SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop-class combination that sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile. This pairing brings a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a 65 W TDP together with a 70 W workstation GPU that carries 20 GB of GDDR6 memory, and the benchmark data shows both components performing near the top of their respective categories. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimated from the available benchmark scores rather than observed frame rates.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 720 MHz and a boost clock of 1560 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The rendering hardware is substantial: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s, while FP32 and FP16 compute each reach 19.17 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 with four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 place it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GB10 (deltaPct -0.3%), AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (deltaPct -1.6%), NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (deltaPct +2.4%), and NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (deltaPct +2.8%). The negative deltas for the first two indicate that the RTX 4000 SFF sits slightly below those cards in average benchmark score, while the positive deltas against the Tesla V100 and RTX A5500 Mobile show a clear advantage over those older or mobile parts. For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing and the 192 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated denoising and DLSS, while the 20 GB frame buffer provides ample capacity for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS is competitive in its class, and the 1:1 FP16 ratio suggests mixed-precision compute tasks will not suffer a throughput penalty. The 280 GB/s bandwidth is moderate by modern standards, but the large VRAM pool and high compute density make it a capable workstation card for 3D rendering, CAD, and scientific visualization.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so no frame-rate figures can be cited. Instead, the gaming potential must be inferred from the benchmark scores of each component. The GPU's Vulkan score of 109364 and OpenCL score of 124812 indicate strong raw compute performance, which typically translates to solid rasterization and ray tracing throughput. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2080 and Geekbench single-core score of 2409 suggest it can feed frames to the GPU without stalling, which is important for high-refresh gaming. The combined percentile of 93 implies that the pair is well above average for gaming builds, and the 20 GB VRAM is far larger than what most games require, ensuring no memory-related bottlenecks at high detail settings. However, because the GPU is a workstation-class card with a dual-slot, 168 mm length and 69 mm height, it is not designed specifically for gaming, so users should expect a strong but not gaming-tuned experience. Based on the benchmark data, the system should be capable of handling high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming with ultra detail settings, and it is likely to handle 4K gaming at moderate refresh rates, though these are estimates and not measured values. The absence of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations, not guarantees.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is a 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but is not the focus of this build. The processor was released on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $384, and it is not multiplier-unlocked.

The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 28398, while single-core is 2080; Cinebench R20 multi-core is 14388 and single-core is 2031; Cinebench R15 multi-core is 4061 and single-core is 299. Geekbench multi-core is 17087 and single-core is 2409. PassMark multi-thread scores 40318 and single-thread 4236, with additional PassMark subtests: data compression 498198, data encryption 29601, extended instructions 28388, find prime numbers 164, floating point math 106716, integer math 154535, physics 2226, and random string sorting 54340. The average benchmark score is 52301, placing the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H (deltaPct -0.2%), AMD EPYC 8124P (deltaPct +0.3%), Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (deltaPct +0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (deltaPct +0.7%). The negative delta against the Xeon means the i7-14700 is effectively a tie with that server chip, while the positive deltas against the other three show it is slightly ahead of those parts. For real workloads, the 28 threads make it a strong performer in multithreaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the 5.40 GHz boost clock and high single-core scores ensure fast responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU sits at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 95th, with a combined percentile of 93. This close positioning suggests that neither component is drastically outclassed by the other, but the GPU is the higher-performing part relative to its own pool. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2080 and Geekbench single-core of 2409 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is important for gaming and lightly-threaded workloads. The GPU's compute scores, while high, are not paired with any measured FPS data, so the balance must be inferred from the percentile gap. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions and detail settings, and given the GPU's 95th percentile position, it is unlikely to be the bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p where the CPU can feed frames quickly. In CPU-heavy workloads such as physics simulation or data compression, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 2226 and data compression score of 498198 show strong throughput, but the GPU's FP32 19.17 TFLOPS could become the bottleneck in rendering tasks if the scene is large enough to require the full 20 GB buffer. For a mixed workload that includes both gaming and content creation, the 28-thread CPU and the 20 GB GPU are well matched, with the GPU providing compute-heavy rendering and the CPU handling simulation and logic. The absence of measured FPS data means the exact scaling of frame rates with resolution is unknown, but the percentile alignment suggests that a user is unlikely to experience a severe bottleneck in either direction unless the workload is heavily one-sided.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile and the CPU's 91st percentile indicate that this build is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 provide ample headroom for ultra detail settings, while the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 2409 Geekbench single-core score ensure frame times stay low. Without measured FPS data, the exact refresh rates are estimates, but the benchmark scores suggest that 144 Hz or 165 Hz at 1080p is achievable, and 144 Hz at 1440p is plausible for most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads and 20 cores provide plenty of headroom for software encoding, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 40318. The GPU's 192 tensor cores can also assist with hardware-accelerated encoding if the streaming software uses them, though the data does not specify encoder support. The combination should handle simultaneous gaming and encoding without a noticeable drop in frame rate.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and Geekbench multi-core of 17087 indicate strong rendering performance for timeline playback and export, while the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 support effects and color grading. The 33 MB L3 cache and 28 threads help with multi-track editing, and the ECC memory support is a plus for long render sessions.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are tailored for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated denoising. The 20 GB frame buffer allows for large scenes that would exceed the VRAM of many consumer cards. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 indicate strong compute performance, and the CPU's 28 threads keep the render pipeline fed. The 280 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most render workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 28 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock are ideal for compiling large codebases, while the GPU's compute capability can accelerate parallel workloads like CUDA-based simulations. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 154535 and extended instructions score of 28388 suggest good performance for code compilation and data manipulation. The 33 MB L3 cache is a benefit for large datasets.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance is more than adequate for daily productivity tasks, and the 20-core/28-thread design handles occasional heavy multitasking. The GPU is overkill for office applications, but the low 70 W TDP means the system stays quiet and cool, which is useful in a shared workspace. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle office tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is intended for users who need a balanced desktop system with strong both CPU and GPU performance. Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh displays will find the GPU's 95th percentile and the CPU's 91st percentile sufficient for high frame rates, though the exact FPS is not measured. Content creators in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 28 threads and the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and RT cores, with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 124812 supporting demanding render pipelines. Software developers working with large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 154535 and the 33 MB L3 cache. Students and small business workstations can leverage the system's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench 2409) for everyday tasks, while the 65 W CPU and 70 W GPU keep power consumption modest. The build's 168 mm GPU length and 69 mm height make it suitable for SFF cases, which aligns with the "SFF" designation of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 52301, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its most relevant scores are Cinebench R23 multi-core 28398 and single-core 2080, Cinebench R20 multi-core 14388 and single-core 2031, Geekbench multi-core 17087 and single-core 2409, and PassMark multi-thread 40318 (single-thread 4236). The GPU's average benchmark score is 117088, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL 124812 and Vulkan 109364. The combined percentile for the pair is 93. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H, has an average score of 52431 (deltaPct -0.2%), meaning the i7-14700 is essentially tied with that server chip. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, has an average score of 117393 (deltaPct -0.3%), so the RTX 4000 SFF is a hair below that, but it is ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (deltaPct -1.6%) by 1.6% and the NVIDIA Tesla V100 (deltaPct +2.4%) by 2.4%. Together, the two components create a system that is at the top of its class, with the GPU being the stronger half in terms of percentile position.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has a launch MSRP of $384.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the recommended PSU for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W.

Q: How many display outputs does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Is this a desktop build?

A: Yes, the build class is "desktop".

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The CPU's boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700 with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread part from the 14th Generation, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a 65 W TDP and a 5.40 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a workstation-grade card from the Ada Lovelace generation, with 20 GB of GDDR6, a 70 W TDP, and a dual-slot 168 mm length. The combined percentile of 93 places this build in the upper echelon of desktop systems, with the GPU at the 95th percentile and the CPU at the 91st. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280 GB/s bandwidth make it a strong choice for 3D rendering, while the CPU's 28 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock handle both gaming and productivity. The build is not unlocked for multiplier overclocking, but it offers strong out-of-the-box performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, and the memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, so the total power demand is moderate, leaving headroom in the PSU for additional components. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier GPU with a larger power envelope, given the 250 W suggested PSU leaves room for a more power-hungry card. Alternatively, the platform can accommodate more storage or expansion cards via PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the dual-channel memory support allows for additional memory modules if the user wants to increase capacity. The 33 MB L3 cache and 28 threads mean the CPU will not become a bottleneck for most applications for several years, so the upgrade path is primarily GPU-driven.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds