SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14650HX

41,576 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14650HX pairs with the AMD Radeon 8050S in a laptop build that targets a high-performance mobile experience. The CPU, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-HX part, and the GPU, built on RDNA 3.5 with 2048 shading units, combine to place this system in the 89th percentile of all hardware pairs. The data shows a machine designed for demanding tasks, though the absence of measured gaming FPS means performance expectations must be derived from the individual component benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and can boost up to 5.20 GHz, giving it a wide frequency range to handle both bursty single-threaded work and sustained multi-threaded loads. The chip is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for a mobile part and helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 20454 points in multi-core and 1969 points in single-core. The multi-core result places it near the top of mobile processors, indicating strong capabilities for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. The single-core score of 1969 is equally important, as it reflects responsiveness in everyday tasks and in games that rely heavily on a single thread. Geekbench scores of 14249 multi-core and 2173 single-core reinforce this pattern, showing a balanced performer that excels in both throughput and latency-sensitive scenarios.

The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms its high-end status, but the nearest rivals show how tight the competition is. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores an average of 41621, just 0.1% below the 14650HX’s 41576 average. Similarly, the Intel Core 7 251TE is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is 0.5% ahead. This means the 14650HX is essentially tied with these parts, with differences of less than one percent in either direction. The Intel Core i7-12850HX, a previous-generation part, is 0.5% ahead, showing that generational gains are modest in this segment.

PassMark results shed light on specialized workloads. The integer math score of 116661 and floating point math score of 84999 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, useful for scientific computing and financial modeling. Data encryption scores 22917, while extended instructions hit 24150, suggesting solid performance in cryptography and SIMD-heavy code. The multithread score of 33495 and physics score of 2202 round out the picture, with the latter being relevant for physics simulations in games and engineering software. The single-thread score of 3841 matches the Geekbench and Cinebench single-core results, confirming that this CPU does not sacrifice single-core responsiveness for core count.

Architecturally, Raptor Lake-HX is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the exact performance-core and efficiency-core split. The 16 cores and 24 threads imply a configuration with a mix of core types, where the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is achievable on the performance cores. The 30 MB shared L3 cache is a key advantage for gaming and content creation, as it reduces memory access latency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile part and could appeal to professionals who require data integrity.

The integrated UHD Graphics 710 is present, but it is not a gaming solution; its role is basic display output and video decode. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, which is relatively high for a laptop chip, indicating that it is designed for machines with robust cooling solutions. The multiplier is unlocked, suggesting that some laptops may allow overclocking, though this is less common in mobile platforms. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41576, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, but the nearest rivals show that it is not a runaway leader. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part, is 0.5% ahead, which is remarkable given that the 14650HX is a mobile processor. This suggests that the 14650HX can deliver desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a laptop chassis, at least in terms of raw compute benchmarks.

The GPU, AMD Radeon 8050S, scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, which is 2.5% ahead. The Radeon RX 7600M is 2.6% ahead, and the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is 2.7% ahead. This puts the 8050S in a tight cluster of mid-to-high-range GPUs, where the differences between parts are small enough that driver optimizations and thermal headroom could swing results in either direction.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of all tested combinations. This is a high overall tier, but the data also shows that neither component is a top-tier flagship. Instead, this pair sits in the upper-middle range, where it can handle demanding tasks but may not be the absolute fastest option available. The CPU’s multi-core scores are exceptional for mobile, while the GPU’s scores are competitive but not class-leading.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3470.5 multi-core and 285.5 single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 11946 multi-core and 1686 single-core. These results show consistent scaling across benchmark versions, with the multi-core scores being roughly 12 times the single-core scores, reflecting the 16-core, 24-thread configuration. PassMark data compression scores 398418, which is a high number that indicates strong performance in file compression and decompression tasks, such as those found in backup software or game asset loading.

The data encryption score of 22917 and extended instructions score of 24150 suggest that the CPU handles AES encryption and AVX-512 workloads well. The find prime numbers score of 152 is lower, which is typical for a CPU that prioritizes turbo clocks over sustained integer throughput. The random string sorting score of 43035 is another data-heavy metric, showing good memory bandwidth and cache efficiency. Overall, the CPU’s benchmark suite paints a picture of a processor that excels in both integer and floating-point workloads, with particular strength in multi-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array design that is soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU cannot be removed or upgraded in a conventional sense; the entire laptop or motherboard would need to be replaced. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the fact pack does not specify which memory type is used in a given laptop. ECC memory support is available, which is a professional feature that could be relevant for workstations that require error-correcting memory.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself. This is a high-bandwidth interface that can accommodate the fastest NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPU enclosures, though the latter is less common in mobile systems. The GPU, AMD Radeon 8050S, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which matches the CPU’s lanes. However, the GPU’s memory is system shared, meaning it uses a portion of the system’s RAM rather than having dedicated VRAM. This is a key architectural decision that affects memory bandwidth and latency, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory access.

The GPU’s TDP is 55 W, which is identical to the CPU’s TDP. This combined thermal envelope of 110 W is significant for a laptop, and it suggests that the system requires a robust cooling solution to maintain sustained performance. The fact pack does not list a suggested PSU for the GPU, which is typical for an integrated or IGP-class part. The GPU has no power connectors, as it draws power from the motherboard, and its slot width is listed as IGP, confirming that it is integrated into the system rather than being a discrete card.

Memory bandwidth is system dependent, meaning it varies based on the type and speed of RAM installed. For a system with DDR5 memory, the bandwidth would be higher than with DDR4, but the fact pack does not provide specific figures. This means that real-world performance could vary significantly based on the laptop’s memory configuration. A dual-channel DDR5 setup is likely the best choice for maximizing both CPU and GPU performance, as the GPU relies entirely on system memory for its frame buffer.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited. The CPU is soldered, and the GPU is integrated, so neither can be swapped out. The primary upgrade would be increasing system memory, which could improve GPU performance if the current configuration is bandwidth-limited. Storage is another upgrade path, with PCIe 5.0 x16 lanes available for fast NVMe drives, though the fact pack does not specify the number of M.2 slots or SATA ports. For a user looking to extend the life of this system, adding more RAM or a faster SSD would be the most practical steps.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in terms of percentile rankings, with the CPU at 88 and the GPU at 89. This suggests that neither component is a severe bottleneck for the other in most workloads. In multi-threaded CPU tasks like Cinebench R23, the CPU’s score of 20454 indicates that it can feed the GPU with data quickly, but the GPU’s performance in OpenCL (65818) shows that it can also keep up with the CPU’s output. The combined percentile of 89 is a strong indicator of balance.

However, in gaming, the bottleneck often depends on the resolution and game engine. At lower resolutions, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The CPU’s single-core score of 1969 in Cinebench R23 is strong, but it is not the absolute highest, meaning that in CPU-bound games, the 14650HX may struggle to keep up with the fastest desktop parts. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the Radeon 8050S’s 89th percentile ranking suggests it will handle 1440p and 4K gaming reasonably well, though it is not a flagship part.

The fact that the GPU uses system shared memory is a potential bottleneck. Dedicated VRAM has higher bandwidth and lower latency than system memory, so the 8050S may underperform in memory-intensive scenarios, such as high-resolution textures or ray tracing. The GPU’s RT cores (32) are present, but their performance is not quantified in the fact pack. The FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is a measure of raw compute, but gaming performance depends on more than just this number.

In content creation workloads that use both CPU and GPU, such as video editing or 3D rendering, the balance is favorable. The CPU’s multi-core scores are strong, and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 indicates good compute performance for GPU-accelerated effects. The data does not show any single workload where one component severely lags the other, suggesting that this is a well-balanced pair for mixed-use scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a high-performance laptop for demanding tasks but do not require a top-tier workstation. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, as the multi-core score of 20454 in Cinebench R23 will speed up build times. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s OpenCL capabilities.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system capable, based on the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking, though the lack of measured FPS data means specific frame rates are estimates. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU’s performance for simulation software and programming assignments, while the GPU can handle CAD or light 3D modeling. Small business workstations that run virtualization or data analysis tools will also benefit from the 16-core, 24-thread CPU.

The system is less suitable for users who need the absolute highest gaming performance or who require dedicated GPU memory for workloads like large neural network training. The system-shared memory of the GPU could be a limitation in such cases. However, for a broad range of professional and enthusiast tasks, this pair offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 20454 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M but 2.5% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14650HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature useful for professional workstations that require data integrity.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of all tested hardware combinations.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in the future?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, making it non-upgradable.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with an equal 11.47 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system should deliver solid frame rates in most titles, based on the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s strong single-core score of 1969 in Cinebench R23. The lack of measured FPS means these are estimates, but the hardware is clearly capable of 60+ FPS in many games.

Streaming while gaming is a dual-load scenario where the CPU’s 16 cores shine. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 provides ample headroom for encoding video while the GPU handles rendering, and the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS can also assist with encoding if the software supports it.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 for effects and color grading. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the dual-channel memory support (with either DDR4 or DDR5) provides sufficient bandwidth for 4K timelines.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software is a CPU-heavy task, and the 14650HX’s 20454 Cinebench R23 score indicates strong performance for viewport interaction and final renders. The GPU’s 32 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced renders, though the system-shared memory may limit complex scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 24 threads, which speed up compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 116661 shows strong arithmetic throughput, and the data encryption score of 22917 is useful for security-related development. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running builds that need reliability.

For students and office work, this system is overkill but not wasteful. The single-core Geekbench score of 2173 ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and office suites, while the 88th percentile CPU ranking means it will remain relevant for years. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 can handle basic display output if the GPU is underutilized, saving power.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass is laptop) that combines the Intel Core i7-14650HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is an AMD Radeon part based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, specifically the Strix Halo chip. The combined percentile of 89 places this system in the upper tier of all tested hardware pairs, indicating strong overall performance for a mobile platform.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41576 and the GPU’s average of 62108 are both above the median, and their nearest rivals are within a few percentage points, suggesting that this pair is competitive with several other high-end mobile options. The system’s TDP of 55 W for both CPU and GPU indicates a power-hungry laptop that requires adequate cooling, but the performance potential justifies the thermal requirements. This is not a budget build, but rather a performance-oriented machine for users who need desktop-class compute in a portable form factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile GPU built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Halo chip. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the fact pack does not provide specific RT benchmark scores.

The GPU’s base clock is 1295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. This wide clock range allows the GPU to run efficiently at low loads and ramp up to high performance when needed. The memory configuration is system shared, meaning the GPU uses a portion of the system’s RAM as its frame buffer. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as system shared, with bandwidth described as system dependent. This is a significant departure from discrete GPUs that have dedicated VRAM, and it means that the system’s memory speed and configuration directly impact GPU performance.

The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. These figures are derived from the GPU’s clocks and the number of ROPs and TMUs. The FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is unusual as many GPUs have faster FP16 throughput. This suggests that the GPU is optimized for FP32 workloads, which are common in gaming and general compute.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs. Its TDP is 55 W, which is the same as the CPU, and it has no power connectors, drawing power from the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for data transfer between the GPU and the CPU. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% behind) and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% ahead), showing that it sits in a competitive mid-range segment.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 65818, which is higher than its average, indicating strong compute performance. The Vulkan score of 58398 is lower but still respectable. These scores suggest that the GPU can handle compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference, though the system-shared memory may limit performance in memory-bound scenarios. For gaming, the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking implies it can handle modern titles at high settings, but the lack of dedicated VRAM means texture-heavy games at high resolutions may see performance drops.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the fact pack contains no entries for measuredFpsUltraByGame. Therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so these figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398, this system is likely capable of 60+ FPS at 1080p ultra settings in most games, with some esports titles potentially exceeding 100 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU’s system-shared memory could become a limiting factor, and frame rates may drop to the 40-60 FPS range in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-core score of 1969 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with the GPU in most games, though at lower resolutions, the CPU might become the bottleneck in titles that are heavily single-threaded.

The absence of measured FPS data is a notable gap, as it means these estimates carry more uncertainty than a tested configuration. However, the individual component scores provide a reasonable basis for expectations. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is similar to what many mid-range desktop GPUs offer, so users can expect console-level performance in most games. For ray tracing, the 32 RT cores are present, but their performance is untested, so it is unclear how well the GPU handles ray-traced effects. Given the system-shared memory, ray tracing at high resolutions could be challenging.

In summary, this build should provide a satisfying gaming experience at 1080p and acceptable performance at 1440p, with the caveat that specific frame rates cannot be guaranteed without measured data. Users who prioritize gaming may want to consider a system with dedicated VRAM, but for a laptop, this pair offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14650HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds