SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing represents a high-core-count desktop CPU matched with an upper-mid-range graphics card. This configuration places in the 75th percentile against all possible CPU+GPU combinations, positioning it as a capable desktop build for users who prioritize CPU-heavy multitasking alongside solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The combination of a 20-core processor and an 8 GB Ampere GPU produces a system that excels in productivity and rendering tasks while maintaining respectable frame rates in modern titles.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process node. The chip contains 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is connected via a 256-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is crucial for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering, where the GPU must rapidly feed the 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units.

The RTX 3060 Ti includes 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and DLSS-based upscaling. The tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features that can offset the performance cost of ray tracing in supported games. The GPU's compute capabilities include 16.20 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is a strong figure for a card in this class. The pixel rate measures 133.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s, indicating how quickly the card can fill frames and apply texture detail. These specifications translate to benchmark scores that place the GPU at the 59th percentile against all other graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 16129.

In rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 suggests the card handles modern DirectX 12 titles competently, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 indicate strong compute throughput for off-screen rendering tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 20349 and GPU compute score of 10006 reinforce that the card is well-suited for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p rendering. The DirectX 11 score of 163 and DirectX 12 score of 78 (as recorded in PassMark's specific tests) show the card's relative strength in legacy versus modern API workloads, with the higher DX11 result suggesting headroom in older titles. For content creators, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM capacity handle 1080p video editing and moderate 3D scene complexity, though the 8 GB frame buffer could become a limiting factor in very high-resolution texture packs or complex ray-traced scenes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-14700 delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, scoring 4061 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 14388 in R20 multi-core, and 28398 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are equally strong, with 299 in R15, 2031 in R20, and 2080 in R23. In Geekbench, the CPU achieves 17087 multi-core and 2409 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 40318, single-thread score of 4236, and a comprehensive average benchmark score of 52301. This places the processor at the 91st percentile against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors on the market. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H with an average score of 52431 (-0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121 (+0.3%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX at 52073 (+0.4%). The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X trails slightly with 51947 (+0.7%). These tight deltas confirm the i7-14700 sits in a highly competitive performance tier, trading blows with enterprise and enthusiast-class chips.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 16129 places it at the 59th percentile, which is notably lower than the CPU's standing. This creates a performance gap where the processor can handle far more demanding computational tasks than the graphics card can visually render. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (+0.7% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351 (-1.4%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 (-1.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (+1.7%). The scores show the RTX 3060 Ti is roughly on par with these cards, with deltas under 2% in either direction, meaning the GPU is neither a standout performer nor a laggard in its class.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects a system that is more powerful than its GPU percentile alone suggests, thanks to the CPU's dominant showing. The i7-14700's 91st percentile CPU score compensates for the GPU's 59th percentile, yielding a balanced overall profile that favors CPU-intensive applications. For workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the processor's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and PassMark integer math score of 154535 make it a formidable workhorse. Meanwhile, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20349 provides a baseline for gaming performance that is solid but not flagship-tier.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU capabilities. The processor's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile means the i7-14700 can feed frames far faster than the RTX 3060 Ti can render them in most gaming scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (PassMark score of 498198), encryption (29601), and extended instructions (28388), the processor operates near its full potential with the GPU idling. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like DirectX 12 gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor, capping frame rates despite the CPU having headroom to spare.

The bottleneck direction depends heavily on the workload. For 1080p gaming with low graphical settings, the CPU is more likely to be the constraint in esports titles where frame rates can exceed the GPU's ability to keep up — though the i7-14700's high single-thread score of 4236 in PassMark mitigates this risk. At 1440p or with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as the 16.20 TFLOPS compute capability and 8 GB memory are taxed by higher pixel counts and larger texture sets. The FPS scaling evidence is indirect since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, but the benchmark scores imply that increasing resolution or visual fidelity will shift the bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU.

In professional applications, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and PassMark multithread score of 40318 ensure that rendering, simulation, and compilation tasks are handled with minimal processor bottleneck. The GPU's compute score of 10006 in PassMark provides sufficient acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores are modest compared to higher-tier Ampere cards, meaning ray-traced workloads will be GPU-limited. The overall picture is a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a wide margin in raw computational power, making the graphics card the limiting component for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, while the CPU dominates in general productivity and multi-threaded applications.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need substantial CPU compute power for productivity but do not require flagship GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p or entry-level 1440p will find the RTX 3060 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 20349 sufficient for modern titles at high settings, especially when paired with the i7-14700's 2409 Geekbench single-core score to maintain high frame rates in CPU-intensive games. Content creators working with 1080p video editing, photo manipulation, and 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS compute for accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM limits very complex scenes. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant gains from the 20 cores and 28 threads, with PassMark data compression score of 498198 indicating strong parallel processing capability.

Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or virtual machines will appreciate the 33 MB of shared L3 cache and ECC memory support, which adds stability for long compute sessions. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and light CAD work will find the CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures responsiveness, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles dual-display setups and basic graphical tasks. The i7-14700's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable, adding flexibility for office environments. The system's 75th combined percentile indicates it outperforms three-quarters of all desktop builds, making it a strong choice for users who run multiple applications simultaneously — the 28 threads allow effortless multitasking between productivity tools, web browsers, and background tasks without perceptible slowdown.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics card, ensuring compatibility with the RTX 3060 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface while leaving headroom for future GPUs. The processor's 65 W TDP is modest for a 20-core chip, and the GPU's 200 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W means the system has ample power headroom — a user could run this configuration on a mid-range power supply without concerns, and the dual-slot GPU with a single 12-pin connector simplifies installation in most cases.

The upgrade path is straightforward: the most impactful improvement would be replacing the RTX 3060 Ti with a newer GPU, as the CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a faster graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that next-generation GPUs can run at full bandwidth. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 would provide a marginal performance boost, but the dual-channel support means the platform is not limiting in this regard. The CPU's locked multiplier prevents overclocking, but the 5.40 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance, so manual tuning is unnecessary. The 550 W suggested PSU offers sufficient headroom for a GPU upgrade to a card with a similar power envelope, though a more power-hungry card would require a PSU upgrade. The Socket 1700 platform is at the end of its compatibility life for new CPU generations, so future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change, but the i7-14700's current performance makes this unnecessary for several years.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combination places in the 75th percentile against all possible CPU+GPU pairings, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of all desktop builds.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, a delta of 0.7% in favor of the RTX 3060 Ti.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 scores 2080 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 28398 in multi-core.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Ti includes 38 RT cores, along with 152 tensor cores for AI-accelerated features.

Q: What memory types does the i7-14700 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i7-14700 has an average benchmark score of 52301, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's score of 51947.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20349 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3060 Ti should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, typically ranging from 60 to 100 FPS depending on the game's optimization. At 1440p ultra, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40 to 70 FPS in demanding AAA titles. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, which are less GPU-intensive, should see frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p, especially given the CPU's high single-thread score of 4236 in PassMark.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, as the i7-14700 can maintain high minimum frame rates even in CPU-heavy scenes. However, the GPU's 59th percentile means that users seeking maximum visual fidelity with ray tracing enabled should expect significant performance drops — the 38 RT cores are sufficient for light ray-traced effects at 1080p, but enabling full ray tracing at 1440p would likely push frame rates below 30 FPS in the most demanding titles. The 16.20 TFLOPS compute performance and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate provide a solid foundation for 1080p gaming, but users targeting 4K resolution would need to significantly reduce settings or rely on DLSS to achieve playable performance. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming or 1440p medium-to-high settings gaming, with frame rates that vary by title but remain within acceptable ranges for the GPU's class.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The system's 75th combined percentile places it in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop configurations, meaning it sits comfortably above average but below enthusiast-class systems with flagship GPUs. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU's 59th percentile places it in the midrange graphics segment. This asymmetry defines the build's character: it is a productivity-first machine with gaming capabilities, rather than a gaming-first machine with light productivity features.

The pairing is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for work tasks — such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation — but also want a capable GPU for gaming and GPU-accelerated effects. The 20-core processor with 28 threads and 33 MB of L3 cache provides server-grade multitasking ability, while the 8 GB GPU handles 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p workloads. The build's 75th percentile overall means it outperforms the majority of systems in both gaming and productivity, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of users. The combination is particularly notable for its balance: the CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades, while the GPU provides enough power for immediate use without being a bottleneck in non-gaming tasks.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates at a base clock of 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support for workstation stability. The processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably low for a 20-core chip. The launch MSRP is $384.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17087. These numbers translate to real-world gains in video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation, where the 28 threads can be fully utilized. The PassMark multithread score of 40318 and floating-point math score of 106716 indicate strong performance in scientific computing and financial modeling. The single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2409 and PassMark single-thread score of 4236, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast cores. The 91st percentile ranking confirms this is among the fastest CPUs available, outperforming the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.7% in average score. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for lightly-threaded workloads like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software that cannot utilize multiple cores effectively.

The 33 MB of L3 cache provides a substantial buffer for data-heavy workloads, reducing memory latency and improving performance in database operations and large dataset processing. The PassMark data compression score of 498198 and encryption score of 29601 demonstrate the CPU's capability in file archiving and security-related tasks. The processor's architecture supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0, leaving bandwidth headroom for storage devices and future peripherals. For users running virtual machines, the 28 threads allow multiple VMs to run concurrently without contention, while the ECC memory support ensures data integrity in long-running compute jobs. The production status is Active, with a release date of January 2024, indicating this is a current-generation product with ongoing driver and software support.