SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a high-end desktop pairing that targets the upper tier of performance in both productivity and gaming. The CPU, part of Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores to balance multi-threaded throughput with single-thread responsiveness. The base clock sits at 2.10 GHz, while the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, giving the processor substantial headroom for burst workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache, which helps feed the 28 threads with data in compute-heavy tasks. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature often associated with workstation reliability. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes that secondary. The processor is locked, meaning the multiplier is not unlocked for overclocking, so users must rely on the stock boost behavior rather than manual frequency tuning. Its 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 20-core part, suggesting efficient power management under sustained loads.

In terms of raw compute, the i7-14700 delivers strong results across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28398 in multi-core and 2080 in single-core, a gap that illustrates the processor’s dual nature: it can handle heavily parallel rendering tasks while still offering competitive per-core speed for everyday responsiveness. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern, with a multi-core score of 14388 and a single-core score of 2031. Geekbench 6 reports a multi-core score of 17087 and a single-core score of 2409, which aligns with the Cinebench data in showing a processor that excels when all cores are engaged but does not sacrifice single-thread performance. PassMark results further break down the workload profile. The multi-thread score is 40318, while single-thread is 4236. Integer math scores 154535, floating point math scores 106716, and extended instructions score 28388, indicating robust ALU and FPU throughput. Data compression scores 498198, while data encryption scores 29601, and random string sorting hits 54340. Find prime numbers scores 164, which is a lower value but still within expected ranges for such a task. Physics scores 2226, and the average benchmark score across all tests is 52301, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Relative to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700 sits within a tight band. It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H by 0.2 percent, leads the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.3 percent, leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.4 percent, and leads the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.7 percent. This means that in average aggregate performance, the i7-14700 is effectively tied with those four processors, making it a highly competitive choice for its class.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU each bring distinct benchmark strengths, and their combined picture is one of a system that ranks high in both compute and graphics. The i7-14700 achieves an average benchmark score of 52301, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The RTX 3080 Ti, meanwhile, posts an average benchmark score of 41187, landing in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 87, which places the entire build above the vast majority of desktop configurations in the database. This is a high-tier setup, though not an absolute top-tier one, as the GPU’s percentile is slightly lower than the CPU’s, a point that will matter for certain workloads.

Looking at the GPU scores in detail, the RTX 3080 Ti delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077, which is a strong result for modern DirectX 12 titles. Geekbench OpenCL scores 170037, and Vulkan scores 192697, indicating solid compute performance across different APIs. PassMark results show a G3D score of 26896, a G2D score of 1091, and a GPU compute score of 15282. DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores are 223 and 110 respectively, while DirectX 10 and DirectX 9 score 184 and 274. These numbers reveal a GPU that is well-suited for current-generation APIs but shows relatively lower performance on legacy DirectX 9 workloads, which is typical for modern architectures. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, which it leads by 0.8 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, which it trails by 2 percent. It also sits between two NVIDIA Tesla M40 variants, leading the Tesla M40 24 GB by 1.2 percent and the Tesla M40 by 1.7 percent. This places the RTX 3080 Ti in a performance band where it is competitive with both professional workstation cards and newer consumer GPUs, though it is not the absolute fastest in its segment.

It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so any discussion of frame rates must be treated as an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than a direct measurement. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile suggest that in gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely to be the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU has enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck in most titles. The combined percentile of 87 reinforces this view, indicating a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-14700 have?

A: The i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that supports heavy multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and software compilation.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, while the base clock is 2.10 GHz, allowing the processor to scale up significantly under load for single-threaded tasks.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The i7-14700 has an average benchmark score of 52301, which is 0.7 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, and 0.4 percent higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, it has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, which handle ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads like DLSS.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 350 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 750 W.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, placing this build in the upper tier of desktop systems in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-14700 and the RTX 3080 Ti is skewed toward the CPU in terms of raw percentile ranking, but the practical bottleneck depends on the workload. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile, while the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile, a gap of 8 points. In gaming, this suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU may be able to feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, potentially making the GPU the limiting factor. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and its 83rd percentile position means it will likely be the primary constraint on frame rates. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 2080 in Cinebench R23 and 2409 in Geekbench indicates that it can handle the per-core demands of most game engines without becoming a bottleneck, so the GPU’s rendering speed will typically set the ceiling for FPS.

In productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core scores, such as 28398 in Cinebench R23 and 40318 in PassMark multi-thread, are strong enough to handle heavy compute workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding. The GPU’s compute score of 15282 in PassMark and 170037 in Geekbench OpenCL show it can accelerate certain tasks, but for pure CPU-bound workloads, the processor is the workhorse. The data shows that for workloads like data compression, where the CPU scores 498198, the GPU has little involvement, so the CPU is the sole driver. For graphics-intensive tasks like DirectX 12 rendering, the GPU’s score of 110 in PassMark DirectX 12 is the relevant metric, and the CPU’s role is to feed it data. The FPS scaling, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the percentile gap: in gaming, the GPU will limit performance in most scenarios, while in compute, the CPU will dominate. The 87th combined percentile indicates that the system is well matched overall, with no single component severely limiting the other in a way that would waste the other’s potential.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA102 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process node. The die contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 45.1 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem is substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, which is critical for high-resolution textures and large data sets in rendering. The shader configuration includes 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 34.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, the latter at a 1:1 ratio, which supports heavy floating-point workloads.

