SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing matches Intel's high-end mobile silicon with a modern integrated GPU: the Core i7-13850HX sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Radeon 890M lands at the 45th percentile of all GPUs, giving the combination a combined percentile of 68. Note up front: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores, not measured data.

FAQ

Q: How powerful is the CPU in this build?

A: Very, by mobile standards. The Core i7-13850HX ranks in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, with 20 cores and 28 threads. Its average benchmark score of 50761 puts it within a fraction of a percent of chips like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.1 percent apart) and the Intel Core i9-14900T (0.5 percent apart), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-13980HX by 0.7 percent.

Q: How good is the Radeon 890M integrated GPU?

A: It is a mid-tier integrated GPU. Its average benchmark score of 9210 places it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs — essentially tied with the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (0.1 percent delta) and comparable to much older discrete cards such as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (0.7 percent delta) and GTX 465 (0.9 percent delta).

Q:

Can this combination play modern AAA games?

A: Expectations should be tempered. With no measured FPS data for this pairing, estimates come from the PassMark G3D score of 8076 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 — figures that point to reduced settings and resolutions for demanding titles rather than high-preset play.

Q: Is this CPU good for content creation?

A: Yes. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30695 and a PassMark multithread score of 36870 indicate strong throughput for rendering, encoding, and compilation workloads, especially for a mobile part with a 55 W TDP.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The Core i7-13850HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support included. Since the 890M uses system-shared memory, fast system RAM directly feeds GPU performance too.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: It is a laptop-class pairing. The CPU uses Intel BGA 1964 packaging, the GPU is an IGP soldered into Strix Point silicon, and the build class is explicitly listed as laptop.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: The multiplier is unlocked on the Core i7-13850HX, which is notable for a mobile part, though tuning headroom in a laptop will depend on the chassis cooling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU side is more than ready — a PassMark single-thread score of 3769 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4333 deliver the per-core speed high-refresh gaming demands. The GPU is the limiter. A G3D score of 8076 and a Steel Nomad result of 590 place the 890M near the GTX 960, so high-refresh play is realistic primarily in esports and lighter titles at reduced settings, not in AAA games at ultra presets.

Streaming: The 28 threads and 36870 PassMark multithread score leave ample headroom to run a game and an encoder simultaneously without starving either task. The bottleneck remains GPU rendering, not CPU encoding, so single-PC streaming of lighter games is feasible while AAA streaming would pressure the integrated graphics.

Video editing: The 30695 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 441525 PassMark data compression result support smooth timeline scrubbing, proxies, and export throughput. GPU-accelerated effects are weaker: the Geekbench OpenCL score of 37254 and Vulkan score of 40808 are serviceable but mid-tier, so export acceleration exists while heavy GPU effects work may lag.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is the strong path here — 20 cores at a 5.30 GHz boost clock make the 13850HX genuinely capable for mobile rendering sessions. GPU path tracing is limited: 16 RT cores on the 890M exist, but the 45th GPU percentile means GPU rendering should be treated as a convenience rather than a primary workflow.

Software development: This is near-ideal mobile developer silicon. The 126852 PassMark integer math score, 92369 floating point score, and 49198 string sorting result directly map to compile times, test suites, and data processing. Rival analysis shows it effectively level with the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (0.6 percent apart) and the i9-13980HX (0.7 percent ahead), both flagship-class mobile chips.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way. Documents, browsers, and video calls barely register against a 90th-percentile CPU, and the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU plus the 890M handle multi-display output without breaking a sweat. Battery-sensitive users should note the 55 W CPU TDP, which favors plugged-in use.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU pairing in the database — every figure discussed in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay.

The GPU evidence is consistent: a PassMark G3D score of 8076, a Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 40808. The rival deltas reinforce the positioning — within 0.1 percent of the Radeon Vega 8, 0.7 percent of the GTX 960, and 1 percent of the GTX 850M. In practical terms, the 890M trades blows with an older mainstream discrete card.

That translates to estimated esports performance in the comfortably smooth range at reduced settings, and older or well-optimized titles playable at moderate settings. Modern AAA blockbusters at ultra presets are not realistic; the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 in particular signals that heavy DX12 titles will need aggressive setting reduction. Ray tracing is technically available through the 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, but the performance tier suggests leaving it off.

One structural advantage: system-shared memory means the GPU draws from the system's DDR5 or DDR4 pool, so configurations with faster, dual-channel memory will meaningfully outperform single-channel variants. The CPU will never be the gaming limiter here — the single-core scores are elite, and the combined percentile of 68 reflects a CPU carrying a mid-tier GPU.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience is the performance-laptop buyer who needs flagship compute without a discrete GPU: developers, engineers, and content creators who want desktop-adjacent CPU muscle in a portable chassis. A CPU in the 90th percentile with a 12891 Cinebench R20 multi-core score rivals desktop workstations from recent generations — the 0.1 percent delta against the Ryzen 9 5900XT, a desktop part, makes that comparison literal.

Students in technical fields fit well: the 34,000 million transistors of GPU silicon handle everyday graphics while the 20-core CPU chews through simulations, virtual machines, and large codebases. Small businesses building mobile workstations benefit from ECC memory support and 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, which matters for external expansion and fast storage.

Casual and esports gamers who value battery life and portability over AAA fidelity are also served, provided expectations align with a 45th-percentile GPU. What this pairing is not for: enthusiasts chasing maximum frame rates in demanding titles, or professionals whose workflow is GPU-render-bound. Those users need discrete graphics; no amount of CPU headroom fixes a GPU ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13850HX is a Raptor Lake-HX mobile flagship in all but name. The spec sheet reads like a desktop chip: 20 cores, 28 threads, a 2.10 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost, 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core — all fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process on a 257 mm² die.

The hybrid thread count explains the benchmark profile. Multi-core results are excellent for mobile silicon: 3093 in Cinebench R15, 12891 in R20, and 30695 in R23. Single-core results are equally telling — 436, 1819, and 4333 across the same three Cinebench versions — confirming that lightly threaded applications still get top-tier responsiveness rather than being sacrificed for throughput.

Context from the rivals sharpens the picture. An average score of 50761 puts this chip 0.7 percent ahead of the i9-13980HX, 0.6 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, 0.5 percent behind the i9-14900T, and essentially tied with the Ryzen 9 5900XT. In other words, it competes with i9-class hardware while wearing an i7 badge. PassMark component scores tell the same story across workload types: 126852 integer math, 92369 floating point, 26062 encryption, 26586 extended instructions, and 2483 physics. Memory bandwidth also gets a boost from dual-channel DDR5 support.

The 55 W TDP and BGA 1964 socket mean this silicon lives in larger, cooling-capable laptops. The unlocked multiplier is present but practically constrained by that chassis dependency.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 890M is AMD's RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics, built on TSMC's 4 nm node as part of Strix Point. The specifications are modern: 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 16 RT cores, a 400 MHz base clock, and a 2900 MHz boost. Peak figures include 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 (with FP16 at 1:1), 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 185.6 GTexel/s texture rate.

The benchmark reality is more modest than the spec sheet. A PassMark G3D score of 8076 and GPU compute score of 4157 place it mid-pack, and the 45th percentile against all GPUs confirms integrated-class standing despite the advanced node. The DirectX API results show the same tier: 97 in DX9, 73 in DX11, 37 in DX12, and 33 in DX10 — a declining curve as test difficulty rises, which is typical of integrated graphics hitting compute limits.

For rendering, the implications are clear. The 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) / Vulkan 1.4 support mean hardware ray tracing and modern APIs are available, but the Geekbench OpenCL (37254) and Vulkan (40808) results indicate compute throughput suited to acceleration, not heavy lifting. Memory is system shared, bus width and bandwidth are system dependent — so GPU output scales with RAM configuration. The 15 W TDP is efficient, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is largely academic for an IGP that will rarely sit beside a discrete card in the same design.

Benchmark Performance

CPU scores, in full: Cinebench R15 multi 3093 / single 436; R20 multi 12891 / single 1819; R23 multi 30695 / single 4333; PassMark multithread 36870, single-thread 3769, integer math 126852, floating point 92369, encryption 26062, extended instructions 26586, physics 2483, prime finding 184, string sorting 49198, data compression 441525.

GPU scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 590, PassMark G3D 8076, GPU compute 4157, Geekbench OpenCL 37254, Geekbench Vulkan 40808, plus the DirectX series and G2D result of 979.

The positional data frames everything. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile with an average score of 50761; the GPU sits at the 45th percentile with an average of 9210. The combined percentile of 68 lands between them, and the rival tables confirm both positions: the CPU is statistically inseparable from the Ryzen 9 5900XT, i9-14900T, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, and i9-13980HX, while the GPU clusters with the Vega 8, GTX 960, GTX 465, and GTX 850M.

The combined picture is a compute-heavy laptop platform: elite processing attached to competent-but-limited graphics.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing — a Raptor Lake-HX mobile CPU from a January 2023 release mated to a Strix Point integrated GPU released in July 2024. In practice this combination would appear in a single-silicon-ecosystem crossover design or as a database comparison pairing, since the 890M lives inside AMD's Strix Point APU family while the 13850HX ships with Intel UHD Graphics 770 as its own integrated solution.

The tier is unambiguous. A 90th-percentile CPU defines the platform as high-end mobile compute; a 45th-percentile GPU defines its graphics ceiling as mainstream. The 68th combined percentile positions the overall build as an upper-mid machine: workstation-grade processing, entry-to-mid graphics. The launch MSRP of the CPU was $428; no GPU launch MSRP is listed, consistent with integrated silicon that ships as part of a platform.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is CPU-heavy, decisively so. The 45-point percentile gap between CPU (90) and GPU (45) is the entire story of the build: virtually every graphically intensive workload will be GPU-bound.

For gaming, the evidence is structural rather than measured — no FPS rows exist for this combination, so scaling is inferred from the scores. The 890M's G3D score of 8076 and Steel Nomad result of 590 cap what any game can render, regardless of the CPU feeding it. The i7-13850HX's single-core scores (4333 Cinebench R23, 3769 PassMark) mean frame delivery is never CPU-limited; adding a faster processor to this GPU would change nothing. Adding a discrete GPU to this CPU, conversely, would unlock enormous headroom — the 20 cores and 36870 multithread score are waiting for a stronger rendering partner.

Non-graphical workloads invert the relationship entirely. Rendering, compilation, compression, and encryption all run at the CPU's pace, with the 890M's compute scores (4157 PassMark GPU compute) playing only a supporting role. The Vulkan-over-OpenCL gap in Geekbench results (40808 versus 37254) suggests the GPU extracts more from modern APIs, but neither figure changes the hierarchy.

The verdict: buy this configuration for the processor, tolerate the graphics, and — if the chassis allows — plan around the PCIe Gen 5 lanes by adding discrete graphics later. As an integrated pairing, the CPU is the engine and the GPU is the passenger.