SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13850HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a laptop configuration that leans heavily on processor muscle to define its character. The data shows a stark asymmetry: the CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 62nd percentile among all graphics cards. This is a system where the brain significantly outclasses the brawn, creating a performance profile that favors multi-threaded productivity over high-end gaming. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this split, placing the overall package in the upper-middle tier of laptop performance, but the bottleneck analysis reveals that the graphics card will frequently be the limiting factor in visually intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most revealing data point for this pairing is the gap between the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 62nd percentile ranking. This 28-point spread indicates that the processor is capable of feeding the graphics card far more data than the GPU can render. In gaming workloads, this means the RTX 3060 Mobile will almost certainly be the primary constraint, capping frame rates before the i7-13850HX can be fully utilized. The CPU’s multi-core might, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695, is so high that it will sit partially idle in many gaming scenarios, waiting on the GPU to catch up.

Conversely, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the processor in CPU-bound tasks. The i7-13850HX’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4333, is strong but not class-leading, and its 90th percentile overall rank shows it can handle demanding computational loads. However, in a gaming context, the 62nd-percentile GPU means that even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is higher, the graphics card will still likely be the limiting factor. The data suggests a classic imbalance: a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range mobile GPU. For tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the workhorse and the GPU will assist; for gaming, the GPU is the ceiling.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact combo, can be inferred from the component scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 13230 and its 62nd percentile position suggest it is capable of solid 1080p performance but will struggle at higher resolutions or with maximum settings in newer titles. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 36870 and single-thread score of 3769 indicate it will not hold the GPU back at 1080p, but the GPU will still be the bottleneck. The data points to a system where the user must make a choice: leverage the CPU for heavy productivity where it excels, or accept the GPU’s limitations for gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13850HX delivers a benchmark profile that is squarely aimed at high-end mobile workstations. Its average benchmark score of 50761 places it at the 90th percentile, putting it in the top decile of all CPUs. The data shows it is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, while trailing the Intel Core i9-14900T by 0.5% and the Intel Core i9-13980HX by 0.7%. These are marginal differences, indicating that the i7-13850HX is trading blows with flagship desktop and mobile parts from the same era. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle heavily threaded workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, by contrast, presents a more modest picture. Its average benchmark score of 18159 places it at the 62nd percentile, which is firmly in the mid-range segment for mobile GPUs. The data shows it is 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, but 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and 1.2% behind both the AMD Radeon RX 460 and the Intel Arc A770M. This places it in a crowded pack of previous-generation and entry-level current-generation parts. Its Passmark G3D score of 13230 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 confirm its position as a capable 1080p card, but not one designed for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

The combined picture is one of a system that is exceptional for CPU-centric tasks but average for gaming. The CPU’s 90th percentile performance is a major selling point for content creators, while the GPU’s 62nd percentile performance is a compromise for gamers. The data suggests that this pairing makes sense for a user who prioritizes processing power for work and plays games as a secondary activity. The system is not balanced, but it is purposeful: the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a capable supporting actor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform for this pairing is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered, mobile-only interface. This means the CPU is not user-upgradable; the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, which is a notable feature for workstation use. The CPU itself provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, ensuring ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The power envelope is a critical consideration. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 80 W. This combined 135 W thermal budget is typical for a performance laptop, but it leaves little headroom for the rest of the system. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the data implies that a robust power delivery system is necessary. The GPU has no power connectors listed, indicating it draws power solely from the motherboard slot, which is standard for mobile parts. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel DDR5 support is a bottleneck for the CPU’s multi-core potential.

For users looking to improve gaming performance without changing the platform, the options are limited. The GPU is also soldered and not upgradeable in a laptop. The only practical upgrades are memory and storage. Adding more RAM would help with multitasking and larger datasets, and a fast NVMe SSD would reduce load times, but neither will address the GPU bottleneck. The data suggests that this is a closed platform; users should buy it with the understanding that the CPU and GPU are fixed for the life of the machine. The next upgrade would be an entirely new laptop, rather than a component swap.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is a clear fit for professionals and students who need serious processing power for computation-heavy tasks. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, engineers running simulations, and data scientists processing large datasets. The ECC memory support is a boon for those who require data integrity in financial modeling or scientific research. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

For content creators, the pairing is a mixed bag. Video editors will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core performance for rendering and encoding, but the GPU’s 62nd percentile performance means effects-heavy timelines in programs like After Effects may lag. 3D artists using GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will find the RTX 3060 Mobile adequate for preview work but slow for final renders, where the CPU’s Cinebench score will be more valuable for CPU-based renders. The system is best suited for those who primarily work in CPU-bound applications.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they are content with 1080p gaming at medium to high settings. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 13230 and 62nd percentile position suggest it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at high frame rates, but it will struggle with the latest titles at maximum settings. Students and small business users who need a machine for general office work, web development, and light photo editing will find this configuration overkill; the CPU’s power is wasted on such tasks. The target user is a mobile professional who values CPU performance above all else.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all other processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13850HX is at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50761.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT?

A: The i7-13850HX is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT in average benchmark scores, with scores of 50761 and 50718, respectively.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to all other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18159.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s cache layout?

A: The CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13850HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is 76.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13850HX supports ECC memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 13230 and 62nd percentile position indicate that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4333) will allow the GPU to reach high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at medium settings. For older AAA games, the RTX 3060 Mobile should handle 1080p at high settings with frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range.

For newer, more demanding titles, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 suggests that the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 1080p with ultra settings in the latest games, often requiring a drop to medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will degrade significantly, and the system will likely only be suitable for less demanding games or older titles. The CPU’s 90th percentile performance ensures it will not cause stuttering or frame drops, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s mid-range capabilities.

The data suggests that this is a gaming machine for 1080p with compromises. Users who prioritize high-refresh-rate gaming will need to lower settings, and those who want 1440p gaming should consider a different configuration. The system is more than capable for casual gaming, but it is not a gaming laptop in the traditional sense. The estimated frame rates are based on the GPU’s Passmark and 3DMark scores, and actual performance will vary by title and driver optimization.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system is adequate but not exceptional. The GPU’s 62nd percentile performance will allow frame rates above 100 FPS in competitive shooters with lowered settings, but the CPU’s power is largely wasted. The data suggests a capable but not enthusiast-level gaming experience.

Streaming is a strong suit for this configuration. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695, provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s NVENC encoder can offload the work. The system can handle a game and a stream simultaneously without major frame drops.

Video editing is where this pairing shines. The CPU’s 90th percentile multi-core performance accelerates timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times in programs like Premiere Pro. The GPU assists with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU does the heavy lifting. This is a solid machine for 4K video editing, though 8K projects may strain the GPU.

3D rendering is also a strong workload for this system. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 makes it a beast for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM and 10.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can handle GPU-based renders, but its 62nd percentile position means it will be slower than higher-end cards.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high core count and single-thread performance. Compilation times will be short, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this an excellent choice for developers who need a powerful mobile workstation.

Student and office work is overkill for this system. The CPU’s power and the GPU’s capabilities are far beyond what is needed for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The system will excel at running virtual machines or handling large datasets, but it is a waste of resources for basic productivity tasks.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class configuration featuring the Intel Core i7-13850HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. The CPU, a 20-core Raptor Lake-HX part, is a high-end mobile processor designed for performance. The GPU, an Ampere-based GA106 chip, is a mid-range mobile graphics solution. The combined percentile of 76 places this pairing in the upper-mid tier of all laptop configurations, indicating it is a powerful machine but not a top-tier gaming or workstation system.

The overall tier is defined by the CPU’s dominance. This is a processor-first build, where the GPU is a secondary component. The data shows a system that is excellent for CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compiling, and scientific computing, but merely average for gaming. The build class of "laptop" means that all components are soldered and not upgradeable, so users must accept the fixed performance profile. The combined percentile of 76 suggests that this is a well-above-average laptop, but it is not in the top quartile of systems, primarily due to the GPU’s 62nd percentile ranking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU features a large cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile processor with a desktop-class core count, designed for maximum multi-threaded performance.

The benchmark data confirms its high-end positioning. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 is exceptional, placing it in the top 10% of all CPUs. The single-core score of 4333 is also strong, indicating good performance in lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark multi-thread score of 36870 and integer math score of 126852 further underscore its computational power. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 50761 is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-13980HX, a flagship mobile part, and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, a desktop-class chip.

For real workloads, this CPU is a powerhouse. The data shows it can handle the most demanding multi-threaded applications, from 3D rendering to video encoding, with ease. Its ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output when the discrete GPU is not in use. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking confirms that it is one of the fastest mobile processors available, and it will not be a bottleneck in any workload except for the most extreme single-threaded tasks.