SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
80%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score
Top 20% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s 13th Gen mobile flagship-class CPU with NVIDIA’s professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU in a laptop chassis. The data shows a system built for heavy parallel workloads, with a CPU that sits in the 90th percentile of all processors and a GPU that appears far lower in the standings at the 21st percentile. That gap is the single most important fact to understand before buying, and it defines every workload this machine handles well versus poorly. The Core i7-13850HX is a 20-core Raptor Lake-HX part with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada is a 16 GB GDDR6 professional GPU with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. Together, they form a laptop that is a compute monster but a surprisingly modest gaming GPU, and the benchmark data confirms that split personality.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. It has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, with base and boost clocks of 1425 MHz and 2115 MHz respectively. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 18 Gbps. The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are the headline features, and they push the FP32 compute to 41.15 TFLOPS with FP16 running at the same 1:1 rate. The pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s, which are solid numbers for a 120 W mobile part.

The only benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,596 points. That single result places the GPU in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, which is a surprisingly low standing. The nearest rivals are all older or entry-level desktop parts: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 is 0.1% behind, the GT 735M is 0.6% ahead, the GTX 1050 is 0.9% ahead, and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 is 1.5% ahead. Those deltas are tiny, meaning the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada scores essentially the same as a GTX 1050 in this specific DX12 test. That is not a typo; the data shows a professional mobile GPU landing in the same performance tier as a budget desktop card from years ago. The practical implication is that for pure rasterized gaming or general DX12 workloads, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada is not a high-end performer.

However, the benchmark score only measures one aspect. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present for ray tracing and AI acceleration, and the 16 GB VRAM with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is clearly aimed at professional rendering, machine learning inference, and large dataset work. The FP32 throughput of 41.15 TFLOPS is substantial for compute tasks that leverage the GPU as a parallel processor rather than a rasterizer. The data suggests that the GPU’s value is in CUDA-accelerated workloads, not in raw frame rates. For rendering in applications that use OptiX or CUDA, the RT and tensor hardware should provide meaningful acceleration, but the Steel Nomad score indicates that traditional game rendering is not this GPU’s strength.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are extensive and consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, the Core i7-13850HX scores 3,093 multi-core and 436 single-core. In R20, it scores 12,891 multi-core and 1,819 single-core. In R23, it scores 30,695 multi-core and 4,333 single-core. PassMark results include 441,525 for data compression, 26,062 for data encryption, 26,586 for extended instructions, 184 for finding prime numbers, 92,369 for floating point math, 126,852 for integer math, 36,870 for multi-thread, 2,483 for physics, 49,198 for random string sorting, and 3,769 for single-thread. The average benchmark score is 50,761, placing the CPU in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals show how tight the competition is. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718, which is 0.1% behind the Intel part. The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51,015, which is 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448, which is 0.6% behind. The Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50,398, which is 0.7% behind. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms. The i7-13850HX is effectively tied with a desktop Ryzen 9 and a newer i9, and it is only 0.7% ahead of its own predecessor, the i9-13980HX. This is a very strong mobile CPU that competes with desktop parts from the same era.

The GPU’s 3,596 Steel Nomad score is the outlier. The 21st percentile is a stark contrast to the CPU’s 90th percentile. The combined percentile for the whole system is 56, which reflects the massive imbalance between the two components. The data shows a CPU that is near the top of its class and a GPU that is near the bottom of modern desktop GPUs. For any workload that is CPU-bound, this laptop will feel fast. For GPU-bound tasks, it will feel like a mid-range machine from several years ago. The combined picture is a workstation laptop optimized for CPU-heavy compute, not for gaming or GPU rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the CPU is the strongest component, and the GPU is the limiting factor for most graphics workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile versus the GPU’s 21st percentile creates a massive disparity. In any application that relies on the GPU for frame rendering, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada will cap performance. The Steel Nomad score of 3,596, which is within 1.5% of a GTX 1050, suggests that gaming FPS will be constrained by the GPU long before the CPU is stressed.

The CPU, with 20 cores and 28 threads, is designed for multi-threaded workloads like compilation, rendering, and simulation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36,870 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 indicate that the CPU can feed even the fastest GPUs in most scenarios, but this GPU does not demand that kind of bandwidth. The data shows that for 3D rendering, the GPU will be the bottleneck. For data compression and encryption, the CPU will dominate, with scores of 441,525 and 26,062 respectively. The balance is lopsided: this is a CPU-centric machine with a GPU that is adequate for professional compute but weak for gaming.

There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so frame rate scaling cannot be directly quantified. However, given the GPU’s percentile position, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU in any game that is not heavily CPU-bound. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4,333, is high enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU simply does not have the rasterization power to push high frame rates. In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will be idle waiting for the GPU, which is wasteful given its 90th percentile standing.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is for users who need maximum CPU compute power in a portable chassis and do not require high-end gaming graphics. The target audience is mobile professionals, specifically software developers, data analysts, and researchers who run multi-threaded code. The 20-core, 28-thread CPU with a 30 MB L3 cache is excellent for code compilation, simulation, and virtual machine workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 441,525 and integer math score of 126,852 show that the CPU handles data-heavy tasks well.

Content creators who work with CPU-based rendering (like 3D animation simulations) will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core might, but GPU-accelerated renderers will be limited by the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada’s 21st percentile standing. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU excellent for running complex models and compiling large projects. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or scientific computing will see strong CPU performance.

The 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU are notable for machine learning professionals who need to load large models into memory. The 304 tensor cores provide CUDA acceleration for inference tasks, even if the raw rasterization is weak. Gamers should avoid this laptop unless they play at 1080p with low settings, because the GPU is not designed for high-refresh gaming. The data clearly shows a tool for compute, not for entertainment.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT?

A: The Core i7-13850HX has an average benchmark score of 50,761, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 9 5900XT’s 50,718. This is a negligible difference, meaning the two are effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark score and how does it rank?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation scores 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. It is within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050’s score of 3,629.

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 21st percentile and its similarity to a GTX 1050 suggest that gaming frame rates will be modest, likely suitable for 1080p at low-to-medium settings in modern titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13850HX has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 55 W TDP.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at an effective 18 Gbps.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 56, which reflects the strong CPU and weak GPU. The CPU is at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 21st percentile.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory and has PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,596 places it at the 21st percentile, and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, which scores 3,629 (0.9% higher). This suggests that the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada will perform similarly to a GTX 1050 in DX12 gaming titles. For 1080p gaming, that means playable frame rates in older or less demanding games, but modern AAA titles will require significant settings reductions. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4,333) will not be the limiting factor in most games; the GPU will be the bottleneck. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle further, as its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3,596 Steel Nomad score are not competitive with modern gaming GPUs. Users should expect low-to-medium settings at 1080p for modern titles, and esports titles may run at higher settings due to lower graphical demands. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for textures, but the raw compute power is not there for high frame rates. Treat this as a workstation GPU that can run games on the side, not as a gaming laptop GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-HX family, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, and it has PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated GPU is UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for basic display output but not for gaming.

The benchmark scores are uniformly strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 and single-core score of 4,333 place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. PassMark scores show specific strengths: 441,525 for data compression, 126,852 for integer math, and 92,369 for floating point math. The multi-thread score of 36,870 and physics score of 2,483 indicate that the CPU handles parallel compute tasks exceptionally well. The single-thread score of 3,769 is competitive, and the extended instructions score of 26,586 shows good SIMD performance.

In real workloads, this CPU is a top-tier mobile part. The 20 cores and 28 threads allow it to handle heavy compilation jobs, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and complex simulations without breaking a sweat. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks like spreadsheet calculations or script execution feel snappy. The 30 MB L3 cache is large enough to reduce memory latency for many workloads. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and the Intel Core i9-14900T, with deltas of 0.1% and -0.5% respectively. This means the i7-13850HX holds its own against desktop-class parts in the same price tier. For a laptop, this is exceptional CPU performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass is "laptop") that pairs the Intel Core i7-13850HX with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a 13th Gen Core i7 from the Raptor Lake-HX series, released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $428. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace professional mobile part, released on March 20, 2023, with no launch MSRP listed. The combined percentile for the system is 56, which is a middle-of-the-road overall tier, but that number masks the extreme split: the CPU is at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 21st percentile.

This is not a balanced gaming machine. It is a CPU-centric workstation laptop designed for professionals who need massive multi-core compute power on the go. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 304 tensor cores make it suitable for AI inference and some professional rendering, but its rasterization performance is comparable to a GTX 1050. The system’s overall tier, as indicated by the 56th percentile, is average, but that is entirely due to the GPU dragging down the CPU’s excellent standing. For a user who mostly runs CPU-bound applications, this will feel like a high-end machine. For gaming, it will feel like a budget laptop. The build class is laptop, so it is a self-contained unit with integrated display and no upgrade options for the GPU or CPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The GPU is also a mobile part (IGP slot width, portable device dependent display outputs), so it is not replaceable. This is a closed platform; the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the core components. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so users can upgrade the RAM if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is bandwidth headroom.

The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 120 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 175 W. There is no suggested PSU listed in the FACT PACK, but for a laptop, power is provided by an external adapter. The data suggests that the system requires a substantial power brick, but no specific wattage is given. For a sensible next upgrade, the only realistic option is to increase RAM capacity, up to the limits of the memory controller and motherboard. The storage is also likely upgradeable via M.2 slots, but no details are provided. Given the CPU’s high performance, a user would not need to upgrade it for many years. The GPU is the weak point, but it cannot be changed. The platform is what it is: a high-CPU, low-GPU laptop with no meaningful upgrade path for the main components. Users should buy this with the understanding that the GPU performance is fixed and will not improve over time.