SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13850HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q represents a specific mobile workstation configuration that combines a high-core-count 13th-generation Intel processor with a professional Turing-architecture GPU. The benchmark data places this pairing at the 70th percentile overall among all builds, with the CPU ranking in the 90th percentile against all processors and the GPU sitting at the 50th percentile against all graphics cards. This discrepancy in component tiers immediately signals a system designed more for CPU-intensive professional workloads than for GPU-bound gaming or rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 70, placing it above the majority of tracked system configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13850HX compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT?

A: The i7-13850HX has an average benchmark score of 50761, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT's score of 50718.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, indicating it is exactly mid-pack in the overall performance distribution.

Q: Does the benchmark database contain measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions must be considered estimates derived from component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i7-13850HX features 20 cores and 28 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: What memory and PCIe capabilities does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 50761, which places it at the 90th percentile among all tracked processors. This is a strong result that positions the i7-13850HX comfortably in the upper decile of CPU performance. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, scores 50718, a mere 0.1% difference that puts the Intel part effectively at parity with that desktop-class chip. The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51015, which is 0.5% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448, 0.6% lower. The i9-13980HX, a sibling in the same HX family, scores 50398, meaning the i7-13850HX is 0.7% ahead of it.

Looking at specific benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 30695, while the single-core score is 4333. The Cinebench R20 multicore score reaches 12891, with single-core at 1819. In PassMark tests, the multithread score is 36870, single-thread is 3769, integer math scores 126852, and floating-point math scores 92369. Data compression scores 441525, data encryption scores 26062, and extended instructions score 26586. The CPU handles physics at 2483, finds prime numbers at 184, and random string sorting at 49198.

The GPU presents a very different picture. It has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, placing it at the median of the GPU performance distribution. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer relative to all processors, while the GPU is an average performer relative to all graphics cards. This creates a configuration that excels in CPU-bound workloads but will not lead the charts in GPU-bound tasks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4333 in Cinebench R23 and 3769 in PassMark single-thread tests suggests it can feed frames to the GPU effectively, but the GPU's mid-pack 50th percentile ranking limits overall gaming throughput.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, with its 8.294 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, is a professional workstation part rather than a gaming-oriented card. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is generous, but the TU104 chip from the Turing architecture, while supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, is not designed for high-refresh-rate gaming. At 1080p, the system would likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU would become the limiting factor, with estimates suggesting significant frame rate drops in demanding games.

Because the GPU sits at the 50th percentile and the CPU at the 90th, gaming performance will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU. The i7-13850HX can easily keep up with the RTX 5000 Max-Q in frame generation, but the GPU's Turing architecture and 80 W TDP suggest it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. Users seeking competitive esports frame rates would find the system adequate for lighter titles, while AAA games at maximum settings would likely run at moderate frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The 90th percentile CPU ranking makes this an excellent choice for professionals running multi-threaded applications that scale with core count. The 20 cores and 28 threads of the i7-13850HX are well-suited for software development, particularly compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, or executing parallel build processes. The PassMark multithread score of 36870 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 demonstrate substantial parallel processing capability.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU's strength, though the GPU's 50th percentile position means GPU-accelerated rendering tasks will be average at best. The 16 GB of VRAM on the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is useful for large scenes, but the 8.294 TFLOPS compute throughput is modest by modern standards. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find the CPU performance valuable for simulation and data analysis work.

Small business workstations running database queries, data processing pipelines, or financial modeling would see strong performance from the CPU. The PassMark data compression score of 441525 indicates efficient handling of data-intensive operations. The GPU's professional Quadro lineage, despite its age, supports certified drivers for workstation applications, which can be a deciding factor for enterprise deployments. However, gamers or GPU-centric creators would find this pairing unbalanced and should look elsewhere.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU holds a 90th percentile ranking while the GPU holds a 50th percentile ranking, a 40-point gap that indicates the processor can far outpace the graphics card in sustained workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, or multi-threaded physics calculations, the i7-13850HX will operate at its full potential, with the GPU idling or handling minimal work.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming, 3D rendering, or machine learning inference, the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q will limit overall system throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.294 TFLOPS and its 80 W TDP constrain its ability to sustain high frame rates or fast render times. The CPU, meanwhile, will likely sit underutilized, waiting for the GPU to complete its work.

The FPS scaling picture, while not measured, can be inferred from the component percentiles. At lower resolutions where CPU performance matters more, the system will show better relative performance. As resolution increases, the GPU's limitations become more pronounced, and the 40-point percentile gap between CPU and GPU will manifest as increasingly severe frame rate drops. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are adequate, but the 12 nm Turing architecture is several generations behind current GPU designs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant, using a 10 nm process node from Intel. It contains 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU is built on the Intel BGA 1964 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included.

The benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4333 is strong, and the multi-core score of 30695 demonstrates excellent scaling across its 20 cores. The PassMark integer math score of 126852 and floating-point math score of 92369 indicate robust arithmetic capability for scientific and engineering applications. The 5.30 GHz boost clock is notable for a mobile processor, suggesting good short-burst performance for interactive workloads.

The CPU's 55 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, indicating that it is designed for laptops where thermal limits are a concern. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, but the discrete Quadro GPU handles graphics duties. The multiplier is unlocked, offering overclocking potential on supported platforms, though mobile thermal constraints will limit practical gains. The production status is Active, with a launch date of January 3, 2023, and a launch MSRP of $428.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded independently of the motherboard. This limits the upgrade path to replacing the entire laptop or system. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can choose between the two standards, but the dual-channel configuration means memory bandwidth is capped at what two channels can provide. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and other devices.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This mismatch does not significantly impact performance, as most GPUs do not saturate PCIe 3.0 x16 bandwidth. The GPU has no suggested PSU requirement, and its TDP is 80 W, making it suitable for laptop implementations where power delivery is shared. The CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 80 W TDP suggests a total power draw that is manageable for a high-end laptop chassis.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom for more powerful graphics hardware. The 50th percentile GPU ranking is the weakest link, and replacing it with a higher-tier GPU would significantly improve GPU-bound workloads. However, since the GPU is a Max-Q design with an IGP slot width and no power connectors, it is likely soldered to the motherboard, making even this upgrade impractical in most laptop designs. The platform's limitations point toward a full system replacement for meaningful performance gains.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier professional GPU. The Intel Core i7-13850HX ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, making it one of the strongest mobile processors available. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median of graphics card performance. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU pulling the overall score up while the GPU holds it back.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 50761 places it in the company of desktop-class processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT at 50718 and the Intel Core i9-14900T at 51015. This is a remarkable achievement for a mobile part with a 55 W TDP. The GPU, however, has no benchmark scores in the database, which is consistent with its professional workstation positioning rather than a gaming or consumer compute focus. The system overall is best described as a CPU-centric workstation for professionals who need massive parallel processing power but do not require top-tier GPU acceleration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process by TSMC. It contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0 million per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 600 MHz, boosting to 1350 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz or 12 Gbps effective.

The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a professional card of this era. The pixel rate is 86.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 259.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.294 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance doubles to 16.59 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark scores indicate that its performance is average relative to all GPUs, but its professional Quadro lineage suggests it excels in stability and certification for workstation applications rather than raw gaming throughput. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile Max-Q design. The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of May 26, 2019, and its predecessor was the Quadro Pascal-M, with the successor being Ampere-MW.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 90th percentile CPU can easily generate frames, but the 50th percentile GPU will cap frame rates well below what the processor can deliver. The 8.294 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is feasible, but high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming would strain the GPU beyond its capabilities.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are more than adequate for encoding video while gaming, provided the GPU can maintain playable frame rates. The PassMark data compression score of 441525 indicates efficient handling of stream encoding workloads, but the GPU's modest gaming performance limits the overall streaming experience.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 and PassMark multithread score of 36870 provide strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is ample for 4K timelines, but its 8.294 TFLOPS compute means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on newer cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent, with the 20-core processor handling complex scenes efficiently. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q's 50th percentile performance, though the 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores provide some acceleration for compatible renderers.

Software development: The CPU excels here, with the 5.30 GHz boost clock and 28 threads providing fast compilation times. The PassMark integer math score of 126852 and extended instructions score of 26586 indicate strong performance for code compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines or containers.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical student or office workloads, but the CPU's single-thread performance of 4333 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP make this a power-hungry option for basic tasks, but the performance headroom is there for any demanding academic or business software.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13850HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds