SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13850HX and AMD Radeon 860M represent a fascinating study in asymmetry within the laptop market. The data presents a processor with desktop-class muscle paired with an integrated graphics solution that punches well above its weight class. This combination targets users who need serious multi-threaded compute power for professional workloads but are willing to accept integrated graphics performance for gaming and graphics tasks. The benchmark results indicate a machine built for productivity first, with gaming as a secondary, albeit surprisingly capable, feature.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a Rapt Lake-HX architecture processor, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It is a 20-core, 28-thread powerhouse with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB of L3 cache. This configuration, with a TDP of 55 W, is designed for high-performance mobile workstations and gaming laptops where sustained multi-core load is a priority.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end positioning. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30695 is exceptional for a mobile chip, indicating that the CPU can sustain heavy all-core workloads. The single-core score of 4333 in the same test is equally impressive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 36870 and integer math score of 126852 further reinforce its compute-heavy nature. In data encryption, the score of 26062 showcases its ability to handle security-related tasks efficiently.

The percentile ranking of 90th among all CPUs places it firmly in the enthusiast tier. The nearest rivals data shows a razor-thin margin of competition. It is a mere 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and just 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13980HX. Conversely, it trails the Intel Core i9-14900T by only 0.5%. This data suggests that in raw CPU performance, the i7-13850HX is virtually indistinguishable from these top-tier alternatives, all of which are within a 1.2% performance band of each other. For real workloads, this means a user will not experience a tangible difference between these chips; the i7-13850HX is at the very apex of mobile processing power. The Passmark data compression score of 441525 highlights its strength in archiving and file management tasks, and the floating-point math score of 92369 indicates robust scientific and engineering calculation capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this pairing is defined by a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU, with its 90th percentile ranking, is a top-tier performer, while the GPU, at the 72nd percentile, is a strong mid-range part. This creates a clear bottleneck scenario: in gaming, the AMD Radeon 860M will be the limiting factor. The CPU will almost certainly be able to feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, meaning that the GPU will be at or near 100% utilization in most graphically intensive scenarios. This is not a negative, as it means the system's frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's capability, and the CPU will rarely, if ever, cause a stutter or frame drop due to processing limitations.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU will be mostly idle while the CPU does the heavy lifting. The system's overall performance in these tasks will be entirely dependent on the i7-13850HX's excellent multi-core scores. The data suggests a very lopsided but predictable performance envelope: gamers will be GPU-limited, and professionals will be CPU-served. The lack of a discrete GPU means that the system memory is shared, so the "System Shared" memory bandwidth for the GPU is system-dependent. This means that the performance of the Radeon 860M can vary based on the speed and configuration of the system's DDR4 or DDR5 memory, making the choice of RAM potentially more impactful than in a system with a discrete GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The AMD Radeon 860M, with a 72nd percentile ranking, is not a high-refresh 1080p powerhouse. While it will be able to run esports titles at high frame rates, AAA games will require significant graphical compromises. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance gives a baseline for its compute capability, but its 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate will limit fill-rate heavy effects. Users should expect to target 60 FPS at 1080p with medium-to-low settings in demanding titles, rather than high-refresh 144Hz+ experiences.

Streaming: This is a strong scenario for this CPU. The i7-13850HX's 20 cores and 28 threads are more than capable of handling the encoding workload for a stream. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30695 indicates that a user could run a game, encode video, and manage streaming software simultaneously without fear of CPU bottlenecks. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is present, but the dedicated encoding capabilities of the CPU are the primary asset here.

Video Editing: Video editing software is heavily multi-threaded and benefits from both strong CPU and GPU acceleration. The i7-13850HX is an excellent editor's CPU, with the Passmark multithread score of 36870 and high data compression score of 441525 suggesting fast timeline scrubbing, preview generation, and final renders. The Radeon 860M can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but it will not be a primary driver of performance. The CPU is the star of this workload.

3D Rendering: This is where the system excels. Rendering is a pure CPU workload, and the i7-13850HX's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30695 puts it in a class where it can compete with desktop processors. The 0.7% delta to the Intel Core i9-13980HX means render times will be nearly identical to that flagship part. This laptop could easily serve as a primary rendering workstation for a freelancer or small studio.

Software Development: The 20-core, 28-thread configuration is ideal for compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 126852 indicates high throughput for tasks that involve logic and arithmetic operations, which are common in code compilation and interpretation. The single-core performance (4333 in Cinebench R23) ensures a responsive IDE, and the high core count will drastically reduce build times for large projects.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is massively overqualified for standard office tasks. The single-core performance will make spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing feel instantaneous. The high core count is wasted on such workloads, but it provides immense headroom for future multitasking or more demanding academic projects. The integrated GPU is more than sufficient for video playback and general desktop rendering.

