SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs benchmarked, placing it firmly in the high-performance desktop tier. This is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The architecture uses an 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. Despite its substantial core count and high boost capability, the TDP is rated at just 65 W, which is notably efficient for this class of processor.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 35404, while the single-core score hits 4998. The R20 results show 14869 multi-core and 2099 single-core, and R15 shows 3568 multi-core and 503 single-core. These numbers indicate strong scaling across the 16 cores, with the boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivering excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44737 and single-thread score of 4212 confirm this dual strength.

The nearest rivals in the database show how tight the competition is at this level. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX averages 63173, which is 0.1% higher than this chip's 63080 average. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, trailing by 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G leads by 0.4% at 63331, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX trails by 0.5% at 62738. This clustering means the i7-13790F is effectively at parity with the best current mobile and embedded parts, but it does so as a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP.

For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU handles content creation, compilation, and scientific computing with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 567473 and encryption score of 31703 indicate strong throughput for archival tasks and security workloads. Floating point math scores 110512, integer math scores 151416, and extended instructions hit 34828. The random string sorting score of 58607 shows solid memory and cache performance, while physics simulation scores 3017. The find prime numbers result of 207 is comparatively modest, but this is a niche workload. The average benchmark score of 63080 places this chip in the top 7% of all CPUs in the database.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Core i7-13790F?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, running on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the i7-13790F compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark score?

A: The chip averages 63080 across all benchmarks, which is within 0.5% of four rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173, 0.1% higher), AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839, 0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (63331, 0.4% higher), and Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62738, 0.5% lower).

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i7-13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the PCIe capability of this processor?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. This allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Q: Does the i7-13790F have integrated graphics?

A: No, this processor does not include integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of this processor and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The TDP is rated at 65 W. This is modest for a 16-core part, meaning a capable air cooler should handle it without issue, though the 5.20 GHz boost clock may generate additional heat under sustained loads.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. This is a fixed-clock processor, so overclocking headroom is limited by design.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a 93rd percentile CPU and a 61st percentile GPU means the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The single-core score of 4998 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4212 provide the per-core performance needed to feed high-refresh displays, though the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 will set the practical ceiling for frame rates.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcasting. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44737 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 indicate that background encoding tasks will have plenty of processing power without starving the game thread. The GPU's 288 tensor cores could assist with AI-enhanced encoding features, though the Turing architecture is older.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export rendering all benefit from the high multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 places this CPU well above the median for video work, and the 33 MB shared L3 cache helps with large media files. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate acceleration for effects and color grading.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will see excellent performance from the 16-core, 24-thread configuration. The PassMark floating point score of 110512 and integer score of 151416 indicate strong compute throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 7.119 TFLOPS and FP16 of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1) offer acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the Turing architecture lacks the newer RT core efficiency of later generations.

Software development: Compilation tasks scale well with core count, and the 33 MB shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The 65 W TDP means sustained all-core builds won't require exotic cooling. The PassMark data encryption score of 31703 also indicates strong performance for secure development workflows and code signing.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for typical productivity applications, but the headroom ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication tools. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking means it will handle any academic workload from engineering simulations to data analysis. The efficiency of the 65 W TDP also keeps electricity costs and noise levels reasonable.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13790F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which accommodates the fastest current GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

The 65 W TDP is the key specification for PSU and cooling planning. The GPU, however, requires more attention: the Quadro RTX 4000 has a 160 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 450 W. This is modest by modern standards, meaning most quality power supplies will have ample headroom. A 450 W PSU is the floor, but builders with additional drives, fans, and peripherals should consider a larger unit.

The platform is mature, with the production status listed as active for the CPU. The GPU, however, is end-of-life, having been released in 2018. Its predecessor is Quadro Volta and its successor is Workstation Ampere, so there is a clear upgrade path for the GPU side. For the CPU, the Socket 1700 platform supports the full Raptor Lake generation, but this particular chip is already among the faster options in that socket.

Memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means the system can take advantage of high-speed memory kits. The 33 MB shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency in many workloads. For a sensible next upgrade, moving to a newer GPU from a later architecture would be the most impactful change, as the CPU is already at the 93rd percentile.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 63080, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, with the nearest rivals all within 0.5%: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX at 63173, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63331, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62839, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738. The clustering of these scores indicates that the i7-13790F is at the current performance frontier for its class.

The GPU, an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, achieves an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (0.7% lower), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17639 (0.9% lower), AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (1.1% lower), and AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (1.4% lower). The GPU's individual scores include a PassMark G3D score of 15117, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1873.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussion must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, indicating that the system as a whole sits well above the median but below the top tier. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, being 32 percentile points higher than the GPU, which means the GPU will typically be the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process. It uses the TU104 chip with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The card has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 1625 MHz memory clock (13 Gbps effective) providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for workstation tasks at 1080p and 1440p, though 8 GB can be limiting for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures. The GPU clocks run at 1005 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1).

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older standard but sufficient for this performance class. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The card is a single-slot design, 241 mm long (9.5 inches) and 111 mm tall (4.4 inches), requiring a single 8-pin power connector with a 160 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs well for its age but is not competitive with modern cards. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 and average score of 17789 place it at the 61st percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, scores 17639, just 0.9% lower, which is surprising given the architectural gap. The DirectX scores are notably weak: PassMark DX12 at 52, DX11 at 128, DX10 at 108, and DX9 at 205. The G2D score of 846 indicates modest 2D performance. Compute performance is stronger, with PassMark GPU compute at 6176.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU is at the 61st percentile, a 32-point gap. In gaming, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 will determine the maximum frame rate, while the CPU's high single-thread performance ensures it can feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU's role becomes secondary. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 and PassMark multi-thread score of 44737 deliver strong throughput, while the GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU compute at 6176, Geekbench OpenCL at 74540) provide acceleration for GPU-compute tasks.

The FPS picture, estimated from benchmark scores since no measured FPS data exists, suggests that in gaming, the GPU will cap performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support. A modern GPU at the same CPU percentile would likely deliver substantially higher frame rates. In productivity tasks, the balance is more even, with the CPU handling most of the heavy lifting and the GPU accelerating specific workloads like ray tracing, AI inference via its 288 tensor cores, and GPU-accelerated rendering.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects this imbalance: the system is solidly above average but not elite. For users upgrading from a weaker CPU, the i7-13790F provides massive headroom. For users coming from a weaker GPU, the Quadro RTX 4000 will be the first component to show its age.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13790F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a current, active-production part from the Core 13th Gen series, while the GPU is an end-of-life workstation card from 2018. The combination places this system at the 77th combined percentile, which is above average but below the top tier of performance.

The CPU is the clear strength of this pairing. At the 93rd percentile, it outperforms 93% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU, at the 61st percentile, is competent but unremarkable. This is a system where the processor provides years of headroom, while the graphics card is the component most likely to need upgrading for demanding modern games or GPU-accelerated workloads.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 160 W GPU TDP combine for a total power draw that is manageable with a 450 W PSU as suggested. This is not a power-hungry build by modern standards. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide future-proofing for storage and expansion. The GPU's PCIe 3.0 interface is a potential bottleneck for data transfer, but it will not significantly impact most workloads.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the CPU more than capable, but the GPU will limit performance to mid-range levels. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 61st GPU percentile suggest playable frame rates at medium to high settings, but not the high-refresh, max-settings experience that the 93rd percentile CPU could support with a stronger GPU.

Content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 accelerates export and render times, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth handle moderate graphics workloads. The 288 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for supported applications.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads. The 33 MB L3 cache and 65 W TDP make this an efficient workhorse for sustained build loads. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows flexibility in memory configuration.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science fields will find this system handles all academic workloads with ease. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile, ensuring it will not be the bottleneck for any educational software. The GPU, while not top-tier, is sufficient for CAD, simulation, and basic machine learning tasks.

Small business workstations that need reliable multi-threaded performance for office productivity, financial analysis, or database work will benefit from the CPU's efficiency. The 65 W TDP keeps cooling and power costs low, and the platform's active production status ensures long-term availability of replacement parts. The Quadro RTX 4000's workstation pedigree includes certified drivers for professional applications, which is valuable for business environments.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds