SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14650HX

41,576 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i7-14650HX with an AMD Radeon 740M is an unusual one, and the data tells an interesting story about it. This is a laptop-class build where the processor sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs while the integrated GPU sits at just the 53rd percentile of all GPUs — a split that defines everything about how this combination behaves. The CPU is a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh part with 16 cores and 24 threads; the Radeon 740M is a small RDNA 3 integrated unit with 256 shading units and no dedicated memory. Together they produce a combined percentile of 71, which hints at a machine built for computation first and graphics second. Notably, no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14650HX is a high-end mobile processor from Intel's 14th Gen Core lineup, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-HX) on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². The specification sheet reads like a desktop-class part squeezed into a mobile package: 16 cores, 24 threads, a 2.20 GHz base clock that boosts to 5.20 GHz, and an unlocked multiplier — a rarity in the mobile segment that gives system builders some tuning latitude. The TDP is listed at 55 W, which for a BGA 1964 socketed chip means it is soldered to the board, not user-replaceable.

Cache provisioning is generous. Each core carries 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with a shared 30 MB block of L3 serving all cores. That L3 pool matters for the hybrid core layout Raptor Lake uses, because it lets the threads that finish work early hand data to threads still running without touching main memory. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that suggests this chip can anchor a mobile workstation rather than purely a consumer laptop.

The benchmark scores confirm the "desktop-class mobile" framing. In Cinebench R23, the chip posts 20454 points multi-core and 1969 points single-core. That multi-core figure indicates sustained throughput suitable for rendering, compilation, and batch processing; the single-core figure indicates snappy per-task responsiveness in applications that refuse to parallelize. Cinebench R20 lands at 11946 multi-core and 1686 single-core, and the older R15 test records 3470.5 and 285.5 respectively — the consistency across Cinebench generations suggests the scores reflect genuine capability rather than a benchmark-specific quirk.

Geekbench tells the same story: 14249 multi-core, 2173 single-core. The Passmark suite adds texture. Integer math scores 116661, floating point math 84999, and the multithread score is 33495 against a single-thread score of 3841 — a ratio of roughly 8.7x, which indicates the chip scales well when work is properly threaded. Data compression at 398418 and encryption at 22917 point to competent file-handling throughput, while the physics score of 2202 and find-prime-numbers score of 152 sit lower on the curve, hinting that some serial-number-crunching workloads favor chips with different core designs.

Against its nearest rivals, the i7-14650HX sits in a remarkably tight cluster. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H averages 41621 against this chip's 41576 — a delta of just -0.1 percent. The Intel Core 7 251TE is 41650 (-0.2 percent), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is 41376 (+0.5 percent in this chip's favor), and the Intel Core i7-12850HX is 41779 (-0.5 percent). What does that imply? Functionally, the 14650HX performs like a Ryzen 9 5900X — a desktop flagship of a prior AMD generation — in a mobile power envelope. For a laptop buyer, that is the headline: near-flagship desktop throughput in a portable chassis.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 740M is a different animal entirely. It is a Phoenix2 chip, part of AMD's Navi III IGP generation, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die — a transistor density of 152.6 million per square millimetre. The architecture is RDNA 3.0, running DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

But the hardware allocation is entry-level. There are 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, 8 render output units, and 4 ray tracing cores. Compute output is 2.867 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same 2.867 TFLOPS figure. Pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The clock range spans 800 MHz base to 2800 MHz boost — high clocks compensating for a small array, a classic integrated-graphics tradeoff. Memory is system shared with system-dependent bandwidth, which ties GPU performance directly to the speed and configuration of system RAM; a dual-channel DDR5 configuration will feed it far better than a single stick. There are no tensor cores listed, so AI acceleration on the GPU side is limited.

The benchmark picture bears this out. Geekbench OpenCL scores 10172, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 15568; the average benchmark score is 12870, placing the 740M in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs — the middle of the pack. Its nearest rivals are telling: the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847, +0.2 percent), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831, +0.3 percent), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830, +0.3 percent), and AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928, -0.4 percent). Matching an RX 580 within a fraction of a percent in aggregate score is respectable for an integrated unit — but the RX 580 is itself a modest bar by modern standards. For rendering, this means the 740M can accelerate viewport work and light GPU compute, but sustained offline rendering, heavy ray tracing, and large-scene GPU workloads will exceed what 4 RT cores and 256 shaders can deliver.

Benchmark Performance

Laying the numbers side by side clarifies the split personality. On the CPU side: Cinebench R23 multi 20454, single 1969; Cinebench R20 multi 11946, single 1686; Cinebench R15 multi 3470.5, single 285.5; Geekbench multi 14249, single 2173; Passmark multithread 33495, single-thread 3841. On the GPU side: OpenCL 10172, Vulkan 15568.

The percentile columns convert those raw numbers into context. The CPU's 88th percentile means it outperforms roughly seven of every eight CPUs in the database. The GPU's 53rd percentile means it beats barely half of them. The combined percentile of 71 lands in between — and closer inspection suggests it is dragged toward the CPU's level by the sheer size of the processor's scores. In aggregate terms, the average benchmark score of the CPU (41576) is more than three times that of the GPU (12870). This is a lopsided pairing by design: the processor is the engine, and the graphics unit is a utility.

Balance and Bottleneck

There is no ambiguity here — the GPU is the bottleneck in every graphics-bound workload. An 88th-percentile CPU feeding a 53rd-percentile GPU means the processor will spend much of its time in games waiting on the graphics side. There is no measured FPS scaling data in the database for this pairing (the measuredFps set is empty and dataIsMeasured is false), so the scaling argument must be made from percentiles alone: the gap of roughly 35 percentile points between the components predicts CPU headroom in abundance, with frame rates limited by the 740M's 256 shading units and system-shared memory bandwidth.

The flip side is equally clear. In CPU-bound workloads — code compilation, video encoding on the CPU, simulation, compression — the picture inverts, and the Radeon 740M's role shrinks to display output and light acceleration. The Passmark CPU numbers (33495 multithread, 3841 single-thread, 398418 compression) describe a machine that will not stall on processor work. The bottleneck question, then, is workload-dependent to an extreme degree: graphics-limited in games and rendering, effectively unlimited by the GPU everywhere else.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not realistic on this configuration. A 53rd-percentile GPU with 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput will not drive high-refresh play at demanding settings; frame expectations should be modest, and older or lighter titles are the natural fit.

Streaming: Viable with caveats. The 20454-point Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 24 threads mean encoding and gameplay logic can share the processor comfortably, but if the game itself leans on the integrated GPU, the combined load will strain the graphics side first. CPU-based encoding is the sensible path.

Video editing: Well supported on the processor side. Sixteen cores, DDR5 support, and a 398418 compression score handle timeline scrubbing, proxy workflows, and export queues. GPU-accelerated effects will hit the ceiling of the 740M's 4 render pipelines and OpenCL score of 10172 quickly, so CPU-rendered exports will often be faster.

3D rendering: Split verdict. CPU rendering exploits the full 20454 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and the ECC memory support — a genuine workstation advantage. GPU-path rendering and ray tracing are constrained by the 4 RT cores and mid-pack Vulkan score of 15568.

Software development: Excellent fit. A single-core score of 2173 in Geekbench and 3841 in Passmark single-thread means responsive IDEs and interpreters, while 14249 Geekbench multi-core makes parallel builds quick. The 116661 integer-math score reinforces this.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way. Browsing, documents, and video calls will barely register on a chip with this much headroom, and the battery-versus-performance question a 55 W TDP mobile part raises is a thermal-design matter for the specific laptop chassis rather than a capability limit.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination — measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so the following discussion consists of estimates derived from benchmark scores, not recorded measurements. What do the numbers imply? A GPU at the 53rd percentile, scoring within half a percent of a Radeon RX 580 in aggregate, suggests playable frame rates at 1080p in mainstream and older titles with settings reduced, and struggles in modern AAA games at ultra presets. The 2800 MHz boost clock and RDNA 3 architecture extract more from the 256 shaders than older integrated designs would, and the Vulkan score of 15568 relative to the OpenCL score of 10172 indicates the driver stack performs best under modern APIs — Vulkan and DirectX 12 titles should fare better than older paths. Ray tracing, with only 4 RT cores, is technically supported via DirectX 12 Ultimate but practically inadvisable as a primary feature. Fast dual-channel memory is the single biggest lever available, since every bit of GPU bandwidth is borrowed from system RAM.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a developer, engineering student, or mobile-workstation buyer who needs near-flagship CPU throughput — the 88th percentile, Ryzen 9 5900X-class performance — in a portable form factor, and for whom gaming is secondary. Software teams running containerized builds, students in compute-heavy coursework, analysts processing data (the 22917 encryption and 43035 string-sorting scores are directly relevant), and small businesses needing ECC-capable workstations all fit the profile. Content creators whose work is CPU-rendered will also find the 20454 Cinebench R23 multi-core score productive. Gamers at high resolutions or high refresh rates do not fit this pairing; the graphics hardware is not built for that tier.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform realities of this build are constrained by its laptop classification. The CPU uses Intel BGA 1964 — a ball-grid array socket, meaning the processor is soldered and non-replaceable. The GPU is an integrated unit drawing power through the board itself, with a 45 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU figure; system power planning therefore centers on the CPU's 55 W TDP plus platform overhead, as defined by the laptop's own power delivery rather than a user-selected unit. Expansion comes through the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the processor, plus the GPU-side PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface — relevant chiefly for OEMs, since external GPU expansion in laptops is chassis-dependent. Memory offers the one genuine user lever: support for both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus means populating both channels with the fastest supported DDR5 directly improves both CPU throughput and the 740M's system-shared graphics bandwidth. Display outputs are motherboard-dependent, as is typical for integrated configurations. In short: there is no socket upgrade path, and the sensible "next upgrade" is a memory configuration change or a move to a discrete-GPU laptop for graphics-heavy needs.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-14650HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 41576 puts it within half a percent of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (41621, -0.1%), Intel Core 7 251TE (41650, -0.2%), and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376, +0.5% in its favor) — effectively a dead heat across all four.

Q: Can this configuration handle modern games?

A: Only modestly. The Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile with an aggregate score within 0.4 percent of a Radeon RX 580, indicating lighter or older titles at reduced settings are the realistic ceiling. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so this is an estimate from benchmark scores.

Q: Is the CPU good for professional workloads?

A: Yes. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20454, Geekbench multi-core of 14249, and a Passmark multithread score of 33495 place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with ECC memory support adding workstation credibility.

Q: Can the CPU or GPU be upgraded later?

A: No on both counts. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket (soldered), and the GPU is an integrated unit with no dedicated memory or power connectors.

Q: Does the build support ray tracing and modern APIs?

A: The 740M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with 4 ray tracing cores — but the hardware allocation is small, so ray tracing is supported rather than practical.

Q: What memory should be used?

A: The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. Dual-channel DDR5 is the clear choice: it raises CPU throughput and, critically, the system-shared bandwidth that the 740M depends on for graphics performance.

Q: Is this a laptop or desktop build?

A: It is a laptop build — the CPU is a 55 W TDP mobile part in a BGA package, and the GPU is an integrated mobile unit fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process.

Build Overview

This pairing is a laptop-class, computation-first machine: a 16-core, 24-thread Intel Core i7-14650HX at the 88th CPU percentile joined to an integrated AMD Radeon 740M at the 53rd GPU percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 71. The overall tier is best described as upper-mid — a strong mobile workstation and developer platform whose graphics capability is deliberately utilitarian. For buyers whose workloads are measured in threads and compilation time, the data shows a capable machine; for those measured in frames per second, it shows a ceiling that a discrete GPU would be needed to raise.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14650HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds