SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation pairing represents a desktop-class build that sits at the 95th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone ranks in the 91st percentile against all processors, while the GPU commands the 98th percentile against all graphics cards. This is a configuration aimed at professional workstations and high-end content creation, where the CPU’s 20 cores and the GPU’s 32 GB of memory create a platform with substantial compute headroom. The data shows a system that is not primarily oriented toward pure gaming, but rather toward sustained multi-threaded workloads and GPU-accelerated tasks that demand large memory buffers.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 20 cores and 28 threads, which is a hybrid configuration typical of modern Intel parts—performance cores paired with efficiency cores—though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact split. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. This is a locked multiplier part, so overclocking via multiplier adjustments is not available; the boost behavior is determined by the CPU’s firmware and thermal headroom.

Cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. For workloads that rely on repeated data access, such as database queries or compiling large projects, that 33 MB L3 helps keep frequently used data close to the cores. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported—an important feature for workstation stability when running long compute jobs. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which gives ample bandwidth for the GPU and high-speed NVMe storage. Integrated graphics are present in the form of UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or as a fallback display output.

Benchmark data shows a CPU that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 28398, which is a heavy-lifting result for rendering and batch processing. Single-core performance in R23 is 2080, which indicates solid but not class-leading responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 14388, and the R15 multi-core score is 4061. Geekbench results echo this pattern: a multi-core score of 17087 and a single-core score of 2409. PassMark tests further break down the CPU’s strengths: integer math scores 154535, floating point math scores 106716, and multithread scores 40318. Data compression performance is 498198, while data encryption is 29601. Extended instructions score 28388, and prime number finding scores 164. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 52301, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700 is effectively tied with a group of high-end server and desktop chips. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H scores 52431, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700—a negligible difference. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073, 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947, 0.7% lower. In practical terms, the i7-14700 matches or slightly edges out these rivals in aggregate performance, which means it can stand in for a Xeon or EPYC in many single-socket workloads without a measurable penalty. For real workloads, this CPU handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with authority. The 28 threads allow parallel tasks to scale well, and the high boost clock ensures that single-threaded applications like legacy CAD tools or older games still run smoothly.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation builds that require error correction during long compute or data processing tasks.

Q: What is the power draw of the CPU and GPU respectively?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the entire build is 600 W.

Q: What socket does the i7-14700 use, and what memory types are compatible?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How does the i7-14700 compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in aggregate performance?

A: The i7-14700 has an average benchmark score of 52301, while the Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947. This means the i7-14700 is 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU is not designed for manual overclocking, but it does boost up to 5.40 GHz automatically.

Q: What is the PCIe generation supported by the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this pairing are dominated by the GPU’s high percentile ranking. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184664. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 175286, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 194041. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183725 (0.5% lower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187147 (1.3% higher), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182109 (1.4% lower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D at 178050 (3.7% lower). This means the RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits in the upper echelon of accelerators, slightly above the A100 80 GB and just below the A100 40 GB in aggregate compute scores, while clearly outpacing a consumer flagship like the RTX 4090 D.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking, combined with the GPU’s 98th percentile, places the whole build at the 95th combined percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 52301 is respectable but not as dominant as the GPU’s. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 28398, which is strong for a desktop part, but it is not in the same league as the GPU’s raw compute throughput. The GPU delivers 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1), making it a compute monster for floating-point workloads.

The combined picture is that of a system where the GPU is the star. In any workload that leverages GPU compute—such as rendering, machine learning inference, or video encoding—the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it exceeds what most CPUs can feed it. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads are sufficient to keep the GPU busy in most scenarios, but the GPU’s performance ceiling is far above the CPU’s. For example, in a 3D rendering scene, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 on the CPU is a fraction of what the GPU can do in a GPU-accelerated renderer. However, for physics simulation or CPU-based scene preparation, the CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2226 and multithread score of 40318 provide a solid foundation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility: they can reuse existing DDR4 modules to lower build cost, or opt for DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the FACT PACK does not specify speed advantages. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for future NVMe drives and GPUs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, running at Gen 4 speeds without issue.

The GPU’s TDP is 250 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 600 W. This leaves headroom for additional drives and fans, but not for a second high-power GPU. The CPU’s TDP is a modest 65 W, which means the total system draw is well within the 600 W envelope, assuming a typical configuration of one GPU, a few drives, and standard peripherals. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have that connector available.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory bandwidth or capacity, given the dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The CPU’s 33 MB L3 cache is already substantial, so cache upgrades are not applicable. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU allows for future high-speed NVMe drives, though the FACT PACK does not list specific speeds. The GPU’s 32 GB of memory is already large, so memory capacity is unlikely to be a bottleneck for most workloads. The platform is at the end of its socket life, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the current CPU is still in active production and should serve for several years.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance is decent, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2409 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080. The GPU is extremely powerful, but the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so gaming performance is estimated. At high refresh rates, the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 98th percentile ranking suggests it can push very high frame rates at lower resolutions. The 32 GB of VRAM is overkill for gaming, but it ensures no texture-related bottlenecks.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 40318 indicates strong parallel performance, and the GPU has dedicated tensor cores (400) and RT cores (100) that could assist with encoding or AI-based features. The CPU’s data compression score of 498198 is high, which helps with stream buffering.

Video editing: This is where the pairing shines. The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 32 GB GPU memory allows for editing 8K footage or complex multi-layer compositions without spilling to system RAM.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and 32 GB of VRAM make it ideal for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 106716 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks, but the GPU will dominate. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14388 is strong for viewport physics or final frame CPU passes.

Software development: Compilation benefits from the CPU’s 28 threads and 33 MB L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 154535 and data encryption score of 29601 are relevant for build servers or code signing. The GPU’s compute power can accelerate machine learning model training or test suites that use CUDA.

Student and office work: This is overkill for standard office tasks. The CPU’s single-core performance is fine, but the GPU’s power and cost are wasted on spreadsheets or web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle basic display tasks, allowing the GPU to be reserved for compute jobs. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is efficient, but the system as a whole is not designed for low power consumption.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals and heavy users who need both strong CPU throughput and massive GPU compute. Content creators working with 8K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the 32 GB of VRAM and 98th percentile GPU ranking. Data scientists and researchers running machine learning models will find the 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance useful for training and inference. Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the 28 threads and high multithread scores for parallel compilation. Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or financial modeling will see immediate gains from the CPU’s 91st percentile rank and the GPU’s compute capabilities.

Gamers at 4K resolution will find the GPU capable of high settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact expectations are estimates. The CPU’s single-core score of 2409 in Geekbench is sufficient for most games, but the build is not optimized for esports titles where high refresh rates matter more than raw compute. The 32 GB of VRAM is excessive for gaming, but it does future-proof against texture-heavy titles. The target user is more likely a workstation operator than a pure gamer, and the build’s 95th combined percentile reflects a focus on professional-grade performance rather than gaming efficiency.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that, at 1440p and 4K, this GPU can handle most titles at ultra settings with high frame rates. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2409 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080, is adequate for feeding the GPU in most games, but in CPU-bound titles, the GPU may not reach its full potential.

At 1080p, the CPU could become the bottleneck in some games, as high refresh rates demand fast single-thread response. The PassMark single-thread score of 4236 is solid, but not top-tier, so expect frame rates to be limited by the CPU in less demanding scenes. At 4K, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, but given its 98th percentile position, it will still deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 32 GB of VRAM ensures that no game will exceed memory capacity, even with ultra textures and high-resolution mods. However, without measured data, these are qualitative expectations rather than precise numbers.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread part from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is a workstation-class accelerator with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, 12800 shading units, and 400 tensor cores, built on Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined percentile ranking is 95th, meaning this build outperforms 95% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile, and the GPU at the 98th, so the GPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance.

In terms of tier, this is a high-end professional workstation. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 52301 places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, while the GPU’s average score of 184664 is near the top of all graphics cards. The build is not designed for casual use; it’s built for sustained compute workloads. The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are the standout features, while the CPU’s 33 MB L3 cache and 28 threads provide the necessary support. The 95th combined percentile indicates that few configurations offer this level of overall performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is skewed heavily toward the GPU. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 91st percentile means that, in most workloads, the GPU will be the component that finishes tasks faster, and the CPU may struggle to keep up in certain scenarios. For example, in GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning training, the GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance will complete iterations quickly, but the CPU’s data preparation or preprocessing steps—scored at PassMark integer math 154535 and data compression 498198—may become the bottleneck if they are not parallelized enough.

In gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-core score of 2409 in Geekbench becomes the limiting factor, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The PassMark physics score of 2226 also indicates modest physics simulation performance relative to the GPU’s power. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 98th percentile ranking means it will still be the primary limiter, but the CPU is less likely to hold it back. For productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and the GPU’s compute power complement each other, but the GPU’s 32 GB memory and high bandwidth suggest that GPU-dependent tasks will complete faster than CPU-dependent ones.

The FPS scaling, though unmeasured, follows this pattern: at 1080p, expect CPU limits; at 4K, expect GPU limits. The overall system is balanced for compute-heavy workloads where the GPU does the heavy lifting, but not for tasks that require rapid single-threaded response. Builders should pair this with fast DDR5 memory to minimize memory bandwidth constraints, though the FACT PACK does not specify speed benefits. The 600 W suggested PSU is adequate, but the 250 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP leave little room for overclocking or adding a second GPU, so the system is best left at stock settings.