Who Should Build It

This build is not for the average consumer. It is specifically tailored for the mobile professional who requires top-tier CPU performance for compute-intensive tasks on the go. The primary target is the content creator—specifically video editors and 3D artists—who need to render and encode on location. The performance parity with the Intel Core i9-13980HX (0.7% delta) means they get flagship-level CPU power without the flagship-level CPU price.

The secondary target is the software developer who works on large codebases and needs fast compilation times. The 90th percentile CPU ranking ensures that their workflow is not hindered by the processor. For gamers, this is a less obvious choice. It is only suitable for those who prioritize CPU-intensive simulation or strategy games and are comfortable with lower graphical settings to accommodate the GPU. It is a workstation first, a gaming laptop second. The mobile market segment and BGA 1964 socket mean this is a component for a laptop, not a user-buildable desktop. This is a system to be configured at purchase, not upgraded later.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 50761, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, scores 50718, a difference of 0.1%, effectively a tie. The Intel Core i9-14900T is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is 0.6% behind. This tight clustering confirms the i7-13850HX is a top-tier performer.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon 860M, shows a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and an OpenCL score of 22759, for an average benchmark score of 26401. This places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its most direct rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a mere 0.1% faster. Notably, it is 0.3% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and 1.1% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A4000. This data shows the 860M is a capable integrated solution that matches entry-level discrete graphics performance. The combined percentile for the system is 81st, indicating that while the CPU and GPU are individually strong, the pairing is greater than the sum of its parts in some ways, but limited by its GPU in others.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no traditional upgrade path for the processor. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Since the GPU relies on system memory, upgrading to faster DDR5 RAM could yield a performance increase in graphics tasks, as the "System Dependent" bandwidth would be improved.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which is future-proof for high-speed NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and the GPU has a 15 W TDP, for a combined 70 W. This is a low total power draw for the performance offered, suggesting that a laptop with this configuration could have a relatively modest power supply and cooling solution. The next sensible upgrade for this system is not internal, but external: a high-resolution external monitor would be a better pairing for the CPU's power, as the laptop's own display is likely to be the bottleneck for the iGPU's output. Given the GPU's reliance on system memory, a future upgrade would be to a new laptop with a more powerful discrete GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 raster operation units (ROPs). It has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and can boost up to 3000 MHz.

The memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This is a crucial detail, as the GPU's performance is tied to the speed and type of system RAM. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs.

In terms of raw throughput, the Radeon 860M delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s. Its benchmark scores are impressive for an iGPU. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and OpenCL score of 22759 put it on par with entry-level discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (within 0.1%). This means it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles and is a very capable multimedia accelerator. The 8 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capabilities, though performance will be modest.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop class system. It pairs a 90th-percentile CPU with a 72nd-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 81. The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a top-tier mobile processor, while the AMD Radeon 860M is an upper-mid-range integrated graphics solution. The system is defined by its CPU performance, making it a mobile workstation for professionals. The GPU is a capable companion that allows for light gaming and hardware acceleration, but it is not the primary draw. It is a high-performance computing platform with a competent, but secondary, graphics component.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13850HX compare to the Intel Core i9-13980HX?

A: The data shows the i7-13850HX has an average benchmark score of 50761, which is 0.7% higher than the i9-13980HX, making it effectively a performance tie.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon 860M good for gaming?

A: The Radeon 860M is in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs and performs on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% difference). It can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, but it is not a high-refresh-rate gaming solution.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and GPU?

A: There is a significant gap. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile, indicating the CPU is a much stronger component and will not be a bottleneck in GPU-limited tasks.

Q: What type of memory does this system support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The GPU uses this system memory, so its performance is dependent on the system's memory speed.

Q: What is the release date of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The release date for the AMD Radeon 860M is 2025-02-28.

Q: Does this system have ray tracing support?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 860M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling ray tracing, though performance will be limited compared to discrete GPUs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the system is 81, reflecting the strong CPU performance and the mid-range GPU performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M's performance, as indicated by its Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043, places it in the same class as the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. As such, gaming expectations should be calibrated to that tier of hardware.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's immense single-core power (4333 in Cinebench R23) will help push frame rates high, and the GPU should be capable of achieving 100+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the 3.072 TFLOPS of compute power will be the limiting factor. Users should expect to run these games at 1080p with low-to-medium settings to achieve a playable 30-60 FPS. The 8 RT cores are present, but enabling ray tracing will likely result in a significant performance hit, making it impractical in most scenarios. The "System Shared" memory also means that frame pacing can be less consistent than with a discrete GPU, as the system memory is shared with the CPU. This pairing is best for gamers who prioritize high frame rates in less demanding titles or are willing to make significant visual sacrifices for playable performance in AAA games.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13850HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds