of 505,885 and data encryption of 30,144 show the CPU handles these specialized tasks well. Extended instructions score of 28,564 and floating-point math of 107,005 indicate solid compute for scientific and financial workloads. Integer math of 155,808 and find prime numbers of 176 are also respectable. The random string sorting score of 55,918 suggests good memory subsystem performance. The physics score of 2,455 in PassMark is moderate, which may reflect the 65 W TDP limiting sustained all-core loads.

The 91st percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, is a server part that costs significantly more, yet the i7-14700F matches it within 0.2%. This makes the CPU the clear strength of this build, capable of handling heavy multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation without bottlenecking.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is best suited for gamers targeting 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolution with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, titles like Counter-Strike 2 run at 222.5 FPS, Valorant at 503 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 261 FPS. These are competitive gaming scenarios where the CPU’s strong single-core performance shines. At 1440p, the results are still playable: Counter-Strike 2 drops to 144.9 FPS, Valorant to 429 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 171 FPS. However, at 4K, the GPU limits these esports titles to 82.3 FPS, 343 FPS, and 94 FPS respectively, which are still playable but show the GPU constraint.

Content creators and video editors will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded power. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,122 and PassMark multi-thread of 41,317 indicate strong rendering performance for software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 3D rendering workloads, as measured by Cinebench, will be CPU-bound, and the i7-14700F’s 91st percentile ranking means it can handle complex scenes. The GPU’s 75th percentile performance is sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects but not for high-end 3D rendering tasks that rely on CUDA cores.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see substantial benefits from the 20 cores and 28 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 155,808 is particularly relevant for compilation tasks, which are heavily integer-bound. Students and small business workstations using office productivity suites will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures smooth multitasking and future-proofing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive workloads, making this a viable entry-level workstation despite the desktop classification.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a clear bottleneck hierarchy. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 75th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the FPS drops from 166 at 1080p to 147 at 1440p to 125 at 4K. This is a relatively small drop, suggesting the CPU is keeping up but the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions. In contrast, in Counter-Strike 2, the drop from 222.5 FPS at 1080p to 144.9 FPS at 1440p to 82.3 FPS at 4K is much steeper, indicating the GPU is heavily limiting the frame rate.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The GPU’s compute score of 11,601 in PassMark is respectable but not exceptional, meaning GPU-accelerated compute tasks will be less efficient than CPU-bound tasks. The system’s combined percentile of 83 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the CPU’s 91 and the GPU’s 75. The pair rank of 1,285 out of 3,732 pairs (approximately 65th percentile) confirms that this is a balanced-but-GPU-limited pairing.

The FPS data shows that the CPU can drive the GPU to its limits at 1080p, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 75th percentile performance become the bottleneck. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 64.8 FPS at 1080p but drops to 46.1 FPS at 1440p and 33.4 FPS at 4K. This is a typical GPU-bound scenario where the CPU is not the limiting factor. The conclusion is that for gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck at all resolutions above 1080p, while for productivity tasks, the CPU is the star and the GPU is adequate but not limiting.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured (dataIsMeasured is true), so the following FPS figures are actual results at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, this system delivers excellent performance in most titles. Esports and competitive games run at very high frame rates: Valorant hits 503 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 485 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 264.1 FPS. Popular multiplayer titles also perform well: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 166 FPS, Fortnite at 102.7 FPS, and Apex-style games like Fivem at 110 FPS. Single-player titles are playable but less smooth: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 64.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 56.4 FPS, and The Medium drops to 46 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the GPU starts to show its limits. Valorant still runs at 429 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege X at 169.3 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 46.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 42.6 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly demanding, running at only 20 FPS. Most games fall between 60-150 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh monitors above 144 Hz. The 8 GB VRAM is likely the cause of some stuttering in texture-heavy titles.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly GPU-bound. Valorant still manages 343 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 125 FPS, but most AAA titles struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 33.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11 FPS. Many games drop below 40 FPS, making 4K gaming only viable for less demanding titles or with significant settings reductions. The average FPS across all games is 145.1, but this is skewed by the very high esports numbers. For a realistic gaming experience, this system is best suited for 1080p or 1440p, with 4K reserved for less demanding games or older titles.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU’s most significant performance advantage over its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F achieves a 91st percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 53,620. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, scores 53,288, which is only 0.6% lower. This close margin shows the i7-14700F offers comparable performance to a high-end Ryzen part.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its predecessor and successor?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has a predecessor of GeForce 20 series and a successor of GeForce 40 series. Its average benchmark score of 29,945 puts it 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, which scores 29,783. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status.

Q: What memory types does this system support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors. The GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming?

A: The data shows mixed results at 3840x2160. Esports titles like Valorant run at 343 FPS, but demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 33.4 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11 FPS. The GPU’s 75th percentile performance and 8 GB VRAM limit 4K capability.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 290 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads compared to single-threaded?

A: The CPU scores 35,122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4,958 in single-core. This shows strong multi-threading from 20 cores and 28 threads, while the 5.40 GHz boost clock delivers excellent single-thread performance for gaming and light workloads.

Q: What is the system’s overall ranking compared to other CPU-GPU pairs?

A: The pair ranks 1,285 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 145.1 across games. The combined percentile is 83, which is lower than the CPU’s 91st percentile but higher than the GPU’s 75th percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this socket, and ECC memory support is a bonus for reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-compatible with future GPUs and storage devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck from the bus interface.

The power requirements are modest for the performance level. The CPU TDP is 65 W, and the GPU TDP is 290 W, totaling 355 W for the two main components. The suggested PSU is 600 W, which leaves about 245 W of headroom for other components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting. This headroom is adequate but not excessive, especially if overclocking is considered (though the CPU’s multiplier is locked, indicated by multiplierUnlocked: false).

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, as the RTX 3070 Ti is end-of-life and the 75th percentile performance is the system’s main limitation. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 GPU will work at full bandwidth. Memory could also be upgraded if the builder chose DDR4 initially, as DDR5 offers higher bandwidth. Storage upgrades are straightforward with PCIe Gen 5 NVMe support. The platform is mature, so BIOS updates may be limited, but the CPU’s performance headroom means the system can remain relevant for several years.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the Intel Core i7-14700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory. The system’s combined percentile is 83, which places it in the upper tier of desktop systems but not at the absolute top. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 75th percentile creates a system that is more powerful in compute than in graphics.

The pair ranks 1,285 out of 3,732 pairs by FPS, which is in the upper third of all tested combinations. The average FPS across games is 145.1, indicating strong overall gaming performance, driven by the CPU’s ability to maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. This is a high-end productivity machine with solid gaming capability, rather than a pure gaming rig. The CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and 3D modeling, while the GPU provides good but not exceptional gaming performance, especially at higher resolutions.

The system’s tier is best described as upper-mid-range to high-end, with the CPU being the standout component. The GPU, while 75th percentile, is older and has less VRAM than current mid-range cards. This makes the build ideal for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks but still want a capable gaming GPU. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $359, and the GPU is $599, but these are launch prices and not current market values.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This system excels at 1080p and 1440p competitive gaming. Valorant hits 503 FPS at 1080p and 429 FPS at 1440p, while Counter-Strike 2 runs at 222.5 FPS and 144.9 FPS respectively. The CPU’s single-core score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles, making this a strong choice for 240 Hz monitor users at 1080p.

Streaming: The combination of 20 cores and 28 threads allows for simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant performance loss. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 35,122 in Cinebench R23 means x264 encoding at medium preset is feasible. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by RTX tensor cores) offloads encoding tasks, though the 75th percentile GPU performance may drop FPS in demanding titles while streaming.

Video editing: Video editing software benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU’s multi-thread performance (41,317 in PassMark) handles timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing but may struggle with 4K multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary renderer in this system, with 35,122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This is ideal for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores can accelerate OptiX-based rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures this system outperforms most desktop builds in rendering.

Software development: The 20 cores and 28 threads are excellent for compilation tasks, with PassMark integer math of 155,808 indicating strong throughput. The large 33 MB L3 cache improves performance in large codebases. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank means developers will rarely wait on compilation.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical student and office workloads. The CPU’s 91st percentile performance means spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing tasks are instantaneous. The GPU’s 75th percentile performance is unnecessary for office applications but allows for occasional light gaming or creative work. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day operation, and the 600 W PSU provides ample headroom for future upgrades.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds