SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14650HX

41,576 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This CPU+GPU pairing represents a high-end mobile computing platform that prioritizes extreme multi-threaded throughput over graphics capability. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, while the AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU (IGP) based on RDNA 3.5. Benchmark data indicates the CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, placing this combination in the 80th overall percentile for laptop builds. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a mobile processor from the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. It features 16 physical cores and 24 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallelism for demanding workloads. The base clock runs at 2.20 GHz, while the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, offering a wide frequency range that balances efficiency under light loads with raw speed under heavy demand. The chip is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-HX, and it represents the Refresh generation of this platform. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor is fabricated by Intel.

Cache hierarchy is generous: each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, with a shared 30 MB L3 cache pool. This large cache helps reduce memory latency in multi-threaded scenarios. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, operating on a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support enabled. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is critical for high-bandwidth peripherals like NVMe storage and discrete GPUs (though this build uses integrated graphics). The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 710, which is minimal and not intended for gaming. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking, though this is less common in mobile platforms. It is an active production part, released on 2024-01-07, and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are consistently strong across both single-thread and multi-thread tests. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 20454 in multi-core and 1969 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates strong rendering capability for video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-core score of 1969 is competitive for tasks that rely on per-core performance, such as web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 14249 multi-core and 2173 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of excellent parallel performance with slightly above-average single-thread performance.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 116661, floating point math scores 84999, and extended instructions score 24150. The data compression score of 398418 and encryption score of 22917 indicate strong performance in archival and security workloads. The multi-thread score of 33495 is high, while the single-thread score of 3841 is respectable. The physics score of 2202 and prime number finding score of 152 are moderate, suggesting that some specific scientific workloads may not scale perfectly with this architecture.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 41576, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with an average score of 41621 (a 0.1% delta, essentially tied), the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41650 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41376 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 (0.5% ahead). This means the i7-14650HX is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in overall benchmark performance, but it offers the advantage of a newer platform with PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support.

For real workloads, the 24-thread configuration excels in video editing (especially with multi-track timelines), 3D rendering, software development (compiling large codebases), and data analysis. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with workloads that have large working sets, such as database operations and scientific simulations. The single-thread performance is sufficient for responsive everyday use, though it does not lead the field.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the i7-14650HX scores 41576, while the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376, a delta of 0.5% in favor of the Intel chip. This means they are effectively tied in overall CPU performance, though the i7-14650HX is a mobile part while the Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to dedicated graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with a score of 26421 (a 0.1% difference), meaning the 860M performs like a low-end dedicated GPU. It also trails the NVIDIA RTX 5060 by only 0.3% in average score, though that comparison is based on aggregate benchmarks, not gaming-specific tests.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which means the processor can be overclocked if the laptop's BIOS and cooling solution permit it. However, the mobile form factor and 55 W TDP limit the practical overclocking headroom compared to desktop parts.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. This flexibility allows system builders to choose between older, more affordable DDR4 or newer, faster DDR5, depending on the laptop design.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported. This is unusual for a mobile processor and makes the platform suitable for workstations that require data integrity, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its single-core performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 is roughly 10.4 times the single-core score of 1969, indicating excellent scaling across the 16 cores. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 14249 is about 6.6 times the single-core score of 2173, which is also strong. This suggests the processor is well-suited for heavily parallel workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 860M delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). This is modest compared to discrete GPUs but adequate for integrated graphics, supporting light gaming and GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The chip is codenamed Krackan Point and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications. The base clock is 600 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 3000 MHz, which is an aggressive boost for an IGP.

Memory is system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR4 or DDR5 memory as the CPU. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-dependent, so performance will vary based on the laptop's memory configuration. Dual-channel DDR5 memory is recommended to provide sufficient bandwidth for the GPU, though this is not guaranteed in all implementations.

The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is unusual but indicates that the GPU does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W, which is low and contributes to the overall thermal budget of the laptop. It uses no power connectors and has a slot width of IGP, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for an integrated solution. Display outputs are portable device dependent, so the number and type of video outputs vary by laptop model.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications that require these APIs. The GPU was released on 2025-02-28 and is an active production part. Its predecessor is the Navi II IGP.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. The average benchmark score is 26401, placing the GPU at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26421 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26331 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (0.6% behind), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683 (1.1% behind). This means the 860M performs like a low-end dedicated GPU, which is remarkable for an integrated solution. It is not suitable for high-end gaming but can handle esports titles and older games at lower settings.

For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for light 3D modeling and GPU-accelerated effects in video editing, but it will struggle with complex scenes or high-resolution renders. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some future-proofing for ray-traced content, but the overall compute throughput is limited.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop but do not require discrete GPU power. The 88th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads, such as software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex analyses, and video editors working with multi-core-optimized encoding software. The 24 threads and high multi-core scores in Cinebench and PassMark indicate that this laptop can handle heavy parallel processing tasks that would bog down lower-core-count systems.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering (such as certain 3D animation packages or audio production) will benefit from the strong multi-threaded performance. The PassMark data compression score of 398418 is useful for professionals who handle large datasets or archive files regularly. The encryption score of 22917 supports secure communications and file encryption without significant performance degradation.

Students in engineering, computer science, or scientific fields will find the CPU useful for simulation software, statistical analysis tools, and programming IDEs. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that appeals to users who require data integrity for long-running computations.

Small business workstations that handle accounting software, database management, or virtual machines will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads. The processor can run multiple virtual machines simultaneously without bottlenecking, which is valuable for IT professionals or developers testing software in isolated environments.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings will find the Radeon 860M acceptable for esports titles like League of Legends or Counter-Strike, but demanding AAA games will require reduced resolution and settings. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggests it can handle light gaming, but this is not a gaming-focused build. Users who prioritize gaming should consider a discrete GPU configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i7-14650HX is a high-end processor at the 88th percentile, while the Radeon 860M is a mid-range integrated GPU at the 72nd percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads: the CPU can process game logic and physics at high frame rates, but the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to keep up. For gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all scenarios, especially at higher resolutions or with graphical effects enabled.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or data processing, the CPU will perform at its full potential, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The 24 threads ensure that parallel tasks scale well, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The CPU's single-thread performance is also strong, so even single-threaded applications will run smoothly.

The memory configuration will also affect balance. Since the GPU uses system-shared memory, the bandwidth and latency of the DDR4 or DDR5 memory will directly impact GPU performance. Dual-channel memory is essential to avoid starving the GPU, but even then, the shared memory architecture limits the GPU's effective bandwidth compared to a discrete GPU with dedicated VRAM.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects the fact that the CPU is above average, the GPU is above average, but the pairing does not reach the top tier. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in graphics workloads because the GPU is the weaker component; rather, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in gaming scenarios. For productivity workloads, the system is well-balanced, with no component significantly limiting the other.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. This is a significant limitation for future CPU upgrades; the user would need to replace the entire laptop to get a faster processor. The socket supports the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, and the processor is part of the Core 14th Gen series, so it is a current-generation product.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. This allows for some flexibility in memory upgrades, but the maximum capacity and speed depend on the laptop's motherboard design. Users can typically upgrade the RAM by replacing the SODIMM modules, which is a common laptop upgrade. ECC memory support is available, but ECC modules are less common and more expensive.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature. This supports the fastest NVMe SSDs and could theoretically support a discrete GPU via an external enclosure, though the laptop form factor limits this. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its performance level.

The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 15 W, for a combined 70 W of thermal load. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the laptop's power adapter should be sized to handle the total system draw, including the CPU, GPU, and other components. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory to the maximum supported capacity and speed, which would benefit both the CPU and the shared-memory GPU. Storage can also be upgraded with a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive to take advantage of the CPU's 16 PCIe lanes. However, the CPU and GPU are not upgradeable, so the platform has limited longevity in terms of raw performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 41576, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating that the processor outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 20454 and single-core score of 1969 are both solid, with the multi-core score being particularly impressive for a mobile part. The Geekbench scores of 14249 (multi-core) and 2173 (single-core) confirm the CPU's balanced performance profile.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This is a good result for an integrated GPU, but it is not exceptional. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 indicate that the GPU is better suited to Vulkan workloads, which is relevant for modern games that use Vulkan.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, which means the system outperforms 80% of all builds in the database. This is a respectable overall tier, but it is held back by the GPU. The CPU's performance is near the top of the charts, while the GPU is only moderately above average. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is only adequate for graphics work.

The nearest rival CPUs are all within 0.5% of the i7-14650HX in average score, indicating that the CPU is well-positioned in its segment. The nearest rival GPUs are all within 1.1% of the 860M, showing that the GPU is also competitive with its peers. However, the CPU rivals are high-end desktop or mobile parts, while the GPU rivals are low-end dedicated or integrated solutions, which highlights the performance gap between the two components.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass is "laptop") that pairs a high-end mobile CPU with a mid-range integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, designed for performance-intensive mobile workloads. The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on RDNA 3.5, providing moderate graphics performance without the power draw of a discrete GPU.

The overall tier from the percentiles is 80, which means this build outperforms 80% of all configurations in the database. This places it in the upper-middle tier of laptop builds. The CPU is the standout component, ranking at the 88th percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile. This makes the build particularly well-suited for productivity, development, and content creation tasks that rely on CPU performance.

The pairing is unusual in that it combines a top-tier CPU with an integrated GPU, which is typically found in lower-end systems. This suggests a design philosophy that prioritizes CPU performance for professional workloads while accepting limited gaming capability. The build is not a gaming laptop, but it can handle light gaming and GPU-accelerated compute tasks at reduced settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 and 72nd percentile ranking suggest that the Radeon 860M can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with low to medium settings. For example, a game like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant might achieve 60-90 FPS at 1080p low settings, but this is an estimate and not a measured result.

For more demanding AAA games, the GPU will struggle. Titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2 would likely require 720p resolution with the lowest settings to achieve playable frame rates, possibly 30-40 FPS. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient for high-fidelity graphics, and the 8 ray tracing cores will be overwhelmed by ray-traced effects.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1969 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that game logic and physics will not be a bottleneck, but the GPU will limit frame rates in most scenarios. Games that are CPU-bound, such as strategy titles or simulation games, may perform better because the CPU can handle the complex calculations, but the GPU still needs to render the frame.

Since the data is not measured, these figures should be treated as rough expectations. The GPU's performance is comparable to a low-end dedicated GPU like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a common benchmark for integrated graphics. Users should expect a gaming experience similar to that of an entry-level laptop GPU, not a dedicated gaming machine.