SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop pairing that combines a high-core-count 14th Gen Intel processor with a top-tier Blackwell-architecture GPU. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with the combined configuration landing at the 89th percentile overall. The data shows a system built for high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming, heavy multi-threaded productivity, and GPU-accelerated rendering, though it carries a notable power draw that demands planning for the rest of the platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which means the motherboard and memory ecosystem are fixed to that socket generation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 kits or invest in newer DDR5 modules depending on the motherboard chosen. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer Core i7 and can be relevant for small workstations that want error-checking memory without moving to a Xeon platform. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, so the primary graphics card slot and any Gen 5 NVMe drives can run at full bandwidth. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware video decode, which can be useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU active.

The CPU’s thermal design power is rated at 65 W, but that figure is the base power draw; the boost clock of 5.40 GHz on performance cores will pull significantly more under load. The GPU, however, is the dominant power consumer with a 360 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 750 W. A system with this CPU and GPU should be paired with a power supply that comfortably exceeds that 750 W suggestion, especially if the motherboard, drives, and fans add their own draw. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have that connector or an adapter. The platform supports a sensible upgrade path only within Socket 1700 — a builder could move to a higher-tier 14th Gen chip, but the socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel platforms. For most users, the i7-14700 is already near the practical ceiling for that socket, so the next real upgrade would be a full platform change to a newer CPU generation and motherboard. The GPU, on the other hand, is current-gen as of its release date, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is future-proofed for several years — a later GPU upgrade would likely not be bottlenecked by the interface.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus, so the choice depends on the motherboard you select.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this CPU handle ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14700 supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found on workstation-class chips.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5080 is 750 W, and the GPU has a 360 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i7-14700’s average benchmark score is 52301, which is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 9 5950X’s score of 51947, making them effectively equal in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The RTX 5080 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming frame rates must be estimated from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in their percentile standings, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile. This near-parity suggests that neither component will consistently dominate the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck for most workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 52301 is 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 8124P and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, showing it sits in a tight cluster of high-end processors. The GPU’s average score of 56083 is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, but 2.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

In gaming workloads, the balance depends on resolution and game engine. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4236 — will be the limiting factor for very high frame rates, since the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the CPU can feed. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s raw compute (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the primary constraint, and the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads will rarely be the bottleneck. For multi-threaded productivity, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and PassMark multithread score of 40318 show strong parallel performance, but the GPU’s compute capabilities — a PassMark GPU compute score of 21789 — will dominate rendering tasks like 3D scene exports or video encoding that use GPU acceleration. The data indicates a balanced system where the bottleneck shifts from CPU in light-threaded tasks to GPU in heavy graphics workloads, with no single component causing a hard ceiling for the other.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 and PassMark G3D score of 36565 indicate a very high-end graphics card capable of running modern titles at maximum settings. Given the CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s 16 GB GDDR7 memory, this system should handle 1440p ultra settings well above 60 FPS in most games, and 4K ultra at playable frame rates in the majority of titles, though the exact numbers will vary by game.

The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s is exceptionally high, which helps at 4K resolutions where texture data and large frame buffers are common. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz and single-thread score of 2080 in Cinebench R23 suggest frame rates that will be limited more by the game engine’s thread scheduling than by the hardware. For AAA single-player games with ray tracing enabled, the 84 RT cores on the GPU will handle the ray-tracing workload, but the overall frame rate will drop from non-RT levels — the exact drop depends on the game’s RT implementation. The data suggests this pairing is a high-refresh 1440p machine and a capable 4K machine, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid stutter in CPU-bound scenes. Since these are estimates, builders should expect performance in the top tier of current hardware but should not treat any specific FPS number as guaranteed.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who want to play at 1440p with high refresh rates or at 4K with high settings, based on the GPU’s 16 GB memory and high compute scores. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads make it suitable for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile code, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 shows strong parallel throughput. The PassMark data compression score of 498198 and data encryption score of 29601 indicate good performance for file archiving and encryption tasks, which benefits small business workstations handling sensitive data. Developers will appreciate the 28 threads for build parallelization and the ECC memory support for long-running compute tasks that need memory reliability.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this for CAD, simulation, and programming coursework, though the GPU’s 360 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU mean the system is not a low-power laptop replacement — it is a desktop intended to sit on a desk. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a backup display output for office tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, which can reduce power draw during light workloads. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database queries, or multi-threaded analytics will benefit from the 28 threads, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate CUDA-based workloads like machine learning inference. The system is overkill for basic office productivity but well-suited for users who need both high-end gaming and serious compute in one machine.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 uses the GB203 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, which drive the pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at an effective 30 Gbps. The clocks are set to a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, with a 360 W TDP and a suggested 750 W PSU. The card is dual-slot, 304 mm long, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Ray tracing performance is handled by 84 RT cores, while AI and DLSS workloads use 336 tensor cores. The FP32 compute is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which means the card does not halve throughput for FP16 — useful for AI inference and some rendering pipelines. In benchmarks, the GPU scores 8637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern DX12 test, and 235901 in Geekbench OpenCL with 255450 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score of 36565 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% slower), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.7% slower), and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (2.3% slower), while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster. For rendering, the 16 GB GDDR7 memory is sufficient for large textures and complex scenes, and the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory-bound stalls. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures the card can communicate with the CPU without bandwidth limitations, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 API support means it is ready for current and near-future game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 52301, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H with an average score of 52431, which is 0.2% higher — a negligible difference. The AMD EPYC 8124P (52121) is 0.3% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073) is 0.4% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (51947) is 0.7% slower. Key CPU benchmark scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28398 and single-core at 2080, Geekbench multi-core at 17087 and single-core at 2409, and PassMark multithread at 40318 with PassMark single-thread at 4236. The PassMark integer math score is 154535 and floating-point math is 106716, showing strong general-purpose compute.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 56083, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, 0.6% slower), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, 0.7% slower), and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, 2.3% slower), while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367) is 2.2% faster. The GPU’s key scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 8637, Geekbench OpenCL at 235901, Geekbench Vulkan at 255450, and PassMark G3D at 36565 with PassMark GPU compute at 21789. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but both are in the top tier. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile combine for an overall 89th percentile for the build. The PassMark DirectX scores show the GPU is strongest in DirectX 11 (324) and weakest in DirectX 12 (151), which is an odd pattern that suggests the card may perform better in older APIs or that the benchmark is not fully optimized for the newer architecture — but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 is a more reliable indicator of modern DX12 gaming performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The GPU is a GeForce 50-series card using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process, with 16 GB GDDR7 memory and a 360 W TDP. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the upper tier of all builds. The CPU is at the 91st percentile vs all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 87th percentile vs all GPUs, so the pairing is well-balanced with a slight edge toward CPU performance.

This system is not a budget build — the GPU alone has a launch MSRP of 999 USD and the CPU has a launch MSRP of $384 — but it is a high-end desktop intended for gaming at high resolutions and for productivity workloads that use many threads. The pairing works because the CPU’s 28 threads prevent it from bottlenecking the GPU in multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU’s 16 GB memory and high bandwidth prevent it from bottlenecking the CPU in graphics-heavy scenarios. The system is currently active in production for both components, so it is a current-generation build as of the release dates (CPU January 2024, GPU January 2025). The overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for enthusiasts who want a single machine for both AAA gaming and demanding compute work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-R) on a 10 nm process at Intel. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to motherboard-based adjustments rather than a free multiplier. ECC memory support is included, and the launch MSRP is $384.

In benchmark performance, the CPU scores 4061 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 299 in single-core, 14388 in R20 multi-core and 2031 in single-core, and 28398 in R23 multi-core with 2080 in single-core. Geekbench scores are 17087 multi-core and 2409 single-core. PassMark scores include multithread at 40318, single-thread at 4236, integer math at 154535, floating-point math at 106716, data compression at 498198, data encryption at 29601, and extended instructions at 28388. The average benchmark score is 52301, at the 91st percentile. The nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H (0.2% faster), AMD EPYC 8124P (0.3% slower), Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (0.7% slower).

For real workloads, the 28 threads make this CPU strong for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and PassMark multithread score of 40318 indicate high parallel throughput. The single-thread score of 2080 in R23 and 4236 in PassMark show it is also fast for lightly-threaded tasks like gaming, web browsing, and office applications. The data compression score of 498198 suggests fast file archiving, and the encryption score of 29601 indicates decent AES performance for disk encryption or VPN workloads. The 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB shared L3 help with cache-sensitive workloads, and the 5.40 GHz boost clock provides low latency for latency-sensitive applications. The 65 W TDP is a base figure; under sustained all-core loads, the CPU will draw more, but it is not a power-hungry chip compared to the GPU. Overall, the CPU is a versatile high-end desktop processor that handles both gaming and productivity without a clear weakness, and its position at the 91st percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the benchmark database.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds