SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: A Desktop Workstation Pairing Analysis

This desktop pairing combines a 20-core Intel Raptor Lake refresh CPU with a workstation-class NVIDIA Turing GPU. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 79th percentile overall. The data reveals a significant imbalance: the processor is a modern, high-throughput workhorse, while the graphics card, though equipped with professional features, delivers compute and rasterization scores that align more closely with mid-range consumer hardware from several generations ago.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature often associated with workstation reliability.

Benchmark data shows a processor with strong single-threaded and exceptional multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28,398 in multi-core and 2,080 in single-core. The single-core score of 2,080 is particularly notable, indicating excellent per-thread performance that benefits lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 28,398 demonstrates substantial parallel throughput. Geekbench results echo this pattern, with a multi-core score of 17,087 and a single-core score of 2,409.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workload types. The multi-thread score of 40,318 is strong, and the integer math score of 154,535 is significantly higher than the floating-point math score of 106,716. This suggests the CPU is particularly well-suited for integer-heavy tasks such as database operations, financial calculations, and general productivity software. The data compression score of 498,198 is extremely high, indicating excellent archival and compression workload performance. The data encryption score of 29,601 shows respectable cryptographic throughput, while the extended instructions score of 28,388 indicates solid SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 164 is relatively modest, and the physics score of 2,226 is moderate.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,301 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals provide context for this positioning. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H scores 52,431, a mere 0.2% higher, making the two essentially equivalent in aggregate performance. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947, 0.7% lower. The data shows that the i7-14700 sits at the very top of a tightly clustered group of high-end processors, edging out several established server and enthusiast parts by fractions of a percent. This suggests that for multi-threaded productivity workloads, the i7-14700 is competitive with much more expensive server-class silicon.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes directly. This is a modern platform with high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The CPU includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output capability even without a discrete GPU.

The platform's memory flexibility is noteworthy. Supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 allows builders to choose between the lower cost of existing DDR4 modules or the higher bandwidth of DDR5, depending on their workload requirements and budget constraints. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class of desktop processor, though it does limit memory bandwidth compared to the quad-channel configurations found on some server platforms.

For the GPU, the suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 230 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 20-core processor. This suggests that the total system power draw is modest, and a 550 W power supply provides adequate headroom for this combination. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which are standard on most modern power supplies.

The PCIe interface for the GPU is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is older than the PCIe Gen 5 available from the CPU. This presents a potential bottleneck for data transfer between the CPU and GPU, particularly for workloads that require frequent data movement. However, for most rendering and compute tasks, PCIe 3.0 x16 provides sufficient bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom remaining. The CPU's high percentile ranking and strong benchmark scores indicate it can drive more powerful graphics hardware without becoming a limiting factor. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 also means that future GPU upgrades can take advantage of newer interconnect standards, assuming the motherboard supports them.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process. The chip, designated TU104, contains 13,600 million transistors on a die size of 545 mm². It has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU includes 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing and AI-based workloads.

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. This large memory capacity is a defining feature of the card, enabling it to handle large datasets and high-resolution textures that would exceed the memory capacity of consumer GPUs.

Clock speeds are 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost. Compute performance includes 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C.

Benchmark results present a complex picture. The Geekbench scores are relatively strong: OpenCL scores 78,999 and Vulkan scores 92,309. These indicate solid compute and graphics API performance. However, the PassMark scores tell a different story. The G3D score is 15,616, and the GPU compute score is 6,525. The DirectX 11 score is 140, DirectX 10 is 113, DirectX 9 is 195, and DirectX 12 is 59. The G2D score is 709.

The average benchmark score of 21,629 places the GPU at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with an average score of 21,856 (1% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile with 21,379 (1.2% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M with 21,237 (1.8% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL with 21,153 (2.3% lower). The data shows that the Quadro RTX 5000's aggregate benchmark score is essentially equivalent to a GTX 1060, a mid-range consumer GPU from an older generation. This is a striking finding, as the Quadro RTX 5000 carries workstation features and a large memory buffer, but its raw gaming and compute performance in these specific benchmarks is not higher.

The ray tracing and tensor cores provide specialized capabilities that the base benchmark scores do not fully capture. For professional applications that leverage these features, the card's performance profile is different from what the aggregate scores suggest. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably low, suggesting that the card's performance in modern graphics APIs may be a limitation.

Who Should Build It

The data suggests this pairing targets users who prioritize CPU throughput and GPU memory capacity over raw graphics frame rates. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it excellent for content creators, software developers, and researchers running multi-threaded workloads. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide substantial parallelism for compiling code, running simulations, and processing large datasets. The high integer math and data compression scores indicate suitability for database management, financial modeling, and archival tasks.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is its primary asset. This memory capacity supports large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and machine learning models that cannot fit in the 8 GB or 12 GB typically found on consumer cards. The presence of tensor cores and ray tracing cores makes it suitable for AI inference and ray-traced rendering, even if the raw compute throughput is modest by modern standards.

The target users are professionals who need workstation-class features: ECC memory support on the CPU, large GPU memory, and certified drivers for professional applications. This includes architects and engineers using CAD software, video editors working with long timelines and high-resolution footage, and data scientists training or running inference on moderately-sized neural networks. Students in technical fields could also benefit, though the combination is more powerful than what most coursework requires.

The system is less well-suited for gamers seeking high frame rates, as the GPU's benchmark scores indicate it performs at the level of a mid-range consumer card. For gaming at high resolutions with maximum settings, the GPU would be a limiting factor. However, for professional workloads that leverage the CPU's multi-threading and the GPU's memory capacity, this pairing offers a balanced set of capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 67th percentile creates a significant performance gap. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, video encoding, and multi-threaded productivity applications, the system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming, 3D rendering with real-time preview, and GPU-accelerated compute, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The benchmark scores illustrate this imbalance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 is only modest. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly low, suggesting that modern graphics API performance is a bottleneck for gaming and GPU compute tasks.

The PCIe 3.0 interface on the GPU, combined with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, creates a potential data transfer bottleneck. The GPU cannot take advantage of the newer, faster interconnect. This is unlikely to affect most workloads significantly, but it is a notable mismatch for a modern platform.

The memory configuration also presents a balance consideration. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and the GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6. For workloads that require large memory pools, the 16 GB GPU memory is generous, but the dual-channel CPU memory bandwidth may limit performance in memory-intensive tasks.

The FPS scaling data is absent for this combination, as no measured FPS rows exist. However, based on the GPU's benchmark scores, frame rates in modern games would be limited by the GPU's mid-range performance level. The CPU's strong single-threaded scores would not compensate for the GPU's limitations in graphics-intensive workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's benchmark scores indicate this is not a high-refresh gaming system. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15,616 suggest that modern games at high settings would run at moderate frame rates, likely below the thresholds needed for 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitors. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance would provide a solid foundation, but the GPU would be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for software video encoding while simultaneously running a game. The PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 indicate that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting other tasks. The GPU's tensor cores could also be used for AI-based encoding enhancements, though the specific performance would depend on application support.

Video editing: Video editing applications benefit from both the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's large memory capacity. The CPU's high integer math score of 154,535 is relevant for video processing, and the 16 GB GPU memory can hold large video buffers and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 suggests reasonable GPU acceleration, though not at the level of newer or higher-end cards.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench scores are directly relevant to CPU-based rendering. The multi-core score of 28,398 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong performance in rendering tasks that use the CPU. For GPU-based rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB memory is an asset for large scenes, and the 48 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration. However, the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU rendering would be slower than with higher-performance cards.

Software development: The CPU is excellent for software development. The 20 cores and 28 threads accelerate compilation, and the high PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 indicates strong parallel build performance. The data compression score of 498,198 is relevant for package management and version control operations. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds and development servers.

Student and office work: This system is significantly over-powered for typical student and office work. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's capabilities are also excessive for these tasks. A student in a technical field, such as engineering or computer science, might benefit from the CPU's compilation performance and the GPU's memory capacity for specialized projects, but for general academic work, this pairing is more capable than necessary.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system sits at the 79th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 52,301. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H is 0.2% higher, the AMD EPYC 8124P is 0.3% lower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is 0.7% lower.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 1% higher, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is 2.3% lower.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a 14 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 230 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700 CPU with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 GPU. The system is designed around a high-end multi-threaded processor paired with a professional workstation graphics card. The CPU is an active production part from the Core 14th Gen series, released in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of $384. The GPU is from the Quadro Turing (Tx000) generation, released in August 2018 with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, and is now end-of-life.

The CPU represents the modern high-end of Intel's desktop lineup, with 20 cores, 28 threads, and a 5.40 GHz boost clock. The GPU represents the professional workstation segment of the Turing generation, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 48 ray tracing cores, and 384 tensor cores. The combination targets professional workstation users who need CPU throughput and GPU memory capacity.

The overall tier of this system, based on the 79th combined percentile, is upper-mid-range. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top processors available, while the GPU's 67th percentile ranking is more modest. The system's overall position is pulled down by the GPU, which, despite its professional features, does not deliver high raw performance in the benchmark results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 4,061 and the single-core score is 299. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 14,388 and the single-core score is 2,031. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 28,398 and the single-core score is 2,080. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 17,087 and a single-core score of 2,409.

PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 40,318 and a single-thread score of 4,236. The CPU's average benchmark score is 52,301, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more varied. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,999 and Vulkan scores 92,309. PassMark G3D scores 15,616 and GPU compute scores 6,525. DirectX scores are 195 for DirectX 9, 140 for DirectX 11, 113 for DirectX 10, and 59 for DirectX 12. The G2D score is 709. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is one of significant CPU strength and moderate GPU performance. The CPU's scores are consistently high across all test types, indicating balanced multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU's scores are high in compute-oriented tests like Geekbench OpenCL but lower in PassMark graphics tests, suggesting that the card's compute capabilities are stronger than its rasterization performance. The large 16 GB memory buffer and professional features make the GPU suitable for workstation tasks, but its raw performance is not competitive with modern high-end consumer graphics cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, gaming performance would be moderate. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 places the GPU at the level of a mid-range consumer card from its era, comparable to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 1% higher in aggregate. The DirectX 12 score of 59 is low, suggesting that modern games using DirectX 12 would perform relatively poorly.

For games at 1080p resolution with high settings, the GPU would likely deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but would struggle with newer, more graphically intensive games. At 1440p or 4K resolution, the GPU would be a significant bottleneck, and frame rates would be limited by the GPU's compute throughput rather than the CPU's capabilities.

The CPU's strong single-threaded performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,409 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,080, would ensure that the CPU is not a limiting factor in gaming. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and game-related processes.

The 16 GB VRAM is a positive factor for gaming, as it allows for high-resolution textures and large game worlds without exceeding memory capacity. However, the GPU's raw compute performance, measured at 11.15 TFLOPS FP32, is not sufficient to fully utilize this memory capacity in modern games.

Overall, this system is not designed for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's benchmark scores indicate it would deliver moderate performance in games, suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles, but not for competitive high-refresh gaming or 4K gaming at maximum settings. Users seeking a gaming-focused system would be better served by a different GPU selection.