SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

This mobile pairing presents an unusual asymmetry: a top-decile CPU mated to a mid-pack GPU. The Intel Core i7-13850HX sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile lands at exactly the 50th percentile among all GPUs. That 40-point percentile gap defines the system's character. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, spreadsheet crunching, data compression — the processor will finish its work and wait on the graphics subsystem. In GPU-bound tasks like ray-traced rendering or heavy video encoding, the Quadro becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's substantial headroom goes unused.

The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion must be treated as estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. That said, the bottleneck profile is predictable from the component scores. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36,870 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 indicate a processor capable of feeding any current GPU in most scenarios. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, with its 9.4 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, sits in a performance class that will typically bind first at 1080p and 1440p in modern titles.

Memory configuration matters here. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes (20 from the CPU) provide ample bandwidth to the GPU. However, the GPU itself is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16, which means the interconnect is not the constraint — the GPU's raw compute is. In mixed workloads, such as streaming while gaming or rendering while compiling, the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads will absorb multi-tasking overhead without starving the GPU. The 55W CPU TDP paired with the 110W GPU TDP suggests a power envelope where sustained all-core CPU load plus full GPU load could throttle in thinner chassis, but the data does not include thermal measurements to confirm this.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 and a single-core score of 4,333. The R20 results are 12,891 multi-core and 1,819 single-core, while R15 shows 3,093 multi-core and 436 single-core. These place the i7-13850HX in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,761. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51,015 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50,398 (0.7% behind). The i7-13850HX essentially trades blows with these desktop and high-end mobile parts, trailing the i9-14900T by half a percent while edging out the Ryzen 9 5900XT by a tenth of a percent.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs, which is a modest position for a workstation-class mobile part. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling the overall score upward. PassMark data shows the CPU excelling at integer math (126,852), floating-point math (92,369), and multithreaded tasks (36,870), with data compression at 441,525 and encryption at 26,062. Single-thread performance is 3,769, which is competitive for a mobile 13th-gen part.

The combined picture is a workstation laptop that will feel exceptionally responsive in CPU-heavy professional software but will not break records in GPU-accelerated rendering or high-end gaming. The 90th-percentile CPU paired with a 50th-percentile GPU creates a system where the processor is the star and the graphics card is adequate but unremarkable.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a Raptor Lake-HX part built on Intel's 10nm process, featuring 20 cores and 28 threads. This hybrid arrangement — performance cores paired with efficiency cores — is typical of 13th-gen Intel mobile silicon. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the processor carries 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked is true), which is notable for a mobile part. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support included — a feature that matters for workstation buyers.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 is the headline number. This is a strong result for a 55W mobile processor, placing it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-13980HX (score 50,398) in the average benchmark comparison. The single-core R23 score of 4,333 is equally impressive, indicating that the 5.30 GHz boost clock is achievable in real workloads. PassMark single-thread performance of 3,769 confirms that lightly threaded applications — office suites, web browsers, legacy software — will run with minimal delay.

Real workload interpretation: the R20 multi-core score of 12,891 suggests heavy video encoding and 3D rendering tasks will complete quickly. The PassMark data compression score of 441,525 indicates file archiving and database operations benefit from the high core count. Encryption performance of 26,062 is respectable for a mobile chip, supporting VPN and disk-encryption workloads without major slowdowns. The 184 prime-number finding score is low, but this is a synthetic test that does not reflect typical professional use. Floating-point math at 92,369 and integer math at 126,852 both indicate strong scientific and engineering compute capability. The 90th-percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms 90% of all processors in the database, which is exceptional for a laptop component.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th-percentile performance and the GPU's 50th-percentile performance suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile will be the limiting factor in most titles. The GPU's 9.4 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra gaming in most titles, but frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle more noticeably. The 50th-percentile GPU ranking means half of all GPUs outperform it, and modern AAA titles at 1440p ultra will likely push frame rates below the 60 FPS threshold in demanding scenes. The CPU will not be the bottleneck — its Cinebench R23 score of 30,695 indicates it can feed frames far faster than this GPU can render them. For esports titles at 1080p with lower settings, frame rates should be high, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4,333 and the GPU's 64 ROPs (97.92 GPixel/s pixel rate) can handle lighter loads.

Ray tracing is a concern. The GPU has 48 RT cores, but they are Turing-generation RT cores, which are significantly slower than Ampere or newer architectures. The 9.4 TFLOPS FP32 figure is the non-ray-traced throughput; with ray tracing enabled, expect substantial frame-rate drops. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so it can run modern APIs, but the hardware is dated for ray-traced workloads. The 50th-percentile ranking is the key metric — this is a median GPU, and gaming performance will reflect that positioning.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can handle 144Hz-plus frame rates in most titles, but the GPU will cap performance. At 1080p medium or high settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 9.4 TFLOPS and 448 GB/s bandwidth should sustain 60-100 FPS in most games, but 144Hz ultra is unlikely. The 50th-percentile GPU ranking is the ceiling.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are excellent for simultaneous gaming and encoding. PassMark multithread performance of 36,870 means software encoding on the CPU will not cripple game performance, and the 16 GB GPU memory provides headroom for streaming overhead. This is a strong streaming platform despite the mid-range GPU.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 30,695 and PassMark integer math of 126,852 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in applications like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM helps with effects and color grading, but the 50th-percentile GPU ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-end parts.

3D rendering: The CPU will excel in CPU-based renders — the R20 multi-core score of 12,891 is strong for a laptop. GPU rendering with the Quadro's 9.4 TFLOPS will be slower than the CPU in some scenarios and faster in others, but the 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced and AI-accelerated workloads. Expect moderate GPU render times.

Software development: The CPU is ideal for compilation. PassMark data compression of 441,525 and multithread score of 36,870 mean large codebases compile quickly, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces context-switching overhead. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the 50th-percentile ranking does not matter here.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The single-thread score of 3,769 handles office suites instantly, and the 20-core CPU will never be stressed by document editing or web browsing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is wasted on office tasks, but the system will be exceptionally responsive.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a Turing-architecture part built on TSMC's 12nm process, with a TU104 chip containing 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores. The base clock is 1035 MHz with a boost clock of 1530 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, delivering 448 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. The FP32 throughput is 9.4 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 18.8 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s.

The 50th-percentile ranking among all GPUs is the critical fact. This card is exactly average in the database, which is a modest position for a workstation part. The 16 GB VRAM is generous and will handle large textures and datasets, but the compute throughput is not exceptional. The 384 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for deep learning inference and DLSS, while the 48 RT cores offer hardware ray tracing that is a generation behind current standards.

The 12nm process node (vs. the CPU's 10nm) and the 110W TDP suggest this GPU runs hot and draws significant power, but the data does not include thermal measurements. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is a bottleneck on paper — the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 — but the GPU's compute limits will bind before the interconnect does. This GPU is end-of-life production status, which means no new units are being manufactured, and its successor (Ampere-MW) has been released. For rendering workloads, the 9.4 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is workable but not fast; expect moderate render times in Blender, Maya, or Cinema 4D. The 16 GB VRAM is the strongest feature, allowing large scenes that would exceed 8 GB cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — the CPU cannot be upgraded. The GPU is also soldered (the slot width is listed as "IGP," meaning it is integrated into the motherboard), so neither component can be swapped. The memory supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, so RAM upgrades are possible if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots, but the data does not specify the number of slots or maximum capacity.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the GPU runs on PCIe 3.0 x16, which means the system's primary expansion slot is not using the latest standard. The 55W CPU TDP and 110W GPU TDP combine to 165W of component power draw, and the suggested PSU field is null, so no power-supply guidance is available. Storage upgrades are possible via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, supporting fast NVMe SSDs.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be additional RAM, since the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means memory bandwidth can be improved. However, the soldered CPU and GPU mean the system has a fixed performance ceiling. The CPU's 90th-percentile ranking will remain competitive for years, but the GPU's 50th-percentile ranking will age poorly. Users who need more graphics performance would need to replace the entire laptop, not upgrade components. The ECC memory support is a workstation feature that is worth preserving, so any future platform should include that.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13850HX faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the i7-13850HX scores 50,761 and the Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the Intel part. This is effectively a tie.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The i9-14900T scores 51,015 on average, which is 0.5% higher than the i7-13850HX's 50,761. The i7 trails by a negligible margin.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning half of all GPUs perform better and half perform worse.

Q: Does this laptop support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support enabled, which is a valuable feature for workstation reliability in financial, scientific, or data-intensive workloads.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is technically possible, but the 55W TDP and mobile thermal constraints will limit headroom. The data does not include overclocking test results.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile has 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Is this system good for gaming?

A: The CPU's 90th-percentile performance is excellent for gaming, but the GPU's 50th-percentile ranking means frame rates will be moderate. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so estimates suggest 1080p medium-to-high settings are realistic, not 1440p ultra.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets professionals who prioritize CPU compute over GPU throughput. The 90th-percentile CPU with 20 cores and 28 threads is ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running heavy spreadsheet and database workloads, and engineers using CPU-based simulation tools. The PassMark multithread score of 36,870 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 confirm this processor handles multi-threaded professional applications with ease.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles will find the system adequate — the CPU will never bottleneck, and the GPU's 9.4 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM handle most games at medium-to-high settings. Gamers targeting 1440p ultra or 4K should look elsewhere, as the 50th-percentile GPU will struggle. Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU's strength in export and encoding tasks, while the 16 GB GPU memory helps with large timelines and effects. The 384 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for creators using AI-assisted tools, and the 48 RT cores support ray-traced previews in 3D applications.

Students and office workers would be overspending on this hardware — the single-thread score of 3,769 is more than sufficient for any office task, but the 20-core CPU and workstation GPU are wasted on document editing and web browsing. Small business workstations running virtual machines, database servers, or accounting software would benefit from the ECC memory support and high core count. The combined 70th-percentile ranking means the system is above average overall, but the GPU is the weak link. Buyers who need GPU compute — 3D rendering, machine learning training, or high-end gaming — should seek a system with a higher-GPU-percentile pairing, while buyers who need CPU throughput for compilation, data processing, or scientific computing will find this platform well-suited. The CPU's performance is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-13980HX, so there is no meaningful upgrade within this generation for the processor.