SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Gaming Performance — estimated FPS from benchmark scores

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is `false`. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not direct measurements. Readers should treat these as directional indicators rather than definitive frame rates.

The GPU, an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, sits at the 7th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1285 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it in a very low performance tier, roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (0.6% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1.4% ahead). A GPU at this percentile will struggle with modern titles at ultra settings, even at 1080p. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by contemporary standards, and the Turing architecture, while supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, lacks the raw throughput of newer designs.

The CPU, an Intel Core i7-13850HX, is far more capable. At the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50761, it is a high-end mobile processor. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-14900T (0.5% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (0.6% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-13980HX (0.7% ahead). In gaming, this CPU can feed frames at high rates, but the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor.

For a 1080p ultra gaming scenario, the estimated frame rate would be low, likely in the range that is playable for older or less demanding titles but not for modern AAA releases. At 1440p, the situation worsens, and at 4K, the GPU would be severely overmatched. The data suggests a pairing that is heavily CPU-favored, with the GPU acting as a bottleneck in virtually every gaming workload. The combined percentile of 49 for this pairing reinforces the notion that the overall gaming experience would be modest, falling in the middle of the pack despite the strong CPU.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is strikingly lopsided. The CPU is a top-tier mobile part, ranking in the 90th percentile, while the GPU languishes in the 7th percentile. This disparity is the defining characteristic of the pairing. In gaming, the GPU will limit performance in nearly all scenarios. The FPS scaling, even if it were measured, would show that raising resolution or graphics settings would have a dramatic impact on frame rates, while CPU-side changes would have little effect.

For CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded productivity tasks, the Core i7-13850HX is a powerhouse. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 and single-core score of 4333 are strong indicators of its capability. In these tasks, the GPU is almost irrelevant, and the system would perform admirably. However, for any workload that leverages the GPU, such as 3D rendering with CUDA acceleration, video encoding, or gaming, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile becomes the limiting factor. Its 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.60 TFLOPS of FP16 performance are low by modern standards, and the 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, while present, are not enough to compensate for the overall lack of throughput.

The bottleneck is therefore workload-dependent. For productivity and compute tasks that are CPU-centric, the system is well-balanced and fast. For graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU is a severe constraint, and users would see performance that is more in line with a budget laptop than a workstation with a top-tier CPU. The 55 W TDP of the CPU and 80 W TDP of the GPU suggest a thermal envelope that is reasonable for a laptop, but the performance gap between the two components is not something that can be fixed with cooling or power delivery; it is a fundamental mismatch in capability.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark scores are the highlight of this pairing. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3093 in multi-core and 436 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 12891 and 1819, respectively. Cinebench R23 results show 30695 multi-core and 4333 single-core. These numbers place the CPU in the 90th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 50761. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, scores 50718, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51015, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448, 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50398, 0.7% lower. This indicates that the i7-13850HX is essentially tied with several high-end desktop and mobile processors, making it an excellent choice for CPU-intensive work.

PassMark results reinforce this. The multi-thread score is 36870, the single-thread score is 3769, and the integer math score is 126852. Floating point math comes in at 92369, and data encryption at 26062. The extended instructions score is 26586, and random string sorting is 49198. Data compression is particularly strong at 441525. These numbers show a CPU that excels at both integer and floating-point workloads, with strong encryption and compression capabilities.

The GPU, in contrast, has only one benchmark entry: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285. This score places it in the 7th percentile, with an average score of 1285. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1281, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1293, 0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1267, 1.4% higher), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M (1267, 1.4% higher). This is an extremely low score, indicating that the GPU is not suitable for modern gaming or professional 3D rendering.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU alone would rank among the best, but the GPU pulls the overall performance down. The combined percentile is 49, which is the median. This suggests that, on average, the system performs at a mid-range level, but the variance between CPU and GPU tasks is enormous. A user running a multi-threaded CPU benchmark would see top-tier results, while a user running a GPU benchmark would see results from a decade-old budget card.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is not a typical choice for a gaming enthusiast, given the GPU's low percentile. However, for specific professional use cases, the combination makes sense. The target user is someone who needs massive CPU compute power for tasks like software development, data analysis, or scientific computing, but also requires a professional-grade GPU with certified drivers for CAD or other workstation applications, even if that GPU is not the fastest.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as software renderers in Blender or photorealistic CPU ray tracing, would benefit from the i7-13850HX's 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 indicates that long render times would be significantly reduced compared to lower-core-count CPUs. However, if the workflow relies on GPU-accelerated rendering, such as in Redshift or Octane, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile would be a major bottleneck.

Software developers compiling large codebases would see excellent performance from the CPU. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36870 and integer math score of 126852 suggest fast compilation times. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for developers working on mission-critical applications where data integrity is paramount. Students in computer science or engineering programs would also benefit from the CPU's power, though they might find the GPU limiting for any graphics or game development coursework.

Small business workstations that run financial models, simulations, or database applications would be well-served by the CPU's data compression score of 441525 and encryption score of 26062. The GPU's certification for professional applications, while not reflected in raw benchmarks, could be valuable for compatibility with specific software. In contrast, a gamer at 1080p or 1440p would find this system disappointing, as the GPU would fail to deliver high frame rates in modern titles.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The memory support is for both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus. The ECC memory support is a significant feature for professional users who require error correction. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, which provides ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and other peripherals.

