SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13800H + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13800H

34,988 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

46,702 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13800H and AMD Radeon RX 6550M pairing represents a mobile platform built around a high-performance hybrid CPU architecture and a dedicated entry-level RDNA 2 GPU. This combination targets a specific segment of the laptop market where processor-heavy tasks take priority over raw graphical fidelity. The data indicates a system that is substantially more capable in compute workloads than in gaming, making it a versatile tool for productivity but a more measured choice for gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core i7-13800H, which utilizes the Intel BGA 1744 socket. This is a mobile-specific, soldered socket, meaning the CPU is not user-upgradeable; the processor is a permanent fixture of the motherboard. Consequently, any significant CPU upgrade would necessitate a full system replacement rather than a component swap. The platform's memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, offering laptop manufacturers flexibility in balancing cost and performance. The memory bus width is dual-channel, which is standard for this class of mobile processor.

For expansion and peripheral connectivity, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though limited to 8 lanes from the CPU itself. This high-speed interface is available for connecting the fastest NVMe SSDs or other Gen 5 devices, ensuring that storage and I/O are not bottlenecks for the processor's capabilities. The GPU, however, connects via a separate PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The integrated graphics option is Intel Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, providing a fallback for power-saving modes or troubleshooting.

Power delivery is a critical consideration for this platform. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance H-series mobile chip. The GPU, with a TDP of 80 W, is the more power-hungry component. When combined, the system's total power draw requires a robust power supply and cooling solution. While the FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU wattage for this specific combination, the 125 W combined TDP of the primary compute components indicates that the laptop's power adapter will need to be substantial, likely in the 150-200 W range to allow for transient spikes and other system components. Furthermore, the GPU uses no external power connectors, drawing all its power from the motherboard, which simplifies the internal design. The platform also does not support ECC memory, aligning it with consumer and mainstream professional use rather than mission-critical server environments.

In terms of a sensible upgrade path, the data suggests that the CPU has significant headroom. Its performance is on par with the Intel Core i9-12900HX and Core i5-14500HX, indicating it is already a top-tier mobile processor. The most logical upgrade for this system would not be the CPU, but rather the GPU, should a laptop variant exist with a more powerful Radeon RX 6000 series or other discrete graphics option. However, given that the GPU is also soldered, this is not a user-serviceable upgrade. In practice, the "upgrade path" for this platform is limited to increasing memory capacity and storage, or moving to an entirely new laptop chassis for any major performance gains.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a processor that punches well above its weight class. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Core i7-13800H scores 18358 points, a figure that places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. This is a very strong result for a 45 W mobile chip, indicating sustained multi-threaded performance. Its single-core score of 2591 in the same test is equally impressive, showcasing the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture's performance cores. The average benchmark score across all tests is 34988, which is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which scores 35003. The deltaPct of 0% between these two confirms they are performance equals in aggregate, despite the i7 being a newer generation part.

The GPU, while smaller in scope, also holds its own. The Radeon RX 6550M achieves an average benchmark score of 46702, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. In the Geekbench compute tests, it scores 42536 in OpenCL and 50867 in Vulkan, showing strong performance in both API environments. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A530M, scores 46614, a deltaPct of only 0.2%, meaning the two are statistically indistinguishable in performance. It also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which scores 46601. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, which synthesizes the individual strengths of both components into a single, high-tier ranking.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the star performer. The multi-core and single-core scores are both exceptional, suggesting the processor can handle any task thrown at it, from compiling code to rendering 3D scenes. The GPU, while not a performance leader, is a competent partner that will not significantly hold back the CPU in most productivity scenarios. The data indicates a system that is balanced for compute-heavy work, where the CPU's power can be fully utilized.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. The FACT PACK does not contain any rows for `measuredFpsUltraByGame`. Therefore, all frame rate discussions here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components and their relative performance percentiles.

The GPU's performance, while in the 85th percentile, is constrained by its hardware specifications. With a 4 GB VRAM buffer and a 64-bit memory bus delivering 144.0 GB/s of bandwidth, its ability to handle modern games at high resolutions and detail settings is limited. The data suggests that this is a GPU designed for 1080p gaming. At this resolution, with settings lowered from "Ultra" to "High" or "Medium," the RX 6550M could be expected to deliver playable frame rates in many titles. The 5.816 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides a baseline for its raw compute capability, which is modest compared to higher-tier cards.

In more graphically demanding scenarios, such as "Ultra" settings at 1080p, the 4 GB VRAM is likely to become a bottleneck. Games with high-resolution textures can easily exceed this capacity, leading to texture pop-in and stuttering. The 64-bit memory bus further compounds this issue, as the 144.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for the high data throughput required by modern game engines at high settings. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are less demanding, the GPU could likely push high frame rates. However, for AAA titles released in the last few years, the expectation should be for medium settings to maintain a stable 60 FPS. The CPU's high single-core score of 2591 in Cinebench R23 means it will not be the limiting factor in gaming, ensuring that the GPU is fully utilized. The estimates indicate this is a 1080p gaming solution for medium to high settings, not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming powerhouse.

Who Should Build It

This platform is best suited for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive. The Core i7-13800H's 84th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores make it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, students running engineering or scientific simulations, and small business workstations that handle data analysis or financial modeling. The Passmark multi-thread score of 26545 and the data compression score of 299179 highlight its proficiency in parallel processing tasks. For these users, the GPU's performance is secondary but adequate for standard desktop operations and occasional light graphics work.

Content creators who work primarily with video editing or 3D rendering will also find this platform appealing. The CPU's high Cinebench scores translate directly to faster render times in software like Blender or Premiere Pro. The GPU can assist with hardware acceleration in some workloads, but the CPU will be the main workhorse. For gamers, the target audience is those playing at 1080p with moderate settings. The system is not designed for 4K gaming or high-refresh-rate competitive play in demanding titles. It is more suited for a gamer who also needs a powerful processor for work or school, rather than a dedicated gaming machine. The "build" is a laptop, as indicated by the `buildClass`, so it is a self-contained solution for users who need a single device for both productivity and entertainment.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i7-13800H?

A: The processor scores in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34988. This places it on par with the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which has an identical deltaPct of 0%.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 6550M compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 46702, which puts it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Arc A530M (46614) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13800H and AMD Radeon RX 6550M is 85.

Q: What are the key specifications of the GPU's memory subsystem?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 144.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does this platform support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13800H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13800H is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, while the AMD Radeon RX 6550M uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i7-13800H is $457.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Navi 24 chip, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, bringing support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which is a key feature for modern game compatibility.

Its clock speeds are set to a base of 2000 MHz, a game clock of 2560 MHz, and a boost clock of 2840 MHz. This high boost clock helps the small chip achieve a pixel rate of 90.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 181.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 5.816 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance doubling to 11.63 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These numbers indicate a GPU that is efficient but limited by its narrow 64-bit memory interface and 4 GB frame buffer.

The benchmark scores reflect a GPU that is competitive within its class. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 50867 is a strong result, suggesting good driver optimization for modern APIs. The OpenCL score of 42536 is also respectable. In rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint. Complex 3D scenes with high-resolution textures will likely exceed this limit, forcing the system to use slower system memory over the PCIe 4.0 x4 bus, which will impact performance. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking indicates it is better than the majority of GPUs, but its hardware limits place it firmly in the entry-level to mid-range mobile segment. It is a capable GPU for 1080p rendering and light content creation, but not for heavy 3D work or high-resolution gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is a high-end performer, sitting in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 85th percentile among all GPUs, but with clear hardware limitations. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, software compilation, and 3D scene simulation, the system will perform exceptionally well, leveraging the i7-13800H's 20 threads and high boost clock of 5.20 GHz to their fullest extent.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, particularly gaming at high settings, the RX 6550M will be the limiting factor. Its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain performance, preventing the powerful CPU from reaching its full potential in frame rate generation. The data suggests that in gaming, the GPU will consistently be the bottleneck, as its compute and memory throughput are far below what the CPU can feed. The lack of measured FPS data makes this a qualitative assessment, but the hardware specifications strongly point to this conclusion. The CPU's 84th percentile score and the GPU's 85th percentile score are misleading in this context; the GPU's architectural limits are more severe than its percentile suggests. The system is balanced for productivity, where the CPU is the primary driver, but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU's limitations are exposed.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as defined by `buildClass`, pairing a 13th Gen Intel Core i7 processor with an AMD Radeon RX 6000 series GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H part, and the GPU is a Navi 24 chip based on RDNA 2.0. The combined percentile for this pairing is 85, placing it in the upper echelon of systems.

Overall, this is a high-tier mobile platform, but with a distinct skew towards CPU performance. The processor is a flagship-level mobile chip, while the GPU is a more modest entry-level discrete part. This is not a top-tier gaming laptop, as the GPU is not powerful enough to match the CPU's capabilities in that domain. Instead, it is a premium productivity laptop with discrete graphics capabilities. The 85th combined percentile reflects its strength in general computing and its adequacy in gaming, but the specific component scores reveal that the CPU is the primary driver of this high ranking. The system is best described as a powerful mobile workstation that can handle light to moderate gaming, rather than a dedicated gaming rig.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13800H is a mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and codenamed Raptor Lake-H. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and features a die size of 257 mm². The chip has 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power and performance. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but does not support ECC. The processor is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported. It was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $457. The integrated graphics solution is Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

The benchmark results for this CPU are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18358 and single-core score of 2591 are top-tier for a mobile chip. The Passmark single-thread score of 3543 and multithread score of 26545 reinforce its strength in both single and multi-threaded applications. The data compression score of 299179 and integer math score of 92589 show its prowess in data-intensive tasks. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking and its statistical tie with the Intel Core i9-12900HX (deltaPct of 0%) demonstrate that it is a flagship-level processor. In real workloads, this translates to snappy system responsiveness, rapid application loading, and fast processing of complex computations, making it an ideal choice for demanding professional applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is the system's weakest point. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are insufficient for high refresh rates in modern AAA titles. At 1080p with esports titles, the high CPU single-core score can support high frame rates, but the GPU will likely cap below 144 FPS in many instances. For competitive shooters, it is adequate, but not ideal.

Streaming: The system is well-suited for streaming. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can handle game encoding via x264 while maintaining playable frame rates in less demanding games. The high Passmark multithread score indicates enough headroom to run encoding software without significantly impacting game performance, though the GPU's limitations will still apply to the game itself.

Video Editing: This is a primary use case for this system. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18358 ensures fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing in 1080p and even 4K projects. The GPU can provide hardware acceleration for effects and rendering in compatible software, but the CPU is the main driver of performance here.

3D Rendering: The CPU's strong multi-core performance makes it a capable tool for CPU-based rendering engines like those in Blender or Maya. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for GPU-accelerated rendering of complex scenes, but it can handle simpler scenes or act as a secondary device. The high FP32 performance of 5.816 TFLOPS is useful for viewport rendering.

Software Development: This is an ideal workload for the i7-13800H. Compilation times will be short thanks to the high multi-core score, and the fast single-core performance ensures quick response times for IDE features. The Passmark data encryption score of 17726 is also beneficial for secure development tasks.

Student and Office Work: The system is overpowered for standard office tasks, but this headroom ensures longevity. Multitasking with dozens of browser tabs, spreadsheets, and document editors will be effortless. The fast single-core score of 3543 ensures a responsive user interface, and the integrated Iris Xe graphics provide a power-saving alternative to the discrete GPU for basic tasks, extending battery life.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13800H + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13800H

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds