SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 sits on the LGA 1700 socket, a platform that Intel has kept remarkably relevant through multiple generations. The 14th Gen Raptor Lake Refresh architecture uses the same physical socket as 12th and 13th Gen parts, which means the 14700 can drop into existing 600-series and 700-series motherboards with a BIOS update. This is a mature platform, and that maturity translates directly into upgrade flexibility.

Memory support on this CPU is dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5. That is a significant advantage for builders looking to reuse older, cheaper DDR4 modules or jump straight to DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The platform does not lock you into one memory generation, which gives the 14700 a wider compatibility envelope than many competing CPUs that force a single memory type. ECC memory support is present, a feature that is rare in consumer desktop processors and one that appeals to small workstations running long compute jobs where memory corruption is a real risk.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself with Gen 5, 16 lanes. That means a single high-end graphics card or a fast NVMe SSD can run at the latest PCIe standard without a chipset bottleneck. The 14700 is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited to what the motherboard and power delivery allow via BCLK adjustments; the locked multiplier keeps this chip aimed at stable, no-fuss operation rather than extreme tuning.

Power requirements are modest for a 20-core processor. The TDP is 65 watts, which is the same thermal envelope as far less capable CPUs. This low TDP means a wide range of air coolers can handle the 14700, and the platform does not demand a high-end liquid cooling loop to sustain all-core workloads. The included UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for video encoding, which is useful for troubleshooting or for light office use before a discrete GPU is installed.

The GPU side of this pairing, the AMD Radeon RX 6400, is a different story in terms of platform demands. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing a TDP of just 53 watts. The suggested PSU for this card is 250 watts, which is extremely low by modern graphics card standards. That makes the RX 6400 an easy drop-in for pre-built office machines with weak power supplies, or for compact systems where space and power are at a premium. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, which is narrower than the full x16 slot most GPUs use, but it is sufficient for a card of this performance class.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a stronger GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom, as its benchmark scores will show, and the RX 6400 is the limiting factor in nearly every gaming scenario. Swapping the RX 6400 for a more powerful card would not require any other platform changes; the 14700, the motherboard, and the power supply (assuming it is upgraded from the 250-watt suggestion) would all still be relevant. The platform can also accept a higher-core-count 14th Gen CPU if the user ever needs more than 20 cores, though the 14700 is already well into enthusiast territory.

Benchmark Performance

The data shows a lopsided pairing. The Intel Core i7-14700 is a top-tier performer, while the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is at the opposite end of the spectrum.

Starting with the CPU, the 14700 scores 28,398 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,080 in single-core. The Geekbench results are 17,087 multi-core and 2,409 single-core. These are strong numbers that place the CPU at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score across all tests is 52,301. Looking at the nearest rivals, the 14700 sits essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H, which scores 52,431 and is 0.2% ahead. It beats the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.7%. This is significant because the Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread monster that was a top-tier enthusiast CPU in its day; the 14700 outperforms it with fewer threads and a much lower TDP.

The PassMark suite reinforces the CPU's strength. Multi-thread score is 40,318, single-thread is 4,236, integer math is 154,535, and floating-point math is 106,716. Data encryption scores 29,601 and data compression is 498,198. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained all-core workloads.

Now the GPU. The RX 6400 is at the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,001. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, which scores exactly 6,000 and is 0% different. It edges out the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server by 0.1%, the AMD FirePro W4100 by 0.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M by 0.3%. These are all older or lower-tier parts, which tells you the RX 6400 is not in the same league as the CPU it is paired with.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 6400 scores 176. PassMark G3D is 7,673, and PassMark GPU Compute is 2,812. Geekbench OpenCL is 32,011 and Vulkan is 16,372. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 54, 70, and 30 respectively, with DirectX 9 at 93. These are low numbers across the board.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 63. That is a useful summary figure: it says the pair as a whole sits above the median system, but the CPU is doing all the heavy lifting while the GPU drags the average down. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than from direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming system. The RX 6400's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 and PassMark G3D of 7,673 place it firmly in entry-level territory. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, but the GPU will cap framerates well below what a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor needs in modern titles. Older or less demanding esports games may approach playable framerates, but the 35th GPU percentile means most current games will require low settings to hit 60 fps.

Streaming: The CPU makes this scenario work. The 14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 means it can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also supports hardware video encoding, which can offload the streaming encode from the CPU entirely. The RX 6400's role in streaming is minimal; it is not powerful enough to drive high-quality game rendering and the stream simultaneously, so the CPU will carry the load.

Video editing: Editing timelines in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be responsive thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread score of 2,080 in Cinebench R23. Export and render times will be fast, as the multi-thread performance is excellent. The GPU will accelerate some effects and color grading, but its 4 GB VRAM and low compute throughput will limit how much GPU-accelerated processing is possible. Expect the CPU to do most of the heavy lifting in codecs that are not GPU-accelerated.

3D rendering: This is where the 14700 shines. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 is enough for serious 3D rendering in Blender or similar applications. The CPU will chew through ray-traced renders at a pace competitive with much more expensive workstation chips. The GPU, on the other hand, will not contribute meaningfully to GPU-accelerated rendering. Its FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS is low, and its 12 ray accelerators are not going to speed up Blender Cycles or Octane renders. This is a CPU-only rendering machine.

Software development: Compilation times will be short. The PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and the high integer math score of 154,535 indicate a processor that handles parallel builds efficiently. Single-threaded tasks like code analysis and IDE responsiveness benefit from the 4,236 PassMark single-thread score. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work, though the low compute score of 2,812 means any OpenCL-based development would be slow.

Student and office work: This is massively overkill for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU will never break a sweat, and the GPU is fine for 2D desktop work. The PassMark G2D score of 722 is adequate for office applications. The low 53-watt GPU TDP and 65-watt CPU TDP mean the system will be quiet and power-efficient, which is nice for a dorm room or shared office.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who needs enormous CPU power but has minimal GPU requirements. The 91st CPU percentile and 35th GPU percentile tell that story clearly.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games might find the RX 6400 sufficient, but they would be leaving most of the CPU's capability unused. A better fit is a content creator who works primarily in CPU-bound applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, and who only needs basic display output for a second monitor. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle that display duty, making the RX 6400 an optional addition.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded data processing, financial modeling, or database workloads would benefit from the 14700's 20 cores and 28 threads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running jobs. The RX 6400 is fine for spreadsheet and browser workloads, and its low power draw keeps the whole system within a modest power envelope.

Students in engineering or computer science programs who compile code, run simulations, or do CPU-based analysis would appreciate the 14700's speed. The GPU is sufficient for MATLAB plots, document viewing, and light CAD work. Developers building large codebases will see compile times drop dramatically compared to a typical laptop or mid-range desktop.

The one group that should not build this is gamers who want to play modern AAA titles at high settings. The RX 6400 will bottleneck every game, and the CPU's power will be wasted. The 63rd combined percentile reflects a system that is well above average overall, but the imbalance is severe.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis here is unambiguous. The RX 6400 is the limiting component in every GPU-bound workload. Its percentile of 35 means it sits in the bottom third of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the top 10%. In gaming, even at 1080p, the GPU will be the constraint in nearly every modern title. The CPU could theoretically drive much higher framerates, but the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to use the CPU's headroom.

The FPS scaling evidence, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, shows a system where GPU-limited scenarios will see framerates dictated entirely by the RX 6400's 3.565 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The PassMark G3D score of 7,673 is roughly comparable to integrated graphics from a few generations ago, so expect performance in that ballpark.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance flips. Rendering, encoding, and compilation will be fast because the 14700's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 and PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 are elite-level. The GPU is irrelevant for these tasks, so the CPU is the star.

The only scenario where the two components work together is in GPU compute, and there the RX 6400's PassMark GPU Compute score of 2,812 is low. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 29,601 and extended instructions score of 28,388 suggest that any compute task better suited to the CPU will be much faster than anything the GPU can do.

Overall, this is a system with a massive CPU surplus and a GPU deficit. The combined percentile of 63 is pulled down by the GPU, and any upgrade path that replaces the RX 6400 with a stronger card would vault this system into the top tier.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14700 support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 53 watts.

Q: Does the RX 6400 require external power connectors?

A: No, the card has no power connectors and draws all its power from the PCIe slot.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the RX 6400?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 watts, which is very low.

Q: Is the Core i7-14700 overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so traditional overclocking is not supported.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Core i7-14700 have?

A: The CPU has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the memory bus width of the RX 6400?

A: The GPU uses a 64-bit memory bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the Navi 24 chip using the RDNA 2.0 architecture. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 5,400 million transistors packed into a 107 mm² die. Those are small numbers for a discrete GPU, and the performance matches.

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. This is a narrow bus and a small pool of VRAM, which will cause issues in modern games that want more than 4 GB even at 1080p. Texture-heavy scenes will stutter as assets swap in and out.

The GPU clock speeds are a mixed bag. Base clock is 1923 MHz, game clock is 2039 MHz, and boost clock is 2321 MHz. Those are respectable clocks, but the chip only has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The result is 3.565 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is low. FP16 performance of 7.130 TFLOPS is achieved via a 2:1 ratio, meaning there is no dedicated FP16 acceleration.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 12 ray accelerators. This is a token amount, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 reflects that the GPU is not capable of meaningful ray-traced workloads. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is feature-complete on the API front, but those features will run slowly.

The benchmark data confirms the GPU's entry-level status. PassMark G3D is 7,673, and the DirectX scores are uniformly low: DirectX 9 at 93, DirectX 10 at 54, DirectX 11 at 70, and DirectX 12 at 30. The G2D score of 722 is fine for desktop work. The GPU compute score of 2,812 indicates limited utility for OpenCL or compute tasks.

The 35th percentile of all GPUs places the RX 6400 near the bottom of the stack. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, is a laptop GPU from many years ago, and the RX 6400 only beats it by 0%. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, a workstation card, is 0.1% behind, and the AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M are 0.2% and 0.3% behind respectively. These are all old or low-end parts, which tells you exactly where the RX 6400 sits.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a top-tier 14th Gen Intel CPU with an entry-level AMD GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a 4 GB GDDR6 card from the Radeon RX 6000 series.

The combined percentile of 63 places this system slightly above the median of all builds in the database. That number is heavily skewed by the CPU's 91st percentile ranking; the GPU's 35th percentile drags the overall score down. The average CPU benchmark score of 52,301 sits in elite territory, while the GPU's average score of 6,001 is near the bottom.

This is not a balanced build. It is a CPU-first system with a placeholder GPU. The 14700 has enough processing power for demanding workstation tasks, and the RX 6400 is sufficient for basic display output and light gaming at low settings. Any user who buys this pairing should plan to upgrade the GPU first, as the CPU has years of headroom.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz.

The cache hierarchy is generous. Each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, with 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with ECC memory for reliability. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes comes directly from the CPU.

The benchmark results are uniformly strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 28,398, and single-core is 2,080. Geekbench multi-core is 17,087 and single-core is 2,409. PassMark multi-thread is 40,318 and single-thread is 4,236. These scores place the CPU at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, which is elite territory.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the 14700 is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H, a server processor, coming in 0.2% behind. It beats the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.7%. The Ryzen 9 5950X comparison is notable because that chip has 16 cores and 32 threads; the 14700 achieves a higher average score with fewer threads and a much lower TDP of 65 watts.

The PassMark sub-tests show a well-rounded performer. Integer math is 154,535, floating-point is 106,716, data encryption is 29,601, and data compression is 498,198. Extended instructions score 28,388, and random string sorting is 54,340. The find prime numbers score of 164 is a weak point, but that is a niche test.

For real workloads, the 14700 excels at multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation. Its single-thread performance is equally strong, making it responsive for everyday use and lightly-threaded applications. The 65-watt TDP means it achieves this performance without demanding exotic cooling, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a capable fallback for basic display tasks. This is a processor that will remain relevant for years, and it is the clear star of this build.