The GPU is an MXM Module, which is a standard for mobile graphics cards. This form factor allows for the possibility of upgrading the GPU in some laptops, provided the chassis and cooling system support it. However, the GPU is end-of-life, and its successor is listed as Ampere-MW. Users looking to upgrade would need to find a compatible MXM module with a newer architecture, but the data does not specify which modules are compatible with this specific laptop.

The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 80 W. The suggested PSU is not provided, but the combined TDP of 135 W is relatively modest for a laptop, leaving headroom for other components. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more modern MXM module, assuming the laptop's BIOS and power delivery can support it. Given that the CPU is already at the 90th percentile, it is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any future upgrade scenario. The platform itself is mature, with production status for the CPU listed as "Active" and the GPU as "End-of-life." This suggests that the CPU will remain supported for a while, but the GPU is at the end of its lifecycle.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's most impressive benchmark score?

A: The CPU scores 30695 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for modern gaming at high settings?

A: No. The GPU is in the 7th percentile with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610, indicating very low performance.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking, though the data does not specify the extent or stability of such overclocks.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 49, which is the median, reflecting the large gap between the high-performing CPU and the low-performing GPU.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the GPU is listed as "End-of-life," with its successor being Ampere-MW.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking and 1285 3DMark score mean that achieving high frame rates at 1080p on modern titles is unlikely. The CPU could handle the frame generation, but the GPU would cap the output at low levels, making a high-refresh monitor a waste of potential.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695, would handle encoding a stream via software x264 well. However, the GPU's low performance would limit the game's frame rate, making the streamed content less smooth. The combination is not ideal, but the CPU is the saving grace.

Video editing: In a CPU-based editing workflow, this system would be capable. The 20 cores and 28 threads, along with the PassMark multi-thread score of 36870, would speed up timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is enough for basic effects, but GPU-accelerated exports would be slow due to the low FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS.

3D rendering: For CPU rendering, this is a strong system. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 is comparable to high-end desktop CPUs. For GPU rendering, it is a poor choice, as the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS is far below what modern renderers expect, and the 30 RT cores are insufficient for heavy ray-traced workloads.

Software development: This is a prime use case. The CPU's compile times would be short, thanks to the integer math score of 126852 and the multi-thread score of 36870. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds or server-like workloads. The GPU's certification could be useful for testing graphics applications, but its performance is not a factor for most code compilations.

Student and office work: For general productivity, the system is overkill. The CPU's power is far beyond what is needed for web browsing, document editing, or spreadsheets. The GPU's low performance is not a hindrance for these tasks. The high TDP of 55 W for the CPU could impact battery life, but the data does not specify battery capacity or runtime.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, a 13th-generation Raptor Lake-HX processor, and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture professional mobile GPU. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 49, is mid-range. However, this single number is misleading. The CPU alone is in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is in the 7th percentile. The system is a study in contrasts: a top-tier CPU paired with a bottom-tier GPU. It is not a balanced gaming machine, but it is a potent CPU workstation with a professional GPU that can be used for display output and basic graphics acceleration.

The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, and features integrated UHD Graphics 770. The GPU is a 6 GB GDDR6 card with 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The production status of the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is "End-of-life." The launch MSRP of the CPU is $428, but the GPU has no listed MSRP.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel memory, with both DDR4 and DDR5 options, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a professional-grade feature. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high bandwidth for storage and other devices.

Benchmark results show a CPU that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4333 is strong, and the multi-core score of 30695 is exceptional. In PassMark, the single-thread score is 3769, and the multi-thread score is 36870. The integer math score of 126852 and floating point score of 92369 indicate a balanced ALU and FPU design. Data compression at 441525 and encryption at 26062 are also high, making this CPU suitable for database and security applications. The average benchmark score is 50761, placing it in the 90th percentile.

The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, has an average score of 50718, which is 0.1% lower. This means the i7-13850HX is statistically tied with a top-tier desktop processor from AMD. The Intel Core i9-14900T is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i9-13980HX is 0.7% lower. This positioning makes the CPU an excellent choice for any workload that is heavily threaded, from 3D rendering to video encoding to scientific simulations. The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz provide a wide frequency range, allowing for power savings at idle and high performance under load. The 55 W TDP is modest for the performance on offer, making it an efficient choice for a laptop.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is based on the Turing architecture, with a TU106 chip built on a 12 nm process by TSMC. The die size is 445 mm², and it contains 10,800 million transistors. The GPU has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 30 RT cores for ray tracing and 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The base clock is 945 MHz, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. The memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, but this is not a significant bottleneck for the GPU's performance level.

The only benchmark score available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285. This places the GPU in the 7th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 1285. The nearest rivals are all low-end or very old GPUs: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1281, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1293, 0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1267, 1.4% higher), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M (1267, 1.4% higher). This indicates that the GPU's performance is roughly equivalent to a decade-old entry-level card, which is a poor result for a professional workstation GPU.

For rendering workloads, the 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a limiting factor. The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide some capability for ray tracing and AI-enhanced features, but the overall throughput is too low for modern 3D applications. The 6 GB VRAM is also a constraint, as many professional applications and games require more memory for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Ampere-MW, and the production status confirms that it is no longer being manufactured. This is a GPU that is best suited for light graphics work, display output, or tasks that require certified drivers rather than raw performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13850HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds