SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13790F and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 form a desktop pairing that combines a high-core-count 13th Gen processor with a professional Turing-era graphics card. The data shows a system with significant compute potential for multi-threaded workloads, but with a GPU whose overall benchmark standing is modest compared to the CPU. The combined percentile of 80 places this build above the majority of configurations, though the specific strengths and weaknesses of each component create a distinct profile that is more suited to productivity and professional visualization than pure gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, housed in the Intel Socket 1700. This configuration provides a strong foundation for heavily threaded applications, as evidenced by its benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35404 in multi-core and 4998 in single-core tests. The multi-core result is particularly telling, indicating that the processor can sustain high throughput across all cores, which translates directly to faster rendering times and more efficient compilation in software development environments.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps with data locality and reduces latency for frequently accessed data, benefiting workloads that rely on large datasets. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in platform building. The PassMark scores further illustrate its capabilities: a Multi-Thread score of 44737 and a Single-Thread score of 4212. These figures place the CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, showing that it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently tracked.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the i7-13790F’s average benchmark score of 63080 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, which scores 63173, a delta of -0.1%. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, which scores 62839, a 0.4% lead, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738, a 0.5% lead. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63331, which is 0.4% ahead of the i7-13790F. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i7-13790F is squarely in the performance tier of these modern mobile and embedded processors, despite being a desktop part. The PassMark data compression score of 567473 and encryption score of 31703 suggest strong performance in data-heavy tasks, while the floating-point math score of 110512 and integer math score of 151416 highlight its arithmetic capabilities. For real workloads, this means a user can expect brisk, responsive performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software builds, where the combination of 16 cores and high boost clocks provides a balanced mix of parallel and single-threaded speed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed, with the processor being the stronger component in terms of its percentile standing. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. This disparity suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For general productivity tasks like office applications or web browsing, the CPU is more than sufficient, and the system will not be bottlenecked. However, in graphics-intensive scenarios, such as 3D rendering with GPU acceleration or gaming, the Quadro RTX 5000 will likely cap performance before the i7-13790F reaches its limits.

The PassMark GPU Compute score of 6525, compared to the CPU’s PassMark Multi-Thread score of 44737, reinforces this imbalance. In tasks that leverage GPU compute, the system’s overall throughput will be constrained by the GPU’s compute capabilities. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding (if not using the GPU) or complex physics simulations, the i7-13790F can operate at its full potential. The data does not include FPS scaling for games, so a precise bottleneck analysis for gaming is unavailable. However, based on the benchmark percentiles, it is reasonable to conclude that at lower resolutions and settings where FPS is high, the CPU might become the limiting factor if the workload is lightly threaded, but at higher resolutions and demanding graphics settings, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The system is well-balanced for a professional workstation where the CPU handles simulation, logic, and pre-processing, while the GPU handles final rendering and display output, with the CPU having ample headroom to drive the GPU to its maximum.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is based on the Turing architecture, specifically the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The core clocks are a base of 1620 MHz and a boost of 1815 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. This configuration results in a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s.

In terms of compute performance, the Quadro RTX 5000 delivers 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The benchmark scores show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and a Vulkan score of 92309, indicating strong compute throughput for a professional card. However, the PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 21629 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, a delta of -1%. The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.2% behind the Quadro RTX 5000, while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M and RX Vega M GL score 21237 and 21153, respectively, showing the Quadro is 1.8% and 2.3% ahead of those older parts. This indicates that while the Quadro RTX 5000 has professional features and a large VRAM buffer, its raw graphics processing power is comparable to a mid-range consumer card from a similar era.

The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for rendering large scenes or high-resolution textures, as it reduces the need to swap data to system memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that this VRAM can be fed quickly, which is crucial for memory-intensive tasks. The presence of RT and tensor cores means the GPU can handle ray-traced workflows and AI denoising, which are common in modern 3D rendering packages. The FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS is particularly relevant for AI inference and certain compute tasks that can utilize reduced precision. The board uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which, while older than the CPU’s Gen 5 support, still provides adequate bandwidth for most professional workloads. The display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, allowing for multi-monitor setups common in professional environments.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data does not support this as a primary use case. The GPU’s 67th percentile and PassMark G3D score of 15616, which is comparable to a GTX 1060 6 GB, suggest frame rates will be limited, especially at high resolutions and ultra settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4998 in Cinebench R23 can handle game logic, but the GPU will be the bottleneck for achieving high FPS in modern titles.
Streaming: The i7-13790F’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming or running other applications. The PassMark Multi-Thread score of 44737 indicates that simultaneous encoding and gameplay are feasible, though the GPU’s modest rasterization performance may limit in-game quality settings.
Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s high multi-core score of 35404 in Cinebench R23 accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is useful for previewing high-resolution footage and applying GPU-accelerated effects, though its compute score relative to modern cards means some effects will be slower.
3D rendering: The pairing is well-suited for CPU-based rendering, where the i7-13790F excels. The Quadro RTX 5000 can be used for GPU-accelerated rendering with its 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and RT cores, but its performance is not top-tier. The 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for scenes that exceed the memory capacity of consumer cards.
Software development: The CPU is the main asset here. The 16 cores and high boost clock of 5.20 GHz speed up compilation times, as reflected in the PassMark Multi-Thread score. The system’s memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support allows for configurations that suit different project sizes.
Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but the data shows it will handle any office application, spreadsheet, or coding assignment effortlessly. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures snappy performance, and the GPU’s professional drivers offer stability for productivity suites.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 13th Gen Core series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, meaning a user can choose between the two depending on the motherboard. The PCIe interface from the CPU is Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is forward-looking for future storage and expansion cards, though the Quadro RTX 5000 uses PCIe 3.0. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 16-core part, indicating efficient power delivery and making it manageable with a capable air cooler. The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides a baseline for the system’s power supply needs. The power connectors on the GPU are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Quadro RTX 5000 with a more modern GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The i7-13790F’s performance is on par with newer processors like the Core Ultra 7 265HX, so it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for any current or near-future GPU. The platform’s memory support allows for a future upgrade to faster DDR5 modules if not already in use. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU also mean that a future GPU or NVMe drive can take advantage of increased bandwidth, though the current GPU does not. Given that the CPU is in the 93rd percentile, the upgrade path is primarily focused on the graphics side, where moving to a GPU with a higher percentile would bring the system’s overall balance closer together.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13790F compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The i7-13790F has an average benchmark score of 63080, which is 0.1% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265HX’s score of 63173. The performance difference is negligible in practical terms.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, achieved through a 256-bit bus and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13790F does not support ECC memory, according to the data.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 has 48 RT cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 80, indicating it outperforms 80% of all tracked build configurations.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for professionals and power users who prioritize CPU compute over gaming performance. The i7-13790F’s 93rd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the 16 cores and 24 threads will reduce build times. Video editors and 3D artists working with CPU-based rendering engines will also benefit from the high multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 35404. The 16 GB VRAM on the Quadro RTX 5000 is a draw for those working with large 3D scenes or high-res video previews, though they must be prepared for GPU compute performance that is only 1% behind a GTX 1060 6 GB. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU more than capable for simulations and development tasks. Small business workstations that require reliability and multi-display output, given the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, could also use this configuration, provided the software is not heavily GPU-dependent. Gamers should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 67th percentile suggests it is not built for high-refresh gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13790F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a Turing-based professional card with 16 GB of VRAM and a 256-bit memory interface. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper quintile of all tracked builds, signifying strong overall performance. However, the component balance is uneven, with the CPU being a top-tier performer and the GPU being a mid-range part in terms of its benchmark standing. This is a workstation-oriented pairing that emphasizes CPU processing power for productivity and professional applications, rather than a gaming-focused rig.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 63080, placing it in the 93rd percentile. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35404, and its single-core score is 4998. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile, with a PassMark G3D score of 15616. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63173, which is 0.1% higher, showing the i7-13790F is effectively on par with that newer part. The GPU’s closest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856, which is 1% higher, indicating the Quadro RTX 5000’s raw performance is similar to a consumer card from a previous generation. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU that can handle the most demanding multi-threaded tasks, paired with a GPU that offers professional features and a large memory pool but lacks the raw speed of modern gaming or compute cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core i7-13790F and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The following are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 and its 67th percentile suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, this system would struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding modern titles, likely falling below 60 FPS in many cases. At 1440p, the GPU would be the clear bottleneck, and frame rates would drop further. At 4K, the system is not recommended for gaming, as the GPU’s performance is insufficient for smooth gameplay at high detail. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4998 in Cinebench R23 would prevent it from being a limiting factor in most games, but the GPU’s rasterization performance, which is on par with a GTX 1060 6 GB, caps the overall gaming experience. The 16 GB of VRAM is ample for current games, but the raw compute power is lacking for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming scenarios. These figures are estimates, as there are no measured FPS results in the data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds