SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a 20-core Intel desktop processor with a latest-generation NVIDIA graphics card, creating a desktop system that sits near the middle of the overall performance distribution. The CPU is a top-tier performer among all processors tested, ranking in the 91st percentile, while the GPU's single benchmark result places it in the 18th percentile, a figure that requires careful interpretation given the limited data available. The combined system percentile is 55, indicating a balanced but not extreme overall configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, produced on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling a substantial amount of fast on-die storage for frequently accessed data. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700 scores 28,398 points in the multi-core test and 2,080 in single-core. The R20 results are 14,388 multi-core and 2,031 single-core, while R15 shows 4,061 multi-core and 299 single-core. Geekbench scores are 17,087 multi-core and 2,409 single-core. PassMark results are extensive: multi-thread scoring 40,318, single-thread 4,236, integer math at 154,535, floating-point math at 106,716, data compression at 498,198, data encryption at 29,601, extended instructions at 28,388, physics at 2,226, and random string sorting at 54,340. The average benchmark score across all tests is 52,301, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals provide context for the CPU's standing. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H scores 52,431 on average, a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the i7-14700, meaning the Xeon is essentially tied. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121, a 0.3 percent delta, also essentially tied. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073, a 0.4 percent delta, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947, a 0.7 percent delta. These results indicate the i7-14700 sits in a dense pack of high-performance processors separated by less than one percent.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all 28 threads can be utilized. The single-core scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 result of 2,080, indicate responsive performance in everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The PassMark integer math score of 154,535 and floating-point score of 106,716 point to solid number-crunching capability, while the single-thread score of 4,236 reinforces the CPU's strength in latency-sensitive applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared with other 14th-generation and earlier Raptor Lake processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility to choose between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 modules with higher bandwidth potential. Memory operates in dual-channel mode, and the platform supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class systems. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth access for the latest graphics cards and NVMe storage.

The CPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts, which is modest for a 20-core processor. This low TDP means the CPU can be cooled by a capable air cooler without requiring elaborate liquid cooling solutions. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 275 watts, which is the dominant power consumer in the system. The GPU's suggested PSU is not listed in the data, so power supply headroom must be assessed qualitatively: the 65-watt CPU plus 275-watt GPU totals 340 watts of component power, suggesting a mid-range power supply would suffice, but the 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU indicates a modern PSU with that connector type is required.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would involve moving to a higher-tier 14th-generation processor on the same Socket 1700, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. However, the i7-14700 already sits near the top of the CPU performance distribution at the 91st percentile, so CPU upgrades would yield diminishing returns. A more impactful upgrade would be adding more DDR5 memory capacity or faster storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means an upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, limiting the practical upgrade path to GPU or storage changes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores establish it as a high-end desktop processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 is 0.7 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's average score of 51,947, though the comparison is against the average benchmark score rather than the same test. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,087 and single-core of 2,409 reinforce the CPU's strong position. The PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and single-thread of 4,236 show consistent performance across different benchmark suites.

The GPU has only one benchmark result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,690. This places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2,690. The nearest rivals are all significantly older or lower-end cards: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M scores 2,664 (1.0 percent delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,662 (1.1 percent delta), the Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 2,660 (1.1 percent delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 scores 2,645 (1.7 percent delta). These deltas are all within 1.7 percent, indicating the RTX 5070 SUPER's single benchmark score places it in a cluster with these much older GPUs.

This GPU percentile position is anomalous given the modern architecture and specifications, suggesting the single benchmark result may not represent the GPU's true performance capability. The combined system percentile is 55, which reflects the CPU's high percentile pulling up the GPU's low percentile. Benchmark results indicate a system that is CPU-dominated in overall performance, with the GPU's single data point providing an incomplete picture that should be treated with caution.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this system are those who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and are willing to accept uncertainty in GPU performance based on the limited benchmark data. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 28 threads and high multi-core scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 28,398. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the PassMark integer math score of 154,535 and the multithread score of 40,318.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the CPU's 91st percentile ranking for tasks like data analysis, virtualization, and office productivity. The ECC memory support makes this platform suitable for scientific computing or financial modeling where data integrity is critical. Gamers at high resolutions might consider this system, but the GPU's 18th percentile ranking in its single benchmark raises concerns about high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, where GPU-bound scenarios would be limited. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,236 in PassMark ensures responsive gameplay in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's measured performance is insufficient to draw firm conclusions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 18th percentile based on its single benchmark. This creates a system where the CPU will not bottleneck most workloads, but the GPU may limit performance in graphics-intensive tasks. For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, data compression (PassMark score 498,198), or physics calculations (PassMark score 2,226), the CPU will deliver top-tier performance. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering using GPU acceleration, the GPU's low percentile ranking suggests it will be the limiting factor.

The combined percentile of 55 indicates a system that is average overall, pulled down by the GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within one percent of its average score, showing it competes directly with high-end server and workstation processors. The GPU's nearest rivals, however, are decades-old cards like the GT 440 and GT 1030, which suggests either the benchmark data is incomplete or the GPU is severely underperforming in this single test. FPS scaling in gaming would likely show CPU performance well above what the GPU can deliver, meaning frame rates would be GPU-limited in most scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 31,100 million transistors and a die size of 263 mm². It features 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The GPU has 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. Clock speeds are 2,325 MHz base and 2,512 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial memory pool suitable for large textures, high-resolution rendering, and AI models. The FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating strong compute capability for both single-precision and half-precision workloads. Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

Despite these modern specifications, the only benchmark result is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2,690, placing the GPU in the 18th percentile. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440, a card from over a decade ago, with a delta of 1.7 percent. This is contradictory: the RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 32.15 TFLOPS of compute, yet scores nearly identically to a GT 440 in this test. The data suggests either the benchmark is not representative of the GPU's capability, or there is a measurement issue. For rendering, the high memory bandwidth and large VRAM pool would typically indicate strong performance in texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering, but the measured score does not support this conclusion.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52,301.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i7-14700 has an average score of 52,301, while the Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947, a delta of 0.7 percent in favor of the Intel processor.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing has a percentile of 55, meaning it outperforms 55 percent of all systems in the database.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 50 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it compare to the GPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 275 watts, making the GPU the dominant power consumer.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i7-14700 desktop processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER graphics card in a desktop class configuration. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture, and it ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a GeForce 50-series card with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, and it ranks in the 18th percentile based on its single benchmark score. The combined percentile is 55, placing this system in the middle of the overall performance distribution.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,301 places it in competition with server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, all within 0.7 percent of the i7-14700's score. The GPU's average score of 2,690 places it in competition with much older, lower-end cards, which is a significant discrepancy given its modern specifications. The overall tier of this system is that of a capable desktop workstation with a high-end CPU and a GPU whose measured performance does not match its architectural capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,236 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,080 would support high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 18th percentile ranking suggests it would limit frame rates in GPU-bound titles. Estimated FPS at 1080p ultra settings would be modest, likely below the 144 Hz threshold for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads and strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398) would handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops, though the GPU's limited measured performance would constrain the game's rendering settings.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 498,198 and multi-thread score of 40,318 indicate excellent performance in video encoding and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 18 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth would accelerate effects and color grading, but the low benchmark score raises questions about real-world GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would excel with the i7-14700's 28 threads, but GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles would rely on the RTX 5070 SUPER's 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which the benchmark data does not validate.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 154,535 and extended instructions score of 28,388 indicate fast compilation times and efficient execution of compute-heavy code. The GPU's capabilities are less relevant for this scenario.

Student and office work: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures responsive performance in document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but the system's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 4,236, would provide a solid foundation for gaming, ensuring that CPU-bound scenarios like physics calculations and AI logic do not bottleneck frame rates. The GPU's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690, however, places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, which is far below what would be expected for a modern graphics card. If this score is representative of actual gaming performance, the RTX 5070 SUPER would deliver frame rates comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 or GT 440, which are entry-level cards from previous generations.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates would likely be below 60 FPS for most modern titles, given the GPU's low percentile ranking. At 1440p and 4K, frame rates would be even lower, as the GPU would become the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it would not limit performance at any resolution. The 18 GB of VRAM would prevent memory capacity from being a limiting factor, but the GPU's compute throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS, while nominally high, is not supported by the benchmark data. The discrepancy between the GPU's specifications and measured performance suggests the benchmark may not capture the GPU's true gaming capability, but based on available data, this system would not be recommended for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.