SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400: A Desktop Pairing with Extreme Component Tier Divergence

This build pairs Intel’s 20-core Core i7-14700F with AMD’s Radeon RX 7400, a combination that sits at the 54th percentile overall among all desktop pairings in the database. The CPU is a top-tier workstation-class part, ranking in the 91st percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in only the 17th percentile against all GPUs — a 74-point gap that defines the character of this system. The data shows a platform with extraordinary processing headroom paired with entry-level graphics capability, making it a lopsided configuration by design.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that belies its high core count. The memory architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and the chip includes ECC memory support — a feature typically associated with workstation and server platforms rather than consumer desktop parts.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 pool. This large L3 allocation benefits workloads with data locality, such as database operations and complex simulations. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing the foundation for fast NVMe storage and high-bandwidth add-in cards. There is no integrated graphics, meaning the RX 7400 is mandatory for display output. The processor was released on January 7, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $359, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

Benchmark results illustrate the CPU’s multi-threaded dominance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 35,122, while the single-core score is 4,958 — a ratio of roughly 7.1:1 that shows strong scaling across the 20 cores. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. Geekbench reflects a similar profile with a multi-core score of 19,620 and single-core of 2,429. The PassMark suite adds workload-specific detail: integer math scores 155,808, floating-point math 107,005, and extended instructions 28,564. Data compression hits 505,885, while encryption reaches 30,144. The multi-thread score of 41,317 and single-thread score of 4,257 reinforce the dual identity of this chip — it is both a high-frequency single-core performer and a many-core workhorse.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288 (0.6% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206 (0.8% lower). This grouping shows the i7-14700F sits at parity with both server-class Xeons and a high-end Ryzen 9, meaning for multi-threaded productivity it trades blows with parts aimed at entirely different market segments. For real workloads, this translates to rapid video encoding, fast compilation, and fluid 3D rendering — tasks that exploit the 28 threads and large shared cache.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture reveals a system with a pronounced performance asymmetry. The CPU’s 91st percentile standing is among the strongest in the database, while the GPU’s 17th percentile is among the weakest. The combined percentile of 54 reflects the geometric mean of these two extreme positions, placing the overall pairing in the middle of all tracked configurations.

For the CPU, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 puts it in the range of high-end desktop processors, and the single-core score of 4,958 demonstrates that it does not sacrifice responsiveness for core count. The PassMark data compression score of 505,885 is particularly telling — this is a metric that benefits from both high clock speeds and large cache, and the i7-14700F delivers accordingly. The encryption score of 30,144 and random string sorting score of 55,918 indicate strong performance in security-related and data-manipulation tasks.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103, and the PassMark G3D score is 11,897. The GPU compute score is 5,152, which is modest relative to the CPU’s compute capabilities. The DirectX 10 score of 59, DirectX 11 score of 97, DirectX 12 score of 44, and DirectX 9 score of 176 show that the GPU handles older APIs better than modern ones, a pattern consistent with its low overall percentile. The G2D score of 1,209 indicates acceptable 2D desktop performance but nothing more.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 2,467 places it in the 17th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (2,440, 1.1% higher), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2,433, 1.4% higher), Intel HD Graphics 610 (2,425, 1.8% higher), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2,422, 1.9% higher). This grouping means the RX 7400 performs at the level of integrated graphics and decade-old mobile GPUs — a stark contrast to the CPU’s position alongside server Xeons. The combined picture is clear: this system will excel at any CPU-bound workload but will be constrained in GPU-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a severe imbalance: the CPU is 74 percentile points above the GPU. In nearly any workload that engages the GPU, the RX 7400 will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 17th percentile create a situation where the processor is capable of feeding far more graphical work than the GPU can process. For CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, data analysis, or multi-threaded rendering that uses the CPU, the i7-14700F operates at its full potential. For GPU-bound tasks such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 7400 will cap performance well below what the CPU could support.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile gap alone is sufficient to establish that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1080p and above. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 and 4,257 in PassMark single-thread indicates it can deliver frames rapidly to the GPU, but the GPU’s low scores mean it cannot translate that feed rate into high frame rates. In productivity workloads that are purely CPU-based, the bottleneck shifts — the GPU is barely involved, and the i7-14700F’s 28 threads scale effectively. The practical outcome is a system that feels extremely fast for compute-oriented work but underwhelming for graphical tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s 17th percentile ranking, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 and a PassMark G3D score of 11,897, indicates performance in the range of entry-level graphics. Based on these scores, the RX 7400 is expected to handle esports titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high or ultra settings.

At 1080p, the estimated frame rates for competitive titles such as older shooters or MOBAs could reach playable levels, but the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests that newer API-heavy games will see significant performance drops. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for high-texture workloads, and frame rates are expected to fall below 60 FPS in most modern titles. At 4K, the GPU is effectively out of its depth — the pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s are not adequate for such a high pixel count. The CPU’s role in gaming is far less limiting; its single-core performance ranks in the 91st percentile, so it will not be the source of frame rate drops in CPU-bound scenarios. For any gamer considering this build, the expectation should be 1080p gaming at modest settings, with the understanding that the CPU could drive a far more powerful GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that broadens the platform’s appeal for workstation use. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering substantial bandwidth for storage and expansion cards; the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible but narrower than the CPU’s full lane allocation.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 43 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W for the GPU. This low power requirement means the existing power supply headroom is generous — a 200 W PSU recommendation is modest by modern standards, and most systems will have significant room for upgrades. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, which limits physical compatibility in small form factor cases but is manageable in standard desktop towers.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier graphics card. The Socket 1700 platform also supports other 14th Gen processors, though the locked multiplier on this chip means overclocking is not an avenue for performance gains. The DDR5 memory support allows for a future transition to higher bandwidth memory, and the ECC capability is available for those who need error correction in compute workloads. The platform’s Gen 5 PCIe support ensures that a newer GPU with Gen 5 interface will not be bandwidth-limited.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the Navi 33 chip, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die — a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². It uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The chip includes 28 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs advent. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth; memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The clock speeds are a base of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost of 2300 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU’s TDP is 43 W, and it requires a 200 W power supply, drawing power through a single 6-pin connector. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern monitors. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the width of the CPU’s Gen 5 x16 lanes but sufficient for this GPU’s bandwidth needs.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs far below its architectural potential would suggest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 place it in the 17th percentile, alongside integrated graphics solutions. The compute score of 5,152 indicates limited GPGPU capability, which is a disadvantage for rendering workloads that offload to the GPU. The RT cores exist but are low in number (28), and given the low overall scores, ray tracing performance is expected to be weak. For rendering tasks, this GPU is not a suitable acceleration device — the CPU’s 28 threads will outperform it in most compute-heavy scenarios. The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is adequate for 1080p textures but will limit high-resolution or high-detail workloads. The bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is modest, and combined with the 128-bit bus, it constrains memory-intensive operations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and an effective memory speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6505P, 0.3% higher than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and 0.8% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2,467, which is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon 8040S, 1.4% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, 1.8% higher than the Intel HD Graphics 610, and 1.9% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 54, reflecting a CPU in the 91st percentile and a GPU in the 17th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700F supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 43 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, with a single 6-pin power connector.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a 91st-percentile CPU with a 17th-percentile GPU, resulting in a 54th-percentile combined ranking. The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor that competes with server Xeons and high-end Ryzen parts, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 performs at the level of integrated graphics. The system is fundamentally a workstation CPU with an entry-level display adapter bolted on — a configuration that makes sense only if the primary workload is CPU-bound and the GPU is used for basic output rather than acceleration. The overall tier is mid-range by combined metrics, but this obscures the extreme variance between components. The CPU is top-tier, the GPU is bottom-tier, and the pairing is defined by that contrast.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose workloads are dominated by CPU processing and who require only modest graphical output. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 28 threads and high multi-core scores — a Cinebench R23 score of 35,122 indicates rapid build times. Data analysts and researchers running simulations or processing large datasets will find the PassMark integer math score of 155,808 and data compression score of 505,885 valuable. Students in computer science or engineering fields who need a powerful compile machine but do not game heavily will appreciate the CPU power. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads can leverage the ECC memory support and high thread count. Content creators who offload rendering to the CPU rather than the GPU — such as software renderers in 3D applications — will see strong performance. The GPU is sufficient for office tasks, 2D desktop work, and light video playback, but it is not suited for GPU-accelerated editing or rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not a realistic scenario for this pairing. The GPU’s 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 mean frame rates will be limited to entry-level levels; the CPU’s high single-core performance cannot compensate for the GPU’s low throughput.

Streaming: The CPU can handle encoding with its 28 threads, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 28,564 supports AVX workloads, but the GPU will struggle to render games at high quality while streaming, making this a poor choice for game streaming.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding will be fast — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and PassMark floating-point score of 107,005 indicate efficient processing — but GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering will be slow due to the GPU’s low compute score of 5,152.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is excellent; the multi-thread scores are competitive with server Xeons)Skip, but GPU rendering is not viable given the RX 7400’s 17th percentile position and limited compute capability.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. Compilation benefits from the 28 threadsalert, and the single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the GPU handles 2D tasks adequately (G2D score of 1,209). The system is more powerful than needed for these tasks, but it will not struggle with any office workload.