SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 form a pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of desktop computing. The processor, a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU, built on Ada Lovelace, offers solid 1440p-class rasterization and modern feature support. This analysis examines the benchmark data for this combination, noting that no measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU. It also includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked and was released on 2024-01-07.

Benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 28398, while the single-core score is 2080. This multi-core strength is reinforced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 17087 and a single-core score of 2409. Passmark results further detail the chip's capabilities: a multi-thread score of 40318 and a single-thread score of 4236. Specific sub-tests include floating point math at 106716, integer math at 154535, data compression at 498198, and data encryption at 29601. Extended instructions score 28388, and random string sorting hits 54340. The physics score is 2226, and finding prime numbers scores 164.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 52301, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating the processor is significantly more capable than the vast majority of alternatives. When compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700 sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H, which has an average score of 52431. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8124P, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. These deltas are small, showing the i7-14700 is directly competitive with high-core-count server and enthusiast parts in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, the data indicates this CPU will handle heavy video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while the strong single-core score of 2080 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is a member of the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, with an effective speed of 21 Gbps. The base clock is 1920 MHz, and the boost clock is 2475 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 29.15 TFLOPS. The TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. It uses a dual-slot design and a single 16-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The card measures 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This GPU is end-of-life, released on 2024-02-29.

The GPU benchmarks list is empty, and the percentile rank is 50, with an average benchmark score of 0. This means no benchmark data is available for this specific GPU variant in the provided facts. However, the hardware specifications themselves are informative. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth on a 192-bit bus is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 12 GB VRAM capacity is appropriate for modern games at high settings. The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores indicate the card is designed for ray-traced workloads and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) upscaling. The FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS is a measure of raw shader throughput, which will drive standard rasterization performance. Given the specification, this GPU is positioned to deliver strong performance in 1440p rendering, with the 12 GB memory buffer being a key asset. The lack of benchmark scores means we rely on architectural knowledge implied by the core counts and clock speeds, which suggest a capable 1440p-class card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are the only measured data points for this pairing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 is a strong result, placing the i7-14700 in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This percentile is a measure of aggregate performance across various tests, and it shows the processor outperforms 91% of all CPUs in the database. The average CPU benchmark score is 52301.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show a tight grouping. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H leads by a 0.2% margin, while the i7-14700 leads the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.7%. These deltas are minimal, meaning the i7-14700 is effectively on par with these alternatives in overall compute performance. The Ryzen 9 5950X is a well-known 16-core part, so matching it with a 0.7% lead shows the i7-14700’s hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores is competitive.

For the GPU, there are no benchmark scores to report. The combined percentile for this build is 71, which suggests that the pairing of the 91st-percentile CPU with a mid-tier GPU results in an overall system that is better than 71% of recorded builds. This combined percentile is a holistic metric, but it is heavily weighted by the CPU’s strong showing. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank, while based on zero scores, indicates it is an average-performing part in the database, likely because it is a specific variant of the RTX 4070 (AD103 chip) that may be less common than the standard AD104 version. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the standout component, providing top-tier compute performance, while the GPU provides a solid, if unremarkable, baseline for graphics work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The processor, with its 91st percentile ranking and high multi-core scores, is a top-tier component. The GPU, with its 50th percentile ranking and no benchmark scores, is an average part. This means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in a workload. Instead, the GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance, as measured by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU. The bottleneck will be the GPU’s shader throughput and memory bandwidth. For example, in a game at 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU might be able to prepare frames faster than the GPU can render them, leading to a GPU-bound scenario where the frame rate is capped by the RTX 4070 AD103’s capabilities. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU load increases further, making the CPU bottleneck even less likely. For CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the situation reverses. Here, the GPU is underutilized, and the CPU’s 20 cores and strong multi-threaded scores become the determining factor.

The FPS scaling, though not measured, can be estimated. Since the CPU has a 91st percentile rank, it is unlikely to cause frame drops in most games. The GPU, being average, will dictate the maximum frame rate. A game that is well-optimized for multi-threading might see the CPU’s 28398 R23 multi-core score provide headroom, but the GPU’s 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 29.15 TFLOPS will still be the ceiling. The data suggests a system that is balanced for 1440p gaming, where the CPU is not a hindrance and the GPU is the primary performance driver. For 1080p esports titles, the CPU might occasionally become the bottleneck at very high frame rates, but for most modern games, the GPU is the limiting component.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-core score of 2080 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to push high frame rates in less demanding titles. However, the GPU’s average performance means it might struggle to maintain 144Hz+ in all games. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth prevent memory-related stutters, but the lack of measured FPS data suggests caution. This is a solid 1080p high-refresh setup for esports, but not a guaranteed 240Hz performer in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads, evidenced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 17087, provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming. The x264 encoding workload will be handled by the CPU without impacting game performance significantly. The GPU’s tensor cores could also be used for NVENC encoding, offloading the work entirely. This is a capable streaming machine.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 indicates excellent performance in rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU’s 184 tensor cores and 12 GB VRAM will accelerate effects and color grading. However, the GPU is not top-tier, so complex projects with heavy effects might see slower previews. Overall, this is a strong setup for 4K video editing.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is the star here. A Passmark multi-thread score of 40318 will handle CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate GPU-based rendering, but its 50th percentile rank suggests it is not a professional-grade renderer. For hobbyist or semi-professional work, this is a good combination, but not for heavy production workloads.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 2409 in Geekbench ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the multi-core score handles parallel builds. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU is less relevant here, but its presence is sufficient for running multiple virtual displays. This is an efficient development workstation.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 91st percentile rank means it is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, but the discrete GPU handles any graphics acceleration. The system is responsive and quick, but the hardware is far more powerful than needed. This is a professional-grade machine that will last for years.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU’s memory controller is dual-channel, and the system can use either memory type, but not simultaneously. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and future GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves headroom for additional drives or fans.

A sensible next upgrade would be a new GPU. The CPU is powerful enough to support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Given the 91st percentile CPU rank, upgrading to a higher-end RTX 40-series card would be a logical step. The PSU headroom from 550 W would need to be checked, but a more efficient card could fit. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The platform is mature, with no new CPU releases expected for Socket 1700, so the upgrade path is primarily GPU-centric. The 65 W CPU TDP also allows for a wide range of air coolers, making cooling upgrades simple.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU compute power. The 91st percentile CPU rank makes it ideal for content creators who render video or 3D scenes, as the multi-threaded scores are exceptional. Software developers will benefit from the fast compilation times. Gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and are less concerned with maxing out ultra settings on the latest AAA titles will find the GPU sufficient. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for current games, but not future-proof at 4K. Students and small business workstations that run heavy simulations or large datasets will appreciate the CPU’s throughput. The GPU is a mid-range part, so this is not a build for 4K gaming enthusiasts or professional 3D artists who need top-tier rendering speed. It is a balanced machine for the working professional who also games.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which means it performs better than 71% of recorded builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark score.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Is there measured frame rate data for this exact combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700 supports ECC memory.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. Therefore, all figures in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 score of 2080, will not be a limiting factor in most games. The GPU’s average performance, with a 50th percentile rank, will be the primary determinant of frame rates. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though not consistently high enough for 240Hz monitors in demanding AAA games. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM buffer is sufficient for high textures, and the GPU should handle ultra settings in many games, but the lack of measured data means performance will vary. For 4K gaming, the GPU is likely to be the bottleneck, with frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in demanding titles unless DLSS is used. The 46 RT cores suggest ray tracing is possible, but performance will take a hit. Overall, this is a 1080p and 1440p gaming setup, with estimates indicating it excels in esports titles and handles modern games at high, rather than maximum, settings.