The GPU also includes 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. This makes the card capable of handling real-time ray tracing effects and DLSS upscaling, which are increasingly common in modern games. The benchmark scores reflect this capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicates strong performance in current DirectX 12 titles, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 shows that the card works well across different graphics APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 26896 places it in the 83rd percentile, which is competitive but not top-tier, as evidenced by its 2 percent deficit to the RTX 5070 and its 0.8 percent lead over the Radeon Pro 5300. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and its position relative to newer cards suggest that it remains a capable option for high-refresh gaming and professional rendering, though it is no longer the fastest available. The 350 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU indicate that the card draws significant power, so system builders must account for that in their power supply selection. The dual-slot design and 285 mm length require a case with adequate clearance, and the 1x 12-pin power connector means an adapter may be necessary for older power supplies.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is well-suited. The CPU’s 91st percentile and strong single-thread scores, such as 2080 in Cinebench R23, ensure that it can keep up with fast-paced titles, while the GPU’s 83rd percentile and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory handle modern textures and effects. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, but its bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s and 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are sufficient for high frame rates in most titles, though not the absolute highest settings in the most demanding games.

Streaming benefits from the GPU’s tensor cores, which can offload encoding and AI tasks, freeing the CPU for game logic. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for running a game and a streaming encoder simultaneously, as evidenced by its multi-thread scores like 28398 in Cinebench R23. Video editing is another strong suit. The CPU’s high multi-core performance accelerates rendering and export times, while the GPU’s CUDA cores and 12 GB VRAM assist with effects and previews. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15282 indicates solid acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering relies heavily on both components. The CPU’s 20 cores deliver strong performance in CPU-based renderers, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 40318, while the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS and 320 tensor cores can accelerate GPU-based renderers. Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation speed, where the high integer math score of 154535 and data compression score of 498198 help with build times and code analysis. Student and office work are well within this system’s capabilities. The CPU’s single-thread performance, scoring 4236 in PassMark single-thread, ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for any future graphics needs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. This means that the motherboard and memory from a previous build could potentially be reused if they are compatible with Socket 1700, though the CPU itself is a locked part, so overclocking is not an option. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on their motherboard and budget. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU and future expansion cards. The GPU, meanwhile, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slots and will operate at the expected performance level.

The power requirements are notable. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 20-core part, but the GPU has a TDP of 350 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 750 W. This means that a builder should ensure their power supply can handle the combined load, especially during peak GPU usage. The GPU also uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter if the power supply does not have a native 12-pin cable. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, since the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and the dual-channel bus can benefit from faster memory modules. For the GPU, the next step would be a newer generation card, as the RTX 3080 Ti is end-of-life and the successor is the GeForce 40 series, which would offer improved efficiency and performance. However, the current GPU’s 83rd percentile suggests that it is still capable, so an upgrade would only be necessary for users who need the absolute highest frame rates or the latest features.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-end CPU with a high-end GPU, resulting in a system that ranks in the 87th combined percentile. The CPU, the Intel Core i7-14700, is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It achieves a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52301. The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, is an Ampere-architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 384-bit bus, achieving an 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average score of 41187. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high, given that the combined percentile of 87 places it above the vast majority of systems in the database. The CPU is a locked part, so there is no manual overclocking headroom, but its boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides strong out-of-the-box performance. The GPU is end-of-life, but its benchmark scores show that it remains a formidable card, particularly for gaming and compute tasks. This is a system that can handle almost any workload a desktop user might throw at it, from gaming to content creation to software development.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who need high performance across a range of tasks. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth, which can handle high-resolution textures and modern effects. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, scoring 2080 in Cinebench R23, ensures that game logic and physics run smoothly. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find value in the CPU’s multi-core strength, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398, and the GPU’s compute capabilities, including 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 320 tensor cores also support AI-accelerated workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s compilation speed, evidenced by the high integer math score of 154535 and data compression score of 498198, which speed up build times and code analysis. Students and office workers will find this system more than capable for everyday tasks, though it is overkill for basic word processing or web browsing. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile mean that this build will not struggle with any common workload, making it a versatile choice for small business workstations that need to handle a mix of office applications, light rendering, and occasional gaming. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 350 W TDP of the GPU mean that the system will require a robust power supply, but the performance payoff is substantial. For users who want a system that can do everything well, this pairing delivers a balanced experience with no major weak points.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds